A Framework For Strategic Military Capabilities In Defense Transformation

Similar documents
Enhancing Multinational Force Capability through Standardization and Interoperability

CHAPTER 4 : VALUE SYSTEM AND VALUE CHAIN OVERVIEW 4.1 THE VALUE SYSTEM FOR SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL DEFENCE

Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment

NATO UNCLASSIFIED. 6 January 2016 MC 0472/1 (Final)

Telephone (am) (pm) (fax)

Tuesday 13 September 2016:

The Future of US Ground Forces: Some Thoughts to Consider

Comptroller Trends. American Society of Military Comptrollers (ASMC) Mini - PDI. 02 March 2017

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

The Integral TNO Approach to NAVY R&D

155 Third Generation Maritime Fire Support (155 TMF) Robert McClure BAE Systems Global Combat Systems

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

DSMA NOTICE 01. Military Operations, Plans & Capabilities

MILENG contribution to C-IED in art 5 & NATO Response ops

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ASSOCIATED SERIES OF JOINT WARFARE PUBLICATIONS

Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

HQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M. MCO dtd 9 Jun 00 MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES

British Contingency Operations since 1945: Back to the Future. Dr Paul Latawski Department of War Studies

Optimizing Interoperability since 1947

European Parliament Nov 30, 2010

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

Captain DEU Navy Lutz PANKNIER Executive Director

U.S. Army Modeling and Simulation Office. Overview

NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium

On 21 November, Ukraine

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Reconsidering the Relevancy of Air Power German Air Force Development

Version January 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Subj: MARINE CORPS POLICY ON ORGANIZING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING FOR OPERATIONS IN AN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) ENVIRONMENT

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Counter Improvised Explosive Devices

HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM US ARMY AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE OPERATIONS

First Announcement/Call For Papers

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)

The main tasks and joint force application of the Hungarian Air Force

5 June 2018 DOCUMENT C-M(2018)0025 (DNK-OVERVIEW) NATO DEFENCE PLANNING CAPABILITY REVIEW 2017/2018 DENMARK OVERVIEW

STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE PETER B. TEETS, UNDERSECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, SPACE

Lessons Learned from the MSG- 128 Study on Incremental Implementation of NATO Mission Training through Distributed Simulation Operations

Directorate of Environmental Integration, U.S. Army Engineer School COL Robert S. Kirsch

Assessing Technologies using Campaign Analysis and War Gaming: The Warfare Innovation Continuum at NPS

Strong. Secure. Engaged: Canada s New Defence Policy

Headline Goal approved by General Affairs and External Relations Council on 17 May 2004 endorsed by the European Council of 17 and 18 June 2004

DOD DIRECTIVE E ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM (CBDP)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures

Sea Viper Maritime Missile Defence

The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA)

Armor Basic Officer Leaders Course

U.S. ARMY AIR DEFENSE DIGEST

Statement by. Brigadier General Otis G. Mannon (USAF) Deputy Director, Special Operations, J-3. Joint Staff. Before the 109 th Congress

Air Defense System Solutions.

Science and Technology Conference for Chem-Bio Information Systems

Combined Aerial Target Service (CATS)

NEMODE Network+ 3K Open Call

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT

Achieving Information Dominance: Unleashing the Ozone Widget Framework

Policy: Defence. Policy. Use of The Military. / PO Box 773, DICKSON ACT 2602

U.S. Army Modeling and Simulation Office. Overview

Shaping the RAN and RAAF for Seamless Integration

Abstract. Presented at the 2018 ICEAA Professional Development & Training Workshop - Proactive estimating June 2018 QinetiQ 2018

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate

Project ALEXANDER Industry Briefings

The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

SSC Pacific is making its mark as

Command and General Staff Officer Course (CGSOC) Common Core (CC)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

Subj: NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY POLICY FOR NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS

COE-DAT Course Catalog. Introduction

JFHQ DODIN Update. The overall classification of this briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Lt Col Patrick Daniel JFHQ-DODIN J5 As of: 21 April 2016 UNCLASSIFIED

Executive Summary REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE EUROPEAN DEFENCE AGENCY. By: Aude-E. Fleurant, John Hart, Noel Kelly, Pieter Wezeman, Siemon Wezeman

Electronic Systems Division Electronic Warfare Branch

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4

Russia News. Focus on a more operational partnership. issue 3. NATO-Russia Council (NRC) defence ministers meet informally in Berlin

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A

Future Expeditionary Armor Force Needs

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

Chapter 13 Air and Missile Defense THE AIR THREAT AND JOINT SYNERGY

Creation of Defence Planning Committee: A Bold Step towards Defence Preparedness

MULTINATIONAL LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND NATO PLANNING PROCESS

This Brief is Classified: UNCLASSIFIED. NORAD and USNORTHCOM Theater Strategy

TRADOC REGULATION 25-31, ARMYWIDE DOCTRINAL AND TRAINING LITERATURE PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 30 MARCH 1990

Amphibious Landings in the 21 st Century

This is definitely another document that needs to have lots of HSI language in it!

CSFI Cyberspace Operations Strategist and Planner CSFI- CCOSP

SA ARMY SEMINAR 21. The Revision of the South African Defence Review and International Trends in Force Design: Implications for the SA Army

DOD DIRECTIVE DOD COUNTERING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (WMD) POLICY

APPENDIX A. COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF OFFICER COURSE CURRICULUM DESCRIPTION C3 ILE, ATRRS Code (Bn Option) Academic Year 05 06

Office of Executive Director for Conventional Ammunition (O/EDCA)

DOD INSTRUCTION DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION PROCESS

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: February 2008 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E, Dw BA 07

DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL DEFENCE AND THE CANADIAN ARMED FORCES REPORT ON PLANS AND PRIORITIES

Transcription:

A Framework For Strategic Military Capabilities In Defense Transformation Dr Clive Kerr Centre for Technology Management University of Cambridge civk2@cam.ac.uk Last updated: 04-Sep-06

Presentation outline Architecture of the Capability Framework Illustrative case study

The capability paradigm A military force is only as effective today as current capabilities allow. And, in future, it will only be as effective as investments in new capabilities made today will allow. Source: Ankersen (2005)

Generic architecture of the framework Four concentric layers: 1. Building blocks (strategic platforms and common facilities) 2. Functional packages (force structures and environments) 3. Effects (strategic, tactical and operational) 4. Influencers (policy, commitments, threats, scenarios and concept of operations)

Strategic platforms

Lines of development Source: MoD Acquisition Handbook (2005)

Layer 1

National constructs AUS CAN UK USA Organization Personnel Collective training Major systems Supplies Facilities Support Command & management Personnel R&D/ Ops research Infrastructure & organization Concepts, doctrine & collective training IT Infrastructure Equipment, supplies & services Training Equipment Personnel Infrastructure Doctrine & concepts Organisation Information Logistics Doctrine Organization Training & education Materiel Leadership People

Layer 2 The population of the framework by the three services (British Army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force) allows each service to consider the future capabilities of the other two and to then explore what this means in terms of inter-service capability.

Layer 2

Capability integration levels Level 1 is concerned with integrating the LoD within an equipment project so that a capability is delivered and not just a new piece of equipment. Level 2 is aimed at integrating capabilities across a single component (e.g. the Land Component) or within defined areas of a single component (e.g. the Medium Weight Capability). Level 3 is aimed at integrating Land capabilities into the Joint arena. Level 4 aims to achieve capability integration with allies. Source: MoD Army Second Customer Handbook (2005)

Layer 3

Capability tracing Resource driven view: Platforms Effects Output driven view: Effects Platforms

Lexical capability construct Have the capability to perform an action on an object with some device delivered by some vehicle in order to achieve the desired effect. Source: Seiler & Ranne (2005)

Layer 4

Military tasks Source: MoD Delivering Security In A Changing World - Supporting Essays (2003)

Asymmetric threats MoD s conceptual framework for countering terrorism Source: House of Commons New Chapter to the Strategic Defence Review (2003)

Summary Enter discussions of what capabilities are needed in the future Develop a visual representation of those future capabilities such that a shared understanding can be reached Develop individual transformation roadmaps and synchronize the associated capability development plans

Thank you very much for your attention. Any questions?