Achieving Organizational Excellence Through Health

Similar documents
Value of HIT. Pat Wise VP, Health Information Systems HIMSS North America June 21, 2017

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals

HEALTHCARE TRENDS IN NORTH AMERICA ANDY TIPPET SR. MARKETING MANAGER HEALTHCARE, AMERICAS. ScanSource Smart VAR Conference August 21, 2014

EMR Adoption: Benefits Realization

THE FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGY CareTech Solutions

Measuring Digital Maturity. John Rayner Regional Director 8 th June 2016 Amsterdam

CONTINUITY OF CARE MATURITY MODEL. James E., Gaston, MBA FHIMSS Sr. Director maturity Models, HIMSS Analytics

Clinical and Financial Benefits of IT Implementation

Trends in Clinical Informatics: A Nursing Perspective

2012 National Patient Safety Goals and National Priorities Partnership Goals addressed in this case study

Continuity of Care Maturity Model Going Beyond EMRAM

The Value of HIT Latest insights from HIMSS and HIMSS Analytics

Ontario s e-health Journey Assessing the Path Forward

Achieving HIMSS Level 7 Implications for HIM. Children s Health System of Texas

Definition of Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology for Hospitals Approved by the HIMSS Board of Directors April 24, 2009

E-health Leads Nova Scotia s Healthcare Transformation

Meaningful Use Is a Stepping Stone to Meaningful Care

Is there an impact of Health Information Technology on Delivery and Quality of Patient Care?

Three Perspectives of Patient Engagement: A National Study

An Overview of HIT and Meaningful Use From A Federal Perspective

Lessons in Health IT. John Paganini, MBA, CPHIMS, CIIP Sr. Manager Interoperability Initiatives

EMRAM Cases of Success

The Impact of CPOE and CDS on the Medication Use Process and Pharmacist Workflow

Mitzi Cardenas Sr. VP/Strategy, Business Development and Technology Truman Medical Centers

Health Management Information Systems: Computerized Provider Order Entry

Speakers. The Military Health System* Lessons Learned in Implementing a Global Electronic Health Record

A Framework for Sharing Nursing Data: The Quality Jackpot

Iowa Health Information Technology and Meaningful Use Landscape in 2015

Best Practices Contracting for Health IT Supporting Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Early Findings

LESSONS FROM DIGITAL LEADERS

IS IT WORTH TRYING TO GET TO STAGE 7? The vision of a big Spanish public hospital trying to increase IT value

2011 Summer Institute in Nursing Informatics The Tenet Story

Patient Safety It All Starts with Positive Patient Identity APRIL 14, 2016

E.H.R. s and Improving Patient Safety - What Has Been the Real Impact?

Eligible Hours ( ) Achieving HIMSS Stage 7 and Gaining Physician Adoption of a Paperless Record CHC

EHR Enablement for Data Capture

1. What are the requirements for Stage 1 of the HITECH Act for CPOE to qualify for incentive payments?

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Meaningful Use Key Dates

The Continuity of Care Maturity Model (CCMM) John Rayner Regional Director HIMSS Analytics

The Updated Gartner CPR Generation Criteria

Tying It All Together: Informatics In Action

Health Information Exchange 101. Your Introduction to HIE and It s Relevance to Senior Living

Saving Lives with Best Practices and Improvements in Sepsis Care

Ten Tips for Accountable Care Success TEN TEN TEN TEN TE. Retooling for the Shifting Healthcare Landscape

WHO SHARES? A look at the status of HIT and HIE in Arkansas

Building a Better Home: Transformation to a Patient Centered Health Home. Anna M. Gard, FNP-BC Association of Clinicians for the Underserved

Improving the Health of Our Patients and Our Communities:

Ontario Shores Journey to EMRAM Stage 7. October 21, 2015

Staying Connected with Patient-Generated Health Data

Streamlining Medical Image Sharing For Continuity of Care

Toward the Electronic Patient Record:

Clinical Program Cost Leadership Improvement

Health Management Information Systems

For personal use only

Safety Nets Improve Care Coordination with HIE

KPMG Digital Health Pulse April 2017

BETTER IT BETTER HOSPITAL?

Health Information Technology

1. When will physicians who are not "meaningful" EHR users start to see a reduction in payments?

Electronic Physician Documentation: Increased Satisfaction

Transforming Care at Banner Health Through the EMR

Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) Programs: What Role Should Compliance Play?

2. What is the main similarity between quality assurance and quality improvement?

A strategy for building a value-based care program

Healthcare Analytics & Managing Population Health

Sources of value from healthcare IT

Designing Quality into an EMR/CPOE Implementation. Kristine Martin Anderson

Newport Hospital. At the Forefront of EMR Adoption. Case Study.

All ACO materials are available at What are my network and plan design options?

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Roadmap to accountable care: The chicken or the egg technology investment or clinical process improvement?

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals Q Update from 2013 HIE Survey Participants

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

ACO Practice Transformation Program

Bundled Payments to Align Providers and Increase Value to Patients

eclinicalworks integrates with CommonWell and MEDITECH XCA, CCDA MEDITECH integrates with HIMSS Interoperability Showcase 2018 Page 1 of 12

Artificial Intelligence Changes Evidence Based Medicine A Scalable Health White Paper

Creating a Data-Driven Culture to Right-Size Capacity and Enhance Quality and Safety

CAPT VERONICA GORDON, USPHS HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE QUALITY EVALUATION PLAN WORK GROUP DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY (DHA) -

Meaningful Use: A Brief Overview for Society of Health Systems

The Journey to Meaningful Use: Where we were, where we are, and where we may be going

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Summary of Key Health Information Technology Provisions June 1, 2010

Electronic Health Records and Meaningful Use - A Year in Review

GE integrates with ELLKAY; GE integrates with Cerner HIE; GE Media Manager IHE PDQ, IHE XDS, HL7 CDA. ELLKAY LKeMPI IHE PDQ

Nonprofit partnership. A grass roots organization where Board of Directors have vested interest in its success.

Joy in Medicine Physician well-being: A discussion on burnout and achieving joy in practice

Spring User Conference May Sandestin, FL Detailed Agenda

AMN Healthcare Investor Presentation

Keeping Quality and Patient Safety on the Forefront

1 Title Improving Wellness and Care Management with an Electronic Health Record System

Patient Experience Heart & Vascular Institute

Virtua/CHOP Virtua and The Children s Hospital Of Philadelphia: An Example Case Study for Seamless Data Integration

Midmark White Paper Building Your Connected Point of Care Ecosystem. Point Of Care Ecosystem Series Part Four

Cleveland Clinic Implementing Value-Based Care

Successful Clinical Process Redesign in a Connected Healthcare Community. Linus Diedling Allison Foley, MD Elliot Sternberg, MD Michelle Woodley, RN

MEASURING THE BENEFITS OF HEALTH IT SYSTEMS

A Framework for Evaluating Electronic Health Records Overview - Applying to the Davies Ambulatory Awards Program Revised May 2012

Optum Anesthesia. Completely integrated anesthesia information management system

Electronic Health Records: Understanding the Opportunities for Your ASC December 1, 2012

Transcription:

Achieving Organizational Excellence Through Health IT @JohnHDaniels

Objectives Identify the various HIMSS Awards and their focus Determine the challenges and the opportunities of affecting organizational change Discuss those next steps that can define organizational success @JohnHDaniels

Recap How did we get here?

1999 Challenge 98K+ patients die annually due to medical errors!! Why?

Disconnected care settings Self Community Care Home Care Secondary Rehabilitative Tertiary Primary Long Term Care

Silos Providers of care and patients do not have access to all relevant information required to make the most informed decisions at the right time in the care delivery process Health info. sharing Complete health picture Inefficiencies Errors Incorrect diagnosis Isolated Decisions Inefficient health system usage Redundant services Increased costs Un-coordinated Care Silo ed care & care episodes Lost efficiencies Lost opportunity

Pressurring / Overload Medical Knowledge

2001 Opportunity Use information technology to help make healthcare

Pressurring / Overload Automate to optimize decision making Medical Knowledge

Automate to optimize care coordination Home & Community Self Rehabilitative Long Term Care Primary Tertiary Secondary

2009 Solution? ARRA Meaningful Use

Rewarding successes Industry awards

Success begins with a strategy Discover an EMR adoption roadmap

Complete EMR, CCD transactions to share data; Data warehousing; Data continuity with ED, ambulatory, OP Physician documentation (structured templates), full CDSS (variance & compliance), full R-PACS Closed loop medication administration CPOE, Clinical Decision Support (clinical protocols) Nursing/clinical documentation (flow sheets), CDSS (error checking), PACS available outside Radiology CDR, Controlled Medical Vocabulary, CDS, may have Document Imaging; HIE capable Ancillaries - Lab, Rad, Pharmacy - All Installed Q2 2009 Q4 2013 0.3% 2.9% Progressively sophisticated 1.0% 12.5% 4.5% steps 22.0% that track the 3.6% 15.5% accessibility 38.4% 30.3% of information 31.6% 7.6% within an 7.2% 3.3% EMR All Three Ancillaries Not Installed 13.4% 5.8% Data from HIMSS Analytics Database 2014 HIMSS Analytics N = 5167 N = 5458

Why? Provide thought leadership Reflect the market Inform government policy Drive the market

Vision Ensure the most relevant clinical information is available to the clinician at the right place and at the right time

Complete EMR, CCD transactions to share data; Data warehousing; Data continuity with ED, ambulatory, OP ARRA Q2 2009 Q4 2014 0.3% 3.6% Physician documentation (structured templates), full CDSS (variance & compliance), full R-PACS Closed loop medication administration 1.0% 4.5% 17.9% 32.8% CPOE, Clinical Decision Support (clinical protocols) 3.6% 14.0% Nursing/clinical documentation (flow sheets), CDSS (error checking), PACS available outside Radiology CDR, Controlled Medical Vocabulary, CDS, may have Document Imaging; HIE capable Ancillaries - Lab, Rad, Pharmacy - All Installed 38.4% 31.6% 7.2% 21.0% 5.1% 2.0% All Three Ancillaries Not Installed 13.4% 3.7% Data from HIMSS Analytics Database 2014 HIMSS Analytics N = 5167 N = 5467

Q2 2011 MU Payments Q4 2014 Complete EMR, CCD transactions to share data; Data warehousing; Data continuity with ED, ambulatory, OP 1.1% 3.6% +227% Physician documentation (structured templates), full CDSS (variance & compliance), full R-PACS 4.0% 17.9% +347% Closed loop medication administration 6.1% 32.8% +437% CPOE, Clinical Decision Support (clinical protocols) 12.3% 14.0% Nursing/clinical documentation (flow sheets), CDSS (error checking), PACS available outside Radiology 46.3% 21.0% CDR, Controlled Medical Vocabulary, CDS, may have Document Imaging; HIE capable 13.7% 5.1% -62% Ancillaries - Lab, Rad, Pharmacy - All Installed 6.6% 2.0% -69% All Three Ancillaries Not Installed 10.0% 3.7% -63% Data from HIMSS Analytics Database 2014 HIMSS Analytics N = 5441 N = 5467

Q2 2011 MU Payments Q4 2014 Complete EMR, CCD transactions to share data; Data warehousing; Data continuity with ED, ambulatory, OP 1.1% 3.6% MU Stage 3* Physician documentation (structured templates), full CDSS (variance & compliance), full R-PACS Closed loop medication administration 4.0% 6.1% 17.9% 32.8% MU Stage 2 CPOE, Clinical Decision Support (clinical protocols) 12.3% 14.0% MU Stage 1 Nursing/clinical documentation (flow sheets), CDSS (error checking), PACS available outside Radiology 46.3% 21.0% CDR, Controlled Medical Vocabulary, CDS, may have Document Imaging; HIE capable 13.7% 5.1% Ancillaries - Lab, Rad, Pharmacy - All Installed All Three Ancillaries Not Installed Data from HIMSS Analytics Database 2014 HIMSS Analytics 6.6% 2.0% 10.0% 3.7% N = 5441 N = 5467 *Anticipates Emphasis on Information Exchange

This is how long it takes to make significant national progress 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Stage 7 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.7% 1.0% 1.2% 1.8% 2.9% 3.6% Stage 6 0.1% 0.8% 0.5% 1.6% 3.2% 5.2% 7.3% 12.5% 17.9% Stage 5 0.5% 1.4% 2.5% 3.8% 4.5% 8.4% 11.5% 22.0% 32.9% Stage 4 3.1% 2.2% 2.5% 7.4% 10.5% 13.2% 14.0% 15.5% 14.0% Stage 3 18.7% 25.1% 35.7% 50.9% 49.0% 44.9% 41.7% 30.3% 21.0% Stage 2 40.0% 37.2% 31.4% 16.9% 14.6% 12.4% 11.4% 7.6% 5.1% Stage 1 17.4% 14.0% 11.5% 7.2% 7.1% 5.7% 4.8% 3.3% 2.0% Stage 0 20.4% 19.3% 15.6% 11.5% 10.1% 9.0% 7.5% 5.8% 3.7% # of Hospitals N = 4,237 N = 5,073 N = 5,166 N = 5,235 N = 5,281 N=5,337 N=5,310 N= 5,458 N=5,467 Source: HIMSS Analytics Database

So, What Makes a Stage 7 Organization? Summary profile

IT implementation success characteristics Documented goals for vendor & organization Achieving end-user buy-in Strong organizational sponsorship Adequate systems acceptance testing Well-planned end-user training Minimal business and service disruptions Plenty of data conversion time

They are paperless, or near paperless Create no paper ALL clinically relevant data are accessible & available to the clinician in one location

They are fully committed to continuous process improvement through collaboration Strong IT leadership and executive champions Clinician / end-user champions

They use data to drive improved outcomes related to Process Quality Finance Safety Clinical Access

For example Who are your most efficient surgeons? A. Those that use the least resources B. Those that have the best outcomes

Are Stage 7 organizations achieving results? EMRAM studies on a Macro Scale (correlations with EMRAM Stages)

All hospitals within each EMRAM Stage TJC Top Performing Hospitals BY Number of Quality Metrics Excelling In 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2.3% 0.4% 1.9% 1.7% 4.8% 6.2% 10.0% 10.1% 8.1% 6.4% 4.2% 6.4% 12.8% 6.5% 7.9% 30.1% Stage 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7 Source: HIMSS Analytics 6.5% 16.3% 18.1% 10.6% 3 or less 4 or more Tipping Point 12.9% 20.7% 39.8% 9.7%

Hospitals with an "A" Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade by EMRAM Stage 70% All hospitals within each EMRAM Stage 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 62.6% Tipping Point 30.8% 20.1% 21.8% 12.8% 14.3% 5.9% Stage 0.0% 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7

Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program* + = 70% 30% TPS 100 = High Value Performance TPS 0 = Low Value Performance *Program from U.S. Medicare to earn additional reimbursement

Clinical Performance AVG Projected VBP Clinical Score 70 60 50 40 30 64.3 Tipping Point Tipping Point 49.0 45.5 45.9 45.9 44.6 42.7 38.9 Source: HIMSS Analytics TM Database Stage 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7

Patient Experience 70 AVG Satisfaction Score 60 50 40 47.3 43.7 38.6 39.6 43.8 44.4 43.9 35.7 30 Source: HIMSS Analytics TM Database Stage 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7

Total Performance Score (TPS) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 96.5 92.9 92.6 84.5 84.9 86.8 88.2 89.7 Source: HIMSS Analytics TM Database Stage 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7 AVG Clinical Score AVG Satisfaction Score TPS

Association between EMR capabilities and hospital mortality? In General the more advanced the hospital s EMR capabilities the more likely the hospital is to have better risk-adjusted mortality rates when treating Heart Attack Heart Failure Stroke Several types of GI surgeries Pneumonia Sepsis Respiratory failure

Association between EMR capabilities and staff perceptions of hospital safety? In General the more advanced the hospital s EMR capabilities the more positive the staff are about their hospital s patient safety culture Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture

Association between EMR adoption pace and staff perceptions of hospital safety? In General the faster the hospital implements an EMR the less positive the staff are about their hospital s patient safety culture Grouped hospitals by the number of EMRAM stages they passed in a four year period and then analyzed AHRQ s Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture scores

What About Cost Efficiency? Research on the Effect of EMR Deployment

Average Operating Margin Financial Performance (Profitability) 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% -1.0% -2.0% 1.62% 2.84% 2.25% 1.53% -0.43% -0.34% -1.52% -0.58% Source: HIMSS Analytics Database 2.35% 0.77% 1.79% 3.53% 2.56% 2.32% 1.47% 4.06% 3.91% 2.55% 1.66% 2.52% 2.20% 6.19% 4.91% Stage 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7 In 2008 In 2011 2013

What s your EMRAM Score? Moody s wants to know!!

Bond Ratings Multi hospital system case study during 2009 / 2010 recession Bad debt up, cash flow down All hospitals were Stage 6 Bond rating did not change

Advanced EMR adoption = Good vision Good execution Commitment to excellence

Fewer malpractice claims One study found the rate of malpractice claims when EHRs were used was about onesixth the rate when EHRs were not used!!! The Relationship Between Electronic Health Records and Malpractice Claims Mariah A. Quinn, MD, MPH; Allyson M. Kats, MSc; Ken Kleinman, ScD; David W. Bates, MD, MSc; Steven R. Simon, MD, MPH Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(15):1187-1189. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2371.

Summing it up

ROI is possible There are benefits to advanced EMR capabilities but the ROI requires persistence and patience Work on the high touch AND high tech EMR adoption is NOT just an IT department initiative it requires an Organizational Development orientation

Value is achievable Health IT Value Suite S T E P S Satisfaction Treatment/Clinical Electronic Information/Data Prevention/ Patient Education Savings

The Road Ahead towards advanced EMR capabilities will lead you to a STEEEP place but the journey requires thought and strong leadership

Thank You John H. Daniels, CNM, FHIMSS, FACHE, CPHIMS Vice President, HIMSS jhdaniels@himss.org @JohnHDaniels