A Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region

Similar documents
Transportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department

Notice. Quality Assurance Statement

APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT

Title VI Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

KANSAS CITY REGIONAL TIGER PROJECT PMOC PROGESS REPORT 2014 Fiscal Quarter 1 October 1 December 31, 2013

Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Programs

Planning Sustainable Places Program

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016)

Transportation Improvement Program FY

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 71 Public Transportation. (a) Applicability. The United States Congress revised 49

Planning Resources - Tribal. Kenneth Petty

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

Project Selection Advisory Council

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Nevada Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

Job Access Reverse Commute Program & New Freedom Program 2013 FUNDING APPLICATION

MID-HUDSON VALLEY TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT AREA JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE & NEW FREEDOM PROGRAMS GRANT APPLICATION.

Public Participation Plan

Overview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

South Dakota Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

KANSAS CITY REGIONAL TIGER PROJECT MONTHLY PROGESS REPORT

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

PROJECT SELECTION Educational Series

Utah Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

WINSTON-SALEM URBAN AREA MPO EXPLAINED

Developing the Tribal Transportation Improvement Program

The Public Participation Plan in Transportation Decision Making

Missoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by

Job Access Reverse Commute Program & New Freedom Program 2013 FUNDING APPLICATION

Stimulus Funding and Transportation

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN. Tri County Regional Planning Commission. Serving Clinton, Eaton and Ingham Counties, Michigan

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

The Atlanta Region s Transit Programs of Projects

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Montana Smart Transportation:

Transportation Planning Prospectus

Review and Approval of Amendment #2 to the 2014 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FFY Transportation Improvement Program MPO. Lawrence - Douglas County. Metropolitan Planning Organization

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program

Transportation Planning & Investment in Urban North Carolina

By Rmhermen at en.wikipedia (photo by rmhermen) [GFDL ( or CC-BY-SA-3.0

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TOLEDO OH - MI URBANIZED AREA JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM & NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

ANNUAL TRANSIT PROVIDER MEETING FY 2017 GENERAL SESSION, SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

Transportation Planning in the Denver Region

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act

APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Program Management Plan FTA Section 5310

Florida Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Part I. Federal Section 5310 Program

Federal Actions to Reduce Energy Use in Transportation

DRAFT JARC FUNDING APPLICATION January 29, 2013

NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FTA and Tribal Transit Program Past, Present, and Future

NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Sources of Funding for Transit in Urban Areas in Texas Final report PRC

2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Technical Appendix L: Title VI/ Nondiscrimination Program

OF VIRGINIA S FY2018-FY2021 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Table to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation

ODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process

Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Transit. State Management Plan

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

Job Access Reverse Commute Program Application. Submitted to: Mid-America Regional Council 600 Broadway Kansas City, Missouri

Centre County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Coordinating Committee Meeting Tuesday, March 22, :00 p.m.

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook

Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

Prospectus & Organizational Bylaws

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

Making the MOST. of MAP-21. A Guide to the 2012 Federal Transportation Law And How to Use it for Positive Change in Your Community

A Citizens Guide to Transportation Planning in Southeast Michigan

Valley Regional Transit Strategic Plan

Sources of Funding Transit in Texas Final Report PRC

THE. ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects

I-15 Corridor System Master Plan San Diego, California to Utah/Idaho border

URBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM: PROGRAM GUIDANCE AND APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

BOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Oregon Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. STIP Users Guide

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

DRAFT FUNDING APPLICATION October 20, 2010

Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan Update. Fall 2017 Spring 2018 Mid-America Regional Council

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN. A Guide for Public Involvement in the Metropolitan Transportation Planning and Programming Process

DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION REPORT ON AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP?

Washington State Department of Transportation

Section 6. The Transportation Plan

APPENDIX A-5 Transit Program of Projects March 2014 Update

Transcription:

A Guide to Transportation Decision Making In the Kansas City region

2 Guide to Transportation Decision Making

Table of Contents Purpose of guide...4 MARC s planning role...5 What is transportation decision making?...6 Key transportation issues...7 Who are the key players?...8 Transportation Planning Process...10 Visioning and goals Metropolitan transportation plan Transportation improvement program Project details and environmental assessment Project implementation Monitoring and evaluation How projects are developed...13 Identifying Needs... 14 Transportation Funding...15 How You Can Get Involved...16 Get informed Talk with decision makers Volunteer to serve Join a group Attend public meetings Provide input Contact MARC Contact information...18 Acronym glossary...19 Guide to Transportation Decision Making 3

Purpose of the guide Have you ever wondered how decisions are made about transportation projects that affect your life? How do government officials decide where to put a bus stop, road or bridge? How are these and other transportation projects planned? And how can you have an impact by making sure planners, road designers, elected officials and other members of the public consider your opinion? The Mid-America Regional Council (MARC) has designed this guide to explain the transportation-planning process in the Kansas City region. We hope it will help you understand how decisions are made, what role MARC plays in coordinating the process, and how you can help ensure the transportation system is responsive to public concerns and needs. 4 Guide to Transportation Decision Making

MARC s planning role MARC is a nonprofit association of city and county governments and the federally designated metropolitan planning organization for the bistate Kansas City region. One of MARC s main roles is to provide transportation-planning services for eight counties Johnson, Leavenworth, Miami and Wyandotte in Kansas; and Cass, Clay, Jackson and Platte in Missouri. MARC s planning region MARC works with state departments of transportation, transit agencies, local governments, the private sector, aviation interests and the region s residents to plan coordinated transportation systems that move people and goods affordably, efficiently and safely. MARC s transportation work includes: Evaluating the impact of development and land-use patterns on the region s transportation system. Working with committees to establish funding priorities and strategies for managing the region s transportation system. Developing plans for long- and short-term transportation investments. Guiding state and federal transportation dollars to projects that meet regional and local goals. Coordinating technical and policy studies. Promoting transportation choices through supporting public transit, bicycle and pedestrian travel, carpooling and vanpooling. Improving air quality through investments in transportation infrastructure, public education and outreach. Guide to Transportation Decision Making 5

What is transportation decision making? The transportation system is made up of many pieces that work together to move people and goods around and through the metro area including people, vehicles, roadways, bridges, sidewalks, rivers, railways and traffic signals. Transportation planning is the process of identifying transportation problems and looking for solutions, while avoiding future problems. Transportation planners are constantly thinking about the best ways to move people and goods from one place to the next, and doing so in ways that are efficient, safe, cost-effective, and preserve the natural environment. This involves understanding where people live, work and play. Transportation planners have to plan not only for today, but for decades from now. MARC works with many different public and private groups that provide housing, schools, jobs and parks to develop plans. Civil rights law states that federal programs may not discriminate against minorities or people with low -incomes or disabilities. Many transportation projects are federally funded, so transportation planners have to ensure that projects do not have disproportionately adverse effects on these populations. Transportation planning must reflect solutions that benefit all people and communities in the region. Did you know?* The average metro commuter has an annual travel time delay of 27 hours. 6 Guide to Transportation Decision Making

The region s has a population of 1,912,453 that travels a total of 41.3 million miles daily. Did you know? * Key transportation issues Elected officials and planners must deal with important decisions regarding the increased cost of energy and infrastructure in addition to the changing demographics in the region. According to MARC s economic model, the metro is projected to grow by about 500,000 people over the next 25 years from just under 2 million people to about 2.5 million people. We also expect to add 300,000 more jobs to the region by 2040. Where will these additional people live and work? How can we maintain a high quality of life, where everyone has access to opportunities? In the future, should we reinvest in existing areas or build new roads and other transportation infrastructure on undeveloped land? What kinds of places do we want to create? What can we afford? How important is it to support multiple modes of transportation around the region? How can we make transportation safer? What can we do to foster economic vitality and efficient movement? How do we take care of what we already have? How will we preserve valuable natural assets and ensure that transportation investments do not worsen air quality as federal ozone pollutant standards tighten? These are questions you can help elected officials and planners answer by participating in the transportation decision-making process. Guide to Transportation Decision Making 7

Who are the key players? Government The federal government distributes federal Highway Trust Fund dollars annually on a formula basis to every state. Congress can also pass legislation to allocate funds for specially designated projects needed by local congressional districts. The federal government administers laws and regulations to ensure national standards are being met during a project s planning and construction phases. State departments of transportation (DOTs) are largely responsible for building and maintaining our highway systems, and are the main recipients of Federal Highway Administration dollars. Some state DOTs also support public transit, ridesharing, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. State DOTs set transportation goals for their state by working with both public and private transportation agencies, other state agencies, MPOs, local governments and others. Local governments develop comprehensive plans that lay out long-term visions and plans for transportation in their jurisdictions. They also carry out transportation-planning functions, such as scheduling improvements and maintenance for local streets and roads. When a pothole needs to be fixed on a neighborhood street, it is usually the responsibility of the local government. 8 Guide to Transportation Decision Making

Other organizations The U.S. government requires urban areas larger than 50,000 people to designate metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) in order to spend federal highway or transit funds. MPOs develop region-wide plans through intergovernmental collaboration, analysis and consensus-based decision making. MARC is designated as the MPO for Greater Kansas City by the governors of Kansas and Missouri, in agreement with local governments. MARC s Total Transportation Policy Committee sets the agenda and develops policies for regional transportation investments. Transit agencies are public or private organizations that provide transportation services to the region s residents. This may include buses, paratransit vans, trolleys, streetcars, light rail, commuter rail, monorail, inclined railways, subways, passenger ferryboats and trams. The Kansas City Area Transportation Authority, Johnson County Transit, Unified Government Transit, city of Independence and Kansas City Streetcar Authority are major public transit operators in the Kansas City region. More than 250 million tons of freight goods move through the region daily. Did you know? * Guide to Transportation Decision Making 9

The planning process lifecycle Step 1. Develop/revise vision and goals for transportation system Step 2. Create/develop a Metropolitan Transportation Plan Transportation planning process Transportation planning at the local, regional and state levels is cyclical, with designated schedules for short- and long-range plan updates. Step 3. Identify near-term projects in the Transportation Improvement Program Step 4. Determine project details and conduct an environmental analysis Step 5. Implement transportation projects The state develops a state long-range transportation plan and local governments pass a comprehensive plan. States also develop a transportation improvement program (STIP) and local governments use a capital improvement program (CIP). Step 6. Evaluate progress toward regional vision and goals Public involvement is encouraged throughout the entire transportation decision-making process. The best opportunities for the public to get involved are during the first four stages of the transportation decision-making process. 10 Guide to Transportation Decision Making

The decisions are made at each level of government, and each point in the planning process has implications for the others. 1. Visioning and Goals Transportation investments are most effective and have the strongest community support when they are built on a shared idea of what the region aspires to be. It is important to have a vision that lays out broad goals and identifies what role the transportation system should play in achieving the vision. Example goals may include decreasing the use of fossil fuels, creating quality public spaces or preserving existing infrastructure. 2. Metropolitan Transportation Plan The Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) serves as a long-range blueprint for managing, operating and investing in a transportation system over a period of 20 to 30 years. The plan considers projected population growth and economic changes, multimodal transportation needs, safety concerns and environmental issues. Transportation Outlook 2040 is Greater Kansas City s current comprehensive long-term plan. It includes strategies and major projects to help make progress toward the region s vision and goals. MARC updates the plan at least every five years, using an extensive public participation process with local communities. 3. Transportation Improvement Program Every two years, MARC works with KDOT and MoDOT, local governments and public transit agencies to update the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Greater Kansas City. The TIP puts the long-range plan into action by budgeting federal, state and local funds for major transportation investments that support the region s vision and are planned to happen over the next five years. State DOTs develop similar Statewide Transportation Improvement Programs (STIPs). At the local level, cities develop Capital Improvement Programs (CIPs). 4. Project details and environmental analysis Once the STIPs, TIPs or CIPs are approved, the next step in the planning process is to determine who will implement specific transportation projects, develop project details such as location, features, financial costs and evaluate possible impacts to the community. Guide to Transportation Decision Making 11

The National Environmental Policy Act, enacted in 1970, requires all projects using federal dollars to undergo an environmental analysis of potential impacts before construction occurs. This requires agencies that use federal funds to evaluate and address social, economic and environmental concerns. 5. Implementing projects After visioning and project development have taken place, a local project sponsor has been identified, and funding sources are secured, then projects can move on to construction. 6. Monitoring and evaluation Performance measures are a very important part of the transportationplanning process. Local and state governments, transit agencies and MPOs must make sure that their projects connect back to the larger transportation vision for their jurisdiction. The MTP for the Kansas City region includes system measures that help MARC evaluate how well transportation investments are achieving the region s transportation goals. Monitoring and evaluating progress helps us recognize problem areas in the transportation system early on so that adjustments can be made to future plans. Did you know?* The eight-county region has 3,514 bridges and more than 15,500 miles of roadway. 12 Guide to Transportation Decision Making

How projects are developed Federal planning requirements and regional policies influence the types of projects that are developed and submitted by states and local jurisdictions. However, project development typically occurs at the state and local levels. Project development can be unpredictable. Some projects move forward when they are selected as preferred alternatives in studies. But in other cases, projects are delayed or dropped because funding is unavailable, other alternatives emerge, or because they are simply controversial. Projects are sometimes prioritized because elected officials or a group of citizens take a special interest in them. Sometimes transportation improvements are listed for years in local or state plans before any action is taken to get them funded. Guide to Transportation Decision Making 13

Let s look at how transportation projects are selected and developed before they are submitted to the region s MTP and TIP. Federal planning requirements and MARC s Total Transportation Policy Committee s regional policies influence the types of projects that are developed and submitted by states and local jurisdictions. However, project development typically occurs at the state and local levels. Project development can be unpredictable. Some projects move forward when they are selected as preferred alternatives in studies. But in other cases, projects are delayed or dropped because funding is unavailable, because other alternatives emerge, or simply because they are controversial. Projects are sometimes prioritized because elected officials or a group of citizens take a special interest in them. Sometimes transportation improvements are listed for years in local or state plans before any action is taken to get them funded. Identifying needs New transportation projects can arise from simple citizen suggestions or from years of complicated technical analysis. A variety of plans, studies and other mechanisms are used to identify and prioritize project needs throughout the region. Transportation projects are often first identified through local planning, which is performed by county or city governments. Local comprehensive plans usually include a transportation element that identifies specific projects that a jurisdiction has determined will be needed during the period of the plan. State DOTs have methods for identifying projects needed to maintain the transportation system, enhance safety or improve mobility or accessibility. Transit agencies also regularly assess the needs of the public transportation system and identify system enhancements. MARC is often asked to participate in transportation studies that span multiple jurisdictions and look at a variety of solutions and specific needs. At the regional level, MARC helps identify problems and needs by monitoring current travel conditions and forecasting future travel demand. MARC also studies how travel might be affected if we changed current land-use patterns and transportation investments. 14 Guide to Transportation Decision Making

Transportation funding Before the Kansas City region can plan and implement improvements to the transportation system, we must forecast how much money may be available over a period of time. A variety of sources are used to pay for transportation projects, including fuel taxes, vehicle registration fees, transit fares, and sales and property taxes. Just as an individual would budget money for short-term family and household expenses, MPOs, states and local governments allocate funds from various sources for specific transportation projects that help meet their goals. Projected revenues will not be enough to cover all projects plus costs to operate and maintain the existing transportation system that local jurisdictions envision for the next 30 years. The region s top priority is preserving what we have. We will need to spend nearly 66 percent of estimated revenues over 25 years just to keep our transportation infrastructure in good condition. Transportation funds are expected to be in short supply in the future, and the region will have to make tough decisions about what projects will be funded. Infrastructure operations and maintenance The majority of funds expected to be available to the region over the life of Transportation Outlook 2040, $33.1 billion, will mostly be used for operations and maintenance (O&M) of the current system. 65.8% 34.2% Operations and maintenance costs: $21.78 billion Remaining funds: $11.31 billion Figures are based on 25-year estimates calculated for Transportation Outlook 2040. All data listed is in year-of-expenditure dollars. Transportation needs includes set-asides for operation and maintenance of the transportation system and projects identified during the development of Transportation Outlook 2040. Guide to Transportation Decision Making 15

How you can get involved MARC has a Public Participation Plan that guides how the organization involves residents and others in the transportation decision-making process, and how the public can influence planning and investment choices. Ideas and input from the public give state and local governments a clearer understanding of evolving community needs and goals, which can help lead to better transportation solutions. Here are some ways you can become more informed about and involved in transportation decisions that are made in the Kansas City region. Get informed Follow transportation issues in the media. Search the Internet or monitor websites of transportation organizations for information about projects and plans. Sign up to receive newsletters or regular updates on the transportation planning process by placing your name on mailing or email lists or following social media. Talk with decision makers Contact elected officials or the staff at transportation agencies to request information about projects or plans. Find out how citizens can play a role. Join a group Join an organized group that is promoting a special transportation project or advocating broad policy changes for transportation investments in your community or across the region. Attend public meetings Attend public community meetings on transportation projects or plans. These sessions are often advertised in local papers or posted online by local or state agencies. Be sure to ask questions and contribute thoughtfully with the good of your community in mind. 16 Guide to Transportation Decision Making

Find ways to get involved! Provide input Provide input in the transportation-planning process by expressing yourself on record. Citizens have the opportunity to make statements and provide testimony at a number of venues, including formal public hearings and information-sharing meetings on projects and plans as well as online. The MTP and TIP are excellent opportunities to make your voice heard. Send a letter or submit a written statement to key decision makers. Contact MARC s Transportation Department Website: www.marc.org/transportation E-mail: transportation@marc.org Sign up: Visit the MARC transportation website and sign up to receive newsletters and updates. Social media: www.facebook.com/marckcmetro www.twitter.com/marckcmetro www.flickr.com/marckc www.youtube.com/marckcmetro Guide to Transportation Decision Making 17

Contact information Federal Highway Administration Kansas Division Office (785) 267-7281 www.fhwa.dot.gov Missouri Division Office (573) 636-1704 www.fhwa.dot.gov Federal Transit Administration Region 7 Office (816) 329-3920 www.fta.dot.gov Kansas City Area Transportation Authority (816) 346-0200 www.kcata.org Kansas Department of Transportation 1-877-550-KDOT (5368) www.ksdot.org Local governments Please refer to MARC s Public Officials Directory www.marc.org/pod Mid-America Regional Council (816) 474-4240 www.marc.org Missouri Department of Transportation 1-888-ASK-MODOT (275-6636) www.modot.mo.gov Johnson County Transit (913) 782-2210 www.thejo.com Unified Government Transit (913) 573-5000 www.wycokck.org 18 Guide to Transportation Decision Making

Acronym glossary CIP DOT EPA FHWA FTA JCT KCATA KDOT MARC MoDOT MTP MPO NEPA STIP TIP TTPC UGT USDOT Capital Improvement Program Department of Transportation Environmental Protection Agency Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Johnson County Transit Kansas City Area Transportation Authority Kansas Department of Transportation Mid-America Regional Council Missouri Department of Transportation Metropolitan Transportation Plan Metropolitan Planning Organization National Environmental Policy Act Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Improvement Program Total Transportation Policy Committee Unified Government Transit United States Department of Transportation *Did you know notes: pg. 6 pg. 7 pg.9 Texas Transportation Institute (TTI), Urban Mobility Reports. U.S. Census Bureau, 2009 2013 American Community Survey. Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) and Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT); 2013 State DOT Roadway Databases. Source: Mid-America Regional Council (MARC) Import/Export Freight Analysis Framework (FAF3). Guide to Transportation Decision Making 19

600 Broadway, Suite 200 Kansas City, MO 64105-1659 Phone: 816/474-4270 Fax: 816/421-7758 www.marc.org