The Russian Foundation for Technological Development: Boosting Business R & D in Russia

Similar documents
The Present State of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Russia

Funding for Research Collaboration between Finland and China. Dr Ritva Dammert Shanghai 9 April 2008

UPDATE ON INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN RUSSIA

Austria: Public support measures for SME innovation: Some lessons from Austria

Russia s National System of Innovation: strengths and weaknesses Studying the business sector of Russia s NSI

Science, Technology and Innovation for Make in India: Issues and Conditions

Firms and universities: a Portuguese view

SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE «ZELENOGRAD» Unique Environment for High-technology Business In Moscow Region.

Overview of investment activities of pharmaceutical companies in Russia

Valuating intellectual property in innovation support. OSEO s experience

EFB Position Paper: Fostering Long-Term Entrepreneurship

Working in Microfinance

R&D Tax Relief - The Essentials. 4 Minute Read

Facilitating access to financial instruments and SME cluster developments EIfI January Background

Generosity of R&D Tax Incentives

CLEANTECH MÉXICO 2015 ECOINNOVATION Y RECOMENDACIONES LA ECOINNOVACIÓN NACIONAL. Powered by

ROP ERDF Abruzzo Action I.1.1 I.1.4 ABRUZZO Region

Bussines driven innovation

Commercialising cleantech innovation, Finnish national support instruments

H2020 Policy Support Facility Peer Review of the Moldovan Research & Innovation System

EUREKA Peter Lalvani Data & Impact Analyst NCP Academy CSIC Brussels 18/09/17

INNOVATION CENTER SKOLKOVO

2018/SMEWG/DIA/009 INADEM s Programs to Support SMEs, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

THE NATIONAL INVESTMENT IN RESEARCH. Professor Vicki Sara Chair, Australian Research Council

Second Stakeholders Workshop Brussels, 12 th June China s STI Policies and Framework Conditions

SAINT-PETERSBURG: PERSPECTIVE COOPERATION. GOVERNMENT OF SAINT-PETERSBURG Committee for Industrial policy and innovations

RIO Country Report 2015: Slovak Republic

European Trade Mission at NAB, APRIL 2013, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. Dates: Conferences April 6-11, 2013 Exhibits April 8-11, 2013

OPORA RUSSIA ALL-RUSSIAN NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESS SERGEY R. BORISOV

STRATEGIC RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS IN AUSTRALIA COOPERATION AND INTERNATIONAL NETWORKING

Horizon 2020 Financial Instruments for the Private Sector, Especially SMEs An Overview

THE WORLD BANK EXPERIENCE ON RESEARCH & INNOVATION IN THE WESTERN BALKANS

Outline BACKGROUND. WHY do businesses apply to the MSCA? WHAT opportunities do the MSCA offer? WHICH MSCA is made for you? PRACTICAL information

Cluster development in the seafood industry: A strategy for

Forum for Innovation IND-AGRO-POL CLUSTER

PROBLEMS OF WORLD AGRICULTURE

BUSINESS FINLAND AS A PARTNER FOR LARGE COMPANIES 2018

Research Project on Intellectual Property Strategy and Support Measures for Startups Final Report (Summary)

Industrial policy, Smart Specialisation, COSME

Innovation and Technology in Spain

Access to finance for innovative SMEs

The EUREKA Initiative An Opportunity for Industrial Technology Cooperation between Europe and Japan

PRESENTATION BY B. E. MOSHKOVICH LUXEMBOURG

EU support for SMEs through COSME Brussels, 16 May 2018 Finnish Liaison Office for EU R&I

Towards a RIS3 strategy for: Wallonia. Seville, 3 May 2012 Directorate For Economic Policy Mathieu Quintyn Florence Hennart

MOSCOW INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CLUSTER AIMS TO BOOST RUSSIAN HEALTHCARE

Other types of finance

Financial Instruments in Tourism Development

R&D and Innovation in Wallonia-Brussels

Innovation and Prosperity

Governance and Institutional Development for the Public Innovation System

November Dimitri CORPAKIS Head of Unit Research and Innovation DG Research and Innovation European Commission

ATTRACTING VENTURE CAPITAL TO THE WOODWORKING INDUSTRY OF THE CHERNIVTSI REGION

Clusters and Cluster Policy in Europe. Professor Örjan Sölvell

La Réunion France Towards a RIS3 strategy

Kotovo Industrial park as example of formats industrial cooperation in Russia: joint ventures, industrial cooperation, technology partnership

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS

MISSION. Skolkovo is a strategic development initiative to: Diversify and grow Russia s economy through innovation and entrepreneurship

Bilateral R&I Cooperations. 2nd Interregional Steering Committee meeting 2nd Interregional Policy Learning session Burgos 3rd & 4th November 2016

RDP analysis: Measure 16 Cooperation M Other forms of cooperation

Operational Programme Entrepreneurship and Innovations for Competitiveness Regional Office of CzechInvest for South Moravia region

Better Policies for More Innovation Assessment Implementation Monitoring

SKOLKOVO INNOVATION CENTER

INCENTIVES AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS TO FOSTER PRIVATE SECTOR INNOVATION. Jerry Sheehan. Introduction

CHALLENGES FOR INDUSTRY-ACADEMIA COLLABORATION Workshop Sofia, November 2009

New Developments in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in the Russian Federation

MAISON DE L'ECONOMIE EUROPEENNE - RUE JACQUES DE LALAINGSTRAAT 4 - B-1040 BRUXELLES

International Call for Papers:

The 10 billion euro question. How to most effectively support innovation in Poland. Marcin Piatkowski Senior Economist The World Bank, Warsaw

Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Synergy with similar projects/initiatives in WBC countries

innovationisrael.org.il Endless Possibilities to Promote Innovation

INNOVATION IN RUSSIA: POTENTIAL, CHALLENGES & DRIVERS

Putting Finland in the context

CAPACITIES WORK PROGRAMME PART 3. (European Commission C (2011) 5023 of 19 July 2011) REGIONS OF KNOWLEDGE

FlandersBio and Flemish Life Science Cluster Strategy. State of the Union, May 25th 2016

SOFT-LANDING SERVICES -- CHINA & JAPAN

James Cogan PNO Consultants

Introduction & background. 1 - About you. Case Id: b2c1b7a1-2df be39-c2d51c11d387. Consultation document

DEVELOPING A NEW GENERATION OF SUSTAINABLE AND ECO-EFFICIENT INDUSTRIAL SITES

ECOSYSTEMS AND NEW TOOLS FOR FUTURE AT BUSINESS FINLAND TEIJA LAHTI-NUUTTILA

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN CATALONIA AND BARCELONA

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

NUCLEAR & RADIATION TECHNOLOGIES CLUSTER Platform for innovative growth of industrial companies

Problems and prospects of university innovative infrastructure in the triple helix model university - business government.

Technopolis Moscow FLAGSHIP PROJECT. of innovation infrastructure development in Moscow

advancing with ESIF financial instruments The European Social Fund Financial instruments

I 2 Program Frequently Asked Questions

The European Research Area and the National Perspective: Horizon 2020 and Beyond

Management of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Erkko Autio, Professor, Imperial College Business School

The European Research Council. The ERC Scientific Strategy. Barbara Ensoli. Member of the ERC Scientific Council

INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICES IN INNOVATION MANAGEMENT

ERA-NET ERA-NET. Cooperation and coordination of national or regional research and innovation activities (i.e. programmes)

An action plan to boost research and innovation

The Israeli Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Industry

Business Environment and Knowledge for Private Sector Growth: Setting the Stage

This project is funded by the European Union

Synergies between the EIT, its. Innovation Communities and the NCPs A sustainable energy future for Europe, by EIT InnoEnergy

SME Internationalisation: Characteristics, Barriers and Policy Options

Hong Kong (China) is ranked 14th in the GII 2018, moving up 2 positions from the previous year.

Transcription:

The Russian Foundation for Technological Development: Boosting Business R & D in Russia Irina Dezhina Head of Division, IMEMO RAS, And Senior Expert-Analyst, RFTD dezhina@rftr.ru 1 RUSTEC Conference, November 2012

CONTENTS 1.History 2.Major principles of operation 3.Current status 4.Technological platforms 5.Limitations and prospects 2

History 3 RFTD was founded in 1992 with an aim to create favorable conditions for development of Russian scientific and technological potential. RFTR finances applied R&D in top-priority fields defined by the Russian government Since establishment, RFTD supported: about 900 projects Total amount of support: about 230 million USD RFTD was frozen during 2007-May 2011.

RFTD Among Institutes for Development Higher education R&D Pre-seed and seed Start-up Growth Expansion Pre-IPO IPO Universities, R&D institutes RFBR, RFH RFTD Fund for Assistance Skolkovo Russian Venture Company RUSNANO Special Economic Zones SMP Bank (SME) - loans 4 Technology platforms

Budgets of Institutes for Development Investing in R&D Institute for Development Budget in 2012, million USD Funds established by RVC RUSNANO 694.0 Skolkovo Fund 687.5 Fund for Assistance 125.0 937.5 (total budgets of all funds) RFTD 40.2 (total 106.25) 5 5

Major Principles of Operation RFTD supports R&D at small and medium-sized companies, aiming at development of high-tech innovation production. Basic terms of support: Financing is provided in a form of loans with 3% fee for consulting services from RFTD Loan amount - from 0,35 up to 10 million $, but no more than the sum of the net assets of the applicant Loan term up to 60 months The applicant - legal entity - resident of the Russian Federation, participant of TECHNOLOGICAL PLATFORM 6

Consulting Support Advice, information and marketing services in the area of scientific, technological and innovation activities. Support of financed companies: Technological audit; Consulting on the system of management; Monitoring; Marketing support (exhibitions, etc.) Search for co-investors and mobilization of additional funds to the project. 7

Current Projects (as of September 2012) Total number of applications 120 Requested financing 400 million USD Passed different stages of expert evaluation 103 Rejected 74 Received support 10 Amount granted, total 40 million USD Some organizations who currently implement projects are well known: NT-MDT Co. (photonics) group of companies UNICHIMTEK (thermal power engineering) Research Institute Polyus (photonics). 8

Technological Platforms: Definition Initiative was announced in 2010, 30 platforms were founded during 2011-2012. Concept borrowed from EU experience. Participants: research organizations, universities, state and private companies. Should become communication instrument aimed to activate creation of new technologies and products due to synergy of business, science, government, and civil society (according to the Strategy for innovation development-2020) 9

Technology Platforms: EU versus Russia Characteristics ЕU Russia Principle of formation Goals Tasks Bottom-up Synergy among major stakeholders Connections between fundamental research and practical applications Coordination of interests of countries-eu members Development of Strategic Plan and road maps Marketing of ideas in EU Top-down Creation of new technologies Attraction of additional resources for R&D Improvement of legal regulations in R&D and innovation Development of Strategic Program Development of programs to disseminate new technologies Development of educational activities Expert functions for the government Financing State, private, self-financing Government financing (planned) 10 Government role Promotion of platforms concept Limited financial support of operational activities No instruments to push platforms to any activities Participation in governance of platforms Attraction of platforms as experts of government decisions Monitoring according to set of indicators

Technological Platforms in Russia: Problems to Solve and Goals to Achieve ПРОБЛЕМЫ ЦЕЛИ PROBLEMS Unclear interests from side of business Low innovative activity of business Low influence of business on choice of thematic priorities in S&T Low commercial outcome of R&D Duplication of federally-supported R&D Barriers for technology dissemination related to tech regulations Weak priority setting procedures in terms of involvement of all actors GOALS Development of partnerships between science and business Networking Improvement of environment for technology dissemination Attraction of non-budgetary sources Consolidation of resources on S&T priorities Better condition to evaluate technologies for socio-economic development 11

Share of Innovative Enterprises Conducting Technological Innovations, % (Russia-2010, other countries latest year available) 80.0 70.0 79.9 69.0 60.0 50.0 52.2 50.2 45.6 40.0 30.0 30.0 22.0 20.0 10.0 9.5 0.0 Russia Germany Japan Finland France UK China USA (product inno only) 12

Expenditures on R&D Financed by Business and Government 80.0 76.1 78.2 70.0 60.0 64.3 61.8 56.1 55.7 60.1 68.8 50.0 USA 40.0 35.4 35.4 Japan 30.0 20.0 22.4 18.3 30.2 16.8 27.3 15.6 17 EU Countries Russia 10.0 0.0 2005 2010 2005 2010 Business Government 13

R&D in Total Expenditures on Innovations, % (2010) Germany 49.3 France 60.4 Finland 65.6 Norway 67.6 Russia 14.4 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 14

R&D in Business Sector, Financed by Government, % Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 USA 9.7 9.8 9.9 8.9 14.0 Japan 1.2 1.0 1.1 0.9 - Germany 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 France 10.1 11.3 9.8 11.4 - UK 8.3 7.6 6.8 6.6 6.6 OECD countries 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.5 - (average) Russia 53.6 52.0 55.3 56.0 57.4 15

Technological Platforms under RFTD Support 1. Medicine of the Future 2. BioTech 2030 3. Bioenergetics 6. Photonics 15. Ecologically clean thermal power engineering 17. Low dispersed energetics 21. Materials and technologies for metallurgy 22. Shot minerals 23. Technologies for extraction and use of hydrocarbons 24. Deep processing of hydrocarbon resources 16. Perspective technologies of renewable energetics 16 27. Ocean development 28. Technologies of ecological development 16

Technological Platforms: Government Implementation Accent on universities and R&D institutes as driving forces in platforms Linking push for innovations (applied to big companies) with platforms activity Mechanisms of financing: from self-support to different government instruments Government push request to finance technology platforms through various institutes for development 17

Technological Platforms: Insider View Case studies conducted in September-October 2012 show: Organizations in platforms counted either on additional money or influence on top-level decision making Surveyed platforms do not have enough resources to develop vision and strategic plans; big companies are not active in these activities Counting mostly on government financing for R&D projects Do not have clear understanding what would be considered as a successful functioning of a platform. Possible outcomes: 18 New linkages Additional money on R&D Involvement of big companies in various activities

Government Intentions to Support Technology Platforms Evolution: from push to self-support to intention to finance organizational stage and planning stage. At present: government is going to implement: - Earmark equal subsidies for organizational work of platforms and their cooperation with clusters (under discussion co-financing); -Inclusion of thematic R&D areas suggested by platforms to government programs (8 programs are considered); - Appeal to Institutes for development to start activities in support of platforms. 19

20 Limitations and Prospects RFTD unique instrument in the conditions when bank loans system is underdeveloped Financial and consulting activities are combined at all stages of project development Limitations: Budget limitations: low budget for rather big projects Functional limitations: only projects associated with technology platforms may be supported Prospects: support of medium-size companies outside platforms Educational and training programs Support of &D in innovation clusters 20

Thank you for your attention www.rftr.ru 21