SHPO%Guidance%for%Use%and%Submittal% of%the% Survey%Report%Summary%Form%% (SRSF)% % SHPO%Guidance%Point%No.%10% % %Revised% %January%2016%

Similar documents
FINAL DRAFT Programmatic Agreement Among The Bureau of Land Management The Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer

PASPGP-5 REPORTING CRITERIA CHECKLIST

WRP Natural Resources Committee s Southeastern Arizona/New Mexico (SoAZ/NM Project)

WHEREAS, Mn/DOT has been asked to participate in consultation for and to be an invited signatory to this Programmatic Agreement (PA); and

AZSITE Consortium Annual Report to the Governor s Office For the period July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011

Federal Lands Update For the Arizona Game and Fish Commission January Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest (A-S)

RE: Cheyenne Connector Pipeline Project, Weld County, Colorado

A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair McNichol called the meeting to order at 10:02 a.m.

Preliminary Review and. Reference Guide Sections 4.2 and 4.3

THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY *III CORPS & FH REG HEADQUARTERS, III CORPS & FORT HOOD FORT HOOD, TEXAS SEPTEMBER 2001

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

Prepared by State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO): Fiscal Year

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Desert Southwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit. Strategic Plan Approved November 2016

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

DESERT SOUTHWEST COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING

ARIZONA WILDLAND FIRE EQUIPMENT MOBILIZATION PLAN

Build Arizona Awards Application

4Cultural Resources. Promote mission-supporting re-use of historic properties. Manage and maintain cultural resources in a sustainable manor

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

APPENDIX A PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR MINOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

ADOT Transportation Planning and Programming Guidebook for Tribal Governments

The Arizona Rural Recruitment & Retention Program Partnership

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District, Phoenix Office 3636 N. Central Ave., Suite 900 Phoenix, AZ 85012

July 5, JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE Savannah District/State of Georgia

NPS Cultural Resources Programs

Western Regional Partnership Overview

Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX C: COORDINATION PLAN

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1002 WEST 23 RD STREET, SUITE 350 PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA

Conservation Appendix C: Conservation Budget Overview

Arizona State Parks Board June 22, 2011

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNITS NETWORK

The Archaeological Curation Crisis: An Integrated Action Plan for the SAA and Its Partners

ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION DISTRICTS STRATEGIC PLAN P age 75 Years of Locally Led Conservation

FY 2017 Shooting Range Development Grants

COLORADO PLATEAU COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Northeastern Region Grantee Technical Assistance for Federal Compliance

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN CALIFORNIA THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP

Public Notice NOTICE ANNOUNCING MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE LETTER OF PERMISSION AUTHORIZING TRANSPORATION PROJECTS

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Arizona American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 Programs. November 8, 2010 Las Vegas, Nevada

Arizona State Parks Board May 20, 2015

Part III Guidelines

COLORADO PLATEAU COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT. AMENDMENT TWO TO COOPERATIVE and JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. between NAVAJO NATION.

ARIZONA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN UPDATE 2019 STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE

COLORADO PLATEAU COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT. AMENDMENT SIX TO COOPERATIVE and JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. between

AUG JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE Savannah District/State of Georgia

MEETING MINUTES OF PUBLIC MEETING of THE ARIZONA OUTDOOR RECREATION COORDINATING COMMISSION (AORCC) of THE ARIZONA STATE PARKS BOARD

Historic Bridge Programmatic Agreements: Best Practices and Examples

MV DATE: 03/06/2012 TIME: 20:28: ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAGE # 1 MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION ADJUSTED COUNTY MVF DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2015) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2015) Application Seminars

Acres for America Grantee Webinar June 4, 2014

Arizona Game & Fish (AZGFD) Heritage Fund THE HERITAGE FUND IS MAKING A DIFFERENCE IN YOUR COMMUNITY!

Regulatory Guidance Letter 92-01

Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2017) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2017) Application Seminars

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS FOR PENNSYLVANIA WASTEWATER PROJECTS. Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program

Copyright 2004 The Trust for Public Land

Bruce Goff, Barb Giacomini, Noah Stewart, and Larry Dean Anteon Corporation San Diego, CA USA.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1104 NORTH WESTOVER BOULEVARD, UNIT 9 ALBANY, GEORGIA SEPT 1ER

GUIDELINES FOR THE IMPERIAL COUNTY COMMUNITY BENEFIT PROGRAM

TEX Rail Corridor Memorandum of Agreement 1

PUBLIC NOTICE.

GREAT PLAINS COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT. AMENDMENT FIVE TO COOPERATIVE and JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. between

COORDINATION PLAN. September 30, 2011

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

SunZia Southwest Transmission Project. September. Project Update for the Board of Socorro County Commissioners February 28, 2017.

PUBLIC NOTICE. Attn: Mr. Christopher Layton 1200 Duck Road Duck, North Carolina CB&I 4038 Masonboro Loop Road Wilmington, North Carolina 28409

Frequently Asked Questions: Developing the Next Generation of Conservationists

Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Units

Introduction to TITLE Tribal Economic Development Marcelino C. Flores, Commercial Leasing Coordinator, Pima Leasing & Finance

Donlin Gold, LLC Regarding the Donlin Gold Project

PENNSYLVANIA STATE PROGRAMMATIC GENERAL PERMIT-4 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES. June 5, 2014

2017 Nationwide Permit Reissuance

SPD Emergency Procedures and SPK Regional General Permit 8 for Emergency Actions

PACIFIC NORTHWEST COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT. AMENDMENT FOUR TO COOPERATIVE and JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. between

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

STATEMENT OF COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION Regarding S a bill to authorize the Bureau of Reclamation to provide cost sharing

State of Arizona Arizona Fire Chiefs Association. Fire Service Mutual Aid Plan. Jan Brewer Governor

Land and Water Conservation Fund: Appropriations for Other Purposes

RE-ADMISSION NURSING APPLICATION GUIDE SPRING 2019

NOAA s Licensing of CubeSats as Private Remote Sensing Space Systems under the National and Commercial Space Policy Act

Annual Plan

SunZia Southwest Transmission Project. September. EUCI 2017 Western Transmission Summit SunZia Project Case Study February 27, 2017.

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

South Dakota Transportation Alternatives

ARIZONA COMPETES FUND. Annual Report November 1, 2014

COLORADO PLATEAU COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT. AMENDMENT ONE TO COOPERATIVE and JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. between

Water Trust Board 2019 Application Overview and Frequently Asked Questions

WHEREAS, FEMA also may perform its own Undertakings pursuant to this Agreement; and

GROUNDWORK FIRST ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FOOTHILLS CONSERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. May, 2002

55644 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 213 / Friday, November 2, 2001 / Notices

ROCKY MOUNTAINS COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT

Appendix B Review Matrix Text & Table Footnotes

Arizona Department of Education

SEC Speedway Blvd & Euclid Ave

BDWW-GP-1 Number Fish Habitat Enhancement Structures N Days 43. BDWM-GP-6 BDWM-GP-7 Agricultural Minor Road Crossings and Ramps N 43

CITY OF ORANGE LOCAL CEQA GUIDELINES

Transcription:

SHPOGuidanceforUseandSubmittal ofthe SurveyReportSummaryForm (SRSF) SHPOGuidancePointNo.10 Revised January2016 INTRODUCTION The Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) annually reviews thousands of documents for compliance under A.R.S. 41-861 et seq., the State Historic Preservation Act (SHPA), and 36 CFR Part 800 (the regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act [NHPA]). In order to facilitate SHPA and NHPA compliance documentation and review processes, the SHPO has created a Survey Report Summary Form (SRSF) that can be used to report Class I inventory surveys, or Class II and Class III surveys resulting in negative findings. Refer to Standards for Inventory Documents Submitted for SHPO Review in Compliance with Historic Preservation Laws (Revised, January 2016), also known as the SHPO Survey Report Standards, for additional guidance and points of clarification, definitions, and terminology. Arizona State Museum (ASM) will accept SRSFs in lieu of negative survey technical reports for work conducted under Arizona Antiquities Act Blanket Permits. See Appendix A, this document, for instructions for completing the SRSF. CONDITIONS FOR USE OF THE SRSF 1. A list of agencies that have approved use of the SRSF for negative surveys is in Appendix B, this document. It is the consultant s responsibility to obtain approval, in writing, from any agency not listed, and provide the approval to SHPO. 2. TheSRSFmust be completed in its entirety to demonstrate that SHPO, ASM, or other agency reporting standards are met. Therequiredattachmentsmustbeincludedforthesubmittaltobe consideredcomplete. 3. TheSRSFmaybeusedfornonFcollectionsurveysoflessthan640acresorlessthan10linear milesresultinginnegativefindings,andforwhicharecommendationof NoHistoric PropertiesAffected isappropriate. a. Asurveyresultsina negativefinding ifnosites,structures,buildings,objects,or districtsarepresentintheareaofpotentialeffects.

b. Anegativesurveymayincludeisolatedoccurrences(IOs)ofartifactsorfeatures, providedtheiosaresufficientlydocumentedtodemonstratelackofsignificanceand researchpotential. c. For additional policy information regarding eligibility evaluations of IOs, refer to Appendix B in the SHPO Survey Report Standards cited above. d. Any Register-eligible IO requires preparation of a technical inventory report. If in doubt about the recommended eligibility status of an IO, contact SHPO or the appropriate land managing or reviewing agency. e. Regardless of findings, a technical report, including a research design, must be submitted for surveys involving more than 640 acres or 10 linear miles. 4. The SRSF may be used to report the results of Class I inventories not requiring detailed cultural histories. SUMMARY Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.11(a), the SHPO is resolved to improve the quality of those reports that are below or barely meeting expectations for professional adequacy. Thus, we strongly encourage use of the SRSF and SHPO Survey Report Standards, which have been recently updated (2015) with information pertaining to background research, ARHP/NRHP eligibility requirements, and important definitions of key terms. We believe that use of these resources should reduce SHPO requests for additional information (often resulting in the need for report revisions), and thus potentially reduce the time needed for consultation (the mandated 30-day SHPO review period starts over with each new submittal). As such, these tools are intended to help balance the business of archaeology with the requirements for historic preservation compliance. Prepared by SHPO archaeological compliance staff/mew Approved by James W. Garrison, State Historic Preservation Office 2

APPENDIXA INSTRUCTIONSFORCOMPLETINGTHE SHPOSURVEYREPORTFORM(SRSF) TheSRSFisastandKalonedocumenttobesubmittedforClassIsurveys,orClassIIorClassIII surveysresultinginnegativefindings.refertoshpoguidancepointno.10(revised2016)forthe definitionofanegativesurveyandotherapplicableconditions. Regardlessoffindings,atechnicalreport,includingaresearchdesign,mustbesubmittedforall surveysthataremorethan640acresor10linearmiles. WhenfillingouttheSRSF,expandfieldsasnecessary. 1.REPORTTITLE 1a.ReportTitle:Includefulltitle. 1b.ReportAuthor(s):Firstandlastnames. 1c.Date:Reportdate.Identifyas Revised,withdate,ifappropriate. 1d.ReportNumber:Internalreportnumber. 2.PROJECTREGISTRATION/PERMITS 2a.ASMAccessionNumber:ObtainedfromtheArizonaStateMuseum(ASM). 2b.AAAPermitNumber:ObtainedfromtheASM. 2c.ASLDLeaseApplicationNumber(s):ObtainedfromtheArizonaStateLandDepartment. 2d.OtherPermitNumber(s):Listallagencypermitnumbers. 3.ORGANIZATION/CONSULTINGFIRM 3a.Name:Nameoforganizationorconsultingfirmconductingthesurvey. 3b.InternalProjectNumber:Organization/consultingfirmprojectFspecificprojectnumber(s). 3c.InternalProjectName:Organization/consultingfirmprojectname. 3d.ContactName:Nameofthepartyresponsibleforensuringthecompletenessandaccuracyofthe report,generallyprincipalinvestigatororculturalresourcesdirector/manager. 3e.ContactAddress:Localoffice/streetaddressassociatedwithsubmittal. 3f.ContactPhone:refersto3d. 3g.ContactEmail:refers3d. 4.SPONSOR/LEADAGENCY 4a.Sponsor:Theprojectproponent. 4b.LeadAgency:AgencyresponsibleforconsultationundertheStateorNationalHistoricPreservation Acts(SHPA,NHPA). 4c.AgencyProjectNumber(s):Providedbysponsororleadagency.ForADOT,includeboththefederal projectnumberandthetracsnumber. 4d.AgencyProjectName:Asprovidedbysponsororleadagency. 4e.FundingSource(s):Federal,stateorprivate.Includeallfundingsources(e.g.,FWSFWSFR,ASPFRTP, AGFDFHeritageGrant)ifknown. 4f.OtherAgenciesInvolved:Listallotheragencies/reviewingentitiesinvolvedintheproject.Include ASMifappropriate.DonotincludeSHPO. 1

APPENDIXA INSTRUCTIONSFORCOMPLETINGTHE SHPOSURVEYREPORTFORM(SRSF) 4g:ApplicableRegulations:Listallregulationsthatpertaintothecurrentproject(e.g.,SHPA,NHPA, ArizonaAntiquitiesAct(AAA),Section404oftheCleanWaterAct,etc 5.DESCRIPTIONOFPROJECTORUNDERTAKING Brieflydescribethepurposeoftheprojectorundertaking(e.g.,roadwidening,housingdevelopment, landtransfer).describethenatureandextent/limitsofgrounddisturbingactivities,includingthedepth ofthedisturbance,aswellasthetypesofequipmentthatmaybeutilized.includeancillaryfacilitiessuch asutilityeasements,accessroads,stagingareas,etc. 6.PROJECTAREA/AREAOFPOTENTIALEFFECTS(APE) Whatistheextentoftheprojectarea(forstateprojects)orAPE(forfederalundertakings)?Provide descriptionanddimensions.includeaprojectlocationmapwithallelementsoftheprojectdepicted(i.e., rightfoffwaylimits,areasurveyedifdifferentfromtheape,etc.).attachlocationmaps. 7.PROJECTLOCATION 7a.Address:Providestreetaddressifcelltowersurveyorbuildinginventory. 7b.Route:ForADOTprojects. 7c.MilepostLimits:ForADOTprojects. 7d.NearestCity/Town:Indicatethedistanceanddirectiontonearestcityortown. 7e.County:Identify. 7f.ProjectLocatorUTM:ProvidetheUTMcoordinates(E,N)forprojectasawhole.Thisdoesnotneed tobeidentifiedonthemap.thisinformationiscriticalforshpoandasmtocrossfreferenceprojects. 7g.NAD:NAD83(convertallotherstoNAD83) 7h.Zone:11or12 7i:Baseline&Meridian:Gila&SaltRiverBaselineandMeridian(G&SRB&M),SanBernadinoB&M,or NavajoB&M. 7j.USGSQuadrangle(s):Includeallrepresented. 7k:LegalDescription.Township,Range,andQuarterSection:Includeall. 8.SURVEYAREA Includeinformationforareassurveyedandnotsurveyedseparately.ForClassIsurveys,indicate acresbylandjurisdictiononly. 8a.TotalAcres:Identifythenumberoftotalacres,surveyedandunsurveyedcombined,regardlessof landjurisdiction. 8b.1.LandJurisdiction:Identifytheunderlyinglandowner/landmanager.Also,indicatewhetherrightF offway(owned)oreasement. 8b.2.TotalAcresSurveyed:Bylandjurisdiction. 8c.3.TotalAcresNotSurveyed:Totalbylandjurisdiction.NotusedforClassIsurvey. 8c.4.JustificationforAreasNotSurveyed:Brieflyexplainwhytheareawasnotsurveyed(e.g.,steep slope,densevegetation,etc.);includetownship(t),range(r),andsection(s)onlyforareasexcluded fromsurvey.notusedforclassisurvey. 2

APPENDIXA INSTRUCTIONSFORCOMPLETINGTHE SHPOSURVEYREPORTFORM(SRSF) 9.ENVIRONMENTALCONTEXTS 9a.Landform:Identifythelandformthesurveyareaencompasses(e.g.,hilltoporslope,floodplain, alluvialfan;ridge,etc.). 9b.Elevation:Elevation,orelevationrange,inthesurveyarea. 9c.SurroundingTopographicFeatures:Identifythesurroundingmountainsandothernatural features. 9d.NearestDrainage:Directiontoandnameofnearestdrainage. 9e.LocalGeology:Eitherdescribetheformationorlisttheparentrocktypesthatwouldbeconsidered localtothesurveyarea.includetheappropriatecitationinthereferencessection. 9f.Vegetation:Identifythebioticcommunityanddescribeobservedvegetation.Includetheappropriate citationinthereferencessection. 9g.Soils/Deposition:DescribethesoilsintheprojectareausingNRCSsoildescriptions (seehttp://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/surveylist/soils/survey/state/?stateid=az)or commondescriptiveterms.noteifdesertpavementischaracteristic.estimateiferosionoraggradationis significantfactor,particularlyaroundsites. 9h.BuriedDeposits:Identifythepotentialforburieddepositsas LikelyPossible or NotLikely. 9i.Justification:Brieflydescribewhytheremayormaynotbeburieddeposits(e.g.,culturalfillevident fromanimalburrows,etc.). 10.BUILTENVIRONMENT Identifyallstructures,features,orobjects(buildings,fences,powerlines,utilitypoles,etc.)withinand immediatelyadjacenttotheprojectareaorape.statewhethertheyaremodernorhistoricanddescribe anypotentialimpacts,asapplicable. 11.INVENTORYCLASSCOMPLETED 11a.ClassIInventory:Checktheboxonlyifapedestriansurveywasnotperformed. 11b.Researcher(s):Identifytheresearcher(s)ifBox11aischecked. 11c.ClassIISurvey:ChecktheboxifaClassII(sample)surveywasconducted. 11d.SamplingStrategy:If11cischecked,describethesamplingstrategy,whichshouldhavebeen agreeduponinconsultationwithsponsor/leadagencyandshpo.ifthereisnotapreviousagreement, explainwhy. 11e.ClassIIIInventory:Checktheboxifbackgroundresearch(ClassIInventory)andasystematic/ intensivepedestriansurveywascompleted.surveymustmeetaaaorlandfmanagingagencystandards, asappropriate. 12.BACKGROUNDRESEARCHSOURCES Checkallsourcesutilized. 12a.AZSITE:ChecktheboxiftheconsultantreviewedrecordsonAZSITE(see http://azsite3.asurite.ad.asu.edu/azsite/).notethattheasmrecordsofficemayhaveadditional information. 12b.ASMArchaeologicalRecordsOffice:Checkthisboxiftheconsultantconductedarecordscheckat ASM,orifASMconductedarecordscheckfortheconsultant.ASMmayhaverecordsnotyetavailablein AZSITE. 3

APPENDIXA INSTRUCTIONSFORCOMPLETINGTHE SHPOSURVEYREPORTFORM(SRSF) 12c.SHPOInventories/SHPOLibrary:ChecktheboxiftheconsultantconductedresearchattheSHPO. 12d.NRHPDatabase:Required.Werecommendusingboththedatabaseanddownloadingspatialdata forgoogleearth.see:http://focus.nps.gov/nrhp/download/. 12e.ADOTPortal:RequiredbyADOTforallADOTprojects. 12f.GLOMaps:Required.Seehttp://www.glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx. 12g.LandManagingAgencyFiles(e.g.,USFS,BLM):Recordsreviewrequiredforanypartofthestudy areainvolvingfederal(e.g.,usfs,blm)orotheragency(e.g.,srp,aps)land. 12h.TribalCulturalResourcesFiles:Recordsreviewrequiredforanypartofthestudyareainvolving Triballand.PermissionmustbeobtainedfromrespectiveTribes,notASMorSHPO. 12i.LocalGovernmentWebsites:Reviewrecommendedtoidentifyhistoricpropertiesandareasof archaeological/historicalsensitivity.notethatcertifiedlocalgovernments(clgs)generallyhave specificordinancesforidentifyingculturalresources.seehttp://azstateparks.com/shpo/local.htmlfora listofclgs. 12j.Other:!Listallothersourcesutilized(e.g.,SanbornFireInsuranceMaps,historictopographicmaps, historicroadmaps,etc.). 13.BACKGROUNDRESEARCHRESULTS Asappropriate,completeallTablesintheirentirety. 13a.PreviousProjectswithinStudyArea.A1Fmileradiussurroundtheprojectlocationisthestandard searchparameter.forlinearprojects,reducethesearchradiustoa½fmileradius.otherreasonsfor reducingthesearchradiusmustbejustified. 13a.1.ProjectReferenceNumber:ASMorAgencyreferencenumber,e.g.,1997F3.ASM 13a.2.ProjectName:!AsindicatedinAZSITEoronASMProjectRegistrationForms,orotheragency forms. 13.a.3.Author(s):Lastname(s)ofreportauthor(s);noteifeditor(s). 13.a.4.Year:Yearreportwritten. 13b.PreviouslyRecordedCulturalResourceswithinStudyArea:Identifyallarchaeologicalsites (includinglinearstructures)withinthestudyarea.see13.b.1through13.b.5. 13.b.1.SiteNumber/Name:Formalsitedesignation. 13.b.2.Cultural/TemporalAffiliation:Beasspecificaspossible,e.g.,Hohokam,Sedentaryperiod; EuroFAmerican,1917F1968. 13.b.3.SiteType:FollowingASMorlandFmanagingagencyguidelines. 13.b.4.EligibilityStatus:Criterion(criteria)ofsignificanceandwhether Recommended orpreviously Determined eligible/noteligible,orunevaluated. 13.b.5.Reference(s):Author(s)lastname(s)andyear. 13.c.HistoricBuildings/Districts/Neighborhoods.Identifyallwithinthestudyarea.See13.c.1 through13.c.4.! 13.c.1.PropertyNameorAddress:!Officialrecordofentrypreferred. 13.c.3.Year:Constructiondateoftheproperty. 13.c.4.EligibilityStatus:Sameas13.b.4. 4

APPENDIXA INSTRUCTIONSFORCOMPLETINGTHE SHPOSURVEYREPORTFORM(SRSF) 14.CULTURALCONTEXTS 14a.PrehistoricCulture:!Listallprehistoricgroupsaffiliatedwithsurveyareaanditsvicinity. 14b.ProtohistoricCulture:Listallprotohistoricgroupsaffiliatedwithsurveyareaanditsvicinity. 14c.IndigenousHistoricCulture:!IdentifyallhistoricNativeTribesaffiliatedwithsurveyareaandits vicinity. 14d.EuroKAmericanCulture:Providedaterange. 15.FIELDSURVEYPERSONNEL 15a.PrincipalInvestigator:Ifapermitisrequired,identifythepermittedarchaeologistsupervisingthe project. 15b.FieldSupervisor:Whetherapermitisrequiredornot,identifytheleadarchaeologistinthefield. 15c.Crew:!Listallcrewinvolvedinthefieldwork. 15d.FieldworkDate(s):Specificdate(s)ordaterange. 16.SURVEYMETHODS 16a.TransectIntervals:Distance(m)betweentransectintervals;stateifsingletransect. 16b.SurveyCoverage:100(surveysspacednomorethan20mapart),oridentifyothercoverage. 16c.SiteRecordingCriteria:SiteFrecordingcriteriaused(e.g.,ASM,NavajoNation).Thisisnecessary fornegativesurveyswithiosrecorded. 16d.GroundSurfaceVisibility:Identifytheestimatedpercentofsurfacevisibilityatthetimeofsurvey. 16e.ObservedDisturbances:Listallnaturalandphysicalhindrancestosurvey(e.g.,fieldsin cultivation,densevegetation,constructiondebris,etc.). 17.FIELDSURVEYRESULTS 17a.NoCulturalResourcesIdentified:Checktheboxifsurveyresultedinnoculturalresources, includingisolatedoccurrences. 17b.IsolatedOccurrences(IOs)Only:ChecktheboxifsurveyresultedonlyintherecordingofIOs consideredineligibleforinclusioninthearizona/nationalregisterofhistoricplaces. 17c.NumberofIOsRecorded:TotalnumberofIOs,includingisolatedfeatures. 17d.TableofIOs.See17.d.1through17.d.4. 17.d.1.IONumber:Listinconsecutiveorder. 17d.2.Description:Number,class,typeofartifactsorfeature;ifmultipleartifactsarepresent,thearea mustbespecifiedtodemonstratethattheiodoesnotmeetthedefinitionofasite.thedescriptionofthe IOmustbesufficienttojustifythatthereisnofurtherdatapotential(CriterionD);beasspecificas possiblefortemporalandculturalaffiliation. 17d.3.DateRange:Providetheaccepteddaterange;ifthedaterangeisbasedondiagnosticartifacts, includetheappropriatereference. 17.d.4.UTMs(Easting,Northing):IdentifyingtheUTMcenterpointfornonFlinearIOs.IftheIOislinear, includethestartandendpointswithintheareasurveyed. 18.COMMENTS Notewhetherbackgroundresearchindicatesasitewaspreviouslyrecordedintheareasurveyed,butit wasnotidentifiedduringthefieldsurvey;providesitenumberandexplainmethodsusedtoreflocatethe site.includeothercomments. 5

APPENDIXA INSTRUCTIONSFORCOMPLETINGTHE SHPOSURVEYREPORTFORM(SRSF) SECTION19.ATTACHMENTS 19a.ProjectLocationMap:USGS1:24,000TopographicMap;scale1inch=2,000ft.Aerialorstreet mapsmaybeusedinadditiontotheusgstopographicmap 19b.LandJurisdictionMap:Maybecombinedwith19a;includeappropriatekey. 19c.BackgroundResearchMap:Showlocationsofprevioussurveysandpreviouslyrecordedcultural resources.azsitescreenshotisacceptableprovideditshowstheprojectlocationandislabeledand legible. 19d.GLOMap:Includeacopyoftherelevantmapordepictfeaturesonbackgroundresearchmap. 19e.References:UseAmericanAntiquityformat.Referencesarerequiredforallbackgroundresearch results,aswellassourceinformation(e.g.,bioticcommunities,geologicformations,soilcomposition, etc.). 20.CONSULTANTCERTIFICATION SignatureandTitleoftheResponsibleParty(CulturalResourcesDirector,PrincipalInvestigator,or ProjectDirector). 21.DISCOVERYCLAUSE 6

APPENDIX B List of Agencies Approving Use of the SRSF for Negative Surveys (Check periodically for updates) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Game and Fish Department Arizona State Land Department Arizona State Museum Arizona State Parks Bureau of Reclamation Bureau of Land Management City of Phoenix City of Scottsdale Coconino National Forest Customs and Border Patrol Environmental Protection Agency Federal Communications Commission Federal Highways Administration Kaibab National Forest Maricopa County Department of Transportation National Park Service Natural Resources Conservation Service Pima County Prescott National Forest Rural Development/Rural Utilities Service Salt River Project Tonto National Forest U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Forest Service Region 3 Yuma Area Proving Ground 1