Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Similar documents
Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

Report Documentation Page

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Report No. D-2011-RAM-004 November 29, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Projects--Georgia Army National Guard

Report No. DODIG December 5, TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor Program Integrity Units Met Contract Requirements

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

DODIG March 9, Defense Contract Management Agency's Investigation and Control of Nonconforming Materials

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Internal Controls Over the Department of the Navy Cash and Other Monetary Assets Held in the Continental United States

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

at the Missile Defense Agency

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

DoD CBRN Defense Doctrine, Training, Leadership, and Education (DTL&E) Strategic Plan

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Award and Administration of Multiple Award Contracts for Services at U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity Need Improvement

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

INSIDER THREATS. DOD Should Strengthen Management and Guidance to Protect Classified Information and Systems

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

USMC Identity Operations Strategy. Major Frank Sanchez, USMC HQ PP&O

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Report No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Financial Management

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

Information Technology

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Report No. DODIG March 26, General Fund Enterprise Business System Did Not Provide Required Financial Information

Wildland Fire Assistance

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

Report No. D February 22, Internal Controls over FY 2007 Army Adjusting Journal Vouchers

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Acquisition. Diamond Jewelry Procurement Practices at the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (D ) June 4, 2003

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

Complaint Regarding the Use of Audit Results on a $1 Billion Missile Defense Agency Contract

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Preliminary Observations on DOD Estimates of Contract Termination Liability

Report Documentation Page

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Army Environmental Liability Recognition, Valuation, and Reporting June 2010

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Veterans Affairs: Gray Area Retirees Issues and Related Legislation

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information

Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

SIMULATOR SYSTEMS GROUP

Defense Institution Reform Initiative Program Elements Need to Be Defined

Assessment of the DSE 40mm Grenades

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

Report No. D September 22, Kuwait Contractors Working in Sensitive Positions Without Security Clearances or CACs

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Report No. DODIG May 15, Evaluation of DoD Contracts Regarding Combating Trafficking in Persons: Afghanistan

Drinking Water Operator Certification and Certificate to Operate Criteria/Requirements for US Navy Overseas Drinking Water Systems

Report No. DoDIG April 27, Navy Organic Airborne and Surface Influence Sweep Program Needs Defense Contract Management Agency Support

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Value and Innovation in Acquisition and Contracting

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Transcription:

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 2012 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2012 to 00-00-2012 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 - FY 2017 Strategic Plan 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Department of Defense Inspector General,4800 Mark Center Drive,Alexandria,VA,22350-1500 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 12 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

The Department of Defense Office of Inspector General is an independent agency established by the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended. Mission. Our mission is to provide independent, relevant, and timely oversight of the Department of Defense that: Supports the Warfighter; Promotes accountability, integrity, and efficiency; Advises the Secretary of Defense and Congress; and Informs the Public. Vision. Leading Change, Speaking Truth, Promoting Excellence Our vision is to be a model oversight organization in the federal government by leading change, speaking truth, and promoting excellence; a diverse organization, working together as one professional team, recognized as leaders in our field. Values. Integrity Efficiency Accountability Excellence We believe these core values provide a solid foundation for the work that we do. As an organization we work to preserve the trust of the American people by acting with integrity, doing the right thing, at the right time, for the right reasons. We have made a commitment to being good stewards of the resources entrusted to DoD IG, and to strive for excellence in all that we do. Our performance as an organization is shaped in large part by the Inspector General s guiding principles: People, engaged, enabled and empowered, are our most important resource. We are one professional team, always striving to be our best by fostering excellence through unity. We must have integrity in all that we do and strive to do what is right. We must act with fiscal responsibility and be good stewards of taxpayer dollars. We must continue to build and preserve an agency that is relevant, responsive and respected. These guiding principles of the DoD IG, though simply stated, are the pillars of the organization that support our goals and priorities. FY 2012 - FY 2017 DoD IG Strategic Plan Page 1

Priorities We save lives, protect assets, enhance leadership and promote accountability. We have committed to: 1. Support the Warfighter focus on the most critical concerns of the Department, such as the safety of our warfighters and efficient use of resources. 2. Support the Defense Priorities of our Nation, such as to prevail in today s wars, to prepare to defeat adversaries, and succeed in a wide range of contingencies. 3. Support our People, our OIG staff, by striving to achieve the highest levels of employee morale and job satisfaction. 4. Achieve Excellence through Unity. We are a diverse organization, working as one team, always striving to be the best. We are well known and sought after for our professional work. We have an outstanding team of professionals who are talented and knowledgeable, that produce timely and relevant work products of the highest quality. This is how we see the DoD Office of Inspector General and how we want others to see it. Goals. The performance goals for the DoD IG FY 2012- FY 2017 Strategic Plan support the Strategic Goals and Priorities of the Department of Defense: to prevail in today s wars, to prevent and deter conflicts, to prepare to defeat adversaries in a wide range of contingencies, to preserve the All- Volunteer Force, and to implement the President s Reform Agenda. We support these strategic goals and priorities as a model oversight organization working to: Goal 1: Goal 2: Goal 3: Goal 4: Promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness. Identify, deter and investigate fraud, waste, and abuse. Engage, enable, and empower our people. Achieve excellence through unity. FY 2012 - FY 2017 DoD IG Strategic Plan Page 2

Strategic Objectives. GOAL 1: Promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness. Strategic Objectives: 1.1 Identify potential risks and systemic weaknesses in critical DoD programs and operations, and recommend solutions for areas of vulnerability, with an emphasis on those that risk the life and safety of stakeholders. 1.1.1 Continue to focus DoD IG component activities to assess and identify systemic weaknesses such as improper payments, unnecessary losses of funds, and questionable expenditures to improve the economy and efficiency of the Department. 1.1.2 Continue to provide independent and objective audits, evaluations, inspections and investigations of DoD programs and operations; fully inform the Secretary of Defense and Congress of potential problems and deficiencies. Progress towards Goal 1, Objective 1.1 can be demonstrated by measuring impact (e.g., operational performance improvements, money saved, equipment evaluated) of the DoD IG work products on DoD activities; the number of DoD IG work products covering systemic weaknesses; the number of recommendations made and implemented in areas identified as systemic weaknesses in critical DoD programs and operations; and the number of external citations, commendations, honorable mentions or other recognition given to or about staff and operations/processes. 1.2 Identify and promote DoD IG Best Practices across programs and operations to encourage economy, efficiency, and effectiveness. 1.2.1 Develop new ways to respond in a timely and effective manner to inquiries, complaints, and requests, providing recommendations to decision makers. 1.2.2 Analyze internal processes to identify trends and successes. Progress towards Goal 1, Objective 1.2 can be demonstrated by number of processes reviewed/evaluated; number of strengths identified; Best Practices developed/implemented; and number of external citations, commendations, or other recognition given to or about staff and operations/processes. FY 2012 - FY 2017 DoD IG Strategic Plan Page 3

1.3 Provide timely and relevant feedback to the Department through high impact DoD IG products that result in improvements in program and operational performance. 1.3.1 Communicate the results of our work to stakeholders in a timely manner through the use of innovative methods, such as out-briefs, interim reporting and streamlined report formats. Progress towards Goal 1, Objective 1.3 can be demonstrated by component specific metrics, such as the number of opportunities and impact of utilizing interim or streamlined reports/findings formats, and positive feedback reviews for out-briefs, streamlined/interim reporting events, and other methods and formats for providing timely and relevant feedback. 1.4 Assist DoD in improving the security over, and accuracy of, its accounting and performance information. 1.4.1 Regularly work with the Department of Defense to identify, update, and resolve the top Management Challenges. Progress towards Goal 1, Objective 1.4 can be demonstrated by the number of recommendations made compared with the number of recommendations implemented in areas of improving the security over, and accuracy of, DoD s accounting and performance information. FY 2012 - FY 2017 DoD IG Strategic Plan Page 4

Strategic Objectives. GOAL 2: Identify, deter, and investigate fraud, waste, and abuse. Strategic Objectives: 2.1 Increase timeliness and relevance of audits, investigations, inspections and reviews; conduct follow-up reviews to assess implementation. 2.1.1 Component work plans reflect DoD priorities/dod IG Management Challenges and give priority to actions with a potentially broad systemic impact. 2.1.2 Component work plans describe component efforts to improve timeliness and relevance and measure progress. 2.1.3 Follow-up reviews conducted and referred to senior leadership in cases where timely implementation does not occur. Progress towards Goal 2, Objective 2.1 can be demonstrated by the percent of reports and work products that address issues on high risk lists and/or DoD IG Management Challenges and the number of recommendations implemented as per follow-up activities. 2.2 Communicate success stories that can serve as a deterrent to potential fraud, waste, and abuse. 2.2.1 Establish a communications campaign emphasizing the wide range of actions used to deter fraud, waste, and abuse. Progress towards Goal 2, Objective 2.2 can be demonstrated by measuring impact (e.g., operational performance improvements, money recovered, funds put to better use, programs evaluated) of DoD IG actions on DoD operations and programs; the number of proactive opportunities developed to communicate tools for detection (anti-fraud, waste, and abuse campaigns) among staff and within industry. FY 2012 - FY 2017 DoD IG Strategic Plan Page 5

2.3 Increase identification of potential areas of fraud, waste, and abuse that impact the programs and operations of the Department and risk the life and safety of those we support. 2.3.1 Develop the capability to use predictive analytics in support of this objective. 2.3.2 Implement and institutionalize the use of predictive analytics in support of this objective. 2.3.3 Research best practices in combating corruption to determine combinations of tools and training to best assess trends, target areas of greatest vulnerability and gaps in controls; recommend systemic control improvements. Progress towards Goal 2, Objective 2.3 can be demonstrated by the use of tools, trainings and other methods evaluated and implemented for use in assessing trends and targeting likely areas of fraud, waste, and abuse. FY 2012 - FY 2017 DoD IG Strategic Plan Page 6

Strategic Objectives. GOAL 3: Engage, enable and empower our people. Strategic Objectives: 3.1 Invest in our people by promoting individual development and providing resources and support that enable success. 3.1.1 Develop high quality development opportunities for staff through the use of rotations and other inter/intradepartmental opportunities. Broaden selected staff capabilities through temporary assignments and interagency learning opportunities. 3.1.2 Identify Core Skill requirements for each position; identify/develop training to provide opportunities for staff to attain necessary Core Skills. 3.1.3 Encourage staff to develop stretch goals for professional development to include training and education, per funding availability; monitor demand vs. fulfillment of training and education requests. 3.1.4 Provide effective, compliant processes for the protection of DoD IG personnel, information, material and facilities. 3.1.5 Ensure DoD IG personnel are provided a safe working environment. 3.1.6 Provide support, morale enhancement, and accountability of individuals deployed to Southwest Asia. Progress towards Goal 3, Objective 3.1 can be demonstrated by improved employee satisfaction responses on surveys; number of staff involved in development activities per year; percent of individual development plans in place; number of components compliant with OSD Security Directive. 3.2 Invest in the organization by ensuring DoD IG resources meet current and future challenges. 3.2.1 Protect and safeguard DoD IG property and assets against waste, loss, unauthorized use and misappropriation. 3.2.2 Provide timely, effective, comprehensive, and quality products, services and support to DoD IG. FY 2012 - FY 2017 DoD IG Strategic Plan Page 7

3.2.3 Ensure component Strategic Plans are developed, published and shared with staff. Progress towards Goal 3, Objective 3.2 can be demonstrated by percent of accountability records maintained IAW OSD three-year property accountability standard; percent of Components with approved Strategic Plan in place. FY 2012 - FY 2017 DoD IG Strategic Plan Page 8

Strategic Objectives. GOAL 4: Achieve excellence through unity. Strategic Objectives: 4.1 Align component Strategic Plans and performance metrics with DoD IG Strategic Plan. 4.1.1 Review Component Strategic Plans to ensure DoD IG priorities are reflected in Component goals and objectives: Support for the Warfighter; Support for the Defense priorities of our nation; Support for our people; Achievement of excellence through unity. Progress towards Goal 4, Objective 4.1 can be demonstrated by the number of DoD IG Strategic Plan priorities supported in component plans. 4.2 Enhance and sustain a results-oriented, high-performance culture within DoD IG. 4.2.1 Encourage IG and senior leadership to recognize high-performance via All Hands events and awards. 4.2.2 Utilize the DoD IG intranet to share high-performance achievements as DoD IG news. 4.2.3 Recognize milestones achieved by component, position, function, etc. Progress towards Goal 4, Objective 4.2 can be demonstrated by increased recognition of high performance/exemplary results achievements at events held or announcements published quarterly at minimum. 4.3 Develop an inclusive culture for organizational planning. 4.3.1 Develop new ways to assemble cross-component working groups for organizational planning to include a wide range of experience, backgrounds, age and diversity. FY 2012 - FY 2017 DoD IG Strategic Plan Page 9

4.3.2 Establish a cross-component working group to identify stovepiped areas and develop appropriate ways to interact and share information. 4.3.3 Promote use of social media and interactive technologies to increase component interaction and organizational efficiencies. Progress towards Goal 4, Objective 4.3 can be demonstrated by the output recommendations of collaborative teams researching and planning organizational tools, processes and/or reports. FY 2012 - FY 2017 DoD IG Strategic Plan Page 10

Goal Alignment. DoD IG Goals DoD Strategic Goals Prevail Prevent Prepare Preserve Reform GOAL 1: Promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness. X X X X X GOAL 2: Identify, deter and investigate fraud, waste, and abuse. X X X X X GOAL 3: Engage, enable and empower our people. X X X GOAL 4: Achieve excellence through unity. X X Department of Defense Strategic Goals: 1 1) Prevail in today s wars. 2) Prevent and deter conflict. 3) Prepare for wide range of contingencies. 4) Preserve and enhance the all-volunteer force. 5) Implement the Reform Agenda. 1 Sources: 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), Executive Summary, Defense, p. v-vii (goals 1-4); and, the DoD FY2011 Annual Performance Plan, p.1, OSD 13038-10 (goals 1-5). FY 2012 - FY 2017 DoD IG Strategic Plan Page 11