Joint Development of a Non-Magnetic Azimuth Sensor for Dismounted Targeting Operations in All Environments

Similar documents
History of Fire Control and the Application of Implementing Technologies Victor Galgano & Ralph Tillinghast May 2012

Flight Controlled Mortar FCMortar

Picatinny BRAC 05 Information Briefing for ICAP

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

USMC Small Arms Modernization Brief

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 36 R-1 Line #92

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4

Flight Controlled Mortar (FCMortar) for Precision Urban Mortar Attack (PUMA)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory. Dragon Fire II Experimental System NDIA Briefing

Joint Service Small Arms Program (JSSAP) Session

SBIR/Prime Opportunities: A Rapidly Changing Landscape How Do We Move Forward?

Advanced Explosive Ordnance Disposal Robotic System (AEODRS)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Moving Target Artillery Round (MTAR) 2016 NDIA Armament Systems Forum

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

Advanced Capability Extended Range Mortar (ACERM) 2015 NDIA Armament Systems Forum

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

F-35 Lightning II EOTS Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control 2015 Supplier Summit TM

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #29

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

PGK and the Impact of Affordable Precision on the Fires Mission

Standard Missile: Snapshots in Time Captured by Previous Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest Articles

Rapid Development and Integration of Remote Weapon Systems to Meet Operational Requirements Abstract October 2009

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

High Velocity Penetrating Weapon Program Overview

Department of the Navy (DON) Office of Small Business Programs (OSBP) Strategic Priorities

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Armor and Fire Support Systems Product Group 14 Overview

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Distribution Statement A Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND. Proposal Submission

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Long Range Land Attack Projectile (LRLAP)

Briefing for Industry

Department of Defense Technology Transfer, Transition, and Manufacturing 2007 Beyond SBIR Phase II: Bringing Technological Edge to the Warfighter

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Joint Automated Deep Operation Coordination System (JADOCS)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2018 Base FY 2018 OCO

USMC Hybrid Power Efforts

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Advanced Planning Brief to Industry 01 May 2012 PM-Towed Artillery Systems

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Armed Unmanned Systems

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Doing Business With The Marine Corps System Command (MARCORSYSCOM) 2010 APBI Conference

resource allocation decisions.

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Joint Fiber Laser Mission Engagement (J-FLaME) Joint Test

UNCLASSIFIED. RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST (Dollars in Millions) FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 Cost to Complete

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

A Strategy for Naval Energetics Surface Navy Association January 2018

Naval Support Facility. Indian Head. Supporting Our Military and Our Nation INSTALLATION OVERVIEW JULY 2010 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION

Contemporary Issues Paper. Expeditionary Fire Support System. Capt Steven A. Philipp CG #2. Word Count February 06, 2006

Beyond Phase II Conference RIF Overview

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

COST (Dollars in Millions) FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. Michael Caccuitto DoD SBIR/STTR Program Administrator

Lightweight Small Arms Technologies The Final Installment (or is it?)

The recently released National Military Strategy (NMS)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Naval Surface Fire Support

Development and Fielding of the Excalibur XM982 Warhead

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Defense Consortia A Proven Way to Rapidly Develop and Deploy New Armament Capability in Today s Environment

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Development and Fielding of the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) Unitary Warhead

Transcription:

Joint Development of a Non-Magnetic Azimuth Sensor for Dismounted Targeting Operations in All Environments NDIA 44 th Annual Gun & Missile Systems Conference & Exhibition 8 April 2009 Kate Jones NSWC Dahlgren Distribution A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 1

Overview Problem with Current Azimuth Sensors for the Dismounted User Key Performance Parameters Joint Approach to Obtaining a Solution Azimuth & Vertical Angle Measurement (AVAM) Joint Working Group (JWG) Path to AVAM JWG Success Schedule of Joint Development Efforts Pros & Cons of Current Solutions DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 2

The Task What Are We Trying to Do? We are attempting to develop a High Accuracy, Non-Magnetic Azimuth & Vertical Angle Module Joint, Long Term Goal: To Support Joint Effects Targeting System (JETS) with production in 2014 Why? Magnetic anomalies, especially ON the User, are common and result in potentially significant Target Location Error (TLE). Majority of cases, the User is unaware of the interference. Current gear in the field causes azimuth errors of up to 150 mils! GPS guided munitions require more accuracy than is available in current dismounted targeting sensors Require <20m (T), <10m (O) according to Naval Surface Fire Support requirement JDAM Excalibur Users are unaware of magnetic anomalies caused by their gear which affect azimuth error by up to 150 mils Munitions have already been fielded requiring a solution within as short a timeframe as possible DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 3

Target Location Error Definition Target Location Error 50 (TLE50): TLE50 is a measure of deviation from the actual location of a target and defined as the radius of a circle which is centered at the actual target coordinate in which 50% of the observations are contained. x x Current technologies allow the User to very precisely miss targets. Old Targeting System Old Weapon System Old Targeting System New Weapon System DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 4

Key Performance Parameters Key Parameter Near-Term External / Tripod Mount Threshold (T) Long-Term Internal / Fully Integrated Objective (O) Azimuth Accuracy ±4 mils Probable Error (PE) ±1 mil PE Vertical Angle Accuracy ±4 mils PE ±1 mil PE Orientation Range Pitch: ±500 mils (~30 ) Bank: ±270 mils (~15 ) Pitch: ±1511 mils (~85 ) Bank: ±500 mils (~30 ) Slew Rate 30 per second 1000 per second Set up Time < 180 seconds < 1 second Operational Temperature -40 C - +70 C -40 C - +70 C Shock 40g / 11 ms 2000 g / 1.5 ms (weapon fire) Vibration MILSTD 810/ min integrity MILSTD 810/ min integrity Volume 50 cu in 0.25 cu in Weight 4.0 lbs ( 2.0 lbs preferred) 0.2 lbs Power 10.0 W ( 2.0 W preferred) 250 mw Average Unit Production Cost (FY07 dollars) $20K TBD DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 5

AVAM JWG Participants Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), Dahlgren Division (Chair) Army Product Manager (PM) Soldier Sensors & Lasers (SSL) Office of Naval Research (ONR) Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) Program Manager (PM) Fire Support Systems (FSS) Night Vision & Electronic Sensors Directorate (NVESD) Johns Hopkins University (JHU) / Applied Physics Lab (APL) NSWC, Crane Division Air Force Research Lab (AFRL) Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Marine Corps Warfighting Lab (MCWL) DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 6

AVAM JWG History Government funded efforts laid a foundation for current collaboration Limited coordination across DoD resulted in duplication of efforts Spurred initiation of quarterly JWG meetings The 2007 Joint Precision Azimuth Sensing Conference (JPASC) Opportunity for ALL government stakeholders to listen to industry representation Determine what progress was being made in the field of azimuth sensing Present unified front to industry and demonstrate the need & market for azimuth sensing Close collaboration between Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) Program Manager Fire Support Systems (PM FSS), Office of Naval Research (ONR) 30 (Fires), Army Product Manager Soldier Sensors & Lasers (PM SSL), Night Vision & Electronic Sensors Directorate (NVESD), Special Operations Command (SOCOM), Johns Hopkins University / Applied Physics Lab (JHU/APL), and others (2007-present) Several development efforts underway to meet a joint requirement for a nonmagnetic azimuth sensor Collaboration during proposal evaluation prevented duplication of efforts Joint attendance encouraged at status meetings with contractors DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 7

AVAM JWG Evolution Organization Contract Vehicle Contractor Direction Provided Prior to FY08 NSWC Dahlgren AFRL Army PM SSL/NVESD NSWC Crane 1 1 FY08 NSWC Dahlgren Army PM SSL NVESD NSWC Crane AVAM JWG 2 3 4 5 6 AVAM JWG 7 8 CONCEPTUAL PURPOSES ONLY DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 8

AVAM JWG Evolution (cont.) Organization Contract Vehicle Contractor Direction Provided 4 5 6 FY09 & Future NSWC Dahlgren Army PM SSL NVESD NSWC Crane AVAM JWG 1 2 3 AVAM JWG 7 8 9 CONCEPTUAL PURPOSES ONLY DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 9

Path to JWG Success Significant effort & vigilance by all involved is required to establish & maintain joint forum Frequent & open communication Quarterly JWG meetings Joint proposal evaluations Joint attendance at contractor status meetings Report distribution Joint demonstrations / tests JPASC / industry days Tools for sharing information Set aside differences early Goal is to find a solution, regardless of funding source Define common requirements Acknowledge differences in implementation No feelings of ownership towards specific technologies Deliberate collaboration is required to achieve a successful Joint Working Group DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 10

Tools Online tools are used to share data within the AVAM JWG All government support contractors must have appropriate, active Non-Disclosure Agreements on file AVAM JWG meetings are scheduled using the Discussion & JWG Announcements page. Notification can be sent to all members when items are posted, simplifying the scheduling process. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 11

Joint Development Efforts for AVAM Sponsoring Organizations FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S S&T Efforts MCSC SBIR JPASC JPASC-II Phase I Phase II NVESD SBIR Phase I Phase II ONR 30 (Fires) NMAS Short Term NMAS Long Term Army PM SSL NVESD SBIR HAAVM Phase I Near Term Solution (HAAD) Phase II NSWC Dahlgren chairs the AVAM JWG. Members include Army PM SSL, MCSC PM FSS, ONR 30 Fires, NVESD, JHU/APL, and others. DARPA Long Term Sol n Phase III Phase IV NVESD (LEAD & contracting agency), ONR Fires (via NMAS), Army PM SSL, MCSC PM FSS (via NMAS) TLDS ATO-D Procurement Schedules MCSC PM FSS CLRF TNM ECP DT/OT Increment 2 - SDD Phase JETS Army PM SSL LLDR LTLM DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 12 JETS

FY09 Alternatives Analysis Approach Perf. < 4 mil (T) Size Weight < 50 in 3 < 2 lb Power < 5 W Cost < 20 K Maturity FY09 GPS Ring Laser Gyro Fiber Optic Gyro Hemispherical Resonator Gyro Fluid Based Gyro MEMS Celestial requires unobstructed view of the sky Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 13

Summary All services currently have the capability to very precisely miss targets All services require small, lightweight, precise azimuth sensor unaffected by the environment Joint development efforts are capitalizing on DoD investment to develop suitable azimuth sensors DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 14