Financial Disclosure. Learning Objectives. None. Using Technology to Build a Grassroots Approach to A Community Needs Assessment

Similar documents
Survivorship Care: Building a Program

Oncology Data Management Systems

The Point of Care Ecosystem Four Benefits of a Fully Connected Outpatient Experience

History of Patient Navigation 8/26/17. Cancer Navigation September 26, Agenda

An Initiative to Improve Patient Discharge Satisfaction

Initial Assessment, Survivorship Care Plans

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Patient Navigation Programs Leveraging Care Pathways. Tina Evans, RN, BS Director of Nursing,Onco-Nav

PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES AT THE ABRAMSON CANCER CENTER

Module 1 Program Description

Accountable Health Communities

Accessibility, Utilization, and Availability of Services

Telemedicine. Provided by Clark & Associates of Nevada, Inc.

ED Care Coordination Pathway Partnership

September, James Misak, M.D. Linda Stokes, MSPH The MetroHealth System

Health and Behavior Intervention Audit Tool

2017 Catastrophic Care. Program Evaluation. Our mission is to improve the health and quality of life of our members

Administrators. Medical Directors. 61% The negative impact on our hospital-based program s. 44% We will need to consider the most appropriate or most

A Hear from Your Peers Webinar Effective Coordination between Hospitals and CoC Homeless Assistance Providers Results in Improved Residential

Turning Big Data Into Better Care

Inpatient Anticoagulation Management Services to Improve Transitions of Care

PCORI Funding Announcement (PFA):

Begin Implementation. Train Your Team and Take Action

Social Work Assessment and Outcomes Measurement in Hospice and Palliative Care

Domain 1 Patient Engagement

Appendix - A: Telecommuter Questionnaire

Psychosocial Oncology Specialization PRACTICUM AGENCY ROSTER

CARE COORDINATION PROJECT

The Impact of Community Health Needs Assessments

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Summary of Key Health Information Technology Provisions June 1, 2010

COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT HINDS, RANKIN, MADISON COUNTIES STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

How Allina Saved $13 Million By Optimizing Length of Stay

Jumpstarting population health management

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Work and Family Conflict: A Comparative Analysis Among Staff Nurses, Nurse Managers, and Nurse Executives

Partnering with Managed Care Entities A Path to Coordination and Collaboration

Costs Beyond the Cost: Challenges of Utilizing an Enterprise EMR in Hospital Urgent Care

Provider Status: Just Where Are We?

Quality on the Frontlines: Coordinating Care Across Sectors and Achieving Better Outcomes

2.b.iii ED Care Triage for At-Risk Populations

URAC Patient Centered Medical Home

AN OPPORTUNITY TO INTEGRATE NUTRITION SERVICES IN YOUR LOCAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM

Integration of a Standardized Scalable Solution for Video Telemedicine into the Traditional Practice Model

2.b.iv Care Transitions Intervention Model to Reduce 30-day Readmissions for Chronic Health Conditions

CMS Oncology Care Model s Standards for Patient Navigation

The Future of Gig Work is Female. The Future of Gig Work is Female. A study on the behaviors and career aspirations of women in the gig economy

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

2017 Oncology Insights

Developing Post- Hospital Follow-Up Care Plans and Real-time Handover Communications Peg Bradke

2012 CoC Standards: University of Kansas Hospital Cancer Committee Goals. Tim Metcalf, BS, CTR Cancer Registry Manager

Collaborative Care: Case Study of Integrating Primary Care in a Mental Health Setting Beat Steiner MD MPH Brian Sheitman MD

Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Program. Fall 2012 Demographics Survey

Clinically Focused. Outcomes Oriented. Technology Driven. Chronic Care Management. eqguide. (CPT Codes 99490, 99487, 99489)

Midmark White Paper Building Your Connected Point of Care Ecosystem. Point Of Care Ecosystem Series Part Four

All Providers Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

QUALITY MEASURES WHAT S ON THE HORIZON

Meaningful Use of EHRs to Improve Patient Care Session Code: A11 & B11

Improving Access in Infusion Therapy

Navigating Standard 3.1

8/31/2015. Session C719 Outcomes of a Study Addressing Challenges in APRN Practice and Strategies for Success. Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Long-Stay Alternate Level of Care in Ontario Mental Health Beds

Artificial Intelligence Changes Evidence Based Medicine A Scalable Health White Paper

Using Data for Proactive Patient Population Management

Quality Measures and Federal Policy: Increasingly Important and A Work in Progress. American Health Quality Association Policy Forum Washington, D.C.

Lymphoma einformation Project (LeIP) CLINICAL TRIALS Lymphoma Situation Analysis Report

1 Stand-Alone 2 Co-located (or embedded)

Passport Advantage (HMO SNP) Model of Care Training (Providers)

MLK MACC Organizational Structure (Deliverable #3)

Utilizing Mega Planning Theory in the Development of a New Graduate Medical Education Program: A CLER Vision

Electronic Medical Records (EMR) and Individualization of Documentation

MPA Reference Guide. Millennium Collaborative Care

VNAA Blueprint for Excellence PATHWAY TO BEST PRACTICES

Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities in Health and Health Care St. Louis Regional Data

Iatric Systems Supports the Achievement of Meaningful Use

Q I. Quality Improvement Work Plan FY

CRITICAL CARE NURSES OPINIONS REGARDING CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Preliminary Evaluation Findings NJHI-Expecting Success in Cardiac Care

CMS-0044-P; Proposed Rule: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 2

PCQN Forum. Steven Pantilat, MD Kara Bischoff, MD Angela Marks, MSEd. PCQN Conference May 3, 2018

Appendix 5. PCSP PCMH 2014 Crosswalk

Passport Advantage Provider Manual Section 10.0 Care Management

New Facts and Figures on Hospice Care in America

Hillside Medical Office

Mina Li, MD., PhD., CSM Institute for Disability Studies (IDS) The University of Southern Mississippi

January 04, Submitted Electronically

South Carolina Cancer Alliance. Letter of Intent Guidelines for FY Implementation Projects

Improving Health Equity Through Data Collection AND Use: A Guide for Hospital Leaders

Pediatric Integration of Behavioral Health Grant Opportunity 2015 Request for Proposal

Patient-Centered Specialty Practice: Building the Medical Neighborhood

Summary of CMMI Accountable Health Communities Model

Transitional Care Management (TCM) and Chronic Care Management (CCM) Overview and Billing Process. April 19, :00 PM

Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Preparing an Advocacy Strategy. The Consumer Partnership for ehealth

MCS Model of Care For Special Needs Plans (SNP) Annual training for delegated entities and facilities

May 16, Discussion Draft. Marketing, Outreach & Education and Assisters Program for the California Coverage

A Regional Payer/Provider Partnership to Reduce Readmissions The Bronx Collaborative Care Transitions Program: Outcomes and Lessons Learned

U.S. Healthcare Problem

SAMPLE CARE COORDINATION AGREEMENT

Rapid-Learning Healthcare Systems

The ins and outs of CDE 10 steps for addressing clinical documentation excellence

Perceptions of Family Cancer Caregivers in Tanzania: A Qualitative Study. Allison Walker

Transcription:

Using Technology to Build a Grassroots Approach to A Community Needs Assessment Tim Mullett, MD Joan Scales, LCSW University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky None Financial Disclosure Learning Objectives Participants will gain an understanding of scalable, cancer-focused patient-centered Community Needs Assessment (CNA) Participants will understand this method of discovering barriers and disparities in specific at-risk cancer populations Participants should understand how to develop a continuous process improvement to enhance the CNA

The Typical CNA Only performed triennially All look the same Medicaid template Regional/State Population statistics may not be representative of your cancer population No new information The Elusive Targeted Community Needs Assessment Our goal was to develop a targeted CNA Cancer patient focused Patient-centered Align needs with resources available Allow identified barriers/disparities to guide program/resource development Ideal Community Needs Assessment Collect data from patients/caregivers/providers Different perspectives Scalable for different populations (hospital-wide, inpatient, outpatient, ICU, etc.) Easily examine a segment of the cancer population A clinic A disease site Race/Gender/Socioeconomic Factors Phase of care (Diagnosis, Treatment, Survivorship, etc.) Collect on a continuous basis Identify trends Easily prepared for triennial CoC Survey Doesn t distract from daily workflow of patients/caregivers/providers

Survey Origin Qualtrics Demographics, assess participants awareness of personal barriers and awareness of resources in UK and outside Administered via tablet to patients, caregivers and providers (Nurses, Physicians, Technicians, Social Workers) During registration/waiting room down No special training/qualification required Posted link to Markey Cancer Center website Posted link to UK Healthcare homepage E-mail contact with providers Intake Patient Survey Demographics Potential barrier questions Knowledge of resources available to patients Description of factors impacting their care Questions regarding support groups Also delivered to caregivers Provider Survey Demographics Provider perception of patient barriers Provers perceptions of internal barriers Results Received information from patients first hand not outside entity gathering general information Had 455 patient/caregiver participants 77 health care providers

Qualtrics Survey Qualtrics Survey Qualtrics Data

Summary Demographic Markey Cancer Center CNA 69% female; 30% male 61% married Largest group of respondents were between the ages of 45 74 53% income <$2000/mo 199%FPL Education Less than high school 9.1% 41 High school graduate 29.8% 134 Some college 19.6% 88 College graduate 26.1% 41 Professional & Doctorate 15.4% 49 Total 100% 449 Survey Results Patients/Caregivers 12% of patients did not perceive transportation as a concern 54% of respondents reported finances were NOT a concern 25% of respondents report having met with OSW 65% of respondents reported having not met with MCC support services or were not aware services were available Providers 71% of providers perceived transportation as concern 85% of providers perceived finances as a concern 79% of providers report they refer patients to OSW 50% of providers were confident their patients followed up with their referrals Survey Results Patient barriers Travel distance Finances Taking time off from work Transportation Provider barriers Time Patient appt compliance Lack of communication Adequate staffing

Future Direction Inpatient Outpatient Clinic environment Evolution of questions More specific Financial determinant Continuous data collection Disseminate information for resource allocation Summary Versatile platform to gather specific information from the cancer population and providers Can be used to illustrate barriers to leadership and align resources Will be important to compare this data with the generic population data, to be certain that we are eliminating barriers for the population we can serve, but are not yet patients/caregivers