Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Similar documents
Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15. Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

Redefining how Relative Values are determined on Fitness Reports EWS Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain S.R. Walsh to Maj Tatum 19 Feb 08

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Submitted by Captain RP Lynch To Major SD Griffin, CG February 2006

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

Improving the Tank Scout. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain R.L. Burton CG #3, FACADs: Majors A.L. Shaw and W.C. Stophel 7 February 2006

Where Have You Gone MTO? Captain Brian M. Bell CG #7 LTC D. Major

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Sustaining the Marine Corps Martial Arts Program. EWS Contemporary Issues Paper. Submitted by Captain G.S. Rooker. Major Gelerter / Major Uecker, CG#3

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

Marine Corps Mentoring Program. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. D. Watson to CG #10 FACAD: Major P. J. Nugent 07 February 2006

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Closing the Barn Doors After the Cows Have Left: MCRC s Solution to the Recruiter Shortfall EWS Subject Area Manpower

The Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test: The Need to Replace it with a Combat Fitness Test EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain E. M.

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

No Time for Boats EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain P. B. Byrne to Major A. L. Shaw and Major W. C. Stophel, CG 3 7 February 2006

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Adapting the Fitness Report: Evolving an intangible quality into a tangible evaluation to

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Joint Terminal Attack Controller, A Primary MOS For The Future. EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain M.J. Carroll to Major P.M.

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

The Need for NMCI. N Bukovac CG February 2009

Rethinking Tactical HUMINT in a MAGTF World EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Capt M.S. Wilbur To Major Dixon, CG 8 6 January 2006

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

The Need for a New Battery Option. Subject Area General EWS 2006

New Tactics for a New Enemy By John C. Decker

USMC Identity Operations Strategy. Major Frank Sanchez, USMC HQ PP&O

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Report Documentation Page

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Marine Officer Promotions: Incentivizing and Retaining Top Performers. Captain Michael J. Lorino

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

IMPROVING SPACE TRAINING

USMC Expeditionary Energy

Marine Security Guard Program at Risk: Can the Marine Corps Continue to Support the Program?

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

Area Fire Weapons in a Precision Environment: Field Artillery in the MOUT Fight

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Blue on Blue: Tracking Blue Forces Across the MAGTF Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain D.R. Stengrim to: Major Shaw, CG February 2005

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Wildland Fire Assistance

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Shallow-Water Mine Countermeasure Capability for USMC Ground Reconnaissance Assets EWS Subject Area Warfighting

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

In 2007, the United States Army Reserve completed its

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Potential Savings from Substituting Civilians for Military Personnel (Presentation)

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

THE TEXAS MEDICAL RANGERS AND THOUSANDS OF PATIENTS e. Sergeant First Class Brenda Benner, TXARNG

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

Report No. D February 9, Internal Controls Over the United States Marine Corps Military Equipment Baseline Valuation Effort

DETENTION OPERATIONS IN A COUNTERINSURGENCY

GAO AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Budgeting and Management of Carryover Work and Funding Could Be Improved

Transcription:

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency EWS 2005 Subject Area Strategic Issues Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Capt D. W. Harlow To Maj R. H. Duryea and Maj R. M. Dixon, CG-15 February 8, 2005

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 08 FEB 2005 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2005 to 00-00-2005 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) United States Marine Corps,Command Staff College Marine Corps University,2076 South Street, Marine Corps Combat Development Command,Quantico,VA,22134-5068 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 11 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

With the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) and Marine Corps human and materiel resources being stretched to the limit, the need for Marines in the Operating Forces has never been greater. Many Marines are currently deployed in Afghanistan or Iraq, some on their second or even third tour in that country. Still others are deployed in response to humanitarian assistance operations, other contingencies, or as part of routine deployments. There are incredible demands on Marine Corps recruiting and manpower to seek out and train qualified personnel, and to retain and appropriately assign quality Marines. In an effort to alleviate some of this demand, an available resource of Marines is now being tapped. Necessity has forced the Marine Corps to look toward billets in the supporting establishments (bases and stations) that do not have to be filled by Marines, and convert those billets over to civilians as a solution to the shortage in manpower. The Secretary of Defense mandated that each military service branch convert a specific number of military billets to civilian billets. The Marine Corps was tasked with converting no less than 1372 billets in FY05, says Master Sergeant Thomas Delaney of the Logistics Modernization Transition Task Force at Headquarters Marine Corps. 1 A plethora of billets in the Marine Corps' bases and stations are currently being filled by Marines who could be performing their MOS 1

specific role in the Operating Forces. Many of these billets do not require Marines and could easily be converted to civilian jobs. To that end, Marine billets without a warfighting application should be civilianized to relieve the shortage of manpower in the Operating Forces. A Well Trained Force Marines usually call what they do "work" or their "job", when in actuality, they are training. Everything Marines do on a daily basis should be focused on training and preparing for war, and Marines should be training to perform their MOS specific role in a wartime scenario. The focus of all Marine training, and subsequently all Marine billet assignments, should be to sharpen a Marine s skills in order for him or her to better perform their role in combat. Base and station tours that do not achieve this end should be civilianized. It doesn t make sense to have Marines doing things that are not inherently military, says Lieutenant Colonel Edward Martin, Deputy Director of Logistics at Marine Corps Base Quantico. Anytime you can get Marines back into the operating forces, that is a good thing. 2 Every Marine should leave his or her last assignment better prepared to serve to the advantage of the Marine Corps in battle. Many base and station tours do not do this, in fact, 2

they often allow a Marine's skills to dull over the two or three years that he or she is in that billet and not deploying. However, there are necessary exceptions that should not be considered for conversion. Non-fleet tours or "B billets like recruiting, training, and other billets within the supporting establishment, must be done by Marines. The Marine Corps still needs professional recruiters to sell the Marine Corps to young adults. There will always be a need for Marines at the recruit depots, Officer Candidates School, and other schools and training commands. Also, there are numerous base and station tours that keep a Marine's MOS skills sharp, even though he or she is not in the operating forces and not deploying. The aforementioned exceptions not withstanding, keeping as many Marines as possible in the Operating Forces and in their MOS will help ensure that the Marine Corps maintains a well trained force. Returning Marine billets to the Operating Forces and retaining them Civilianizing billets that do not require Marines will return desperately needed Marines to the Operating Forces. It will ease some the burden of the Marine Corp s recruiting, retention, and staffing challenges. Many operating force units 3

are below staffing goal and need the Marines that are trapped in base and station billets. Also, many base and station jobs are mundane. Most young adults join the Marine Corps for a challenge and some excitement. Some new Marines end up in assignments in the supporting establishments that give them neither. They soon become bored and complacent. As MOS skills dull and job satisfaction fades, so does the desire to stay in the Marine Corps. First term Marines, the hardest category to reenlist, often fall into this paradox and leave the Marine Corps after their end of obligated service. The Marine Corps loses a quality Marine unnecessarily. Who should convert and how? The leadership at Marine Corps bases and stations need to look at all Marine billets there and ask: 1. Does this job have to be done by a Marine? 2. Does this job have a wartime application? If the answer to either question is no, then converting the billet to a civilian job should be considered. Candidates for conversion are typically found in the provost marshal's office, 4

game warden's office, supply and logistics, facilities and maintenance, transportation, housing and traffic management, etc. Base and station business performance offices have the available resources to work with units and civilian human resources departments to identify suitable candidates for conversion and assist during the transition process. The process is relatively simple: 1. Identify candidates for conversion. 2. Work with Marine higher headquarters (manpower) to return those billets to the Operating Forces and assign them appropriately. 3. Advertise, recruit, and train the new civilian force. 4. Return Marines to the Operating Forces. The Benefits The benefits of Military to Civilian conversion are abundant, both at the strategic level where the aim is efficiency, and at the tactical level where the goal is 5

effectiveness. Once complete, quality Marines return to the Operating Forces, alleviating some of the recruiting and retention burden, and apply their MOS specific skill where it is needed the most: in the Operating Forces. Ideally, the Marine has more job satisfaction and stays in the Corps. The civilians replacing the billets formerly held by Marines will provide long-term continuity, which increases proficiency over time and ultimately improves the services provided in the supporting establishments. Counter argument Some Marines look around the bases and stations and swear that the Marine Corps is being contracted out. Where a Marine used to be greeted by another Marine at the supply or housing office front desk, there is now a civilian. What many don't know is that it's actually less expensive to pay civilians to do the same job. Most civilians are considered a.7 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) to a Marine. That means that where ten Marines would be required to perform a function, the same function could be done by seven civilians. The logic behind this formula is based on the amount of time that Marines spend away from their job attending required training, professional military education, temporary additional duty, leave, and liberty. Most civilian union contracts stipulate longer hours and less time 6

off than their Marine counterparts who work in the same base or station office. The reality of Military to Civilian Conversion is that we re not trying to reduce the size of the Corps. On the contrary, we re trying to create more warfighters without increasing Marine Corps structure. 3 Another argument is that Marines like having a Marine behind the counter to help them, because a fellow Marine better understands the situation and needs of another Marine. Rest assured that that Marine can provide a better service to his fellow Marines by being back in the fleet, doing his or her MOS specific duty, and providing quality service support in the Operating Forces. The same quality service will also be provided by civilians who can stay in the job longer, as the turnover is not as high as a Marine who will transfer every two years. Civilians provide long term continuity to supporting establishment billets, increasing proficiency and effectiveness. In spite of the numerous benefits of Military to Civilian conversion, a measure of caution must be taken when considering potential candidates. Military to civilian conversion efforts must be conducted with the knowledge that Marine Corps bases and stations exist to support the training, equipping, and deployment of Marine forces. Marine Corps installations, the fifth element of the MAGTF, exist only to support the Operating Forces. 4 Military to civilian conversions should not degrade 7

this effort by reducing responsiveness or eliminating essential functions and services that are best done by Marines. Conclusion Most of the Department of Defense has studied the benefits of converting non-essential military billets over to civilians and has implemented numerous conversions. The Marine Corps is now embracing this idea and doing the same. 5 For example, Marine Corps Base Quantico is currently in the process of converting nearly 100 billets over to civilians during Fiscal Year 2005. Most of the billets are within the bases's Logistics and Facilities Divisions. 6 The Marines currently assigned to those billets will train the incoming civilian force, and then those Marines will return to the Operating Forces where they are needed most. The benefits of military to civilian conversion are abundant. The Marine Corps should continue to exploit this human resource and return Marines to the Operating Forces in order to relieve some of the recruiting, retention, and staffing challenges. Military to civilian conversion successfully marries the best of the strategic and tactical worlds, where effectiveness meets efficiency. 8

1 Notes Master Sergeant T. A. DeLaney, Logistics Modernization Transition Task Force, Installations and Logistics, Headquarters Marine Corps, USMC, letter to author, January 2 Lieutenant Colonel E. Martin, Deputy Director, Logistics Division, Marine Corps Base Quantico, USMC, letter to author, January 3 Master Sergeant T. A. DeLaney, Logistics Modernization Transition Task Force, Installations and Logistics, Headquarters Marine Corps, USMC, letter to author, January 24, 2005. 4 Stephen A. Vines, "Installations Strategic Planning", Marine Corps Gazette, October 2004, 18. 5 Marine Corps Administrative Message (MARADMIN) 027/04. 6 Lieutenant Colonel E. Martin, Deputy Director, Logistics Division, Marine Corps Base Quantico, USMC, letter to author, January 26, 2005. 9

Bibliography Delaney, T. A., Master Sergeant, USMC. Logistics Modernization Transition Task Force, Installations and Logistics, Headquarters Marine Corps. Letter to author, January 24, 2005. Headquarters Marine Corps, Marine Corps Administrative Message (MARADMIN) 027/04. Martin, E., Lieutenant Colonel, USMC. Deputy Director, Logistics Division, Marine Corps Base Quantico. Letter to author, January 26, 2005. Staff, HqSvcBn, MCB Quantico. "The Fifth Element in a Post-9/11 World". Marine Corps Gazette, October 2004, 37. Vines, Stephen A. "Installations Strategic Planning". Marine Corps Gazette, October 2004, 18. Williams, W. J., Brigadier General, USMC. "Bases and Stations: Are They Relevant?" Marine Corps Gazette, October 2004, 12. 10