Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain Cristina CORREA SÁINZ.

Similar documents
Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain Cristina CORREA SÁINZ.

DIRECTIVES. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2009/71/EURATOM of 25 June 2009 establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations

NRC Public Meeting October 27, 2014

LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS COUNCIL DIRECTIVE establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations

Life Extension of Nuclear Power Plants

Licensing of Nuclear Installations

HUMBOLDT BAY INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION LICENSE APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

Radiation Protection Program Updates

République du SENEGAL. Un Peuple -Un But -Une Foi CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY. Seventh Review Meeting. Vienna-Austria

REVIEW PROCESS AND LICENSING FOR RESEARCH REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES IN ROMANIA

Convention on Nuclear Safety

Testimony On the 2016 Decommissioning Cost Estimate for Palo Verde Units 1, 2, & 3

INTEGRATED REGULATORY REVIEW SERVICE (IRRS)

Royal Decree 1546/2004, of June 25 th, approving the Basic Nuclear Emergency Plan

Overview of the Regulatory Framework for the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants in Romania

24 th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology

Radiation protection and public health of nuclear professionals and the public living in the vicinity of radiation hazardous facilities in Russia

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS SERIES. GENERAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS No. GSR Part 1 (Rev.1)

Regulatory challenges in nuclear safety

IAEA MISSION TO REVIEW NISA S APPROACH TO THE COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SAFETY OF EXISTING POWER REACTOR FACILITIES

Organized in cooperation with the Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD/NEA)

The Code of Conduct on the Safety of Research Reactors

Licensing of a Nuclear Installation. November 11th 2010 Licensing of a Nuclear Installation 1

Nuclear Safety Council (State Official Gazette No. 268 of 8 th November 2007) October 2007, on the CSN Resident

EXTRAORDINARY PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY. ISLAMABAD, THURSDAY, March 1, 2012

Topical Peer Reviews, ARTEMIS and other Approaches to Peer Review

Testimony On The Reasonableness Of The SONGS 2&3 Nuclear Decommissioning Activities And Costs Incurred During

May 23, Docket No License No. DPR-12

Functions important to nuclear power plant safety, and training and qualification of personnel

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

Convention on Nuclear Safety 7 th Review Meeting 2017

NRC UPDATE EP REGULATORY ACTIVITIES. Glenn M. Tracy / Kathy Halvey Gibson Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Physical Protection of Nuclear Installations After 11 September 2001

NATIONAL NUCLEAR REGULATOR

Nuclear Safety Charter

EMERGENCY ARRANGEMENTS OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Supervision in France

Regulatory framework and safety requirements for new (gen III) reactors

IAEA Safety Standards for Regulatory Bodies Overview and Recent Development

National Presentation - Indonesia - Setiyanto & Khoirul Huda

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Nuclear Law and Malaysian Legal Framework on Nuclear Security AISHAH BIDIN FACULTY OF LAW UKM

Fundamental Principles

National Report related to the Convention of Nuclear Safety

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

OVERVIEW OF THE NRC'S CONSOLIDATED NMSS DECOMMISSIONING GUIDANCE

EU Stress Tests and National Action Plans

INTEGRATED REGULATORY REVIEW SERVICE (IRRS)

NEI [Revision 0] Guidelines for a Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program

1. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR SECTION 1. Legislative and Regulatory Framework

PLANNING AND PROGRESS FOR DECOMMISSIONING OF HEAVY WATER RESEARCH REACTOR

Record of Proceedings, Including Reasons for Decision

Topical Peer Review 2017 Ageing Management of Nuclear Power Plants

Approaches and Methods to Conduct Regulatory Safety Review and Assessment

Vietnam Agency for Radiation and Nuclear Safety (VARANS), 113 Tran Duy Hung, Hanoi, Vietnam Corresponding author: Luu Nam Hai

Swedish Radiation Safety Authority Regulatory Code

A Brief Synopsis of Army Contributions to Early Health Physics and Nuclear Engineering

7 TH REVIEW MEETING OF THE CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY VIENNA, AUSTRIA, 27 MARCH - 7 APRIL 2017

Establishing Nuclear Regulatory Infrastructure in Bangladesh: IAEA Cooperation

MISSION REPORT ON THE INTEGRATED NUCLEAR INFRASTRUCTURE REVIEW (INIR)

The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

HERCA Guidance Implementation of RPE and RPO requirements of BSS Directive Nov Index

Occupational Radiation Protection in the European Union: Achievements, Opportunities and Challenges

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE TECHNICAL SERVICES CATALOGUE

DOE B, SAFEGUARDS AGREEMENT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC SYMBOL, AND OTHER CHANGES HAVE BEEN BY THE REVISIONS,

VERIFICATION OF READINESS TO START UP OR RESTART NUCLEAR FACILITIES

Regulation on Decommissioning of Nuclear Installation

NIS technical briefing note

Post- Fukushima accident. Action plan. Follow-up of the peer review of the stress tests performed on European nuclear power plants

NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY RADIATION SAFETY OFFICERS FOR MEDICAL-USE LICENSES UNDER 10 CFR PART 35

Measures to Strengthen International Co-operation in Nuclear, Radiation and Transport Safety and Waste Management

REGULATORY DOCUMENTS. The main classes of regulatory documents developed by the CNSC are:

Radiation Safety Code of Practice

(2) Ensure measures are established to control health and safety hazards from ionizing radiation sources and radioactive material.

NUCLEAR SAFETY PROGRAM

Regulatory Guide 3.67 Standard Format and Content for Emergency Plans for Fuel Cycle and Materials Facilities

Health and Safety in the lab. Seyed Hosseini SA Pathology Chemical Pathology

NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY REQUIREMENTS FOR EXEMPT DISTRIBUTION LICENSEE ANNUAL TRANSFER REPORTS

Final Report. (Main Text)

Republic of Croatia CROATIAN REPORT ON NUCLEAR SAFETY 6 TH CROATIAN NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE

The Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD) A Model for Networking, Cooperation, Information Exchange and Regulation Harmonization

CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION S RISK BASED APPROACH TO REGULATING FUEL FACILITIES IN CANADA

Canada. Record of Decision. In the Matter of. University of Alberta. Applicant

TO ALL LICENSEES OF OPERATING PLANTS, APPLICANTS FOR AN OPERATING LICENSE, AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

IAEA MISSION TO REVIEW NISA S APPROACH TO THE COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SAFETY OF EXISTING POWER REACTOR FACILITIES CONDUCTED IN JAPAN

Emergency Preparedness and Response System for Nuclear Accidents in Argentina

Overview of Safeguards, Security, and Treaty Verification

Massey University Radiation Safety Plan Version

Acquisition Path Analysis as a Collaborative Activity A.El Gebaly a, R.Grundule a, K.Gushchyn a, R.Higgy a, W.Mandl a, A.Nakao a, I.

Worker Safety and Health Support Annex. Coordinating Agency: Mississippi State Department of Health (MSDH)

Emergency Preparedness and Response in China

Global Security Evolution

OSART. Operational Safety Review Teams

Basic training module 3: Occupational radiation protection

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Occupational Ionizing Radiation Protection Program

Are the conclusions of the IAEA Fukushima Daiichi report of relevance in a Nordic context?

Establishing Nuclear Security Infrastructure for a Nuclear Power Programme

INTEGRATED REGULATORY REVIEW SERVICE (IRRS)

SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY

MEDICAL-TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: BIOLOGICAL/INFECTIOUS DISEASE

Transcription:

PREDEC 2016: Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain, February 16-18, Lyon, France Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain Cristina CORREA SÁINZ. Enresa, Emilio Vargas 7, 28043 Madrid, Spain Keywords: decommissioning, regulatory framework 1.- Introduction The Enresa experience related to the decommissioning of nuclear facilities includes the decommissioning of the Vandellós I and José Cabrera NPPs. The Vandellós I gas-graphite reactor was decommissioned in about five years (from 1998 to 2003) to what is known as level 2. Figure 1: Vandellós 1 site in period of latency (Enresa) In February 2010, the decommissioning of José Cabrera power plant has been initiated and it is scheduled to be finished by 2018. The decommissioning of a nuclear power plant is a complex administrative process, the procedure for changing from operation to decommissioning is established in the Spanish law. This paper summarizes the legal framework defining the strategies, the main activities and the basic roles of the various agents involved in the decommissioning of nuclear facilities in Spain. It also describes briefly the Licensing documents required to obtain the decommissioning authorization and the Enresa point of view, as licensee, on the licensing decommissioning process. 2.- Responsibilities and Organization in Spain The organization and responsibilities involved in the decommissioning of nuclear facilities in Spain are legally defined by Royal Decree 1836/1999 of 3 December approving the Regulation on Nuclear and Radioactive Facilities (RINR) and its subsequent amendments, and by Royal Decree 102/2014 of 21 February on the responsible and safe management of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste. In accordance with the latter decree, responsibility for the management of activities arising from the decommissioning of nuclear facilities in Spain lies with ENRESA (the National Radioactive Waste Company). 1 Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain

PREDEC 2016: Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain, February 16-18, Lyon, France The RINR states that when a nuclear facility ceases operation, the holder of the operating permit is responsible for the pre-dismantling activities, and these are regulated by the competent authority. The new conditions governing the activities to be undertaken at the facility until the authorization for decommissioning is granted are established during the permanent shutdown phase. For the purposes of Spanish legislation, the permanent shutdown phase constitutes an amendment to the operating permit. In order to be granted the authorization for decommissioning, the holder of the operating permit must already have conditioned the radioactive waste generated during the facility's operation. They must also have unloaded the fuel from the reactor and spent fuel storage pools or, failing this, have a plan for spent fuel management approved by the Ministry of Industry, subject to a report from the CSN (Nuclear Safety Council). On the basis of the legal provisions above, these obligations are set out in a contract between Enresa and the owners of nuclear power plants, which is approved by the Ministry of Industry. The contract defines each party's responsibilities and determines that it is Enresa's responsibility to draft and submit for approval to the Ministry of Industry the dismantling and decommissioning plan for each nuclear power plant, following shutdown. Figure 2: José Cabrera site under decommissioning (Enresa) 3. Decommissioning Strategy Current decommissioning strategy in Spain involves complete (IAEA Level 3) and immediate dismantling of light water reactor plants, starting 3 years after shutdown, with an expected duration of 10 years. In the case of the Vandellós I nuclear power plant, Level 3 is expected to be implemented from 2028, with a duration of 10 years. 4. Planning for Decommissioning Once the decision has been taken to shut the plant down permanently, planning for the decommissioning begins, comprising the following steps: Planning, engineering and licensing of the project; Radiological characterization; Preparation for decommissioning. In Spain, these activities are in some cases carried out by Enresa and in others by the license holder in cooperation with Enresa. 2 Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain

PREDEC 2016: Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain, February 16-18, Lyon, France 4.1 Planning, Engineering and Licensing of the Project The planning phase for decommissioning begins once the date is set for the facility's permanent shutdown. Enresa carries out the tasks included in this phase in coordination with the license holder for the facility's operational phase, within the framework of the contract between Enresa and the owners of the nuclear power plants. During this phase the following tasks are carried out: Basic Strategy Study The Basic Strategy Study for the facility to be dismantled assesses the physical and radiological inventories and the costs of dismantling, and proposes the preferred decommissioning option. Following this, ENRESA begins work on the Basic Engineering and Licensing Documentation for the Dismantling and Decommissioning Plan for the nuclear power plant, in line with the chosen strategy in the facility's Basic Strategy Study. Basic Engineering and Licensing Documentation The preparation of the basic engineering and licensing documentation required by Spanish law for the authorization for decommissioning involves the following activities: Basic design of the decommissioning plan; Licensing documentation required by nuclear regulations and any other documents necessary for the authorization required by environmental regulations, the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) and local and regional authorities. Detail Engineering This includes the engineering tasks and design activities for specifying the various tasks involved in site preparation and subsequent dismantling, and setting out their tendering requirements. In parallel to this, the licensing process for obtaining the authorization for decommissioning is carried out with the competent authorities. This may include a review of the mandatory documents. 4.2 Radiological Characterization The radiological characterization of a nuclear facility for the purposes of its dismantling is an activity which can be started before the plant has been permanently shut down and which continues until the unrestricted or partial release of the site. Its outcomes are a key element in the planning of the decommissioning. Radiological characterization includes not only the facility itself but also the environment which may have been affected by the facility's operation. 4.3 Preparation for Decommissioning Site preparation tasks are begun after the permanent shutdown of the nuclear power plant. Their main objective is to ensure that the facility is made safe. In this respect the following activities must be undertaken: 3 Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain

PREDEC 2016: Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain, February 16-18, Lyon, France Design modifications to discharge systems which are not required following permanent shutdown; Reclassification of systems from a safety point of view, in accordance with the new functions and risks; Preparation of the site for the decommissioning phase; Adaptation of official documentation and any other documentation which governs the operation of the facility in line with the new operating situation and new risks; Undertaking of any tasks required by legislation. Activities whose implementation are the responsibility of the operator of the facility and which are required by Spanish legislation prior to decommissioning are as follows: a) conditioning the operational waste; b) unloading the fuel from the reactor and spent fuel storage pools or having a spent fuel management plan approved by the competent authority. With regard to point b) the option to be put into practice is established in the Basic Strategy Study, previously drawn up by Enresa. Fuel management is a key element to be determined within the decommissioning strategy chosen. In Spain, in the case of both the Vandellós I and José Cabrera nuclear power plants, the strategy chosen for spent fuel management was its removal from the reactor and the storage pool. These activities, as well as the conditioning of the operational waste, were carried out during the permanent shutdown phase, as stipulated by Spanish legislation. Figure 3: Removing spent fuel Within this regulatory framework, the permanent shutdown of the José Cabrera nuclear power plant occurred on 30 April 2006 and the authorization for decommissioning was granted on 1 February 2010. At the Vandellós I nuclear power plant, permanent shutdown occurred in 1989 and the authorization for decommissioning was granted on 28 January 1998. In the case of the José Cabrera nuclear power plant, the licensee of the facility established action plans some 2-5 years prior to permanent shutdown, in order to adapt all the documentation and systems to the situation of the plant in the shutdown state. A series of design modifications was made to disable some systems in their entirety and in other cases to disable only the specific functions of systems not required in shutdown. Additionally, personnel training began for the permanent shutdown stage. 4 Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain

PREDEC 2016: Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain, February 16-18, Lyon, France Site preparation activities for decommissioning which can be undertaken during the permanent shutdown period are as follows: Decontamination of the power plant's primary circuit; Disabling of all systems, equipment and structures not required for dismantling, including removal of hazardous waste and drainage systems; Modifications to existing systems or design of new systems (fire monitoring, electrical, ventilation, instrumentation and monitoring, radiological protection, etc.) to support dismantling activities; Construction/renovation of auxiliary facilities (for waste storage, decontamination, immobilization, cutting, etc.) and preparation of work areas to support dismantling activities. In Spain, these activities may be carried out at the shutdown stage or during the initial phase of decommissioning. They must be included in the official documentation and authorized on a case by case basis. Figure 4: New Electrical Building (José Cabrera NPP) During the shutdown stage and in partnership with Enresa, the licensee of the José Cabrera nuclear power plant carried out the decontamination of the primary circuit in order to reduce worker exposure during decommissioning activities. During decommissioning, after the disassembly of the major components at the José Cabrera plant, it was shown that there was a highly significant dose reduction to the workers. Figure 5: Chemical decontamination of primary system (José Cabrera NPP) Besides the above, an important aspect to be taken into consideration during the shutdown stage is the licensing for the operating personnel. Under Spanish law, this is specific to the 5 Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain

PREDEC 2016: Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain, February 16-18, Lyon, France decommissioning phase and because of this, the personnel assigned to apply for these licenses must be trained during the shutdown stage. Figure 6: New Fire Protection Pumps (José Cabrera NPP) Likewise, the personnel who will continue to work during the dismantling must be trained with regard to the new risks and the changes that the plant will undergo. 5. Documentation for the Decommissioning License The documentation required for the application for authorization for decommissioning a nuclear facility is set out in the regulations governing nuclear facilities. Some of these documents share titles similar to the facility's official documents during its operational phase, but their scope and content differ markedly. These documents include the description, analysis and security guarantees of a process of ongoing changes in the radiological state, with differing risk situations and dynamic activities which occur one after the other, eliminating successive barriers, and which are generally irreversible. There are also documents specific to the decommissioning, such as those related to the management of materials and site restoration. The documentation for decommissioning is adapted to the new risk profile of the plant. The regulatory documentation and its basic content are as follows: Safety Analysis, including the following information: description of the initial state and radiological characterization of the site; general decommissioning project, scope of each phase in the proposed decommissioning, significant tasks and activities that may involve changes in the safety conditions; safety assessment, including the applicable safety and radiological regulations and criteria, as well as the identification of risks under normal operational and accident conditions, and preventive measures to be adopted; environmental radiological impact assessment and radiological monitoring program for implementation during the dismantling. Operating specifications, for the equipment and systems which are to be kept operational and which are significant for nuclear safety. Systems which are important for radiological protection are regulated by means of Surveillance Programs that are referenced in this document. 6 Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain

PREDEC 2016: Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain, February 16-18, Lyon, France Operating Regulations, which include descriptions of the organization and responsibilities of personnel involved in the dismantling activities, including the number of required operating licenses. Quality assurance manual establishing the scope and content of the quality assurance program designed for the process. Radiological protection manual, including the organization, standards and criteria for radiation protection. On-site emergency plan detailing the organization and measures planned to address accident situations during decommissioning. Physical protection plan, which is confidential and includes measures for organization, equipment, systems and physical safety components. Radioactive waste management plan, including the management criteria and strategy for all radioactive waste generated during decommissioning. Plan for the control of clearable materials, a document specific to the decommissioning process, which contains the guidelines and methodology for verifying compliance with criteria for clearance of the materials generated during decommissioning. Site restoration plan, a document specific to authorizations for decommissioning and which should include the projected final scenario, radiological criteria for the release of the site and the methodology for the final radiological verification. It also includes the initial radiological characterization of the site. Economic study including the financial forecasts for the decommissioning project. This documentation is evaluated by the Spanish regulatory authority (Nuclear Safety Council), CSN. A fluid relationship with the regulatory authority is very important to ensure that there is no excessive delay in obtaining authorization for decommissioning. In general, this is a complex process that takes place in parallel with pre-dismantling activities. In the case of the José Cabrera NPP, one important issue arising from the review of the regulatory documents was the accident analysis. The set of possible accidents during decommissioning activities as well as assumptions and the evaluation methodology to estimate the doses in the limits of the radius exclusion, they had to be agreed one by one. The following table shows the type of accidents considered in the Safety Analysis: Handling of radioactive material Risks related with decommissioning activities Release of liquid radwaste Risks related to spent resins Fires Explosion Risks related with the ISFSI The decommissioning license documentation established a significant reduction of safety systems and then Operating Specifications. As previously mentioned, the systems considered important for the radiation protection were not included in Operating Specifications and specific Surveillance Programs were developed. This topic and the criteria for reporting events to the regulatory authority were the subject of extensive discussion and were agreed during the licensing process. Additionally, other documentation required for decommissioning, based on further regulations, includes: 7 Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain

PREDEC 2016: Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain, February 16-18, Lyon, France Environmental impact assessment (non-radiological); Documentation required by Article 37 of the EURATOM Treaty; Local and regional regulations. The environmental impact report (EIR) includes the assessment of conventional impacts (non-radiological), monitoring program and preventive measures to implement during decommissioning works. These identified impacts are: noise, dust, vibration, environmental impact on flora and fauna caused by dismantling works. According to the Spanish regulatory framework, the radiological impacts, its control and monitoring, they are evaluated by the CSN in the process of decommissioning authorization, as part of the regulatory documentation. The information of the radiological aspects can be included in the EIR but for purposes of completeness only. Environmental authorization is subjected to public consultation. Scoping is made by the Ministry of Environment with consultation to the stakeholders, local, regional and national authorities. The project and the EIR are made available to the public before the approval. The public is allowed to comment on the environmental issues of the project. Decommissioning authorization is granted by the Spanish Ministry of Industry, once the Nuclear Safety Council has positively assessed the licensing documentation and the environmental authorization is granted. 6. Conclusions and lessons learned. The licensing process governing the granting of the authorization for decommissioning in Spain involves various agents in addition to the regulatory authorities at national, local and provincial levels. On the one hand, there is the licensee of the nuclear facility, responsible for its operational phase and shutdown, and on the other, Enresa, the agency responsible for carrying out the decommissioning. The relationship between these two agents is set out in a framework agreement which delineates the responsibilities of each party. Enresa is responsible for conducting a basic strategy study for the selection of the decommissioning option. During the permanent shutdown phase, the facility must be prepared for decommissioning as follows: undertaking a series of activities required by legislation, as well as other preparatory activities that are established on a case-by-case basis; preparing the documentation for the authorization for decommissioning, and training the personnel for the new decommissioning phase. It is very important that good understanding is maintained between the operating license holder and Enresa, to ensure an efficient transition to decommissioning and make good use of the operating personnel's experience in the functioning of the systems. Activities such as the removal of spent fuel, primary circuit decontamination and discharge of systems demands the expertise of the plant's operating personnel. At the same time, operating personnel who will continue working during the dismantling must be trained on the new documentation and changes to the plant. Decommissioning requires an appropriate mixture of experienced workers with operational memory and new workers with decommissioning experience. The licenses for operating personnel are mandatory and specific to decommissioning. The number of licenses is established by the regulatory authority in the authorization conditions. 8 Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain

PREDEC 2016: Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain, February 16-18, Lyon, France Training for personnel assigned to be awarded operating licenses for the decommissioning phase must begin during the shutdown stage. The documentation required to obtain the authorization for decommissioning is extensive and it is adapted to the new risk profile of the plant. A fluid relationship with the regulatory authority is very important to ensure that there is no excessive delay in granting the authorization. References [1] J.L. Santiago, N. Martín, C. Correa "Marco general y bases de los desmantelamientos de las instalaciones de las instalaciones nucleares", Revista Radioprotección nº 76 Vol. XX, 2013. [2] M. Ondaro, C. Correa. Marco normativo y licenciamiento del desmantelamiento. La visión del titular, Revista Radioprotección nº 76 Vol. XX, 2013. [3] J. Luis Revilla, S. Solís, E. España. Marco normativo y licenciamiento del desmantelamiento. La visión del regulador, Revista Radioprotección nº 76 Vol. XX, 2013. 9 Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain

DECOMMISSIONING LICENSING PROCESS OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS IN SPAIN Preparation for decommissioning symposium February 16-18, Lyon France Cristina Correa Sáinz ccos@enresa.es 1

TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT Responsibilities and Organization in Spain Decommissioning Strategy Planning for Decommissioning Planning, Engineering and Licensing of the Project Radiological Characterization Preparation for decommissioning Documentation for the Decommissioning License Conclusions and Lessons learned 2

RESPONSIBILITIES AND ORGANIZATION IN SPAIN VANDELLÓS 1 NPP 1998 / 2003 JOSE CABRERA NPP 2010 / 2018 3

RESPONSIBILITIES AND ORGANIZATION IN SPAIN Responsibilities during the transition period Operator ENRESA Plant Operation Transition Period Plant Decommissioning Operator ENRESA Hold License Remove SF from pools to safe storage Condition operational waste Maintain records Prepare plans for D+D Provide SF Storage Perform Preparatory Activities for D+D 4

RESPONSIBILITIES AND ORGANIZATION IN SPAIN Transfer of License Operational License Shutdown period Amendment of operational License Decommissioning License License Termination Return site to owner 5

DECOMMISSIONING STRATEGY Decommissioning Scenario Plant Operation (40 years) Transition Period (3-5 years) Plant Decommissioning (7-10 years) Condition Operational Waste Remove fuel from pool Immediate Total Dismantling (except V-1) 6

PLANNING FOR DECOMMISSIONING TABLE OF CONTENT Planning, Engineering and Licensing of the Project Basic Strategy Study Basic Engineering and Licensing Documentation Detail Engineering Radiological Characterization Preparation for decommissioning 7

PLANNING FOR DECOMMISSIONING TABLE OF CONTENT Planning, Engineering and Licensing of the Project Basic Strategy Study Basic Engineering and Licensing Documentation Detail Engineering 8

PLANNING FOR DECOMMISSIONING-RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION TABLE OF CONTENT Radiological Characterization is essential for a good D&D planning: Facility Environment 9

PREPARATION FOR DECOMMISSIONING Activities required by regulation Preparatory Activities for D&D Removal of Spent fuel Adapt organization to D&D Removal of operational Waste 10

PREPARATION FOR DECOMMISSIONING - Preparatory Activities for D&D Discharging systems and components Draining circuits and systems Removal of non-radiological components and hazardous components Decontamination of systems Construction/adaptation of auxiliary systems / facilities (for waste storage, decontamination) 1

EXAMPLES OF JOSÉ CABRERA-PREPARATORY ACTIVITIES. Shutdown period 1963 1969 2006 2010 CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENT OPERATION TRANSITION DISMANTLING & DECOMMISSIONING SHUTDOWN Decontamination of the primary system (Enresa & plant operator) Radiological characterization of the plant (Enresa &plant operator) Preparation of decommissioning plan and licensing documentation (Enresa) Licensing and fabrication of spent fuel cask (Enresa) Construction of on-site interim spent fuel storage (ISFSI) (Enresa &plant operator) Transfer of spent fuel to ISFSI: 12 casks from 19 January to 3 September 2009 (Plant operator) TRANSFERENCE TO ENRESA 12

EXAMPLES OF JOSÉ CABRERA-PREPARATORY ACTIVITIES. SPENT FUEL CASK LOADING LOAD FUEL ASSEMBLIES MOVEMENT OF THE HI-TRAC LOADED TO THE AUXILIARY CASK VAULT HI-TRACK EXIT of CONTAINMENT BUILDING TRANSPORT THE HI- STORM TO ISFSI 13

INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION (ISFSI) 12 HI-STORM Z CASKS 14

EXAMPLES OF JOSÉ CABRERA-PREPARATORY ACTIVITIES. D & D period 1963 1969 2006 2010 CONSTRUCTION OPERATION TRANSITION DISMANTLING & DECOMMISSIONING Installations: New use of Turbine Building and the Cooling Towers Pad Systems: New design of water supplies (Fire, general services and effluent dilution), electrical supply, instrumentation and control, ventilation, etc. Others were modified (Radwaste Treatment, ventilation systems, radwaste stores etc.) Conditioning for a New Use New Electrical Supply New Water Supply Conditioning for a New Use 15

PREPARATION FOR DECOMMISSIONING- Adapt organization to D&D New organization is required with new competences. D&D requires an appropriate mixture of experienced workers with operational memory and new workers with D&D experience Plant records and as-built documentation are generally not complete and the use of experienced operating personnel is beneficial to D&D OPERATOR SERVICES CONTRACT ENRESA (On Site) Radiological Protection Operation/Maintenance of systems Specialized operations ENRESA (Head office) New licenses for the operating personnel and for the head of radiological protection. 16

DOCUMENTATION FOR THE DECOMMISSIONING LICENSE Document should be adapted to the new risk profile (significant reduction in safety systems). Nuclear Regulation: Safety Analysis Report Operating Regulations Technical Specifications Nuclear Safety (ISFSI) Surveillance Programs (Ventilation systems, Fire protection systems, others systems) On-site Emergency Plan Quality Assurance Manual Radiological Protection Manual 17

DOCUMENTATION FOR THE DECOMMISSIONING LICENSE Document should be adapted to the new risk profile (significant reduction in safety systems). Nuclear Regulation: Security Plan Radioactive Waste and Spent Fuel Management Plan Plan for the control of material for clearance Site Restoration Plan Economic Study Outside Dose Calculation Manual Environmental Radiological Surveillance Plan 18

DOCUMENTATION FOR THE DECOMMISSIONING LICENSE Type of accidents considered in the Safety Analysis Accidents related to the handling of radioactive material (spent fuel excluded) Accidents related to the decommissioning activities. Loss of containment and / or HEPA filtration Accidents related to the decommissioning activities. Explosions Accidents related to the decommissioning activities. Accidental liquid spills Accidents related to the decommissioning activities. Fires Accidents involving spent fuel 19

OTHER DOCUMENTATION FOR DECOMMISSIONING Environmental Impact Assessment Surface Water Release Authorization Health and Industrial Safety regulation Labor Risk Prevention Plan Local Regulation Work License Project European Commission Data Required by the Art. 37 of EURATOM Treaty Data Required by Regulation 302/2005 20

CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED 21

Operation Routine operations D&D The change from operation to D&D Non-routine operations/changing work environment Primary hazards associated with nuclear fission process Reduction of hazards in a systematic and progressive way Risks associated with nuclear safety Risks associated with radiological protection and industrial safety 22

OPERATOR ENRESA Regulatory authorities Cooperation between plant operator and ENRESA is essential to ensure a gradual decrease of regulatory requirements from operation to D&D The licensing documents should be adapted to the new risk profile (significant reduction in safety systems). Licensing documentation is extensive A good response to regulatory requirements reduce the authorization times Operational License TRANSITION PERIOD Operational License Amendment DECOMMISSIONING Decommissioning License Spent fuel Storage Condition operational waste Preparatory Activities for D+D 23

Adapt organization to D&D Adapt Organization to D&D D&D requires an appropriate mixture of experienced workers with operational memory and new workers with D&D experience Change mind setting from operation to D&D New organizational challenges must be addressed (relocation, motivation, integration of old and new personnel, training, knowledge retain and transfer,.) Licenses for the operating personnel 24

Thank you for your attention