ARCHIVED REPORT. AGM-45 Shrike - Archived 10/2001

Similar documents
ARCHIVED REPORT. AIM-54A/C/C+ Phoenix - Archived 11/98

Keywords. Guided missiles, Classification of guided missiles, Subsystems of guided missiles

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

Trusted Partner in guided weapons

ARCHIVED REPORT. SSQ-72/108(V) (OUTBOARD/OUTBOARD II) - Archived 7/2002. Outlook. Orientation. Electronic Warfare Forecast

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARCHIVED REPORT. USC-38/LDR/MDR EHF SATCOM Terminals - Archived 02/2008

ARCHIVED REPORT. Submarine Acoustic Warfare Development Archived 12/2002

Arms Control Today. U.S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

mm*. «Stag GAO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Information on Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and Other Theater Missile Defense Systems 1150%

MULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (MLRS) M270A1 LAUNCHER

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #98

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

MEADS MEDIUM EXTENDED AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM

ARCHIVED REPORT. AIM-7 Sparrow - Archived 11/2007

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2018 Base FY 2018 OCO

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91

Russian defense industrial complex s possibilities for development of advanced BMD weapon systems

OSD Perspective. Presentation to the 2003 Munitions Executive Summit Falls Church, VA 12 February George W. Ullrich

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

Challenges and opportunities Trends to address New concepts for: Capability and program implications Text

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 P-1 Line #1

Military Radar Applications

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Other Missile Product Improvement Programs. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Billing Code:

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

Small Diameter Bomb Increment I (SDB I) Precision Strike Association Annual Program Review

F-16 Fighting Falcon The Most Technologically Advanced 4th Generation Fighter in the World

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: Special Operations Aviation Systems Advanced Development

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2019 OCO. FY 2019 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: RADAR DEVELOPMENT

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Joint Strike Fighter Squadrons

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45

B-1B CONVENTIONAL MISSION UPGRADE PROGRAM (CMUP)

ARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM (ATACMS) BLOCK II

Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 Published on Arms Control Association (

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

THAAD Program Summary

Nuclear dependency. John Ainslie

Introduction to missiles

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: MQ-9 Development and Fielding. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

GAO. PRECISION-GUIDED MUNITIONS Acquisition Plans for the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile. Report to Congressional Committees.

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Air Control

Precision Fires Rocket and Missile Systems. Brief to PSA. COL David Rice PFRMS, Project Manager. Any Warfighter, Anywhere, All The Time UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

snapshots of 17 key Air Force space programs experiments, development, production, sustainment, and upgrades. The list is not allinclusive.

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

First Announcement/Call For Papers

Naval Electronic Warfare Solutions Ensuring your mission success.

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: KC-10S. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

AIM-54 Simulation. 1 st July By Tom Tyrell Márton Nagy. Heatblur Simulations

Last Production A-6 Flies Into History

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

The Integral TNO Approach to NAVY R&D

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

ARCHIVED REPORT TPN-31 ATNAVICS/FPN-67 FBPAR

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

9 th Annual Disruptive Technologies Conference

11/2000 ARCHIVED REPORT. AWG-9/APG-71(V) - Archived. Outlook. Orientation. Airborne Electronics Forecast

GLOBAL STRIKE THE INDISPENSABLE CAPABILITY FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

French response to air and ballistic missile threats

Ammunition and Explosives related Federal Supply Classes (FSC)

New Artillery Sunday Punch

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Transcription:

Missile Forecast ARCHIVED REPORT For data and forecasts on current programs please visit www.forecastinternational.com or call +1 203.426.0800 AGM-45 Shrike - Archived 10/2001 Outlook Production concluded. The Shrike program was terminated in favor of the AGM-88 HARM Modifications to the existing inventory were undertaken, involving enhancements to the missile s rocket motors and guidance system Over 25,000 Shrikes were manufactured; the missile served in the raids on Libya during the 1980s and Operation Desert Storm 10 Year Unit Production Forecast 2000-2009 Units NO PRODUCTION FORECAST 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Years Description. A supersonic, all-weather, air-to-surface guided missile for hostile radar suppression. Sponsor. US Department of Defense through the US Navy; overall management was through the Naval Air Systems Command, Washington, DC. US Air Force procurement was managed by Warner Robins Air Logistics Center, Macon, GA, USA. Contractors. Developed by the Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, CA, and jointly manufactured. Texas Instruments, Missile and Ordnance Division; Dallas, TX, was the prime. Motorola Incorporated, Government Electronics Group, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, is presently the primary contractor on the AGM-45 Shrike. Motorola s Tempe, AZ, facility is also involved in the Shrike program. Major Subcontractors. Aerojet, Motorola and Rocketdyne. Orientation Technical Data Metric US Dimensions Missile Length: 304.8 cm 10 ft Missile Diameter: 20 cm. 7.92 in Missile Weight: 177 kg 389.40 lb Finspan: 91.4 cm 2.99 ft Performance Second Source. Sperry Rand Univac; Blue Bell, PA, USA. Status. Out of production; production totaled over 25,000 missiles through Fiscal 1980. Production was terminated in favor of the follow-on AGM-88 HARM. (See separate report.) Funding was continued through 1983 to regain the rocket motors in order to extend shelf life, fuse antenna improvement and to maintain inventories. Total Produced. 25,220 missiles (including RDT&E units) were constructed. Application. Shrike is used to destroy hostile radar installations, especially those controlling air defense systems. Price Range. Mod 9 and 10 versions of the AGM-45 cost $56,000 (Fiscal 1980).

AGM-45 Shrike, Page 2 Missile Forecast Metric US Speed: Mach 2 Mach 2 Range: 12-16 km 6.47-8.63 nm Propulsion. Rocketdyne Mk 39 Mod 7 or Aerojet Mk 53 solid-propellant (polybutadiene) motor. Aerojet also produced an improved dual-thrust polyurethane motor for later Shrike variants; this motor was the Mk 78. Control & Guidance. Texas Instruments or Sperry Univac guidance/control systems are employed. The aerodynamic control surfaces are operated by hot gas actuators. Launcher Mode. Fired from underwing-mounted racks off all Navy attack aircraft, late F-4 variants, and the USAF s F-105. The primary USAF application is aboard F-4G Wild Weasel aircraft. Israel mounts the AGM-45 on its F-4 and Kfir aircraft. Warhead. Proximity-fused, high explosive blast/ fragmentation type weighing 66 kg (145.2 lb). AGM-45 Shrike Source: US Navy There is basically one version of the Shrike, although various upgrades were incorporated into this missile over the last several years. For additional information, Background. Originally known as the ASM-N- 10 ARM (Anti-Radar Missile), Shrike is a supersonic, air-to-surface weapon which homes in on hostile radar emissions. The missile was developed by the Naval Ordnance Test Station (NOTS), now called the Naval Weapons Center, and was partially based on the AIM-7 Variants/Upgrades Program Review please see the pertinent entries under the Program Review section. Sparrow; development began in 1961 and the missile was type classified in 1962. The US Navy began

Missile Forecast AGM-45 Shrike, Page 3 equipping its attack aircraft with Shrikes in 1964. The early use of the AGM-45 in Vietnam by the Navy and Air Force was disappointing. This led to several modification programs to rectify identified faults or to integrate the modified passive homing head for new hostile frequencies. The USAF initially used this missile on its F-105 Wild Weasel aircraft, but later also equipped its more advanced F-4G Wild Weasel aircraft with Shrikes, the latter application accounting for the majority of the remaining inventories of the missile. Shrike has been progressively upgraded and improved over the years; 10 versions with 18 sub-types were produced. The last production models were the AGM-45-9 and -10, which differ principally in the frequency coverage of the seeker assembly, and detachable seeker sections. After production termination, the Navy and Air Force continued funding Shrike to support requirements for fleet support, mods, and spares. The USAF began procuring the AGM-45 in 1965 and procured a total of some 14,000 missiles through Fiscal 1981; the Navy procured about 6,200 missiles. Sequence of Operation. The missile s seeker assembly, which is changed on the ground according to the anticipated threat, is switched on as the aircraft approaches the suspected hostile emitter s position. After the seeker has locked on, the missile is launched. Following motor cut-off, the missile follows a semi-ballistic path as the aerodynamic control surfaces are activated. The guidance system has a monopulse crystal receiver and continually updates the targeting solution by determining the direction of arrival of the hostile radiation. Combat Employment. It is not known if the Shrike was used by the United States during its involvement in the war to liberate Kuwait (1990-1991). However, anti-radiation missiles were used extensively and in great quantities by the allied air forces in their attacks on Iraqi air defense units. The apparent lack of an Iraqi air defense response to the numerous and sustained air attacks could mean that these systems were fairly effective in their suppression missions. In 1986, the AGM-45 was employed by US Naval forces in the joint US Navy/US Air Force strikes against Libya. The success rate of the AGM-45 was considered more than acceptable. During the 1982 Falklands War, the United Kingdom used the Shrike missile to suppress Argentinian coastal radar installation, although with limited success. Modification. Motorola Incorporated, Government Electronics Group, Tempe, AZ, is currently the only manufacturer with the facilities to modify/manufacture AGM-45 Shrike missiles. The company is currently performing on an upgrade contract from the US Air Force to increase the accuracy and flight envelope of the Shrike. The modifications which the company is performing deal with the guidance system only. Potential Modifications. Shrike was the first Western anti-radiation missile to enter service, but contained various limitations. For example, if the hostile emitting radar shut down after the Shrike had been launched, the round would lose guidance signals and (as one author said) would go ballistic. The Shrike also places tactical limitations on the launch aircraft. The missile also had a relatively short range approximately eight kilometers (five miles) and minimal off-boresight attack capability. In order to launch a Shrike successfully, the launch aircraft must fly directly towards the target; the missile cannot be fired from a turn. However, Shrike remains in front-line service with a small number of armed services worldwide, including the US Air Force and Navy. US Air Force F-4G Wild Weasel crews now regard the Shrike solely as a defense-suppression weapon, rather than a kill weapon. The Shrike s relatively light warhead and limited flight performance are better suited to the task of forcing the enemy to keep his radar shut down for as long as possible, rather than that of actually causing massive damage. These noted limitations could be corrected through a modification program for the system. Potential modifications to the AGM-45 could include the addition of a new seeker, possibly the Texas Instruments Block IV and/or the Ford Aerospace HARM Low Cost Seeker (see AGM-88 report), or other improved system. It could also include the upgrade/replacement of the existing rocket motor to provide increased range and better performance and the replacement of the existing hot gas actuation system with a more modern one, such as pneumatic. Although each of these modifications appears to be quite viable, the likelihood of the US Armed Forces initiating an extensive Shrike capability modification program seems doubtful. This belief is due to the relatively small number of Shrikes involved (between 6,000 and 7,000 missiles), and the potential cost. A more likely anti-radiation modification program could involve the AIM-9 Sidewinder, which has already been the basis for the AGM-122 SIDEARM I (see separate report). It should be noted, however, that during the US raid on Libya in 1986, the Air Force and Navy aircraft fired over 50 anti-radiation missiles, approximately 1.5 per participating aircraft.

AGM-45 Shrike, Page 4 Missile Forecast Funding The US Air Force s Fiscal 1989 budget contained funding ($14.9 million) for the modification of a small number of Shrike anti-radiation missiles. No additional funding has appeared within recent US defense budgets. Recent Contracts In June 1989, Motorola Incorporated received an $8.4 million contract for guidance section modification kits, control section modification kits, data for engineering change proposals and configuration changes for the AGM-45. The contract was awarded by the Warner Robins Air Logistics Center, Robins Air Force Base, Georgia. Timetable Year Major Development 1961 Program began 1962 Redesignated AGM-45 1964 Initial deliveries made to US Navy 1966 Air Force procurement began 1974 HARM (Shrike follow-on) development contract awarded 1975 Shrike scheduled to end production 1976 HARM technical slippage occurred 1977 Production contracts for Shrike increased 1978 HARM entered FSED 1979 Iran canceled Shrike purchase; USAF withdrew FY80 buy 1981 Shrike production for USN/USAF terminated 1989-90 Shrike modification program continued Worldwide Distribution User Country(s). The only countries which are known to operate Shrike are the United States, United Kingdom, Iran and Israel. Iran canceled its purchase in 1979; only a few missiles had been delivered. The AGM-45 Shrike remains in service with the US Armed Forces, but may have been designated a reserve system. The main anti-radiation missile used by the US military is the AGM-88 HARM. Should demand for anti-radar missiles rise higher than the supply of HARMs, the Shrike would then be used. There is no mention of any AGM-45 Shrikes being fired against Serbian units during Operation Allied Force. If true, this is the first time that the US has not used Shrike during a major operation. The missile was used against Libya in 1986 and extensively on Iraqi air defenses during Operation Desert Storm (1990-1991). Whether this is significant remains to be seen. The AGM-45 Shrike is expected to remain in active duty with the US military until its numbers are Forecast Rationale exhausted or the system is overtaken by obsolescence, making Shrike s maintenance costs too high to justify the missile s continued use. No further production of the AGM-45 is anticipated, having been concluded in 1981. However, the US could continue the low-level modification of the system as part of its routine maintenance cycle in order to maintain its combat viability. The US is studying various options for meeting its future anti-radiation missile requirements. In the meantime, the US military will continue to depend on existing systems like the AGM-45 Shrike and AGM-88 HARM.

Missile Forecast AGM-45 Shrike, Page 5 Ten-Year Outlook ESTIMATED CALENDAR YEAR PRODUCTION High Confidence Good Confidence Speculative Level Level Total Missile (Engine) thru 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 00-09 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED AGM-45 (a) MK.37/53/78 25220 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Production 25220 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (a) Forecast line includes RDT&E units.