Possible technology domains and project categories of EDIDP Industrial Forum

Similar documents
EUROPEAN FUNDING FOR DUAL-USE AND DEFENCE

Envisaged national contribution to the attainment of the commitments

investment expenditure on defence equipment, and regularly review these objectives, in the light of the security environment and of the

Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) first collaborative PESCO projects - Overview

PUBLIC. 6393/18 NM/fh/jk DGC 1C LIMITE EN. Council of the European Union Brussels, 1 March 2018 (OR. en) 6393/18 LIMITE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Joint Warfare System (JWARS)

ROBUST NATO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE

Annual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium

The European Technology Platform, HORIZON 2020 & WORTH

Unmanned Systems. Northrop Grumman Today Annual Conference

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Specific Call for Proposals Mainstreaming Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Among SMEs Grant Programme 2005

Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

Jean Monnet Networks (policy debate with the academic world)

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

SACT s KEYNOTE at. C2 COE Seminar. Norfolk, 05 July Sheraton Waterside Hotel. As delivered

European Parliament Nov 30, 2010

COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2011/18/EU

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

Evolving Surveillance and Response Group s role in supporting Navy in the extended battlespace

Linking research and standardization. Integrating standards in your research project: a pocket guide for project proposers

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

EU policy and programme support to "European Higher Education in the world" Date: in 12 pts

BUILDING MULTINATIONAL MEDICAL CAPABILITIES: THE EUROPEAN DEFENCE AGENCY EXPERIENCE

Patient Empowerment. Kostas Aligiannis, Policy Officer, European Patients Forum eupatientsforum

Strengthening partnerships: Nordic defence collaboration amid regional security concerns

Reconsidering the Relevancy of Air Power German Air Force Development

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)

A Concept for Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ)

10 August Space and Missile Defense Technology Development Panel AMRDEC Missile S&T. Mr. Jeffrey Langhout

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

SA ARMY SEMINAR 21. The Revision of the South African Defence Review and International Trends in Force Design: Implications for the SA Army

C4I System Solutions.

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head

Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama

Programme Officer International Development

Air-Sea Battle & Technology Development

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

Go Tactical to Succeed By Capt. Ryan Stephenson

Local innovation ecosystems

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 R E P O R T COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.R. 5136

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

Delegations will find attached the declassified sections of the above-mentioned document.

Jean Monnet support to associations

The State Defence Concept Executive Summary

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)

NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING GROUP & NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

EU egovernment Action Plan

FORWARD, READY, NOW!

MISSILE S&T STRATEGIC OVERVIEW

GMV PRESENTATION. A GMV no Programa do Soldado do Futuro. José Neves Seminário 17/02/2016

THE MILITARY STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA

6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit

Logbook Adm. Greenert and Gen. Amos: A New Naval Era Adm. Greenert and Gen. Welsh: Breaking the Kill Chain

Navy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces

COSME. 31 January 2014 Tallinn, Estonia. Andreas Veispak DG Enterprise and Industry - European Commission

Governance and Sustainability of EOSC Ambitions, Challenges and Opportunities

The Marine Corps Operating Concept How an Expeditionary Force Operates in the 21 st Century

H2020 possibilities for SMEs. Dr. Laura Kauhanen Green Growth Programme coordination team

3 rd Annual Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Summit

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Policy and Procedures for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

EUTM Mali Public Affairs Office Internet :

Cryptologic and Cyber Systems Division

Tactical Technology Office

Presentation of Interreg Europe

Power Projection: - Where We Were - Where We Are - Where We Need To Be

Participation and funding in H2020 actions Ingrid Mariën-Dusak, DG CONNECT

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE

Integrated Maritime Policy and Surveillance

HORIZON Societal Challenge 6 egovernment. Supporting the implementation of egovernment at regional and local level. Brussels, 15 November 2016

JADE An Experiment in Distributed Simulation Based Joint Tactical Training

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Overview of Expeditionary Power Systems Marine Corps Systems Command Warren Clare Joint Service Power Expo August 25, 2015

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

Horizon SME Instrument

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

The Air Force View of IAMD in a Joint Environment

Test and Evaluation in Acquisition of Capabilities

The Competition for Access and Influence. Seabasing

AGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance

First Announcement/Call For Papers

Transcription:

Possible technology domains and project categories of EDIDP Industrial Forum Andrea Barbagelata, (Leonardo), ASD Task Force on the European Defence Fund 30 May, 2018

Table of Contents Rational and purpose Technology Domains Project Categories Conclusions 2

EDIDP (2019/20): PREPARE EDF (2021-27) Overall rationale: 1. Foster European strategic autonomy through cooperation on the development of key defence capabilities. 2. Demonstrate European added value and support industrial competitiveness Main purposes: 1. test co-funding mechanisms: How can EU budget support collaborative Member State development projects? 2. prepare the Capability Window of the future EDF: Which development activities to fund under the next MFF? 3 3

ASD FOCUS ON SECOND PURPOSE: Co-funding Mechanisms tested (mainly) through prototyping actions Limited to already ongoing development projects, proposed by Member States Preparation of Capability Window post-2020 Sows the seed for new cooperative procurement projects Crucial for industry s competitiveness and Member States upcoming capability needs Equally important, focus of ASD work 4 4

EDIDP WORKPROGRAMME

ELIGIBLE ACTIONS Action EC Funding (% of eligible direct costs) Design of a defence product 100 + 25 System prototyping 20 x (1,25) Testing 100 + 25 Qualification 100 + 25 Certification 100 + 25 Feasibility Studies & accompanying measures 100 + 25 Ref: Commission s Proposal dated 7 June 2017 6 6

POSSIBLE CONTENTS AND RELEVANT ACTIONS AT EU LEVEL Project Categories Technologies and systems Based on CDP, CARD, PESCO, Mind timing hence ASD input! 7 7

ASD REVISED CAPABILITY NEEDS (1/2) 1. Information Superiority Battle space ICS, space capabilities, ISR including RPXS, digital capabilities 2. Expeditionary Operations Intra-theater combat, precision engagement and rapid response, interoperability and effectiveness, mobility for engineering, logistical support 3. Protection of EU Territory New systems for direct and indirect fire, air and missile defence, close air support, FCAS, RPAS 8 8

ASD REVISED CAPABILITY NEEDS (1/2) 1. n 2. Nn 3. n 4. Maritime Mobility and Operational Capability at Sea future naval platform, future innovative naval systems, UxV integration in naval environment, naval weapons and sensors 5. Cross-cutting Drivers energy, logistics, autonomy, modelling/simulation/experimentation Based on EDA Capability Development Plan 2014, now under revision, + Industry own view of evolving capability requirements 9 9

ASD INPUT Based on the capability needs shown in the previous slides, ASD started a thorough internal process to identify possible topics that would be of interest for the European Defence Industry. 75 project topics were identified and described in a Food for Thought Paper that was made available to the Commission. Based on the Programme purposes previously stated, ASD has identified five possible project categories. 10 10

POSSIBLE PROJECT CATEGORIES: 1. Major system concepts and architectures prepare future major procurements at European level 2. Experimentation and demonstration test and exercise systems and subsystems, and generate candidate approaches 3. Interoperability of systems allow systems with different national origins to operate together in CSDP missions 4. Critical subsystems ensure security of supply at European level and industrial competitiveness 5. Supporting measures to address general aspects of the defence development lifecycle 11 11

CONCLUSIONS EDIDP is clearly a great opportunity for European Defence Industry ASD is playing its role trying to collect and channel industry views to the key players The next months will be crucial for the definition of the Work programme and for companies to define their strategy to best exploit this unique opportunity 12 12

Thank you ASD rue Montoyer 10 I 1000 Brussels, Belgium info@asd-europe.org I www.asd-europe.org