We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan

Similar documents
STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

Executing our Maritime Strategy

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES


James T. Conway General, U.S. Marine Corps, Commandant of the Marine Corps

Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama

***************************************************************** TQL

Total Ownership Cost. CAPT Tom Ryan OPNAV N414

a. To promulgate policy on cost analysis throughout the Department of the Navy (DON).

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

1. Purpose. To define and implement a comprehensive approach to the conduct of force structure assessments.

STRATEGIC PLAN. Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head EOD Technology Division. Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

A Call to Action for the Navy Reserve

resource allocation decisions.

VISION MISSION. Deliver and sustain a full-spectrum surface combat force.

OPNAVINST C N43 18 Jun Subj: NAVY EXPEDITIONARY TABLE OF ALLOWANCE AND ADVANCED BASE FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT POLICY

Subj: NAVY ENTERPRISE TEST AND EVALUATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL WILLIAM F. MORAN U.S. NAVY VICE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATE OF THE MILITARY

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

Strategic Vision. Rapidly Delivering Cyber Warfighting Capability From Seabed to Space. Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

Naval Aviation Enterprise Strategic Plan

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

CAPT Heide Stefanyshyn-Piper

OPNAVINST N46 21 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVY INSTALLATIONS COMMAND

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

The Marine Corps Operating Concept How an Expeditionary Force Operates in the 21 st Century

NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference

OPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND

Charted Course MISSION PRIORITIES VISION

Advance Questions for Buddie J. Penn Nominee for Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Installations and Environment

Advance Questions for Dr. Delores M. Etter Nominee for Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition

Prepared Remarks for the Honorable Richard V. Spencer Secretary of the Navy Defense Science Board Arlington, VA 01 November 2017

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM FOR SECURITY AND INDEPENDENCE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Enabling Greater Productivity

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Consolidated Afloat Network Ent Services(CANES) FY 2012 OCO

THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON DC

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

The Fifth Element and the Operating Forces are vitally linked providing the foundation that supports the MAGTF, from training through Operational

Navy Medicine Strategic Plan FY14 U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine & Surgery

NMETC 10 year Strategic Plan

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

NAVY MEDICINE STRATEGIC PLAN

EVERGREEN IV: STRATEGIC NEEDS

Subj: ACCOUNTABILITY AND MANAGEMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY PROPERTY

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

NAVAL SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS POLICY AND COORDINATION

Department ofthe Navy Business Transformation Plan Fiscal Year 2013 & Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Report

Logbook Navy Perspective on Joint Force Interdependence Navigating Rough Seas Forging a Global Network of Navies

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

United States Army Security Assistance Command

U.S. Air Force Electronic Systems Center

NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE

Secretary of the Navy Richard V. Spencer USNI Defense Forum Washington Washington, DC 04 December 2017

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002

Logbook Adm. Greenert and Gen. Amos: A New Naval Era Adm. Greenert and Gen. Welsh: Breaking the Kill Chain

Strong. Secure. Engaged: Canada s New Defence Policy

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES DEFENSE ACQUISITION REFORM PANEL UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified

Task Force Innovation Working Groups

Navy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

Subj: IDENTIFICATION OF MAJOR PROGRAM MANAGER EQUIVALENT BILLETS

BALANCING RISK RESOURCING ARMY

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

NAVAIR Commander s Awards recognize teams for excellence

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

Subj: NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY POLICY FOR NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS

The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address

challenge the force... change the game

To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE

J. L. Jones General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps

Meeting the Challenge of a New Era

MC Network Modernization Implementation Plan

Subj: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEFENSE STANDARDIZATION PROGRAM IN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

POLICIES CONCERNING THE NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING GROUP & NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Committees

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 19 Dec Subj: NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY POLICY, RELATIONSHIPS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The Naval Education and Training Security Assistance Field Activity (NETSAFA) Strategic Plan:

Department of Defense

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

UNCLASSIFIED FY Due to the number of efforts in this PE, the programs described herein are representative of the work included in this PE.

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #6: Streamlining the Contracting Process)

STATEMENT OF MS. ALLISON STILLER DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY (SHIP PROGRAMS) and

Strategic Cost Reduction

SUSTAIN THE MISSION. SECURE THE FUTURE. STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

Department of the Navy Annual Review of Acquisition of Services Policy and Oversight

Transcription:

The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team 1999-2004 Strategic Plan Surface Ships Aircraft Submarines Marine Corps Materiel Surveillance Systems Weapon Systems Command Control & Communications Systems Intelligence Systems Ordnance Satellites Training Systems Supply and Support Facilities We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea.

A Letter from the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition The Honorable H. Lee Buchanan Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition This Strategic Plan represents a significant step for the ASN(RD&A) Team. It is an evolutionary departure from our initial strategic plan published in 1996. This new plan reflects our commitment to help the Navy and Marine Corps successfully address the core issue of achieving long-range modernization and recapitalization goals during a period of fixed budgets and extensive operational demands. It reflects a total commitment to support our customers, the Sailors, Marines and allies operating our equipment, by providing better equipment and services faster, cheaper and smarter than ever before. Success will result in meaningful improvements in how we work, how we fight and how we live with emphasis on reducing burden on the fleet Sailor and Marine. To realize this vision the ASN(RD&A) Team has embarked upon an extensive outreach program. The goals, strategies and metrics contained in this plan will require the support of the Chief of Naval Operations, Commandant of the Marine Corps, Assistant Secretary for Financial Management and Comptroller and the Operational Commanders. By linking arms with these customers and stakeholders, we intend to implement strategies that will unify and streamline efforts across the Department to help meet today's growing operational demands while developing the force of the future. During the first year of this plan we will baseline each goal area throughout our organization, then establish quantitative performance targets. Subsequent activity will focus on performance measurement against these targets. Goals, strategies and metrics will continue to be refined through close coordination with our customers and stakeholders. Successful execution of this plan cannot be accomplished by the ASN(RD&A) organization alone. It requires the coordinated efforts of the entire Navy and Marine Corps Team. Our challenge is to sustain the maritime superiority our nation enjoys by providing the finest equipment in the world to our Sailors and Marines. The ASN(RD&A) Team is committed to meeting this challenge now - and in the future. Sincerely, H. Lee Buchanan

Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition Assessment of the Strategic Environment The President's National Security Strategy for a New Century tells us that we must simultaneously address the problems of today and prepare for the uncertainties of tomorrow. The National Military Strategy, developed by the Joint Chiefs, describes four strategic concepts that guide us in the development and acquisition of Navy force structure - Strategic Agility, Overseas Presence, Power Projection and Decisive Force. The Navy-Marine Corps Team fulfills a particularly critical role in executing the National Military Strategy. The ASN(RD&A) Team must develop and provide equipment that is technologically superior, sufficient in quantity, and affordable in operation to support our military strategy throughout the globe. Successful execution of our military strategy since the end of the Cold War has been complicated by an overall increase in the tempo of operations combined with a steady decline in the defense budget. Peacekeeping and operations other than war, such as Bosnian peacekeeping operations, have increased the operational demands on our Navy-Marine Corps Team. Sustaining readiness levels along with a high operational tempo, in a period of fixed or declining resources, has contributed to deferred modernization and threatens to create a vicious cycle - increasing cost to support current readiness at the expense of modernization. We must find a balance, in partnership with resource sponsors, operational commanders, the Congress, and overseas partners, to ensure a capable Navy and Marine Corps today and for the 21st Century. Meeting these challenges will require innovative approaches. The Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) promises potentially dramatic increases in military capability by leveraging new technology with new operational concepts and organizations. In keeping with the goals of the National Performance Review and consistent with the Government Performance and Results Act and the Revolution in Business Affairs (RBA), ASN(RD&A) will strive to develop and procure the weapons systems of tomorrow better, smarter, cheaper and faster. We will carry forth this revolution by expanding acquisition reform beyond procurement into logistics, finance and other key business areas, with the ultimate goal of combating resource shortages through revolutionary business practices. Resource savings may then be applied toward modernization and recapitalization of the Navy-Marine Corps Team. one

Strategic Plan 1999-2004 Concept of Operations Instituting a Strategic Planning Process The RD&A Team will build a dynamic planning process. This process will become a tool to provide both equipment and services better, faster, cheaper and smarter. To succeed, we will need to constantly refine the Plan to accomplish our mission and to achieve our vision. Critical Success Factor: Integration of Planning and Management We must use the Plan to drive RD&A operations and align support functions. Accountability RD&A leaders will develop corresponding plans to support RD&A strategic goals. Each RD&A organization will implement a cascading planning and reporting structure of supporting objectives, strategies and performance measures. The recurring metrics briefs will provide formal feedback on progress toward strategic goals. We will use this information to improve our performance. Customer and Stakeholder Outreach In this Plan, we have made the priorities of our customers and stakeholders our own priorities. We will base our goals on our realistic assessment of the strategic environment, derived from CNO and CMC requirements and priorities. We will reach out to our customers and stakeholders to update them on our progress in achieving their goals and objectives. Through this process, we will jointly explore means to meet their expectations and, if necessary, explain any inability to meet their requirements. Performance Management System Our Strategic Plan will form the underpinning of a performance management system. During the initial year of implementation we will concentrate on building baseline and benchmark data to validate our measurements. We will use this baseline data to set targets for each measure of success. Ultimately, we will use our performance plan to support budget development. Overarching Concept Reducing Total Ownership Costs to increase resources available for recapitalization and modernization is the overarching concept for this Strategic Plan. Simplicity and Focus To focus our efforts and simplify the planning process, we will concentrate on four key areas of our enterprise; the Warfighter customers, our People, our Finances and our Business Processes. two

Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition Mission, Vision, and Goals Mission The Naval Research, Development and Acquisition Team, in partnership with Industry, will continue to serve the Nation by developing, acquiring and supporting technologically superior and affordable systems for Navy, Marine Corps, Joint and Allied Forces. Our products allow the operating forces, in support of the Unified Commanders, to train, to deter conflict and, if required, to fight and win. Vision Our continuing vision is to be the world's best acquisition and lifecycle support organization. We will dedicate ourselves to innovation and excellence through teamwork and trust - developing, acquiring and supporting systems for the finest Navy and Marine Corps in the world. Goals PEOPLE Shape and train an efficient and effective acquisition workforce Smarter WARFIGHTER Improve Warfighter Satisfaction Better FINANCIAL Lower the total ownership cost of equipment and services Cheaper BUSINESS PROCESSES Reduce cost and cycle time for delivering equipment and services Faster three

Strategic Plan 1999-2004 WARFIGHTER GOAL Provide effective, reliable, affordable and interoperable battleforce systems. Pursue initiatives to lessen workload on Sailors and Marines. Engage in regular and open communication with stakeholders and the Warfighter. Focus science and technology (S&T) efforts on future Naval capabilities desired by the Warfighter. MEASURES OF SUCCESS Improved Effectiveness - Increase Warfighter readiness as measured by established operational performance standards. Mission Capable "IMPROVE WARFIGHTER SATISFACTION" PROVIDE BETTER PRODUCTS AND SERVICES STRATEGIES MC Successful OPEVALS 1st Attempt Total OPEVALS OPEVAL Higher Availability - Increase overall systems availability as measured by SYSCOM and operational data. Total Platform Hours Mission Capable Total Platform Hours Availability Greater Affordability - Lower the cost to the Warfighter of operating weapons systems. Operating and Support Cost Operating Hour Cost/Hour Superior Interoperability - Reduce systems interoperability issues measured by Warfighter Battle Group Systems Interoperability Test (BGSIT) reports. BGSIT Issues Operation BGSIT Increased Capability - Accelerate progress toward future Naval capability objectives. S&T Resources Applied to Warfighter Objectives Total S&T Resources Successfully Transitioned S&T Initiatives four S&T Resource S&T Transitions

Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition "SHAPE AND TRAIN AN EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE" PEOPLE GOAL PROVIDE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES SMARTER STRATEGIES Establish a requirements driven plan for the size, composition and capabilities of the ASN (RD&A) total workforce. Improve workforce by aligning recruiting and retention to total workforce. Improve civilian and military skill levels through the DAWIA program, mentoring, leadership development programs, continuous learning and career management. MEASURES OF SUCCESS Correctly Sized Workforce - Number and skill mix of people relative to Warfighter force structure and mission requirements. Number of People per Skill Number of Platforms per Type People C B A C B A C B A Platform Platform Platform A B C Skills Higher Certification Levels - Increase the number of DAWIA certified employees. Employees Properly Certified Total Acquisition Positions Certification Employees Properly Certified in a Career Field Total Employees by Career Field Career Field Certification Increase Workforce Development - Improve workforce skills through continuous professional training. Employees Receiving Minimum 40 Hours Training Total Employees Training five

Strategic Plan 1999-2004 FINANCIAL GOAL "LOWER THE TOTAL OWNERSHIP COST OF EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES" PROVIDE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES CHEAPER STRATEGIES Develop financial management process improvements with stakeholders that support high-level decision-making. Develop TOC baselines and measurement tools. Promote initiatives that will lower TOC. Identify acquisition team operating efficiencies by applying such techniques as Activity Based Costing (ABC) and Activity Based Management (ABM). Invest a portion of program savings to reduce TOC. Pursue international program partnering opportunities that lower TOC. MEASURES OF SUCCESS Reduce Total Ownership Cost - Decrease development, acquisition, operation and maintenance costs for weapons systems. New Systems: Projected TOC (Constant Year $) TOC Fielded Systems: Actual TOC (Constant Year $) TOC Increase Operating Efficiency - Increase amount of products and services provided per dollar of operating cost. Dollar Value of Contracted Products and Services RDA TOA Minus Dollar Value of Contracted Products and Services Operating Efficiency Optimize Return On Investments - Invest in initiatives that produce largest reductions in TOC over the life cycle of weapons systems. Change in TOC Investment ROI six

Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition BUSINESS PROCESS GOAL "REDUCE COST AND CYCLE TIME FOR DELIVERING EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES" PROVIDE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES FASTER STRATEGIES Promote acquisition reform initiatives that reduce cost and cycle times. Increase integration of the requirements, resources and acquisition communities in the acquisition process. Improve the efficiency of internal processes that have a major impact on cycle times. Partner with the Warfighter, stakeholders and industry on a weapons system approach to life cycle management. MEASURES OF SUCCESS Reduce the time to develop and insert new technologies that improve Warfighter capabilities. Reduce Major Product Cycle Time - Reduce cycle time to develop products and services for the Fleet. Time to Develop by Product Line (Milestone 0-3) M O -M 3 Time to Field by Product Line (Milestone 3-IOC) M 3 -IOC Total Time Out of Service Total Platform Time Out of Service Shorten the Product Improvement Cycle - Reduce elapsed time to develop and field major modifications. Reduce elapsed time to field new Science and Technology capability. Time to Develop Major Modifications Develop Mods Time to Field Major Modifications Field Mods Increase the Quality of Logistics Support - Increase percentage of logistics elements in place at product IOC. Decrease direct maintenance man-hours per platform. Program (Logistics Elements Required)-(Logistics Elements in Place at IOC) IOC Direct Maintenance Manhours (DMMH) Platform Type seven DMMH

Strategic Plan 1999-2004 CONCLUSION This Strategic Plan represents a significant milestone for the Naval Research, Development and Acquisition Team. It is a capstone document, marking our continuing transition to a performance management system. We rigorously analyzed our vision, mission and goals to reduce them to their very core - to better focus our efforts. Guided by the Defense Reform Initiatives, we will adopt the best commercial business process applicable to our operation. Beginning with this Plan, the Team is adopting a simplified process for integrated planning that uses the existing organizational framework. This will help us implement the Plan throughout the Team. It will also provide improved accountability for achieving our strategic goals. The number of strategic goals has been reduced and concentrated in four functional areas: Warfighter Satisfaction; People; Finance; and Business Processes. The goals, strategies and performance measures set forth herein will be further improved through a process of continuous interaction with our customers and stake-holders. Developing relevant strategic goals and a supporting performance management plan will be an iterative process. We will begin by building a baseline of data for measuring future progress toward our strategic goals, recognizing that it will take time, effort and resources to achieve our vision. We are confident that through our partnership with industry, operational customers and stakeholders we will succeed in our vision of sustaining the maritime dominance of the finest Navy and Marine Corps Team in the 21st Century. eight

Department of the Navy Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition 1000 Navy Pentagon Washington, D.C. 20350-1000 For Public Inquiries Contact: Chief of Information Department of the Navy 1200 Navy Pentagon Washington, D.C. 20350-1200 (703)697-9020 Visit our website at: http://www.hq.navy.mil/rda/ All individual photographs within this document are official U.S. Navy images.