NEW TOOLS FOR COORDINATING HEALTH CARE AND LONG-TERM SERVICES AND SUPPORTS. National HCBS Conference September 1, 2016

Similar documents
TEFT Grantee Meeting. National HCBS Conference August 31, 2015

CAHPS Home and Community- Based Services Survey Tools 2017 HCBS Conference August 31, 2017

Overview of TEFT Project

Standardizing LTSS Assessments for State Initiatives

TEFT Intensive. National Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Conference. August 28, 2017

New Opportunities in Long Term Services and Supports

Improving the Continuum of Care: Progress on Selected Provisions of the Affordable Care Act One Year Post-Passage

A Snapshot of the Connecticut LTSS Rebalancing Agenda

Trends in Health Information Exchange (HIE) and Links to Medicaid Led Quality Improvement

Minnesota Accountable Health Model Practice Transformation Grant Program

Strengthening Long Term Services and Supports (LTSS): Reform Strategies for States

Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene FY 2012 Memorandum of Understanding Annual Report of Activities and Accomplishments Highlights

Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Waiver Programs

Trends in State Medicaid Programs: Emerging Models and Innovations

Arkansas Independent Assessment. Provider Information Sessions October, 2017

Opportunities to Advance Lifespan Respite: Managed Long-Term Services and Supports and Affordable Care Act Options

5D QAPI from an Operational Approach. Christine M. Osterberg RN BSN Senior Nursing Consultant Pathway Health Pathway Health 2013

Trends in Medicaid Long-Term Services and Supports: A Move to Accountable Managed Care

Designing a Medicaid ACO Program: Insights from Trailblazing States

10/3/2014. Ohio Department of Medicaid

Maryland s Evolution Towards Value Based and Population Health in Pediatrics. June 21, 2017

Health Information Exchange in Minnesota

Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017

Diane Thorson Otter Tail County Public Health Director, and Wade Jyrkas, Lake Region Healthcare, CIS Director

HIT Glossary and Acronym List

medicaid Case Study: Georgia s Money Follows the Person Demonstration

Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC) February 2013 Meeting Summary

Lead Agency Quality Assurance Plan Survey for Medical Assistance Waiver Home and Community-Based Services

Michigan s Vision for Health Information Technology and Exchange

The Minnesota Accountable Health Model STATE INNOVATION MODEL (SIM) GRANT OVERVIEW, GOALS, & ACTIVITIES

Maryland s Health Information Exchange 6 th National Medicaid Congress

Elizabeth Mitchell December 1, Transforming Healthcare in an Uncertain Environment

What Have we Learned from the Pioneer ACO Model?

Improving Care for Dual Eligibles through Health IT

Medicaid Innovation Accelerator Project

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

HIT and Medicaid: Opportunities for States Part I of a three part series on the State Alliance for E-Health E

REQUEST FOR COMPETITIVE BID Strengthening State Systems to Improve Diabetes Management and Outcomes

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

A Self-Advocate s Guide to Medicaid

Nonprofit partnership. A grass roots organization where Board of Directors have vested interest in its success.

State Medicaid Directors Driving Innovation: Continuous Quality Improvement February 25, 2013

Transforming Louisiana s Long Term Care Supports and Services System. Initial Program Concept

Essentia Health. A View on Information Technology. ND HIMS Conference April 12, Tim Sayler, COO Essentia Health - West

Comprehensive Primary Care Plus. Plus (CPC+) Update for Payers

States Roles in Rebalancing Long-Term Care: Findings from the Aging Strategic Alignment Project

Managing Medicaid s Costliest Members

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Incentivizing Investments in Healthcare

Day 2, Morning Plenary 1 CMS and OIG Joint Briefing: Importance and Progress of Improved Background Screenings for Long Term Care

NCI-AD Overview. Quality of life survey focused on older adults and adults with physical disabilities Assess outcomes of state LTSS systems

ACO Practice Transformation Program

Sunflower Health Plan

Request for Information NJ Health Information Network. State of New Jersey. New Jersey HIT Coordinators Office. Request for Information

The Quality Payment Program Overview Fact Sheet

Implementing the Affordable Care Act:

Measure Applications Partnership

Provider Training Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) FIDA Education Provider Workgroup 6/1/15

Paying for Value and Aligning with Other Purchasers

A National Survey of Medicaid Readiness for Electronic Visit Verification. Introduction

Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations

Using Data to Promote Continuity of Care and Increase Accountability

Welcome and Introductions

CAQH CORE and ehealth Initiative Joint Webinar

National Coalition on Care Coordination (N3C) Care Coordination and the Role of the Aging Network. Monday, September 12, 2011

Health Information Exchange (HIE) Nevada s Department of Health & Human Services

Issue Brief. EHR-Based Care Coordination Performance Measures in Ambulatory Care

Lessons Learned from the Dual Eligibles Demonstrations. Real-Life Takeaways from California and Other States

MACRA & Implications for Telemedicine. June 20, 2016

Examining the Differences Between Commercial and Medicare ACO Models

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Summary of Key Health Information Technology Provisions June 1, 2010

EHR for the PCMH A Doctor s Perspective. Medical Home Summit

The Value of Integrating EMR and Claims/Cost Data in the Transition to Population Health Management

ArPath: Advancing Electronic LTSS Systems in Arkansas

QUALITY AND COMPLIANCE

Webinar Objectives. Coordination of Care Initiative Home Health Gap Collaborative Informational Webinar

Overview for HCBS. August 31, 2016

A strategy for building a value-based care program

Iowa Medicaid: Innovations & Initiatives

Care Coordination is more than a Care Coordinator: Translating Research to Practice in Rural

MNsure FY 2019 Navigator Outreach and Enrollment Grants Webinar Script and Notes

Improving Care and Lowering Costs for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries

State (and U. S. Territorial) Health Department Request for Technical Assistance (RTA): Applications due: (December 1, 2014) at 11:59 pm ET

Michigan s Response to CMS Solicitation State Demonstrations to Integrate Care for Dual Eligible Individuals

Bending the Health Care Cost Curve in New York State:

Health Information Exchange Activities for LTPAC and Behavioral Health Communities

Future of Patient Safety and Healthcare Quality

EVV Requirements in the 21 st Century Cures Act Pre-Conference Intensive

July 21, Rayburn House Office Building 2368 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC Washington, DC 20515

From Fragmentation to Integration: Bringing Medical Care and HCBS Together. Jessica Briefer French Senior Research Scientist

Long-Term Care Improvements under the Affordable Care Act (ACA)

Aetna Better Health of Illinois

Joseph Lugo. Administration for Community Living. Slide 2

What s Next for CMS Innovation Center?

Global Budget Revenue. October 8, 2015

Healthy Aging Recommendations 2015 White House Conference on Aging

Health System Transformation Overview of Health Systems Transformation in New York State. July 23, 2015

CDC s 6 18 Initiative: Informational Webinar for Prospective States and Territories

Definition of Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology for Hospitals Approved by the HIMSS Board of Directors April 24, 2009

DEFINING THE ROLE OF A CARE TRANSFORMATION ORGANIZATION

Medicare Medicaid Alignment Initiative (MMAI) November 14, 2014

Transcription:

NEW TOOLS FOR COORDINATING HEALTH CARE AND LONG-TERM SERVICES AND SUPPORTS National HCBS Conference September 1, 2016

2 SESSION OBJECTIVES What makes the TEFT Demonstration an innovative approach to HCBS delivery? How can your state, agency, or organization adopt health IT initiatives related to information exchange or engagement to improve HCBS delivery? lewin.com 2

PARTICIPATING TODAY Barbara Holt Cindy Gruman Cara Campbell Kathleen Tucker Greg Linden Tom Gossett Linda Aldoory lewin.com 3

AGENDA CMS Testing Experience and Functional Tools (TEFT) program background TEFT eltss Plan experience Health literacy and PHRs TEFT PHR experience lewin.com 4

CMS OVERVIEW OF TEFT Barbara Holt, Ph.D. Division of Community Systems Transformation, Disabled & Elderly Health Programs Group, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services lewin.com 5

LTSS Spending for HCBS Increases, Prompting New Quality and Health IT Tools through TEFT lewin.com 6

TEFT Program Background Introduced in Affordable Care Act Section 2701 Requirement for HHS to identify and publish initial core set of adult quality measures for adults eligible for Medicaid In response, CMS established TEFT as a Medicaid community-based long-term services and supports (CB-LTSS) Planning and Demonstration Grant Program CMS is working with six states to review and pilot systems that give beneficiaries access to personal health and LTSS information, and that support service delivery decision-making lewin.com 7

TEFT Components 1. Experience of Care Survey Field test a beneficiary experience survey within multiple CB-LTSS programs for validity and reliability 2. Functional Assessment and Standardized Items Field test a modified set of functional assessment measures for use with beneficiaries of CB-LTSS programs 3. Personal Health Record Demonstrate use of Personal Health Record (PHR) systems with beneficiaries of CB-LTSS 4. eltss Plan Identify, evaluate and harmonize an electronic Long-Term Services and Supports (eltss) plan in conjunction with the Office of the National Coordinator s Standards and Interoperability Framework lewin.com 8

What Did States Set Out to Accomplish? Awarded by CMS in March 2014 8 states currently active Focus today on health IT State* Experience of Care Survey Functional Assessment Standardized Items Personal Health Record eltss Plan Arizona Colorado Connecticut Georgia Kentucky Maryland Minnesota New Hampshire *Louisiana field tested Experience of Care Survey in Round 1 lewin.com 9

INTRODUCING THE ELTSS PLAN PILOTS Cara Campbell The Lewin Group lewin.com 10

TEFT Stakeholders TEFT state teams work with HCBS waiver populations Older Adults Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injuries Individuals with Physical Disabilities Individuals with Serious Mental Illness State agencies Care/case managers HCBS and other community providers ADRC/AAAs lewin.com 11

TEFT and other state initiatives TEFT is part of the state s larger information exchange efforts (e.g., MMIS, HIE, BIP, other LTSS IT systems) General HCBS waiver processes are similar in TEFT states TEFT will impact information exchange for providers and consumers Combined with other initiatives, TEFT will transform the paper-based HCBS system to increase electronic information exchange lewin.com 12

13 Areas of innovation in the eltss plan The coordination of HCBS information exchange between an individual s providers Transition from largely paper-based to electronic information collection Capture consistent information Interoperability between typically disparate providers Two focus areas Create the eltss plan Standardize the transmission of the eltss plan lewin.com 13

TEFT ELTSS PLAN: MINNESOTA Greg Linden, Stratis Health lewin.com 14

THE ELTSS PROJECT Identify, evaluate and test an electronic Long Term Services and Supports (e-ltss) standard with the Office of National Coordinator (ONC)

ONC ELTSS PROJECT CHARTER With its origins in the 2010 ACA, DHHS directed CMS to issue TEFT grants to, among other things, Identify and harmonize electronic LTSS (e-ltss) standards. Scope statement: To identify, evaluate and harmonize standards needed for the creation, exchange and re-use of: (i) key domains and associated data elements of CB -LTSS person-centered planning, assessment and services; and (ii) interoperable, accessible person-centered service plans for use by providers and beneficiaries, accountable entities and payers.

ELTSS INITIATIVE ROADMAP

INTERSECTION OF PHR AND ELTSS The PHR Pilot and the eltss Pilot are related to what degree remains to be discovered through our work together! LTSS data will be shared from DHS to Beneficiaries/caregivers, Case Managers and possibly other Providers through the PHR selected Providers in the selected Community Collaborative will explore sharing LTSS data among each other through the eltss Pilot

TEFT COMPONENT INTERSECTION eltss Pilot Services Provider Services Provider Services Provider LTSS Data Case Manager Community Collaborative

ELTSS PILOT ELEMENTS

EXAMPLE ELTSS DOMAINS Person Information e.g. Work (Income), Residence (Assistive Equipment), etc. Health, Wellness and Rights e.g. Health (Primary Care Provider), Safety (Feeling Safe), etc. Service Planning and Coordination e.g. Service Information (Current Residence), etc. Family and Caregiver Information e.g. Family Information (Lives with Family), etc. Cross-Cutting Sub-Domains e.g. Goals (Goals Narrative), Priorities (Preferences)

ELTSS DATASET SUGGESTION EXAMPLE

ELTSS PILOT PROJECT

WE HAVE GREAT PARTICIPANTS!

INTERESTED AND ENTHUSIASTIC They are very interested and enthusiastic Most of that is due to who they are as a community We selected their community because they were all in for ehealth We went through all the participating organizations and settings last week Bottom line: we re collecting data from 10 organizations and 18 settings! They have day jobs They are busy providing services to people/beneficiaries Objective has been to provide concrete, tangible and well - defined data collection requests and tools

THREE-TIER PILOT APPROACH

PILOT PROJECT PLAN ELEMENTS Tier I/Level I 1. Work plan development 2. Develop eltss training what is this initiate all about 3. Work with the selected Community Collaborative leadership to present Pilot goals and structure; solicit interested parties 4. Develop engagement model and data collection tools (paper, spreadsheet... nothing fancy) 5. Deliver eltss training Pilot program plan to participating Providers; share eltss data model; assign homework 6. Schedule Provider Check -In Calls to review completed homework that identifies useful eltss data element (desired state) 7. During calls, complete use case/dat a sharing matrix (partner -based send/receive matrix) 8. During calls, work with staff to assess eltss data readiness of their HIT systems (current state) 9. After all planning is complete, convene the participating providers; share use cases; plan exchange strategy 10. Develop an plan that might be paper, fax or secure PDF exchange between providers 11. Develop proposed success metrics and attributes; how will we measure the value? 12. Level I Closeout Review

PILOT PROJECT PLAN ELEMENTS (CONT.) Tier I/Level II 13. Providers develop required report objects; review with Pilot Team 14. Establish provider-specific exchange plans and milestones; communicate w/providers; staff education and workflow 15. Initiate Exchange Plan monitoring and mentoring (weekly by phone at first; bi -weekly later) 16. Capture feedback on benefits, value (both realized and missing), barriers, key learnings as the pilot rolls 17. Convene Pilot Team mid-point reviews; adjust pilot as necessary 18. Level II Closeout Review Tier II/Level III 19. Opportunistically use Direct as a transport mechanism; capture workflow impact and learnings 20. Level III Closeout Review

DATA-DRIVEN DISCOVERY Our participants are EXPERTS at defining and delivering CB -LTSS services They LIVE with their data they know it and depend upon it Best way to get in the game was to dive into the data FIRST They re on solid ground regarding their data This will help build awareness of our larger objectives as they sift through the data Going right for the data elements FIRST allows us to see what sub-domains (and Domains) were important to them by what was selected

ONC SUGGESTED DATA ELEMENTS

MISSING DATA ELEMENTS Note minimum-required fields

MINNESOTA PLAN ELEMENTS

DATA INVENTORY COMPLETE Everyone had evaluated data elements in three categories: The ONC Dataset Suggestions Minnesota LTSS Data Elements Missing Data Elements Data elements that are used were coded as: Electronic currently being used and available in an electronic system Paper the data element is currently being used on paper Future while not used today, the Provider can see a need for this data element in the future 27 columns by 457 rows (12,339 cells) of data and information!

DATA EXCHANGE MAP EXERCISE Each member of the collaborative looked at all the other member s data that was available electronically and indicated what elements they would like to receive

OUR ELTSS PILOT STANDARD! The data elements receiving 90% of the Receive votes are part of our Pilot s eltss data sharing standard This comprises about 122 of the most important data elements We need to recognized that: There are many other important data elements that should be part of our eltss standard some day There are many data elements we d want to have in our Standard even right now But our mission for this Pilot is to try to do data sharing now. So this is the dataset standard we ll work with for the Pilot data exchange phase

REPORT WRITING In May, providers began report writing activities to pull as many of the 122 data elements out of their information systems as possible The goal is to produce a report that can be turned into a PDF, which can then be shared securely between providers After the reports are ready, they will serve as our OTC eltss Data Sheets A Prototype form was shared with all of the Providers and EHR/HIT system vendors as a model to work towards

NEXT STEPS After understanding workflow and process implications, providers can begin securely sharing the OTC eltss Data Sheets The community HIE is the likely secure exchange mechanism However, most of the providers in the Collaborative also have subscriptions to a Direct HIESP as well The ONC has recently released the harmonized set of candidate data elements Our Collaborative will evaluate these data elements against our existing standard and incorporate them as appropriate

SUMMARY The Collaborative has been a really engaged and enthusiastic set of organizations A lot of hard, detailed work has been done through six months of effort We are moving into our next phase, which is secure exchange of our standard data elements We will validate the value of these data being exchanged We will learn about the implications and challenges of exchanging these data securely We will continue to deliver value to the ONC eltss effort

INTRODUCING THE HCBS PHR DEMONSTRATION Kathleen Tucker The Lewin Group lewin.com 41

42 Key activities supporting TEFT s PHR demonstration The integration of medical and social service information delivery to the individual via a PHR PHR Planning PHR environmental scans and review of state information systems Stakeholder engagement and design planning to identify features and functions for the PHR Procurement and requirements gathering for PHR configuration PHR Implementation User acceptance testing and user and stakeholder training Phased releases and refinements for the PHR Monitoring PHR adoption and usage lewin.com 42

TEFT PHR considerations for HCBS populations Use Medical and social service information is presented without technical jargon PHR access via web page on computer and mobile Training videos/help screens Allows beneficiaries to update/store electronic documents to the PHR (e.g., advanced directives) Accessibility Integrates with assistive technology (e.g., screen readers) Strong visual help cues to enter information Error messages appear in plain language with suggested course of action Definitions available by right-clicking or hovering over a word (e.g., tool tip ) lewin.com 43

HEALTH LITERACY Linda Aldoory, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Communication University of Maryland lewin.com 44

+ Have you ever had problems with Understanding side effects of medications listed? Filling out medical forms online? Emailing health care providers when confused? Sharing personal information through an electronic patient portal?

Health Literacy is the ability to Access Understand Use health messages and medical information.

+ Health Literacy Skills Numeracy Reading Listening Speaking Selfefficacy Critical reasoning Technology

+ Low Health Literacy and its Impact

+ In this country Only 12% of adults have average health literacy. This means that nearly 9 out of 10 lack the skills needed to manage their health. 69% who reported poor health have basic or below basic health literacy.

+ Impact of Low Health Literacy

+ Health Literacy in Health Care Settings

+ Where to address health literacy? Signage Forms and pre-op materials Discharge instructions Medical interpreters Provider communication Patient education materials Electronic patient portals and health records (PHRs)

+ PHRs and Health Literacy Health literacy has been shown to be key factor in patient willingness to adopt a PHR Low self efficacy in using PHRs connected to low health literacy Comfort level with technology affects use and ability to process information Low HL as a barrier to navigating PHR

+ Benefits of PHRs PHR allows for self-directed record maintenance. PHR allows time to read, process, and understand the information, and to coordinate communication with health team. Screen contrast, ability to zoom in, other factors enhance clarity for low health literate patients.

59 TEFT PHR: MINNESOTA Tom Gossett, Minnesota Department of Human Services lewin.com 59

FOCUS ON 2 OF 4 GRANT DELIVERABLES 1. Demonstrate use of an untethered Personal Health Record (PHR) system with beneficiaries of CB-LTSS 2. Identify, evaluate and test an electronic Long Term Services and Supports (e- LTSS) standard with the Office of National Coordinator (ONC) 60

PHR FOR LTSS GOAL Demonstrate that we CAN share information from DHS systems in a way that is: Accessible For seniors For people with disabilities Useful For beneficiaries/legal representatives For case managers Securely Available Where beneficiaries access the Internet Through a mobile-first platform 61

COLLABORATIVE MEMBERS Otter Tail PHR Community Collaborative: Otter Tail County Public Health Otter Tail County Human Services Lake Region Health Care (Hospital and clinics) LB Homes Pioneer Care Lakeland Mental Health Center Productive Alternatives 62

COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES Established contract with PHR vendor RelayHealth Established data sharing agreements Recruited beneficiaries, case managers and providers to participate in demo Create training materials for users 63

DHS AND MN.IT ACTIVITIES Created detailed requirements documentation Established connection with DHS data source Coordinating closely with State Innovation Model (SIM) and Integrated Health Partnership (IHP) leadership Created profile page to be passed to beneficiaries PHR Established secure mechanism to push data from DHS systems to RelayHealth PHR 64

#1. PHR FOR LTSS: UPDATED WIREFRAMES 65

#1. PHR FOR LTSS: DESIGN ITERATIONS 66

DHS PROFILE PAGE 67

MOBILE INTERFACE 68

PHR RELEASE #1 LAUNCH DATE October 3, 2016 69

RFP FOR ADDITIONAL PHR COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVES Total of $750,000 for up to 3 grantees to: Demonstrate a PHR with beneficiaries of MA LTSS, and Participate in testing an eltss standard Collaborative must have at least one partner who is part of a MN: Integrated Health Partnership (IHP) or Accountable Care Organization (ACO) 70

WHERE TO FIND THE RFP Available 7/18/2016 on the PHR for LTSS Demo Website: http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/dhs16_184574 71

TO LEARN MORE Go to the PHR for LTSS Demo Website http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/dhs16_184574 Subscribe to the PHR for LTSS Demo email Update Click on the Subscribe link under Where Can I Learn More on the PHR for LTSS Demo Website Contact Business Project Manager Tom Gossett Email: tom.l.gossett@state.mn.us Phone: 651-431-2601 72

QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION lewin.com 73

THANK YOU! Contact Information: Lewin Group TEFT Evaluation teft@lewin.com lewin.com 74