Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: June 22, 2017 Report Length: 5 Pages

Similar documents
The Assessment of Postoperative Vital Signs: Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: January 25, 2017 Report Length: 5 Pages

Disposable, Non-Sterile Gloves for Minor Surgical Procedures: A Review of Clinical Evidence

TITLE: Pill Splitting: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines

TITLE: Double Gloves for Prevention of Transmission of Blood Borne Pathogens to Patients: A Review of the Clinical Evidence

University of Ottawa (uottawa) Terms & Non-Disclosure Agreement. for. Mitacs Accelerate Internships and. Mitacs Elevate Postdoctoral Fellowships

Policy Forum Health Technology Policy Options Renal Replacement Therapy in Critical Care

KNOWLEDGE SYNTHESIS: Literature Searches and Beyond

Health Technology Assessment and Optimal Use: Medical Devices; Diagnostic Tests; Medical, Surgical, and Dental Procedures

Title: Length of use guidelines for oxygen tubing and face mask equipment

Context. Objectives. Hospital-based Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committees: Evolving Responsibilities and Membership

TITLE: Eden Alternative and Green House Concept of Care: Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines

Giant Tiger s Home for the Holidays Christmas Contest Official Rules

Our Terms of Use and other areas of our Sites provide guidelines ("Guidelines") and rules and regulations ("Rules") in connection with OUEBB.

Hand Antisepsis Procedures: A Review of Guidelines

Title: Automated External Defibrillators in Long-Term Care Facilities. Date: 24 September Context and Policy Issues:

Technology Overview. Issue 13 August A Clinical and Economic Review of Telephone Triage Services and Survey of Canadian Call Centre Programs

Rapid Review Evidence Summary: Manual Double Checking August 2017

Methodology Notes. Identifying Indicator Top Results and Trends for Regions/Facilities

COMPUS Procedure Evidence-Based Best Practice Recommendations

Robot-Assisted Surgeries A Project for CADTH, a Decision for Jurisdictions

Hain-Celestial Canada, ULC presents the Yves Veggie Cuisine SIZZING SUMMER FIRE UP YOUR GRILL Contest

Preoperative Consultations: OHTAC Recommendation

Methodology Notes. Cost of a Standard Hospital Stay: Appendices to Indicator Library

Ohio Opioid Technology Challenge Idea Phase

METHODOLOGY. Transparency. Conflicts of Interest. Multidisciplinary Steering Committee Composition. Evidence Review

Addendum to ICH E6 (R2)

Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual

Hostgator Scholarship Program. Official Rules

A systematic review of the literature: executive summary

Clinical Development Process 2017

STANDARDS OF PRACTICE 2018

Low Molecular Weight Heparins

Rapid Response Report:

Nova Scotia Public Reporting Serious Patient Safety events? Advancing Patient Safety & Quality?

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITA MODENA. Downloaded on November 10,2011 at 14:46:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

Essential Skills for Evidence-based Practice: Evidence Access Tools

2.3. Any amendment to the present "Terms and Conditions" will only be valid if approved, in writing, by the Agency.

Measure #356: Unplanned Hospital Readmission within 30 Days of Principal Procedure National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Background: As described below, 70 years of RN effectiveness makes it clear that RNs are central to a high-performing health system.

Turning for the Prevention and Management of Pressure Ulcers: OHTAC Recommendation

The Chevron-Marketer Miami-Dade Fuel Your School Promotion Miami-Dade County in Florida

INDIGENOUS DAY LIVE 2018 ROCK YOUR MOCS OFF CONTEST RULES AND REGULATIONS

Overview. COTBC Practice Standards for Managing Client Information, Tel: (250) Toll-Free BC: 1 (866) Fax: (250)

DAVIDsTEA + ME to WE Contest OFFICIAL CONTEST RULES NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN. A PURCHASE WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING.

Notre Dame College Website Terms of Use

#AcneFreeLife Sweepstakes Official Rules:

Hospital Mental Health Database, User Documentation

Living Will Sample Massachusetts (aka "Advanced Medical Directive")

Type of intervention Treatment. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis.

JERSEY COLLEGE RECOGNITION OF 5000 TH GRADUATE SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM RULES FOR PARTICIPATION AND AWARDING

Addendum 1 Compliance indicators for the Australian Privacy Principles

SEATTLE ART MUSEUM #SummerAtSAM PHOTO CONTEST OFFICIAL RULES

PUBLISHER Kensington Publishing/ WATTPAD WRITING CONTEST ( Writing Contest ) OFFICIAL RULES

Advanced Roles for Nurses: Clinical Nurse Specialists and Nurse Practitioners

Malnutrition Screening Pathway v.1.1

Aboriginal Health Human. A Current Snapshot

M-COR Modular Hip System Surgical Technique Chart

Misconceptions About Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Complications Rate Based on Insertion Settings: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Win a Panda Trek in Nepal Contest Official Rules

PCNE WS 4 Fuengirola: Development of a COS for interventions to optimize the medication use of people discharged from hospital.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

D DRUG DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS

International Champions Cup Singapore Skills Challenge Contest Terms and Conditions

Health Technology Review Business Case Template

2) The percentage of discharges for which the patient received follow-up within 7 days after

Request for Proposal. Study on Economic Impact of Calgary s Post-Secondary Sector. Reference Number:

Regional consultation on the availability and safety of blood transfusion during humanitarian emergencies

RBC Show Arbie and WIN Student Photo Contest Official Rules and Regulations. Questions:

XXXXX Kwalsa Phase II Project. Interconnection Facilities Study and Project Plan

Building & Strengthening Your Evidence Based Practice Literature Searches

Ontario Mental Health Reporting System

Data Quality Documentation, Hospital Morbidity Database

CONSORT guidelines for reporting abstracts of randomized trials. Sally Hopewell

THE ROLE OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT

Community Infection Prevention and Control Guidance for Health and Social Care. Waste Management

Raising the Bar On Infusion Safety: A Patient Safety Program at Baylor Scott & White Health Improving Infusion Pump Safety: A Systematic Approach

Google Capture the Flag 2018 Official Rules

The RYOBI COMMIT2IT Contest. Official Rules

Standard methods for preparation of evidence reports

TCLHIN Standardized Discharge Summary

THE 2018 WE SOLVE PROBLEMS ESSAY CONTEST OFFICIAL CONTEST RULES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP# CAFTB

Start-up business class

Searching for the Best Evidence

The Rx for Change database: a first-in-class tool for optimal prescribing and medicines use

Overview of a new study to assess the impact of hospice led interventions on acute use. Jonathan Ellis, Director of Policy & Advocacy

JOINT STATEMENT ON PREVENTING AND RESOLVING ETHICAL CONFLICTS INVOLVING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS AND PERSONS RECEIVING CARE

Processor Application

Request for Proposals for Faculty Research

Nursing skill mix and staffing levels for safe patient care

General Terms and Conditions

COURSE LISTING. Courses Listed. Training for Cloud with SAP Ariba in SAP Ariba Supplier Management. Last updated on: 04 Oct 2018.

Institute of Medicine Standards for Systematic Reviews

Supervising Support Personnel

Evidence-Based Practice Pulling the pieces together. Lynette Savage, RN, PhD, COI March 2017

SPECIAL EDITION MARCH 2015 SPECIAL EDITION PHARMACY TECHNICIANS

Allison J. Terry, PhD, MSN, RN

2009/2010 Benchmarking Comparison of Canadian Hospitals

CLEAN TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Transcription:

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Syringe and Mini Bag Smart Infusion Pumps for Intravenous Therapy in Acute Settings: Clinical Effectiveness, Cost- Effectiveness, and Guidelines Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: June 22, 2017 Report Length: 5 Pages

Authors: Charlotte Wells, Melissa Severn Cite As: Syringe and Mini Bag Smart Infusion Pumps for Intravenous Therapy in Acute Settings: Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines. Ottawa: CADTH; 2017 Jun. (CADTH rapid response report: summary of abstracts). Acknowledgments: Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care professionals, health systems leaders, and policy-makers make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. While patients and others may access this document, the document is made available for informational purposes only and no representations or warranties are made with respect to its fitness for any particular purpose. The information in this document should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or as a substitute for the application of clinical judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or other professional judgment in any decision-making process. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) does not endorse any information, drugs, therapies, treatments, products, processes, or services. While care has been taken to ensure that the information prepared by CADTH in this document is accurate, complete, and up-to-date as at the applicable date the material was first published by CADTH, CADTH does not make any guarantees to that effect. CADTH does not guarantee and is not responsible for the quality, currency, propriety, accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in any third-party materials used in preparing this document. The views and opinions of third parties published in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of CADTH. CADTH is not responsible for any errors, omissions, injury, loss, or damage arising from or relating to the use (or misuse) of any information, statements, or conclusions contained in or implied by the contents of this document or any of the source materials. This document may contain links to third-party websites. CADTH does not have control over the content of such sites. Use of third-party sites is governed by the third-party website owners own terms and conditions set out for such sites. CADTH does not make any guarantee with respect to any information contained on such third-party sites and CADTH is not responsible for any injury, loss, or damage suffered as a result of using such third-party sites. CADTH has no responsibility for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by third-party sites. Subject to the aforementioned limitations, the views expressed herein are those of CADTH and do not necessarily represent the views of Canada s federal, provincial, or territorial governments or any third party supplier of information. This document is prepared and intended for use in the context of the Canadian health care system. The use of this document outside of Canada is done so at the user s own risk. This disclaimer and any questions or matters of any nature arising from or relating to the content or use (or misuse) of this document will be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein, and all proceedings shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of Ontario, Canada. The copyright and other intellectual property rights in this document are owned by CADTH and its licensors. These rights are protected by the Canadian Copyright Act and other national and international laws and agreements. Users are permitted to make copies of this document for non-commercial purposes only, provided it is not modified when reproduced and appropriate credit is given to CADTH and its licensors. About CADTH: CADTH is an independent, not-for-profit organization responsible for providing Canada s health care decision-makers with objective evidence to help make informed decisions about the optimal use of drugs, medical devices, diagnostics, and procedures in our health care system. SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Syringe and Mini Bag Smart Infusion Pumps for IV Therapy in Acute Settings 2

Research Questions 1. What is the comparative clinical effectiveness between smart infusion syringe pumps and smart infusion mini bag pumps in patients requiring intravenous therapy in acute care settings? 2. What is the comparative cost-effectiveness between smart infusion syringe pumps and smart infusion mini bag pumps in patients requiring intravenous therapy in acute care settings? 3. What are the evidence-based guidelines associated with the use of smart infusion pumps in patients requiring intravenous therapy in acute care settings? Key Findings No relevant comparative literature was identified regarding syringe and mini bag smart infusion pumps for IV therapy in acute settings. In addition, no evidence-based guidelines were identified. Methods A limited literature search was conducted on key resources including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) databases, Canadian and major international health technology agencies, as well as a focused Internet search. No filters were applied to limit the retrieval by study type. The search was limited to English language documents published between Jan 1, 2012 and Jun 14, 2017. Internet links were provided, where available. Selection Criteria One reviewer screened citations and selected studies based on the inclusion criteria presented in Table 1. Table 1: Selection Criteria Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes Study Designs Any age patient receiving intravenous (IV) therapy for any reason in an acute care setting Smart infusion pumps syringe infusion (also termed large volume infusion pumps) Q1-2: Smart infusion pump- mini bag (also termed large volume infusion pumps) Q3: No comparator Q1: Comparative clinical effectiveness (e.g., but not limited, reducing medication errors, improved patient satisfaction, etc.), safety (e.g., but not limited to, medication errors, harms associated with the different types of infusion, etc.) Q2: Comparative cost-effectiveness Q3: Guidelines (e.g., which device is there more supporting for, infusion standards, infusion practices, etc.) Health technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized studies, economic evaluations, evidence-based guidelines SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Syringe and Mini Bag Smart Infusion Pumps for IV Therapy in Acute Settings 3

Results No comparative health technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized studies, or economic evaluations were identified regarding syringe and mini bag smart infusion pumps for IV therapy in acute settings. In addition, no evidence-based guidelines were identified. References of potential interest are provided in the appendix. Overall Summary of Findings No relevant comparative literature or evidence-based guidelines were identified regarding syringe and mini bag smart infusion pumps for IV therapy in acute settings, therefore, no summary can be provided. References Summarized Health Technology Assessments Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Randomized Controlled Trials Non-Randomized Studies Economic Evaluations Guidelines and Recommendations No literature identified SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Syringe and Mini Bag Smart Infusion Pumps for IV Therapy in Acute Settings 4

Appendix Further Information Clinical Practice Guidelines Uncertain Methodology 1. Intravenous guidelines for the adult patient: resource manual [Internet]. Belleville (ON): Quinte Health Care; 2016 Jan. [cited 2017 Jun 21]. Available from: http://www.qhc.on.ca/photos/custom/qhc%20intravenous%20guidelines%20for%20th e%20adult%20patient%20resource%20manual%20feb%202016.pdf See: Delivery Methods, pages 18-19 2. Vascular Access Clinical Practice Committee. Clinical practice guideline: intravenous therapy [Internet]. Surrey (BC): Fraser Health; 2014 May 15. [cited 2017 Jun 21]. Available from: http://research.fraserhealth.ca/media/2014%2005%2015%20iv%20therapy%20cpg% 20FINAL.pdf See: Information provided on a Drug Library, pages 6, 9, 45, 48, 52 Information on smart pumps throughout Review Articles 3. Arthur KJ, Catlin AC, Quebe A, Washington A. Changing Smart Pump Vendors: Lessons Learned. Hosp Pharm. 2016 Oct;51(9):782-9. PubMed: PM27803509 SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Syringe and Mini Bag Smart Infusion Pumps for IV Therapy in Acute Settings 5