TRANSPORTATION DISCUSSION WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL COUNCIL BEN HART, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, GOED

Similar documents
Testimony of. Before the House Armed Services Committee on the Economic Consequences of Defense Sequestration. October 26, 2011

County Commissioners Association of Ohio

Welcome HUNTSVILLE/MADISON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF HUNTSVILLE/MADISON COUNTY

Military Economic Impact Analysis for the State of Louisiana

Florida s Financially-Based Economic Development Tools & Return on Investment

Positioning the Commonwealth for Healthy Economic Growth

Economic Trends and Florida s Competitive Position

FEDERAL SPENDING AND REVENUES IN ALASKA

GREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT Chris Camacho, President & CEO

Update on HB2 Preparation. Presentation to FAMPO May, 2016

Questions and Answers Florida Department of Economic Opportunity Employment and Unemployment Data Release July 2018 (Released August 17, 2018)

FIVE YEAR FORECAST FY THROUGH FY

THE STATE OF THE MILITARY

City of Palmdale, CA 2018 Federal Agenda

Implementation Projects & Initiatives 2013 Strategic Economic Development

Northeast Ohio Health, Science, and Innovation Coalition (NOHSIC)

Broadband Expansion Ontario s Digital Strategy. Northwestern Ontario Regional Conference September 30, 2010

Economic Impact of Hospitals and Health Systems in North Carolina. Stephanie McGarrah North Carolina Hospital Association August 2017

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Wright State University

Expenditures by Program Explore Minnesota Tourism 0 9,915 10,626 11,626 22,252. Full-Time Equivalents (FTE)

Incentives and Economic Development Policy ELLEN HARPEL NACCTFO COURSE WASHINGTON, DC MARCH 2018

The Economic Impacts of the New Economy Initiative in Southeast Michigan

Economic Development Strategic Plan Executive Summary Delta County, CO. Prepared By:

Metrics Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal

Fiscal Research Center

Presentation to Community Planning and Economic Development Standing Committee July 20th, 2017

Stafford County Economic Development FY 2018 Business Plan. February 10, 2017

Building the Next Metropolitan Centre. The City of Surrey Economic Strategy Overview


Local Government Economic Development Incentives Survey for FY

Economic Development Strategy

Economic Analysis of Proposals to Limit the Municipal Bond Market: 501(c)(3) Issuance

Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017

CONSOLIDATED PLAN 2017 Annual Action Plan

Qology Direct, a marketing services company, is adding 250 jobs in Plantation and making a $1.25 million capital investment.

Appendix Tactics and Metrics from State Agencies and Organizations

Association of Consulting Engineering Companies of PEI

NASHVILLE ECONOMIC MARKET

Coastal Alabama: Stronger Together Wiley Blankenship // Coastal Alabama Partnership. August 18 th, 2016

SECTION 2 INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION

Fiscal Research Center

Hiring America s Military Veterans. Great for Business Great for America!

The Washington Area s Current Economic Performance

Washington Area Economy and Housing Market: Performance and Outlook NVAR Economic Summit

Durham Region Toronto Buffalo. Cleveland Pittsburgh

Research Funding in Texas

APPENDIX METROFUTURE OVERVIEW OVERVIEW

Fiscal Research Center

Attracting Private Sector Investment in Infrastructure Experiences from India

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Page 2-141

Dane County Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Goals & Objectives HED Work Group July 7, 2006

Kenneth E. Poole, PhD. National Conference of State Legislators August 11, 2012

CEDS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SWOT FOUR PRIORITY GOALS WORKFORCE & EDUCATION

NORTH CAROLINA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD 2011 ANNUAL REPORT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Maine s Economic Outlook: 2009 and Beyond

Build New Mexico Four steps to direct and support short-term innovations to build New Mexico s 21st century economy over the next few years

Economic Development Element

REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF DEFENSE-RELATED SPENDING IN ILLINOIS

The Basics of Economic Development

SHASTA EDC BUSINESS PLAN

The National Defense Boost in Rural America

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS IN UTAH

P E N N SY LVA N I A M I L I TA R Y I N S TA L L AT I O N S // I M PACT S

Regional Development Plans

How are Things Going? Thoughts to Barry County

Central Ontario. Canada s Heartland

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

16 Department of the Air Force Department of Veterans Affairs Department of Homeland Security

BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND URBAN TRAVEL

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal

Why do metro areas matter to economic recovery and prosperity? What is ARRA, and how well does it empower cities and metro areas?

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Regional Health Care as an Economic Generator Economic Impact Assessment Dothan, Alabama Health Care Industry

Telecommuting or doing work

MUNICIPALITY OF TRENT HILLS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN

PRELIMINARY. The F-35s Are Coming: How Can You Be Prepared? Fairbanks North Star Borough Eielson Regional Growth Plan

North Texas Commission 2017 Legislative Priorities

$787 Billion Economic Recovery Package Clears Congress; Focuses On Long- Term Competitiveness, in Addition to Job Creation

Concept Paper for ANN VISTA Project for FY 2012 Submitted

WATERLOO EDC Q1 REPORT

NAPA COUNTY GRAND JURY

Technical Report 2: Synthesis of Existing Plans

SOURCE: SITE SELECTION, NOVEMBER 2015 #1 STATE FOR INCENTIVE PROGRAMS (TIED WITH SOUTH CAROLINA).

INVEST. TRADE. PROSPER.

Kforce Inc. J.P. Morgan Ultimate Services Investor Conference November 14, 2017

City of Gardner, KS Business and Economic Development Director

Innovation Village, Cal Poly Pomona Economic Benefits Analysis City of Pomona

Cardinal Bank & George Mason University

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS

Better Align H-1B Visa Fee Revenues to Local Workforce Needs

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

Where the World is Going

HAWTHORNE ARMY DEPOT, NV

BEST PLACE FOR BUSINESS & CAREERS 1. 1st BEST PLACE TO DO BUSINESS 5

Wisconsin Chamber of Commerce Executives

Estimating the Economic Contributions of the Utah Science Technology and Research Initiative (USTAR) to the Utah Economy

Opportunity Austin 2.0 Midcourse Update Strategy Update Recommendations. J. Mac Holladay, CEO September 13, 2011

Village of Hinckley: Local, State and Federal Tax Incentive Programs

Get it Done: Rebuild Michigan GRETCHEN WHITMER S PLAN FOR SAFE ROADS, CLEAN WATER, AND A BETTER ECONOMY

Victoria: state economy and State Budget,

Transcription:

TRANSPORTATION DISCUSSION WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL COUNCIL BEN HART, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, GOED

TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION Utah: accolades, assets and challenges State s economic development toolkit Corporate recruitment issues

Attract Recruit Grow Tourism, Film & Global Branding Corporate Recruitment & International Urban and Rural Business Services

RECENT ACCOLADES #1 Best State for Business #1 Travel Destination #5 Broadband Speeds in U.S. #1 Fastest Growing State #1 in Workforce Quality A+ Small Business Friendliness #1 in Transportation Tech Innovation

CROSSROADS OF THE WEST Convergence of highway, rail, air and perhaps an Inland Port?

1.5 hour flights from SFO and LAX to SLC UTAH: JUST ANOTHER CALIFORNIA SUBURB

UTAH: PRUDENT AND PREDICTABLE AAA Bond Rating Utah has earned AAA ratings since the 1960s. #4 most fiscally healthy state (Source: George Washington University)

INCREASING URBANIZATION 100% 90% 91% 80% % of the Population Urban/Rural 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 9% 0% 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 University of Utah, US Census, Pricenomics

UTAH S ECONOMIC CLUSTERS FINANCIAL SERVICES 75,000 jobs AEROSPACE & DEFENSE 32,000 jobs IT/SOFTWARE 70,000 jobs MANUFACTURING & DISTRIBUTION 190,000 jobs LIFE SCIENCES 35,000 jobs OUTDOOR PRODUCTS 7,000 jobs ENERGY 16,000 jobs ADVANCED MATERIALS 12,000 jobs

UTAH IS FUN Tourism is a $8.4 B+ industry that relies on transportation infrastructure

TRANSPORTATION, TALENT AND CORPORATE RECRUITMENT EDCU: For site selectors, workforce is #1 priority, while transportation access and efficiency is #5 (out of 14 top priorities). Some factors GOED and EDCU hear: The 30-minute commute lasso Where are the workers? Air quality Talent recruitment Access to outdoor recreation Workers quality of life Includes $100 mm in Tourism/Outdoor Rec improvements Flight times to West Coast Access from HQ

AN UNFAIR SIMPLIFICATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE DECISIONS If we build it, they will come. If they come, we will build it.

SOME THOUGHTS FROM WORKING GROUP MEETING Cluster and Economic Development Impact on Infrastructure Decisions Consider Mega-Site Strategy Data Driven Investment Incentives Housing Locations

AEROSPACE

SOFTWARE/IT

INNOVATION OF OUR HIGHWAYS Autonomous vehicle testing on our highways UDOT software to measure signal performance now shared nationwide Cutting-edge traffic signal control UDOT leads nation in development of Intelligent Design and Construction (IDC) initiative

A WAY TO PROMOTE YOUR COMMUNITY: EDCUTAH PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT Help municipalities and counties determine readiness to negotiate and win more corporate expansion projects How well do you understand: Specific industry Local and state incentive processes Site selector strategies Your own communities Demographics Labor Infrastructure Other trends

THANK YOU Q. VAL HALE, GOED JEFF EDWARDS, UAMMI TRAVIS SESSIONS, BIOMERICS

Utah s Defense Sector: Economic Impacts of the Military and Veterans September 19, 2017 Wasatch Front Economic Development District

Economic Impact Generators Hill Air Force Base Dugway Proving Ground Tooele Army Depot Utah National Guard Reserves, Recruiting and ROTC Veterans Additional Contracts and Grants Utah Defense Totals

Combined Economic Impact of Defense in Utah: 109,000 jobs and $9.2 billion in economic activity Defense was responsible for 5.8% of Utah s jobs, 7.1% of its earnings, and 6.2% of its GDP in 2015. Table 1: Economic Impact of Utah s Defense Sector, 2015 (Millions of Dollars) Category Impact Jobs 109,021 Earnings $6,384.3 Gross Domestic Product $9,212.7 Source: Gardner Policy Institute analysis, REMI PI+ Jobs Earnings GDP 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Hill AFB Dugway Tooele Guard Reserves & Other Veterans Grants & Contracts

Hill Air Force Base supported over 47,000 jobs and about $4.6 billion in GDP for Utah in 2015. Table 2: Statewide Impacts of Hill Air Force Base, 2015 (Millions of Dollars) Category Direct Federal* Indirect & Induced Total Jobs 16,732 30,609 47,341 Earnings $1,825.2 $1,377.1 $3,202.3 Gross Domestic Product $4,569.8 * Does not include jobs of contract civilian or private businesses on base. These are included in the indirect and induced jobs. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis using the REMI PI+ model (see Table 2.3 on p. 11 of the report) Hill AFB employed 16,732 military personnel and DoD civilians. Including contractors, nearly 20,000 people worked on base. Hill AFB spent $2.1 billion in Utah during 2015, including employee earnings, DoD contracts, and other expenses.

The Utah National Guard supported over 13,000 jobs and $840 million in GDP for Utah in 2015. Table 9: Statewide Impacts of the Utah National Guard, 2015 (Millions of Dollars) Category Direct Federal Indirect & Induced Total Jobs 9,280 3,896 13,176 Earnings $245.7 $231.6 $477.3 Gross Domestic Product $841.9 Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis using the REMI PI+ model (see Table 5.3 on p. 18 of the report) The Utah National Guard employed 2,383 people full-time, as well as 6,897 Guard members, in 2015. The Guard spent an estimated $251.3 million in-state.

Dugway Proving Ground supported nearly 2,500 jobs and $225 million in GDP for Utah. Table 3: Statewide Impacts of Dugway Proving Ground, 2015 (Millions of Dollars) Category Direct Federal* Indirect & Induced Total Jobs 689 1,790 2,479 Earnings $78.9 $96.9 $175.9 Gross Domestic Product $225.0 * Does not include jobs of contract civilians or private businesses on base. These are included in the indirect and induced jobs. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis using the REMI PI+ model (see Table 3.3 on p. 14 of the report) Dugway Proving Ground employed 689 people and spent an estimated $135.1 million in Utah during 2015. Including contractors, over 1,500 people worked on base.

Tooele Army Depot supported 1,100 jobs and $114 million in GDP for Utah in 2015. Table 4: Statewide Impacts of Tooele Army Depot, 2015 (Millions of Dollars) Category Direct Federal Indirect & Induced Total Jobs 550 614 1,164 Earnings $41.0 $34.0 $75.0 Gross Domestic Product $113.8 Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis using the REMI PI+ model (see Table 4.3 on p. 15 of the report) Tooele Army Depot employed 550 people and spent $56.8 million in Utah during 2015.

Utah Veterans 150,904 veterans, of which 16,963 were military retirees Almost $1.5 billion in benefits received Direct VA employment of 3,010, mostly in Salt Lake VA contracts & grants Source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Census Bureau (see Figure 7.1 on p. 22 of the report).

Federal spending for veterans in Utah supported 24,000 jobs and $1.9 billion in GDP for Utah in 2015. Table 5: Economic Impacts of Federal Spending for Veterans in Utah, 2015 (Millions of Dollars) Category Impact Jobs 24,480 Earnings $1,437.8 Gross Domestic Product $1,891.9 Source: Gardner Policy Institute analysis using REMI PI+ model (see Table 7.6 on p. 25 of the report) During 2015, the VA employed 3,010 people in Utah. VA and DoD spending for Utah veterans was $1.8 billion, including employee earnings, health care, pensions for veterans and military retirees, federal contracts & grants, and other expenditures.

Defense Contracts and Grants in Utah Amounts in 19 Counties Top Three Counties: Salt Lake $831.4 million Davis $387.5 million Weber $111.5 million Other WFEDD Counties: Tooele $43.0 million Morgan $2.5 million Source: Gardner Policy Institute analysis, USASpending.gov (see Figure 8.2 on p. 28 of the report).

Top 10 Defense Contractors Table 6: Ten Largest DoD and VA Contractors in Utah, FY 2015 (Millions of Dollars) Company Amount Share L-3 Communications $334.6 22.1% Orbital ATK $240.7 15.9% Northrop Grumman $82.5 5.5% Boeing $36.8 2.4% Utah State University $32.7 2.2% Rio Vista Management $29.6 2.0% Unisys Corp. $29.6 2.0% BioFire $28.9 1.9% ImSAR $24.1 1.6% Sverdrup Technology $21.9 1.4% Total $861.5 56.9% Note: Shares are of total FY15 DOD and VA contracts of $1.5 billion. Source: Gardner Policy Institute analysis of data from USASpending.gov. (see Table 8.5 on p. 29 of the report)

Fiscal Impacts: The defense sector directly and indirectly generated $146.3 million in net state revenue. Table 7: State Fiscal Impacts of Utah s Defense Sector, 2015 (Millions of Dollars) Category Impact Revenue $387.7 Operating Expenditures $232.4 Net State Revenue $146.3 Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis. (see Table 2, p. 3 in report)

Components of $146.3 Million in Net State Revenue from the Defense Sector in 2015 Dugway 4.1% Tooele 1.7% Guard 7.9% Reserves & Other 3.3% Veterans 2.9% Hill AFB 58.7% Grants & Contracts 21.4% Source: Figure 3 on p. 4 of the report.

Full Report Utah s Defense Sector: Economic Impacts of the Military and Veterans John Downen and Levi Pace, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute, March 2017 gardner.utah.edu/wp-content/uploads/defensereportfinal.pdf Contact Information Juliette Tennert, Director, 801-581-3362, juliette.tennert@utah.edu John Downen, Senior Research Analyst, 801-581-3366, john.downen@utah.edu Levi Pace, Research Analyst, 801-587-9890, levi.pace@utah.edu Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute David Eccles School of Business 411 E. South Temple Street Salt Lake City, UT 84111 801-585-5618 gardner.utah.edu Facebook.com/gardnerpolicyinstitute Twitter.com/KemGardnerInst LinkedIn

Additional Slides Details on direct, indirect and induced economic impacts for each defense component, similar to the slide for Hill AFB with Table 2.

Economic Impact of Hill Air Force Base through 2040: Forecast and Simulation

Statewide Losses Without Hill AFB Table 8: Statewide Economic, Demographic and Fiscal Impacts from Hill AFB Closure Scenario (Millions of Constant 2015 Dollars, Share of State Total) Category 2023 2040 Employment 35,678 1.7% 28,712 1.1% Earnings $2,926.5 2.6% $2,644.3 1.8% GDP $3,899.5 2.1% $3,770.5 1.5% Population 30,616 0.9% 53,830 1.2% State Tax Revenue $155.5 NA $172.8 NA State Expenditures $122.8 NA $230.4 NA Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis (see report Table 10.1, p. 37).

Statewide employment without Hill AFB: more than 35,000 jobs in 2023 and 28,000 jobs in 2040. 2,750,000 2,650,000 2,550,000 2,450,000 Closure Period Baseline Baseline less impact Employment 2,350,000 2,250,000 2,150,000 2,050,000 1,950,000 1,850,000 1,750,000 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 Source: Gardner Policy Institute analysis using REMI PI+ model and Utah GOMB 2012 baseline employment projections (see Figure 10.1 on p. 37 of the report).

Losses in Davis County Without Hill AFB Table 9: Davis County Economic, Demographic and Fiscal Impacts of Hill AFB Closure Scenario (Millions of Constant 2015 Dollars, Share of County Total) Category 2023 2040 Employment by Place of Residence 20,004 9.4% 19,077 7.9% Earnings by Place of Residence $1,670.6 13.5% $1,799.9 11.3% GDP $2,877.3 17.7% $2,899.7 13.4% Population 20,604 5.6% 40,594 9.5% Local Tax Revenue $39.1 NA $47.9 NA Local Expenditures $13.4 NA $34.7 NA Note: Employment and population impacts are relative to the GOMB 2012 baseline forecasts; earnings and GDP are relative to the REMI PI+ baseline. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis using the REMI PI+ model and Gardner Policy Institute fiscal model.

Davis County residential employment without Hill AFB: 20,000 jobs in 2023, 19,100 jobs in 2040 Employment by Place of Residence 250,000 240,000 230,000 220,000 210,000 200,000 190,000 180,000 Pre base closing 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Closure Period Baseline Baseline less impact 2026 2028 2030 Return to pre base closing level 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 Source: Gardner Policy Institute analysis using REMI PI+ model (see Figure 10.8 on p. 41 of the report).

Losses in Weber County Without Hill AFB Table 10: Weber County Economic, Demographic and Fiscal Impacts of Hill AFB Closure Scenario (Millions of Constant 2015 Dollars, Share of County Total) Category 2023 2040 Employment by Place of Residence 5,967 3.8% 4,290 2.2% Earnings by Place of Residence $506.2 7.1% $454.7 5.0% GDP $348.9 3.0% $328.3 2.1% Population 5,392 2.0% 8,588 2.5% Local Tax Revenue $12.4 NA $13.0 NA Local Expenditures $4.1 NA $7.9 NA Note: Employment and population impacts are relative to the GOMB 2012 baseline forecasts; earnings and GDP are relative to the REMI PI+ baseline. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis using the REMI PI+ model and Gardner Policy Institute fiscal model.

Weber County residential employment without Hill AFB: 6,000 jobs in 2023, 4,300 jobs in 2040 Employment by Place of Residence 195,000 185,000 175,000 165,000 155,000 145,000 135,000 Pre base closing 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Closure Period Baseline Baseline less impact Return to pre base closing level 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 Source: Gardner Policy Institute analysis using REMI PI+ model (see Figure 10.8 on p. 41 of the report).

Reserves, recruiting, and ROTC supported over 6,700 jobs and $340 million in GDP for Utah in 2015. Table 10: Economic Impacts of Reserves, Recruiting and ROTC, 2015 (Millions of Dollars) Category Direct Federal Indirect & Induced Total Jobs 4,462 2,284 6,746 Earnings $73.7 $125.5 $199.2 Gross Domestic Product $339.8 Note: This slide does not include 1,128 military and 214 civilian reserve employees at Hill AFB or 106 military and 6 civilian recruiters at Hill AFB and the Utah National Guard. They are all included in Hill and Guard impacts, respectively. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis using the REMI PI+ model (see report, Table 6.2, p. 11 for reserves; Table 6.5, p. 20 for recruiting, Table 6.9, p. 21 for ROTC) Reserves: 3,978 reservists and active-duty, 185 civilians Recruiting: 183 military and 47 civilians ROTC: 54 military and 15 civilians

Additional contracts and grants supported 13,600 jobs and $1.2 billion in GDP for Utah in 2015. Table 12: Economic Impacts of Other Contracts and Grants to Utah Recipients, 2015 (Millions of Dollars) Category Impact Jobs 13,635 Earnings $816.8 Gross Domestic Product $1,230.4 Only includes DoD and VA contracts and grants that were not included in the analysis for veterans, Utah National Guard, or any military installation. Source: Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute analysis using the REMI PI+ model (see report, Table 8.9, p. 30 for grants; Table 8.13, p. 32 for contracts) The DoD and VA provided $891.4 million in contracts and grants to Utah recipients in 2015, in addition to those included in economic impacts for veterans, the Guard or any Utah military installation.

Historical Trends in Federal Defense Employment

Defense employment has been fairly stable in Utah since 2000, with a slight decline in military personnel and a somewhat larger increase in civilian defense jobs. Number of Jobs 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Military Civilian Defense 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics (see Figure 4 on p. 4 of the report or Figure 9.1 on p. 33).

Utah s non-defense employment has grown faster than its defense employment. Defense Jobs as a % of All Utah Jobs 5.0% 4.5% 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 4.5% 1.8% 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics (see Figure 5 on p. 4 of the report or Figure 9.2 on p. 33).