Joseph W. Thompson, MD, MPH Arkansas Surgeon General Director, Arkansas Center for Health Improvement

Similar documents
State Innovation Spotlight: Implementing Multi-Payer Bundled Payment Models

Bi-annual Stakeholder Meeting. May 8, 2013

Ohio SIM: Episode-based Payment Update. Webinar September 21, 2017

Ohio SIM: Episode-based payment updates. Webinar June 29, 2017

Arkansas PCMH: Transformational Success Story. William Golden MD MACP Medical Director, AR Medicaid UAMS Prof. Int. Med and Public Health

NASHP s 30 th Annual State Health Policy Conference. Timeline of Tennessee Health Care Innovation Initiative

Transforming Payment for a Healthier Ohio

Tennessee Health Care Innovation Initiative

Employer Breakout Session Payment Change in Ohio: What it Means for Employers

Statewide Tracking Report

Strategies for Payment Reform in States: Selecting Innovative Models

Oregon s Health System Transformation: The Coordinated Care Model. March 2014 Jeanene Smith MD, MPH Chief Medical Officer- Oregon Health Authority

Arkansas Health Care Payment Improvement Initiative: 2 nd Annual Statewide Tracking Report

SNF * Readmissions Bootcamp The SNF Readmission Penalty, Post-Acute Networks, and Community Collaboratives

Balancing State, Federal and Internal Bundle Payment Initiatives

Ohio Medicaid Overview

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

HEALTH CARE REFORM IN THE U.S.

How to Win Under Bundled Payments

Exhibit 1. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Year 1 Performance of Participating Accountable Care Organizations (2013)

Delivery System Reform The ACA and Beyond: Challenges Strategies Successes Failures Future

Troubleshooting Audio

HHW-HIPP0314 (9/13) MDwise Annual IHCP Seminar. Exclusively serving Indiana families since 1994.

Medicaid Payment Reform at Scale: The New York State Roadmap

Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield Patient Centered Medical Home Provider Manual

NH Medicaid Patient Centered Medical Home Pilot

Transitions Through the Care Continuum: Discussions on Barriers to Patient Care, Communications, and Advocacy

The New World of Value Driven Cardiac Care

Maternity Management. The best part? These are available to you at no additional cost. Intro

MEDICAL HOMES Arkansas Hospital Association

The New York State Value-Based Payment (VBP) Roadmap. Primary Care Providers March 27, 2018

Performance Measurement Work Group Meeting 10/18/2017

THE ALPHABET SOUP OF MEDICAL PAYMENTS: WHAT IS MACRA, VBP AND MORE! Lisa Scheppers MD FACP Margo Ferguson MT MSOM

The Role of Analytics in the Development of a Successful Readmissions Program

Innovative Models of Care

CIGNA Collaborative Accountable Care

CMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018

Cutting Avoidable Readmissions Starts in the Emergency Department

Reducing Readmissions: Potential Measurements

1/14/2013. Emerging Healthcare Issues: How Will They Impact Hospital Reimbursement? EMERGING HEALTHCARE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

AGENDA. QUANTIFYING THE THREATS & OPPORTUNITIES UNDER HEALTHCARE REFORM NAHC Annual Meeting Phoenix AZ October 21, /21/2014

Regulatory Advisor Volume Eight

Managing Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions

The President s and Other Bipartisan Proposals to Reform Medicare: Post-Acute Care (PAC) Reform. Summary

Health Economics Program

10/3/2014. Ohio Department of Medicaid

Bi-Annual Stakeholder Meeting May 12, 2014

Money and Members: Pay for Performance in a Medicaid Program

Wendy Long, M.D., M.P.H.

West Valley and Central Valley Care Coordination Coalitions

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.2 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.3 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

Programs and Procedures for Chronic and High Cost Conditions Related to the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program

Data-Driven Strategy for New Payment Models. Objectives. Common Acronyms

VALUE PAYMENT: A NEW REIMBURSEMENT SYSTEM USING QUALITY AS CURRENCY

Registering for PQRS Reporting and Understanding the Implications and Proposed Policies for the Value based Payment Modifier

Medicaid Payments to Incentivize Delivery System Reform Webinar Dec. 17, :00 3:00 pm ET

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Healthy Aging Recommendations 2015 White House Conference on Aging

Healthgrades 2016 Report to the Nation

MACRA The shift to Value Based Care and Payment. Michael Munger, M.D., FAAFP

MEDICAID MEDICAL HOMES PAYING ON A PER MEMBER, PER MONTH BASIS. By: Susan Price, Senior Attorney

Alternative Payment Methodologies: A Review of Past, Current, and Future Mechanisms

PHCA Webinar January 30, Latsha Davis & McKenna, P.C. Kimber L. Latsha, Esq.

Community Needs Assessment for Albany Medical PPS Stage 1 Summary Results. HCDI Assessment Team 9/29/14

Welcome to. Primary Care and Public Health: Linking Public Health and Advanced Primary Care to Improve Outcomes

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

Quality Measurement Approaches of State Medicaid Accountable Care Organization Programs

CMHC Healthcare Homes. The Natural Next Step

Bundled Payment Primer

CPAs & ADVISORS. experience support // ADVANCED PAYMENT MODELS: CJR

October 3, Dear Dr. Conway:

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.3 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.5 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement Program Measures for Acute Care Hospitals - Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Payment Update

HAWAII REGION R Clinic Administration/Population Management 08/1999 Complex Care 06/01/2000 PAGE NUMBER. 1 of 6 COMPLEX CARE POLICY

HOSPITAL QUALITY MEASURES. Overview of QM s

Trends in State Medicaid Programs: Emerging Models and Innovations

Succeeding in a New Era of Health Care Delivery

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. Molina Healthcare has defined the following goals for the QI Program:

Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield Patient Centered Medical Home Provider Manual

ramping up for bundled payments fostering hospital-physician alignment

Community Performance Report

Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Health and Healthcare in Ohio through Technology

FINAL RECOMMENDATION REGARDING MODIFYING THE QUALITY- BASED REIMBURSEMENT INITIATIVE AFTER STATE FY 2010

New Jersey Medicaid Medical Home Demonstration Project Report to the Legislature

Medicare, Managed Care & Emerging Trends

Topics for Today s Discussion

Alternative Payment Methodologies

Retrospective Bundles

paymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality

4/9/2016. The changing health care market THE CHANGING HEALTH CARE MARKET. CPAs & ADVISORS

Special Needs Plan Provider Education

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

Value based Purchasing Legislation, Methodology, and Challenges

What should board members know about new health care reform payment structures?*

State Policy Report #47. October Health Center Payment Reform: State Initiatives to Meet the Triple Aim. Introduction

Is HIT a Real Tool for The Success of a Value-Based Program?

The Alternative Quality Contract (AQC): Improving Quality While Slowing Spending Growth

Eliminating Excessive, Unnecessary, and Wasteful Expenditures: Getting to a High Performance U.S. Health System

Hot Spotter Report User Guide

Transcription:

Joseph W. Thompson, MD, MPH Arkansas Surgeon General Director, Arkansas Center for Health Improvement

Arkansas Health System Improvement Workforce Payment System Health Information Technology Insurance Coverage

Coordinated Multi-payer Leadership Value of working together recognized by payers with close involvement from other stakeholders Consistent incentives and standardized reporting rules and tools Change in practice patterns as program applies to many patients Enough scale to justify investments in new infrastructure and operational models Motivate patients to play larger role in their health and health care 3

Included in Payment Improvement: Medical Homes, Episodes, and Health Homes Prevention, screening, chronic care Patient populations (examples) Healthy, at-risk Chronic, e.g., - CHF - Diabetes Care/payment models Medical homes - Care coordination - Overall health mgmt - Rewards quality and cost saving Acute + post-acute care Supportive care Acute medical, e.g. - CHF - Pneumonia Acute procedural, e.g. - Hip replacement Developmental disability Long-term care Behavioral health (mental illness/ substance abuse) Episodes - Rewards high-quality, effective care delivery for a specific episode Health homes + episodes - Health home: care coordination - Episodes: payment for supportive care service

Episode Arkansas Payment Improvement Initiative s Integrated Model Episode Episode Episode 5

Wave 2c (not started) Wave 2 Wave 2b Wave 2a Wave 1b Wave 1 Wave 1a Episodes Update PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT; SUBJECT TO CHANGE For Medicaid, work has occurred on 15 Episodes, with 9 having gone live Episode Legislative Review Reporting Period Start Date 1 Upper Respiratory Infection Spring 2012 July 2012 2 Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Spring 2012 July 2012 3 Perinatal Spring 2012 July 2012 4 Congestive Heart Failure November 2012 October 2012 5 Total Joint Replacement (Hip & Knee) November 2012 October 2012 6 Colonoscopy May 2013 July 2013 7 Cholecystectomy (Gallbladder Removal) May 2013 July 2013 8 Tonsillectomy May 2013 July 2013 9 Oppositional Defiance Disorder (ODD) July 2013 October 2013 10 Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) July 2013 January 2014 11 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) July 2013 Q2 CY 2014 12 Asthma July 2013 Q2 CY 2014 13 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) July 2013 Q2 CY 2014 14 ADHD/ODD Comorbidity Q2 CY 2014 2H CY 2014 15 Neonatal Q2 CY 2014 2H CY 2014 Undecided Undecided Undecided Undecided 1 Participation includes development and rollout of episode In Development Live Seeking clinical input Pending legislative review Multipayer Participation 1 6

How episodes work for patients and providers (1/2) Patients and providers deliver care as today (performance period) 1 2 3 Patients seek care and select providers as they do today Providers submit claims as they do today Payers reimburse for all services as they do today 7

How episodes work for patients and providers (2/2) Calculate incentive payments based on outcomes after close of 12 month performance period 4 5 6 Review claims from performance period to identify a Principal Accountable Provider (PAP) for each episode Payers calculate average cost per episode for each PAP 1 Compare average costs to predetermined commendable and acceptable levels 2 Based on results, providers will: Share savings: avg. costs below commendable levels /quality targets met Pay part of excess cost: avg. costs above acceptable level See no change in pay: avg. costs between commendable and acceptable levels 1 Outliers removed and adjusted for risk and hospital per diems 2 Appropriate cost and quality metrics based on latest and best clinical evidence, nationally recognized clinical guidelines and local considerations 8

Case for Change Total average cost per episode post-risk adjustment by Principal Accountable Provider, 2008-2010 Simple upper respiratory infection 1 $120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Total episodes Median cost 10% percentile 90% percentile ~80,000 $57 $44 $76 Pregnancy 2 $5,000 4,000 3,000 2,500 500 0 Total episodes Median cost 10% percentile 90% percentile Preliminary working draft; subject to change ~30,000 $3,608 $3,208 $4,071 ADHD 3 Total hip replacement $12,000 10,000 8,000 Total episodes Median cost 10% percentile 90% percentile ~20,000 $1,641 $1,073 $7,046 $20,000 15,000 Total episodes Median cost 10% percentile 90% percentile 140 $7,953 $5,867 $12,814 6,000 10,000 4,000 2,000 5,000 0 0 1 Episode costs for children less than 10 risk-adjusted by a historically-derived multiplier. 2 Individual episode costs risk-adjusted for clinical drivers of severity based upon historically-derived multipliers. 3 Eligible defined as ADHD without comorbidities between ages 6 and 17. SOURCE: Arkansas Medicaid claims data; Team analysis

How the Episode Payment Model Works Historic distribution of provider average costs for an episode are assessed Year 1 results Year 1 results High Average cost per episode for each provider Low Individual providers, in order from highest to lowest average cost 10

How the Episode Payment Model Works Thresholds are selected to promote highquality and cost-effective care Year 1 results Year 1 results High Average cost per episode for each provider Acceptable Commendable Gain sharing limit Low Individual providers, in order from highest to lowest average cost 11

How the Episode Payment Model Works Thresholds remain the same the next year with expectation that cost effectiveness will improve Year 2 results High Year 2 results Year 1 results Average cost per episode for each provider Acceptable Commendable Gain sharing limit Low Individual providers, in order from highest to lowest average cost 12

How the Episode Payment Model Works Shared Savings Year 2 results High Average cost per episode for each provider Acceptable Commendable Gain sharing limit Low Individual providers, in order from highest to lowest average cost 13

How the Episode Payment Model Works Savings/Cost Neutral Year 2 results High Average cost per episode for each provider Acceptable Commendable Gain sharing limit Low Individual providers, in order from highest to lowest average cost 14

How the Episode Payment Model Works Shared Costs Year 1 results High Average cost per episode for each provider Acceptable Commendable Gain sharing limit Low Individual providers, in order from highest to lowest average cost 15

How the Episode Payment Model Works Quality of care protected by limits on gain sharing and required quality metrics Year 1 results High Average cost per episode for each provider Acceptable Commendable Gain sharing limit Low Individual providers, in order from highest to lowest average cost 16

Included in Payment Improvement: Medical Homes, Episodes, and Health Homes Prevention, screening, chronic care Patient populations (examples) Healthy, at-risk Chronic, e.g., - CHF - Diabetes Care/payment models Medical homes - Care coordination - Overall health mgmt - Rewards quality and cost saving Acute + post-acute care Supportive care Acute medical, e.g. - CHF - Pneumonia Acute procedural, e.g. - Hip replacement Developmental disability Long-term care Behavioral health (mental illness/ substance abuse) Episodes - Rewards high-quality, effective care delivery for a specific episode Health homes + episodes - Health home: care coordination - Episodes: payment for supportive care service

Medical Home: Rollout Timeline PCMH coverage strategy over next several years Wave 3 Wave 1 CPCI Wave 2 Open to all (primary care early adopters enroll 10/1/13-12/15/13) Expansion to remaining primary care (family practice, etc.) Start of wave: October 2012 Jan 2014 Enroll throughout 2014

Wave 1: Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative (CPCI) 69 primary care practices FFS + enhanced payments Improving patient experience Practices responsible for ALL patients Quality, cost, and transformation milestones evaluated PMPM began October 12 Medicare $8 40; risk-adjusted Medicaid +$3 kids; +$7 adults Private ~$5 Must meet targets Quality, performance, transformation Shared savings model yrs 2 4 19

Wave 2: Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Enrollment 637 primary care physicians Covering nearly 243,000 Medicaid beneficiaries (including 40,000 covered in Wave 1: CPC) Together PCMH and CPC cover about 72% of all eligible Medicaid beneficiaries 20

With PCMH, existing fee-for-service reimbursement remains the same Patients and providers deliver care as today Patients seek care and select providers as they do today Providers submit claims as they do today Payers reimburse for all services as they do today

But PCPs can also receive shared savings payments For a shared savings entity (PCMH or group of voluntarily affiliated PCMHs) A B C Providers must perform on quality metrics Must meet ¾ of targets for quality metrics And providers must Remain in good standing for practice support payments Payers calculate average yearly cost per member for each shared savings entity Average costs are compared to Pre-set medium and high cost levels Benchmark costs, based on historical costs projected forward Results PCMH can earn shared savings payment in one of two ways (receive greater of the two): Beating its own benchmark cost Beating a system-wide medium cost threshold If the PCMH is not eligible for either payment, then the provider sees no change in reimbursement.