Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments

Similar documents
FY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic


TABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

TABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education. (in millions)

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD

Introduction. Current Law Distribution of Funds. MEMORANDUM May 8, Subject:

Rutgers Revenue Sources

Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018

PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, ;

How North Carolina Compares

Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report

Interstate Pay Differential

Index of religiosity, by state

Current Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations

Fiscal Research Center

2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15

Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons. State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending. Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only

Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations

2016 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

Fiscal Research Center

MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008

Colorado River Basin. Source: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation

5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12

How North Carolina Compares

November 24, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002

Fiscal Research Center

TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS

States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change October 2017, Seasonally Adjusted

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Copyright, The Joint Commission

STATE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS $ - LISTED NEXT PAGE. TOTAL $ 88,000 * for each contribution of $500 for Board Meeting sponsorship

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. STATE ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016

Senior American Access to Care Grant

Federal Funding for Health Insurance Exchanges

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Q Copyright, The Joint Commission

HOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016

national assembly of state arts agencies

Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: Tuesday, November 6. Saturday, Oct 27 (postal ballot)

How. January. Prepared by

Food Stamp Program State Options Report

EXHIBIT A. List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project

Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017

Food Stamp Program State Options Report

FOOD STAMP PROGRAM STATE ACTIVITY REPORT

STATE ARTS AGENCY GRANT MAKING AND FUNDING

2014 ACEP URGENT CARE POLL RESULTS

Figure 10: Total State Spending Growth, ,

As part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Fiscal Year 2005 Comparisons. Includes Fiscal Year 2006 Rankings for State Taxes Only

Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2016 Q1 Update

Is this consistent with other jurisdictions or do you allow some mechanism to reinstate?

SECTION 1: UPDATES ON 5 YEAR PLAN

In the District of Columbia we have also adopted the latest Model business Corporation Act.

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q2 Update

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q4 Update

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2018Q1 Update

FORTIETH TRIENNIAL ASSEMBLY

CRMRI White Paper #3 August 2017 State Refugee Services Indicators of Integration: How are the states doing?

Interstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC)

Issue Brief February 2015 Affordable Care Act Funding:


Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary. Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies

Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI)

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM

Annex A: State Level Analysis: Selection of Indicators, Frontier Estimation, Setting of Xmin, Xp, and Yp Values, and Data Sources

CAPITOL RESEARCH. Federal Funding for State Employment and Training Programs Covered by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act EDUCATION POLICY

Statutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015]

Weights and Measures Training Registration

The Regional Economic Outlook

National Study of Nonprofit-Government Contracts and Grants 2013: State Profiles

STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX

U.S. Army Civilian Personnel Evaluation Agency

Larry DeBoer Purdue University September Real GDP Growth. Real Consumption Spending Growth

WikiLeaks Document Release

Revenues, Expenses, and Operating Profits of U. S. Lotteries, FY 2002

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

State Authority for Hazardous Materials Transportation

THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET

VOLUME 35 ISSUE 6 MARCH 2017

*ALWAYS KEEP A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE FOR YOUR RECORDS IN CASE OF AUDIT

HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS PARTICIPATION SURVEY

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016

STATE AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORTING S. 744 AS APPROVED BY THE SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties

YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH IS WORSENING AND ACCESS TO CARE IS LIMITED THERE IS A SHORTAGE OF PROVIDERS HEALTHCARE REFORM IS HELPING

Transcription:

Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments

Introduction FFIS has been in the federal grant reporting business for a long time about 30 years. The main thing we ve learned in that time is that this stuff is complicated, almost a language unto itself. For example, when a person refers to total federal grants, that could mean any number of things with different corresponding amounts. This report is meant to demystify the flow of federal funds to their many recipients. It begins with the big picture and slowly works its way down to a more nuanced description of federal grants and how they work. It even explains why different amounts are attached to grant totals on different pages of the report. Federal Funds Information for States (FFIS) founded by the National Governors Association and the National Conference of State Legislatures helps states manage federal funds by analyzing the impact of federal actions. Copyright 2018 Federal Funds Information for States Updated January 2018 Federal Funds Information for States 444 North Capitol St, NW Suite 642 Washington, DC 20001 202.624.5849 www.ffis.org 1 Federal Funds Information for States

Q. What are the pieces of the federal budget pie? A. In FY 2016, federal outlays totaled $3.9 trillion. Mandatory programs including Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid represent a large and growing share of federal spending. Discretionary spending for domestic and defense programs (accounted for by two slices of the pie chart below) has seen its share decline. Federal Outlays, FY 2016 (amounts in billions) Source: OMB Historical Tables, FY 2018 Domestic Discretionary $600 16% Defense $585 15% Medicaid $368 10% Medicare $588 15% Social Security $910 24% Other Mandatory $560 14% Net Interest $240 6% Includes programs such as: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Child Nutrition Supplemental Security Income Earned Income Tax Credit Change in Share of Federal Outlays, FY 2006 - FY 2016 Category FY 2006 FY 2016 Change Social Security 20.3% 23.6% 3.32 Medicare 12.5% 15.3% 2.79 Medicaid 7.3% 9.6% 2.24 Other Mandatory 13.7% 14.5% 0.88 Net Interest 8.1% 6.2% -1.89 Defense 18.8% 15.2% -3.64 Domestic Discretionary 19.3% 15.6% -3.70 Total 100% 100% 0.00 Source: OMB Historical Tables, FY 2018 Federal Grants 101 2

Billions Q. How do federal funds make their way to states? A. The four major fiscal flows totaled $3.4 trillion in FY 2015: Direct payments go directly to individuals. Examples include Social Security, federal retirement and disability, veterans benefits, Medicare, unemployment compensation, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, housing assistance, farm payments, and the Earned Income Tax Credit. Grants are provided to states, local governments, and others to carry out federal programs. Examples include Medicaid, highways, and education assistance. Procurement is the federal purchase of goods and services, such as consultants, weaponry, and fleets. Salaries/wages compensate federal military and civilian employees. Spending on grants and procurement declined between FYs 2010 and 2015, while spending on salaries and direct payments increased. (The amounts are not inflation-adjusted.) The next page shows that total federal funding averaged about $10,500 per person in FY 2015. Federal Spending Traceable to States, FY 2010-FY 2015 $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Grants $610 $558 $527 $506 $587 $603 Procurement $476 $476 $457 $408 $404 $393 Salaries $308 $313 $311 $304 $305 $310 Direct Payments $1,850 $1,902 $1,914 $1,949 $2,008 $2,085 Source: Council of State Governments, Pew Charitable Trusts 3 Federal Funds Information for States

State Total Direct Payments Grants Procurement Salaries/Wages Alabama $12,550 $7,916 $1,385 $2,137 $1,113 Alaska 15,806 5,287 4,497 2,538 3,482 Arizona 10,757 6,642 1,954 1,371 790 Arkansas 10,638 7,156 2,497 355 630 California 9,654 5,598 2,084 1,216 757 Colorado 10,033 5,423 1,734 1,624 1,252 Connecticut 12,793 6,513 2,280 3,484 516 Delaware 10,855 7,442 2,340 337 736 District of Columbia 82,508 7,901 12,872 28,980 32,755 Florida 10,413 7,894 1,125 671 723 Georgia 9,297 6,181 1,184 758 1,174 Hawaii 14,103 6,620 1,932 1,391 4,160 Idaho 9,665 6,063 1,615 1,305 681 Illinois 8,701 6,054 1,391 658 598 Indiana 9,054 6,476 1,518 602 459 Iowa 8,984 6,198 1,770 586 429 Kansas 9,775 6,277 1,573 717 1,208 Kentucky 11,876 7,076 2,216 1,472 1,112 Louisiana 10,040 6,703 1,985 592 760 Maine 12,169 7,783 2,287 1,131 967 Maryland 17,025 7,029 1,962 4,784 3,250 Massachusetts 11,689 6,519 2,594 1,957 619 Michigan 9,562 7,279 1,420 428 434 Minnesota 8,979 5,824 1,815 860 479 Mississippi 11,425 7,405 1,836 1,286 898 Missouri 10,153 6,864 1,806 633 850 Montana 10,710 6,690 2,431 495 1,094 Nebraska 8,961 6,050 1,452 590 869 Nevada 9,417 6,068 1,768 855 726 New Hampshire 10,112 6,804 1,695 1,098 515 New Jersey 9,844 6,580 2,038 702 524 New Mexico 14,743 6,806 3,114 3,399 1,425 New York 10,554 6,421 3,101 479 554 North Carolina 10,131 6,884 1,575 491 1,181 North Dakota 9,758 5,284 2,423 660 1,392 Ohio 9,354 6,559 1,740 466 589 Oklahoma 10,510 6,830 1,757 721 1,202 Oregon 10,173 6,621 2,633 355 564 Pennsylvania 11,254 7,365 2,103 1,167 619 Rhode Island 12,082 7,267 3,058 661 1,096 South Carolina 10,791 7,461 1,341 1,036 954 South Dakota 9,849 6,291 1,944 484 1,129 Tennessee 10,370 7,106 1,841 762 661 Texas 9,159 5,520 1,502 1,289 848 Utah 7,327 4,474 1,208 704 941 Vermont 11,904 7,196 3,308 475 924 Virginia 17,052 6,911 1,192 5,819 3,130 Washington 11,081 6,248 2,105 1,404 1,323 West Virginia 12,694 8,235 2,740 697 1,022 Wisconsin 8,839 6,311 1,645 503 380 Wyoming 9,447 5,863 2,030 374 1,180 United States $10,567 $6,497 $1,878 $1,224 $968 Source: Council of State Governments Per Capita Federal Spending by Category, FY 2015 Federal Grants 101 4

Percent of GDP Dollars in billions Q. How important are grants in federal spending? A. Grants to state and local governments accounted for 17.2% of federal outlays in FY 2016 and totaled $661 billion ($594 billion in 2009 dollars). These grants are concentrated in Medicaid, other mandatory, and domestic discretionary spending, as shown on page 2. Outlays for Federal Grants to State & Local Governments $700 18% $600 $500 17% $400 $300 16% Percent $200 15% $100 $- 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Amount in 2009 Dollars % of Total 14% Source: OMB Historical Tables, FY 2018 Over time, payments to individuals (such as Medicaid, housing assistance, and social services) have become more prominent. Federal Outlays for State and Local Grants as a Percent of GDP 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% FY 1976 FY 1986 FY 1996 FY 2006 FY 2016 Other 1.4% 0.7% 0.5% 0.7% 0.5% Capital 0.8% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% Individuals 1.1% 1.2% 1.9% 2.0% 2.7% Source: OMB Historical Tables - Table 12.1, FY 2018 5 Federal Funds Information for States

$ in billions Q. How important a role do federal grants play in state spending? A. Federal grants accounted for 30.8% of total state spending in FY 2015, and totaled $567 billion. Federal funds made up 43% of Mississippi s revenue in FY 2015, but only 19.1% of North Dakota s. Federal Funds as a Share of State Spending $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $- 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% Percent Amount Percent of Total State Spending Source: NASBO State Expenditure Reports, Various Years Federal Revenues as a Percent of State General Revenue, FY 2015 Rank State Percent Rank State Percent 1 Mississippi 43.0% 51 North Dakota 19.1% 2 Louisiana 42.3% 50 Hawaii 22.8% 3 Arizona 40.9% 49 Virginia 23.0% 4 New Mexico 40.5% 48 Kansas 24.5% 5 Kentucky 39.6% 47 Connecticut 25.9% Source: Census Bureau, State Government Finances Federal Grants 101 6

District of Columbia Alaska New Mexico Vermont Wyoming New York West Virginia Kentucky Rhode Island Oregon Arkansas North Dakota Mississippi Delaware California Massachusetts Montana Puerto Rico Michigan Louisiana Maine Ohio Connecticut Hawaii Pennsylvania Arizona U.S. Average Minnesota Indiana Missouri Washington Tennessee New Jersey Maryland Illinois Iowa Alabama South Dakota Wisconsin North Carolina Idaho Oklahoma South Carolina New Hampshire Colorado Texas Nevada Georgia Kansas Nebraska Florida Utah Virginia Q. Which states receive the most federal grant funds? A. Among states, Alaska received the most grant funding per capita in FY 2016 ($3,700), and Virginia received the least ($1,081). Per Capita Distribution of Federal Grant Spending, FY 2016 $5,000 $4,500 $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- $3,700 $1,871 $1,081 Source: FFIS Grants Database States with large populations receive the most federal grant funding, but states with smaller populations often do better on a per capita basis. Factors that affect a state s receipts of federal funds awarded by formula are listed below. Medicaid accounts for the majority of grant funding, so state rankings are sensitive to annual changes in the Medicaid matching rate and how much a state spends on the program. A number of grant programs share revenues from natural resources extracted from federal lands in a state. Many federal grant allocations are based on demography and income. For example, education grants often target low-income, school-aged children. Small-state minimums in some grant formulas guarantee every state a certain share of total funding. 7 Federal Funds Information for States

Q. What types of programs do federal grants support? A. Health, income security, education, and transportation combined account for about 95% of federal grant funding. Medicaid alone makes up 60.3%. Many federal grants that ultimately go to local governments or others flow through state governments first. Grants to State and Local Governments by Function, FY 2016 (outlays in billions) Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services $60.9 9% Transportation $63.9 10% Includes programs such as: Child Nutrition Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Public Housing Operating Fund Unemployment Insurance Income Security $104.8 16% Other $34.7 5% Health $396.7 60% Source: OMB Historical Tables, FY 2018, Table 12-3 Ten Largest State-Local Grants, FY 2016 (obligations in billions) Rank Program Funding Cumulative Percentage 1 Medicaid $398 60.3% 2 Federal-Aid Highways 40 66.4% 3 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers 20 69.4% 4 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families 17 71.9% 5 Title I-Grants to Local Education Agencies 15 74.1% 6 Children's Health Insurance Program 14 76.2% 7 National School Lunch Program 12 78.1% 8 Special Education-Grants to States 12 79.9% 9 Head Start 9 81.3% 10 Transit Formula Grants 9 82.6% Source: OMB Analytical Perspectives, FY 2018, Table 14.3 Federal Grants 101 8

Q. What is the difference between mandatory and discretionary grants? A. Most grants are discretionary, but most funding is for mandatory programs. Discretionary programs: Congress sets program funding through the annual appropriations process. Such grants may be allocated by formula or competitive. Mandatory programs: Funding is required by the law that authorizes the grant. For some, such as Medicaid, spending depends on the number of eligible beneficiaries and authorized benefit payments. Distribution of Grants by Type, FY 2016 Distribution of Grants by Funding, FY 2016 Mandatory, 45, 21% Discretionary, $154 billion, 25% 210 Programs $620 Billion Discretionary, 165, 79% Mandatory, $467 billion, 75% Source: FFIS Grants Database 9 Federal Funds Information for States

Percent of Total Q. What are competitive grants? A. Competitive grants are not awarded by formula; therefore, not every state receives them. Rather, federal agencies review applications and select grantees using criteria established for each program. There are many more competitive grants than formula grants. However, they are typically small programs and altogether account for just 6% of grant funding provided to state and local governments. Formula Grants as a Share of Total Federal Grants and Funding to State and Local Governments, FY 2015 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Number of Grant Programs Formula Funding for Grant Programs Non-formula Source: FFIS Grants Database, OMB Analytical Perspectives, FY 2017 Federal Grants 101 10

Q. How is a block grant different from a categorical grant? A. Block grants and categorical grants are the two main types of federal grants. The former are always allocated by formula, and the latter can be either formula or competitive. The table below outlines their differences, and the table at the bottom of the page lists the largest grants of each type. Block Grants Block grants provide greater flexibility, allowing recipients to tailor programs to better suit their needs, and avoiding a one-size-fits-all approach. Block grants may be used for any activity that fits within overall program goals. Categorical Grants Categorical grants may only be used for specific purposes. Some categorical grants can be used to support multiple activities whereas other programs exist for a limited purpose only. Largest Grant Programs, FY 2016 ($ in billions) Block Grants Funding Categorical Grants Funding Temporary Assistance For Needy $17.1 Medicaid $380.9 Families Surface Transportation Block Grant 11.2 National Highway Performance 22.3 Program Low Income Home Energy 3.4 Title I-Grants to Local Education 14.9 Assistance Agencies Airport Improvement Program 3.4 Children's Health Insurance Program 14.6 Community Development Block Grant Source: CRS; FFIS Grants Database 3.0 National School Lunch Program 12.3 11 Federal Funds Information for States

Q. How do maintenance-of-effort (MOE) and matching requirements work? A. Federal grants are usually meant to supplement state and local government efforts. As such, many grant programs require state and local governments to contribute resources. Maintenance-of-Effort Specifies the level of financial effort a grant recipient must maintain in a certain program area to receive federal funds. This is similar to non-supplanting requirements, which are attached to many grants and require that federal funds be used to supplement, rather than supplant, non-federal funds for a specified purpose. Matching Represents the portion of costs that are not borne by the federal government. In some cases, the authorizing legislation allows the recipient share to consist of in-kind contributions, such as property and equipment. Matching requirements typically range from 5% to 50% of total costs. Program Matching MOE Medicaid* X X Federal-Aid Highways X Temporary Assistance for Needy Families X Title I-Grants to Local Education Agencies X Children's Health Insurance Program* X X National School Lunch Program X Special Education-Grants to States X Head Start X WIC - Supplemental Feeding Program Consolidated Health Centers * MOE provisions relate to eligibility and enrollment policies for children. Source: FFIS Grants Database Requirements for Largest Grants Federal Grants 101 12

Q. What sources are available to track federal funds? A. Listed below are data sources on federal funds. FFIS Grants Database The grants database provides state allocations for 240+ programs approximately 91% of total grant funding to state and local governments. FFIS tracks primarily formula grants, although several project grants are included in the database, which provides both historical and currentyear data. USAspending.gov This website reports the recipients of federal spending. It has had issues with consistency, methodology, and limited historical data, but is improving. It provides information for contracts, grants, loans, and direct payments, but not for federal wages. Tracking Accountability in Government Grants System (TAGGS) This is a central repository for grants awarded by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). It tracks obligated grant funds at the transaction level. State-Specific Reports Some states, such as Maryland and Illinois, have created annual reports to measure federal funds coming into the state. State Government Finances The Census Bureau publishes an annual report on state government finances, which captures federal intergovernmental revenue by state. No program-specific data are provided. Council of State Governments (CSG) CSG updated the Pew Fiscal Federalism Initiative s data on the four main fiscal flows going to states. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) CFDA does not provide statespecific funding data. It does provide detailed program descriptions for all federal assistance programs, including eligibility, formulas, and use restrictions. Single State Audit Report All states publish audit reports that include financial statements and expenditures of federal awards by state agencies. The reports do not reflect grant awards, but rather expenditures of grant funds. Grants.gov The website includes a searchable database for all types of federal financial opportunities. 13 Federal Funds Information for States

Q. Why don t federal grant totals match? A. In this report, the total grant funding provided to state and local government is not the same in every instance. The table below explains some differences. Page Description Amount Source Notes 5 Outlays for Grants to State and Local Governments 6 Federal Funds as a Share of State Spending 9 Distribution of Grants by Funding Type $661 billion (FY 2016) Historical Tables, President's Budget $567 billion (FY 2015) NASBO State Expenditure Report Outlays are funds actually transmitted (versus available) to state and local governments. Includes state-reported spending of federal funds. Excludes any grants that go to local governments directly. $620 billion (FY 2016) FFIS Grants Database Figures are primarily available funds rather than outlays. Federal Grants 101 14

www.ffis.org