FDA Perspective on the Pre- Submission Program: Updates from MDUFA IV

Similar documents
FDA Guidance Hot Topics: Pre-Submission Guidance Review AMDM Focus Meeting October 25, Elizabeth Hillebrenner, MSE OIR/CDRH/FDA

Pre-Submissions and Meetings with FDA Staff

Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

MDUFA Performance Goals and Procedures Process Improvements Pre-Submissions Submission Acceptance Criteria Interactive Review

Received an RTA Deficiency List or AI Letter? Now What?

PLAN OF ACTION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF 510(K) AND SCIENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017 (FDARA)

TPRG is accredited by the FDA to review Medical Device Submissions on their behalf as part of the Third Party Review Program.

Interactive Review for Medical Device Submissions: 510(k)s, Original PMAs, PMA Supplements, Original BLAs, and BLA Supplements

GDUFA II: Requests for Reconsideration

FDA Inspection Readiness

Unofficial copy not valid

EPA s Integrated Risk Information System Assessment Development Procedures

SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT: University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATIVE NETWORK (OSPAN)

Requests for Feedback and Meetings for Medical Device Submissions: The Q-Submission

Bureau of Waste Management

Guidance for Industry ANDA Submissions Prior Approval Supplements Under GDUFA

Regulatory Updates Health Sciences Authority Singapore

Medical Devices and Device-Led Combination Products; Voluntary Malfunction Summary

Standards and Medical Device Regulation Roundtable. Seoul South Korea. 21 October ASTM International

Standard Operating Procedures for Processing Municipal and Residual Waste General Permit Applications. Bureau of Waste Management

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 1 for Chapter 105 Dam Safety Program Review of Chapter 105 New Dam Permit November 2, 2012

Focus on Medical Device: A conversation about Case for Quality. September 22, 2017

Kansas City Area Transportation Authority BID # ADDENDUM NO.3

DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: August 5, 2008

Informal Dispute Resolution and Independent Informal Dispute Resolution Key Elements and Updates

GDUFA II Pre-ANDA Program Advice for Success

Solutions for GCP Compliance Challenges. September 23, 2015 Northwestern University IRB Brown Bag Session

Solutions for GCP Compliance Challenges

Guidance for applicants requesting scientific advice

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Approved by. The Board of Directors of RusnanoMedInvest, LLC. Minutes # 3 dated April 24, 2012

Best Practice Recommendation for

COMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME. Standard operating procedure

Medical Device Reporting for Manufacturers

FDA Outlook Seth A. Mailhot, Partner Lead, FDA Regulatory Practice

ADDENDUM #2 FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT (CMC) THIS ADDENDUM #2 IS ISSUED: AUGUST 15, 2017

Document issued on: July 8, 2010

Research Governance Framework 2 nd Edition, Medicine for Human Use (Clinical Trial) Regulations 2004

The FDA Medical Device User Fee Program

Summary of NCLB: Service to Private School Students

NEW FRAMEWORK FOR SCIENTIFIC ADVICE & PROTOCOL ASSISTANCE

Complaint Handling and Medical Device Reporting (MDRs)

OKLAHOMA S UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT (UPL) PROGRAM TRAINING GUIDE

STUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)

Standard Peer Review Process for Minimum Flows and Levels and Water Reservations within the Central Florida Water Initiative Area

Regulatory Affairs Outsourcing

NEW COLLEGE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES Meeting Date: March 7, 2015 PROPOSED BOARD ACTION BACKGROUND INFORMATION

BIMO Program Update an operational perspective

Future Supply Actions (FSA) Funding Program 2018 Answers to Questions Received During RFP Webinar and by

TAFE NSW HIGHER EDUCATION APPLIED RESEARCH GUIDELINES

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE

WIRBinar. How to Survive an FDA Inspection. Upcoming Trainings: Contact Us: (360)

I. Preliminary Data Management and Fee Processing (Administrative Staff)

FDA Inspectional Process in Clinical Research An FDA Perspective. Annette Melendez, MPHsN Investigator Office of Biological Products Operations

Submission of a clinical trial for access to ECRIN services Notice to the Applicant

Preparing for Audits and Post Approval Monitoring April 29, 2015

Establishment Registration and Device Listing. Michelle C. Jackson, Esq. Partner Venable LLP

A. Lococo Wholesale Ltd. Workplace Inspection Policy

Presented by NC TraCS Institute UNC Office of Clinical Trials UNC Network of Clinical Research Professionals

Registry of Patient Registries (RoPR) Policies and Procedures

WARNING LETTER. an both of which were sponsored by. (formerly ). The products

New Initiatives in the Army Green Procurement Program

I. Preliminary Data Management and Fee Processing (Administrative Staff)

City and County of San Francisco Nonprofit Contractor Corrective Action Policy

LETTER OF INTENT FOR SAINT ALOYSIUS ORPHANAGE SPONSORSHIP

4.2. Clinical Trial Monitor (or Monitor): The person responsible for monitoring the data on behalf of the sponsor or contract research organization.

SEIRI SEED Grant (SSG) 2018 Request for Proposals

Sandwell Safeguarding Children Board. Resolution and Escalation Protocol

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

The FDA Medical Device User Fee Program: MDUFA IV Reauthorization

Produce Safety Educators Monthly Meeting #16 April 6, PM EDT

SSASPB Escalation Policy (v1) Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Adult Safeguarding Partnership Board (SSASPB) ESCALATION POLICY

County Transportation Infrastructure Fund Grant Program Frequently Asked Questions

Medicaid and CHIP Managed Care Final Rule MLTSS

Why do we need an addendum to ICH E6?

SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CANCER RESEARCH PROGRAM POLICY

Investigator Roles and Responsibilities in Clinical Device Trials

Overview ICH GCP E6(R2) Integrated Addendum

PRE-DECISIONAL SURVEYOR WORKSHEET. Assessing Hospital Compliance with the. Condition of Participation for Discharge Planning

Section VII Provider Dispute/Appeal Procedures; Member Complaints, Grievances, and Fair Hearings

ERN Assessment Manual for Applicants 2. Technical Toolbox for Applicants

DOD DIRECTIVE INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT

managing or activities.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Interim Process and Methods of the Highly Specialised Technologies Programme

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

Research and Survey Application Manual

Quality Assurance and Site Monitoring Visits. Introduction. Training Outline

FINAL DOCUMENT. Global Harmonization Task Force

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (CPD) REGULATION

PDUFA V. New Review Program for NME NDAs and Original BLAs. Enhanced Communications with FDA and Sponsors. Beth Duvall

Judith A. Erlen Nursing PhD Student Research Award Program Description

Real-World Evidence: A CDRH Perspective


Escalation Procedure. Purpose & definition

GOVERNMENT CAREER OPPORTUNITIES

Draft Procedure for Community gtld Change Requests January 2018

RECORD RETENTION: Imaging Data Longevity

Request for Proposal(s) Training Business Intelligence with Operational Integration Services

Transcription:

FDA Perspective on the Pre- Submission Program: Updates from MDUFA IV Maureen Dreher, PhD Policy Analyst Clinical Trials Program/ Office of Device Evaluation/ CDRH

Agenda Pre-Submission Program background Updates for MDUFA IV Tips for Successful Pre-Submission Packages Alignment with other Q-Sub types 2

Patients are at the Heart of What We Do CDRH Vision: Patients in the U.S. have access to high-quality, safe, and effective medical devices of public health importance first in the world 3

Mechanisms for FDA Feedback: The Q-Submission Program Pre-Sub Written Feedback Pre-Sub Meeting Requests Submission Issue Meetings Informational Meetings Study Risk Determinations PMA 100 Day Meetings Breakthrough Device Designation Request Early Collaboration Meetings Accessory Classification Request Best Resource for policy on Q-Subs: Requests for Feedback on Medical Device Submissions: The Pre- Submission Program and Meetings with Food and Drug Administration Staff : Issued Sept 29, 2017 4

Q-Submission Metrics (CY2017) All Q-Submissions 3,160 Pre-Submissions 2,452 Submission Issue 401 Study Risk Determination 145 Informational Meeting 96 Designation Request for Breakthrough Device PMA Day 100 Meeting 25 41 5

Pre-Submissions (Pre-Subs) Evolved from pre-ides (est. 1995) Now known as the Pre-Submission Program, est. 2013 Still a voluntary program Reflects industry desire to understand FDA s expectations before marketing or IDE submission Guidance The Pre-Submission Program and Meetings with FDA Staff issued Feb 18, 2014 & updated Sept 29, 2017 Program benefits Build relationships and understanding Educate the review team on novel technology Design testing and development plans that will facilitate FDA review Minimize surprises during the review process If FDA feedback is addressed, can result in better quality submissions 6

Definition of a Pre-Sub A formal written request from an applicant for feedback from FDA to be provided in the form of Formal written response with a meeting for discussion Formal written response only When FDA s feedback on specific questions is necessary to guide product development and/or application preparation Request should include specific questions regarding review issues relevant to a planned IDE or marketing application From the Pre-Submission Guidance https://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocum ents/ucm311176.pdf 7

A Pre-Sub is: Intended to be specific to the questions posed Our goal is to provide our best advice for your current needs Other deficiencies or concerns noted during review may be shared as part of feedback Generally meant to be a one-time process per topic (i.e., not iterative) Can be utilized at different times and/or for multiple topics for the same device If significant changes are made to submitter s proposal in response to initial FDA feedback, may be appropriate to engage in repeat interaction on the same topic by submitting a Supplement 8

Interactive Review in a Pre-Sub FDA reviewers are encouraged to work interactively with submitters during Pre-Subs Examples of interaction include Meeting scheduling Administrative questions Obtaining clarification on aspects of the submission needed to respond to submitter s questions For example, requesting details of non-clinical test protocol 9

FDA Feedback on a Pre-Sub Feedback represents FDA s best advice based on the information provided FDA intends to stand behind our feedback unless: Information in subsequent submission is not consistent with Pre-Sub Data in the subsequent submission raise important new issues related to safety and effectiveness New issues materially relevant to a determination of safety or effectiveness that have emerged since the time of the Pre-Sub As defined in Q-Sub Guidance and in MDUFA IV Commitment Letter 10

MDUFA IV Commitments for Pre-Subs RTA timeframe Meeting scheduling logistics Written feedback timing RTA Meeting Scheduling Written Feedback Due Performance Goal MDUFA III By Day 14 - MDUFA IV By Day 15 By Day 30 3 business days before meeting The earlier of 5 calendar days before meeting and Day 70 - Written Feedback Date 11

Pre-Submission Process Acceptance Review Meeting Scheduling Submission Review Written Feedback Meeting (if requested) Meeting Minutes (If applicable) Day 1-15 One RTA checklist for meeting requests and written feedback Up to Day 30 Sent by Day 70 or 5 days prior to meeting, which ever is sooner Submitted within 15 days of meeting & reviewed in 30 days 12

Meeting Scheduling If a meeting is desired, submitter should propose 3 possible dates in their Pre-Sub (face-to-face or teleconference) Reviewer confirms one of those dates by Day 15 or suggests alternatives as part of Acceptance Review Schedule meeting by Day 30 Meetings/telecons should generally be limited to 1 hour Longer times can be requested with a rationale (e.g., complex product/issues) and granted if appropriate 13

Reviewing the Submission & Providing Feedback Lead reviewer assembles a team of relevant scientific experts based on feedback requested Some clarification information may be requested interactively via email prior to official written feedback Ensures that relevant feedback is sent Written feedback provided within 70 days or 5 days prior to a meeting (whichever is sooner) Feedback can be: Written responses to submitter s questions FDA identified review issues beyond questions asked Combination of both 14

Meeting Minutes Submitter formally submits draft minutes within 15 days after the meeting as a formal amendment to the Pre-sub FDA committed to reporting on time to receive draft meeting minutes from industry during MDUFA IV FDA review team should review and edit, if necessary, within 30 days after receipt If edits needed, FDA will send back to submitter (via email) After 15 days, FDA-edited version becomes final, unless: Meeting minutes disagreement amendment is received FDA will arrange a teleconference to discuss At conclusion of teleconference, FDA will revise minutes to reflect resolution OR note that the parties agree to disagree Minutes then considered final 15

Tips for Successful Pre-Subs

Write a Clear Cover Letter What type of Pre-Sub is requested? Do you want written feedback only or do you want a meeting? If a meeting, propose three specific meeting dates Specify if this submission is a new request for feedback on same device/ intended use as prior submission? Reference prior Q-Sub number With whom should FDA correspond? 17

Successful Meetings take Planning and Focus Focus the meeting on what you want to get out of it Allow 2/3 of the time for discussion Limit background review to 1/3 Dedicate someone to take minutes 18

Successes & Challenges of Pre-Sub Program Increasing number of Pre-Subs in recent years Reflects interest from industry Strong commitment to program as part of MDUFA IV negotiations Mechanism that fosters collaboration and dialogue to advance device development Lack of clarity on type of Pre-Sub requested Details of the specific questions 19

Other Meetings and Mechanisms for FDA Feedback

Other Q-Submission Types Q-Submission Type Meeting Timeframe for Feedback (from receipt of submission) Pre-Submission Upon request 70 days or 5 days prior to a scheduled meeting, whichever is sooner Informational Meeting Yes 90 days Study Risk Determination No N/A Submission Issue Meeting Yes 21 days Agreement Meeting Yes 30 days or within time frame agreed to with sponsor Determination Meeting Yes Scheduled within 30 days of request PMA Day 100 Meeting Yes 100 days (from filing of PMA) 21

Submission Issue Meetings Meeting/telecon to discuss outstanding review issue in order to move project forward Provide clarification of FDA deficiencies Feedback on proposal to address complex issues Submitter may request a meeting or written feedback without a meeting Related to deficiencies sent by FDA in the following types of letters: IDE letters Marketing submission hold letter (e.g., 510(k) additional information, PMA not approvable letter) 22

Submission Issue Meeting vs Pre-Sub Submission Issue Meeting Usually a meeting request but may request only written feedback Appropriate for Discussing proposals to address outstanding deficiencies for a submission on hold or an IDE letter Shorter timeframe (21 days) Pre-Submission Always includes a formal written response and may include a meeting Appropriate for Device development/ testing proposals for upcoming, planned regulatory submissions Longer timeframe 23

Summary Pre-Submission Program has grown substantially and interest reflected by industry and FDA commitment as part of MDUFA IV We want to address your device development needs FDA is committed to feedback Pre-Subs distinct from but complemented by Submission Issue Meetings 24

If you have questions Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) DICE@fda.hhs.gov 1(800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 Requests for Feedback on Medical Device Submissions: The Pre-Submission Program and Meetings with FDA Staff Available at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guid ancedocuments/ucm311176.pdf Maureen Dreher, Policy Analyst, Clinical Trials Program, Office of Device Evaluation 301-796-2505 Maureen.Dreher@fda.hhs.gov 25