UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 19-9 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 309

Case 1:04-cv UNA Document 1106 Filed 10/11/17 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:10-cv WQH -AJB Document 19 Filed 10/29/10 Page 1 of 3

) V. ) Civil Action No. 1: (PLF)

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 333 Filed 06/10/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR TERMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND A PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUCTION AND DECLARATORY RELIEF INTRODUCTION

Case 1:15-cv NMG Document 21 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:13-cv PEC Document 51 Filed 11/26/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case 1:17-cv CKK Document 39 Filed 01/09/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ARGUED DECEMBER 12, 2016 DECIDED APRIL 11, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:17-cv APM Document 29 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv CKK Document 73 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:12-cv FMO-PJW Document 596 Filed 09/07/17 Page 1 of 46 Page ID #:9163 FILED CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

[1] Executive Order Ensuring Lawful Interrogations

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release January 22, 2009 EXECUTIVE ORDER

The President. Part V. Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Case 1:16-cv JEB Document 81 Filed 01/17/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:14-cv MJP Document 63 Filed 10/06/14 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:15-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 07/29/15 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:05-cv JDB Document 151 Filed 02/09/2009 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia

Case 3:17-cv JD Document 39 Filed 09/13/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 74-1 Filed: 04/15/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2403 EXHIBIT A

Case 3:14-cv JWD-RLB Document 1 08/22/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. No YASER ESAM HAMDI AND ESAM FOUAD HAMDI, AS NEXT FRIEND OF YASER ESAM HAMDI, PETITIONERS

To: From: Roxanne Bailin DATE: June 5, 2013 Chief Judge, 20 th Judicial District

Plaintiff, Bernard Woodruff ("Woodruff), by the undersigned attorneys, makes the

Moving H-1b Employees to a New Location

Case MDL No Document 378 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 8 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

NO SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. In re the Detention of: D.W., G.K., S.B., E.S., M.H., S.P., L.W., J.P., D.C., M.P.

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Case 1:16-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

- vs - Index No.I Assigned Justice John M. Curran. Respondents. Upon the annexed petition of Mary Holl, verified October 12,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant.

Case 1:12-cv ABJ Document 11 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv JEB Document 41 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:05-cv RJL Document Filed 12/03/2008 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ALASKA AIR CARRIERS ASSOCIATION FAMILY ASSISTANCE PLAN Required Update Due: October 2,200O ADDENDUM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1. I am an attorney with the Department of the Army. I am currently the Chief of the Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. : 05-cv-1244 (CKK)

) [Hon. Jeffrey S. S. White] White] LTD, a a Cayman Islands entity, entity, ) CASE NO. CV JSW JSW LTD, a a Swiss entity; and and JULIUS ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv EGS Document 50 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv CKK Document 73-1 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:10-cv AWT Document 14 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

HIRING FOREIGN NATIONALS: What to Know, Whom to Contact, What to Do

Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 262 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv CM Document 20 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 17

CASE NO CA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

Case 1:12-cv BAH Document 9 Filed 08/09/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

EMPLOYEE FILES. Applying for the Job

Grand Prairie Fire Department Applicant Identification Form

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/08/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 254 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Release of Official Information in Litigation and Testimony by DoD Personnel as Witnesses

BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 51-7 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 5 FEBRUARY 2009 Certified Current 23 April 2014

SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION STATUS REPORT NO. 2

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

AGENCY: Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Department of Homeland

Request for Proposal for Digitizing Document Services and Document Management Solution RFP-DOCMANAGESOLUTION1

Case 5:17-cv WHO Document 32 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT WASHINGTON, D.C. PRIMARY ORDER. A verified application having been made by the Director of

NATIONAL CRIME INFORMATION CENTER (NCIC)

Case 2:14-cv MJP Document 254 Filed 05/26/16 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I.

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:09-cv JLQ ECF No. 357 filed 07/18/18 PageID.5099 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON D.C. APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION AND FOR A FOREIGN CARRIER PERMIT

Nidia Cortes, Virgil Dantes, AnneMarie Heslop, Index No Curtis Witters, on Behalf of Themselves and Their RJI No.: ST8123 Children,

Index No. Petitioner, : -against- : VERIFIED PETITION. Petitioner Scott McConnell, by his counsel undersigned, alleges as follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

United States Court of Appeals

Case 1:05-cv UNA Document 364 Filed 07/21/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Obligations for OKP fellowship holders

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO.

PART 512 RESEARCH. Subpart B Research. 28 CFR Ch. V ( Edition)

Case 3:06-cv DAK Document 24 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

TOP S:BCRETHCOM-I:NTh'NOFO~l

Case 1:04-cv AKH Document 529 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 16. v. No. 04 Civ (AKH)

April 9, 2007 To: ALL COUNTY BOARDS OF ELECTIONS Re: ALL BALLOTS FROM THE 2004 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

Case 1:03-cv EGS Document 46-1 Filed 09/21/05 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case3:12-cv CRB Document270 Filed06/26/15 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

smb Doc Filed 03/16/18 Entered 03/16/18 17:07:30 Main Document Pg 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

FAQ about the Death With Dignity Act

epic.org ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER BY FAX AND BY Fax: October 23,2015

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

NO Tallahassee, December 15, Mental Health/Substance Abuse

Case 1:13-cv PLF Document 21 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Nonimmigrant Visas and Immigration Basics

Transcription:

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 5062 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION USAMA JAMIL HAMAMA, et al., Petitioners/Plaintiffs, v. REBECCA ADDUCCI, et al., Respondents/Defendants. Case No. 2:17-cv-11910 Hon. Mark A. Goldsmith Mag. David R. Grand Class Action SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION This Court heard arguments on Petitioners motion for a preliminary injunction on December 20, 2017. At the hearing, the Court questioned counsel for the Respondents on the details of an agreement between the United States and Iraq that permits the return of Iraqi nationals with final orders of removal to Iraq. Respondents submit the attached declaration from Michael V. Bernacke, Acting Deputy Assistant Director for the Removal Management Division East, to address the Court s questions by showing the following: 1. The referenced agreement is not memorialized in writing, but is the product of a number of diplomatic discussions. Bernacke Decl. 4. 1

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 2 of 5 Pg ID 5063 2. The agreement permits the removal of Iraqi nationals with final orders of removal to Iraq by charter flight without the use of individual travel documents. Id. 6. 3. There is no numeric limitation on the number of individuals Iraq has agreed to accept for return under the agreement. Based on the present understanding, the United States expects to be able to obtain approval to return all detained Iraqi nationals with final orders of removal. See id. 5. 4. Since the injunction was entered in this litigation, ICE has been able to return individuals to Iraq only by commercial flight, scheduled on an individual basis as putative class members request removal. Through that process, ICE was able to remove two additional individuals in December. ICE expects to remove 13 more in the near future. See id. 8, 11. 5. The process for returning individuals by commercial carrier is more onerous than returns by charter flight. Unlike charter flights, commercial carriers require individual travel documents. The process to obtain an individual travel document from Iraq is expensive and time consuming, and requires the engagement of individuals in several different agencies located in different countries. Charter flights require only an approved manifest. The United States can repatriate as many as 150 individuals at one time using a charter. See id. 6, 9. 2

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 3 of 5 Pg ID 5064 6. In the event the injunction is lifted, ICE plans to return to using charter flights for removals and would be able to expeditiously remove individuals with final orders of removal to Iraq via that process. See id. 12. 7. It would be harmful to the government s diplomatic relationship with Iraq and jeopardize the current agreement if the United States were to make a large-scale request for individual travel documents that it is presently not able to use. In the event that the requested documents expire prior to the individuals becoming available for removal, the United States may be unable to secure another travel document for those individuals. Thus, it would prejudice the government s interests if required to make premature travel document requests in order to demonstrate a likelihood of removal to Iraq. Id. 10. 3

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 4 of 5 Pg ID 5065 DATED: December 22, 2017 Respectfully submitted, CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Division WILLIAM C. PEACHEY Director WILLIAM C. SILVIS Assistant Director /s/ Vinita B. Andrapalliyal VINITA B. ANDRAPALLIYAL Trial Attorney Office of Immigration Litigation U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20004 Tel: 202-598-8085 /s/ Sarah Wilson U.S. Attorney s Office Counsel for Respondents/Defendants 4

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 5 of 5 Pg ID 5066 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this date, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing Respondents Opposition to be served via CM/ECF upon all counsel of record. Dated: December 22, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Vinita B. Andrapalliyal VINITA B. ANDRAPALLIYAL Trial Attorney Counsel for Respondents 5

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184-1 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 5067 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION USAMA JAMIL HAMAMA, et al., Petitioners and Plaintiffs, v. REBECCA ADDUCCI, et al., Respondents and Respondents. Case No. 2:17-cv-11910 Hon. Mark A. Goldsmith Mag. David R. Grand Class Action SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Index of Exhibits Ex. A: Declaration of Michael V. Bernacke, Acting Deputy Assistant Director for the Removal Management Division East

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184-2 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 5068 EXHIBIT A

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184-2 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 2 of 7 Pg ID 5069 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION USAMA JAMIL HAMAMA, et al., Petitioners/Plaintiffs, v. REBECCA ADDUCCI, et al., Respondents/Defendants. Case No. 2:17-cv-11910 Hon. Mark A. Goldsmith Mag. David R. Grand Class Action DECLARATION OF MICHAEL V. BERNACKE I, Michael V. Bernacke, make the following declaration in accordance with 8 U.S.C. 1746 with respect to the above-captioned matter. 1. I am the Acting Deputy Assistant Director for the Removal Management Division - East which encompasses the Asia and Europe Removal and International Operations (RIO) unit as well as the Middle East/Eastern Africa unit within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Enforcement and Removal Operation's (ERO) Removal Management Division (RMD). The RMD is located at ICE Headquarters in Washington, D.C. RMD provides guidance and assistance to officers attempting to obtain travel documents for foreign nationals who are ordered removed. RMD 1

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184-2 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 3 of 7 Pg ID 5070 collaborates with embassies and consulates, as well as with interagency and international networks to facilitate the efficient removal of aliens from the United States. RMD provides nationwide Post-Order Custody Review (POCR) guidance, implements policy and procedures, and is responsible for providing case management support for aliens subject to a final order of removal. 2. I have been employed with DHS as an immigration officer since March 2006, and I have worked with ERO since February 2009. From October, 2017 to present, I have been employed as the Removal Management Division-East Unit Chief for the Middle East/Eastern Africa unit in a permanent capacity and have served as Deputy Assistant Director in a temporary, acting, capacity. 3. This declaration is based upon my professional knowledge, information obtained from other individuals employed by ICE, and information obtained from DHS records. I am aware of the facts and circumstances of this case and the efforts to arrange for the removal of Iraqi nationals that have been ordered removed from the United States. 4. As noted in the declaration submitted by my colleague John A. Schultz on July 20, 2017, in 2017, Iraq agreed to the timely return of its nationals subject to a final order of removal. The agreement between the United 2

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184-2 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 4 of 7 Pg ID 5071 States and the Iraqi Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) is not memorialized in any written document or treaty. It is a product of ongoing diplomatic negotiations. 5. Based on this agreement, the United States planned to schedule the return of all Iraqi nationals with final orders of removal in the United States. The agreement does not contemplate any numeric limitation on the number of removals in total or on an annual basis. 6. The government of Iraq agreed to accept these removals via charter mission. As a charter mission, rather than a removal conducted via commercial airline flight, formal travel documents are not required. Instead, ICE submits a proposed manifest for the charter flight to Iraqi officials for approval. The manifest for the charter scheduled for June 2017 included approximately 60 individuals. A charter flight, depending on which aircraft is available, can hold as many as 150 individuals for removal. 7. After the successful completion of the June 2017 flight, the United States planned to send a second, larger charter flight following the same general procedure. The scheduling of charter flights to Iraq was to continue through the summer of 2017 until the detained individuals with final orders of removal were returned to Iraq. 3

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184-2 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 5 of 7 Pg ID 5072 8. As a result of the injunction in the above-captioned case, ICE cancelled the June 2017 charter flight. Because only a small number of individuals are now eligible for removal under the injunction, ICE is scheduling removals via commercial flights. 9. Removal by commercial flight requires a significantly more onerous process because travel documents must be individually obtained through direct engagement with the Iraqi government in Baghdad. This is a laborintensive, expensive, and time-consuming process that requires the engagement of individuals in several different agencies located in multiple countries. 10. The United States would be significantly harmed if required to obtain travel documents simply to demonstrate that we will be able to get a travel document again at a later date. Such requests are likely to be substantially harmful to our diplomatic relationship with Iraq. In addition, they may undermine the government s ability to obtain a travel document at a later date for that individual. Overall, such a requirement has the potential to jeopardize the present agreement and our ability to effect future removals to Iraq. 11. ICE is actively seeking and receiving travel documents for individuals who have requested to be voluntarily removed from the class. In 4

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184-2 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 6 of 7 Pg ID 5073 December of 2017, ICE removed 2 putative class members who requested removal. There are 3 additional putative class members for whom ICE has recently received travel documents from Iraq. ICE is in the process of making travel arrangements for these 3 individuals to be removed in the near future. ICE has also submitted 10 additional travel document requests for putative class members who have voluntarily opted out and is awaiting approval of travel documents for these individuals. ICE expects to receive travel documents for all requested individuals in the very near future. 12. ICE believes that the central government of Iraq in Bagdad will permit the entry of detained Iraqi nationals subject to final orders of removal if the injunction is lifted. At that time, ICE will make arrangements to facilitate the use of charter flights for removals. This injunction is the only impediment to ICE to resuming charter flights to Iraq. I declare under penalty of perjury and in accordance with 8 U.S.C. 1746 that the foregoing is true and correct and made after reasonable inquiry and personal knowledge, information, and belief. 5

2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184-2 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 7 of 7 Pg ID 5074 DATED: December 22, 2017 Michael Bernacke Acting Deputy Assistant Director Removal Management Division - East Washington, D.C. 6