HUMAN RESOURCES ADVANCED / SENIOR LEADERS COURSE 42A

Similar documents
HUMAN RESOURCES ADVANCED / SENIOR LEADERS COURSE 42A

HUMAN RESOURCES ADVANCED / SENIOR LEADERS COURSE 42A

HUMAN RESOURCES ADVANCED / SENIOR LEADERS COURSE 42A

CLASSES/REFERENCES TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE

HUMAN RESOURCES SENIOR LEADERS COURSE 42A

HUMAN RESOURCES ADVANCED / SENIOR LEADERS COURSE 42A

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

Army Doctrine Publication 3-0

The 19th edition of the Army s capstone operational doctrine

Integration of the targeting process into MDMP. CoA analysis (wargame) Mission analysis development. Receipt of mission

Revolution in Army Doctrine: The 2008 Field Manual 3-0, Operations

To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.

THE 2008 VERSION of Field Manual (FM) 3-0 initiated a comprehensive

HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM US ARMY AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE OPERATIONS

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

The Marine Corps Operating Concept How an Expeditionary Force Operates in the 21 st Century

MISSION COMMAND AND its associated framework, the operations

ADP309 AUGUST201 HEADQUARTERS,DEPARTMENTOFTHEARMY

STATEMENT BY GENERAL RICHARD A. CODY VICE CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE

Foreword. PETER J. SCHOOMAKER General, United States Army Chief of Staff

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

Doctrine 2015 Information Briefing

ADP337 PROTECTI AUGUST201 HEADQUARTERS,DEPARTMENTOFTHEARMY

Expeditionary Force 21 Attributes

2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT

New FM 3-36 Electronic Warfare a/o 6 Jan 09/ 0800

Future Force Capabilities

Force 2025 and Beyond

Information Operations

150-MC-0002 Validate the Intelligence Warfighting Function Staff (Battalion through Corps) Status: Approved

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND. NCO 2020 Strategy. NCOs Operating in a Complex World

Doctrine Update Mission Command Center of Excellence US Army Combined Arms Center Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 15 January 2017

Religious Support and the Operations Process JULY DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Space as a War-fighting Domain

Sense And Respond: A Paradigm for Future Integration of Information Technology into Command and Control Operations

Revising the National Strategy for Homeland Security

Doctrine Update Mission Command Center of Excellence US Army Combined Arms Center Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 1 May 2017

America s Army Reserve Ready Now; Shaping Tomorrow

Headquarters, Department of the Army

Public Affairs Operations

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

1. What is the purpose of common operational terms?

HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Global Vigilance, Global Reach, Global Power for America

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TRAINING TRANSFORMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Mission Command Transforming Command and Control Colonel (Retired) Dick Pedersen

AUSA Army Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy Symposium and Exposition November 2018 Cobo Center, Detroit, MI. Panel Topic Descriptions

Civil-Military Operations Center. May DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Statement by. Brigadier General Otis G. Mannon (USAF) Deputy Director, Special Operations, J-3. Joint Staff. Before the 109 th Congress

RECRUIT SUSTAINMENT PROGRAM SOLDIER TRAINING READINESS MODULES Conduct Squad Attack 17 June 2011

COMMANDER S HANDBOOK DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM ARMY (DCGS-A)

Plan Requirements and Assess Collection. August 2014

An Evolving Joint Perspective: US Joint Warfare and Crisis Resolution In the 21st Century

J. L. Jones General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps

MECHANIZED INFANTRY PLATOON AND SQUAD (BRADLEY)

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

This publication is available at the Army Publishing Directorate site ( and the Central Army Registry site

When the U.S. Army rescinded Field

Installation of the Future

Go Tactical to Succeed By Capt. Ryan Stephenson

Guidelines to Design Adaptive Command and Control Structures for Cyberspace Operations

A Comprehensive Approach for the 21 st Century. As Prepared Remarks by LTG William B. Caldwell, IV. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

MC Network Modernization Implementation Plan

SBCT Infantry Battalion

TACTICAL EMPLOYMENT OF ANTIARMOR PLATOONS AND COMPANIES

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

SMARTBOOK. Advanced Individual Training Course (Resident) (Feb 17)

UNITED STATES MILITARY FORCES began the second decade of

Damascus: The Renewed Doctrine of the National Army of Colombia

CH (MAJ) Pete Keough, CH (CPT) Marty Schubert, SFC Winston Rhym, and SSG Chris Corbett. Approved for public release: Distribution unlimited

Stability. 4. File this transmittal sheet in front of the publication for reference purposes.

NEWS FROM THE CTC. Where Did I Put That? Knowledge Management at Company and Battalion. CPT Matthew Longar. 23 Jan18

JAGIC 101 An Army Leader s Guide

ADP20 AUGUST201 HEADQUARTERS,DEPARTMENTOFTHEARMY

The Necessity of Human Intelligence in Modern Warfare Bruce Scott Bollinger United States Army Sergeants Major Academy Class # 35 SGM Foreman 31 July

STATEMENT OF: COLONEL MARTIN P. SCHWEITZER COMMANDER, 4 / 82 AIRBORNE BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE


Chapter III ARMY EOD OPERATIONS

Joint Information Environment. White Paper. 22 January 2013

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

THE U.S. ARMY LANDCYBER WHITE PAPER

Train as We Fight: Training for Multinational Interoperability

SUSTAIN THE MISSION. SECURE THE FUTURE. STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

resource allocation decisions.

The Future of US Ground Forces: Some Thoughts to Consider

GOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS:

DoD CBRN Defense Doctrine, Training, Leadership, and Education (DTL&E) Strategic Plan

Author s Presentation

Response to the. Call for Papers on Operational Challenges. Topic #4

THE STRYKER BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM INFANTRY BATTALION RECONNAISSANCE PLATOON

150-MC-5320 Employ Information-Related Capabilities (Battalion-Corps) Status: Approved

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

Emerging Nuclear Detection Technologies in the Department of Defense

150-LDR-5012 Conduct Troop Leading Procedures Status: Approved

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

GAO WARFIGHTER SUPPORT. Actions Needed to Improve Visibility and Coordination of DOD s Counter- Improvised Explosive Device Efforts

21st ICCRTS C2-in a Complex Connected Battlespace. Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation (C2SIM) Interoperability

Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment

Transcription:

HUMAN RESOURCES ADVANCED / SENIOR LEADERS COURSE 42A FACILITATED ARTICLE #25 Doctrine at the Speed of War A 21 st Century Paradigm For Army Knowledge January 2013 From Army Magazine, March 2012. Copyright 2012 by the Association of the U.S. Army. Limited reprint permission granted by AUSA.

U.S. ARMY SOLDIER SUPPORT INSTITUTE Noncommissioned Officer Academy Human Resources Advanced/Senior Leaders Course Facilitating the Discussion Facilitators can orchestrate discussions using the following questions to help choreograph group discussion/class participation. The sequence of the questions builds logically from a taxonomy point of view, i.e., a lower level of learning/thinking to a higher level of learning/thinking, by moving from comprehension of the material to a synthetic or evaluative discussion of the material. Facilitators should ask open-ended questions and allow the students to respond. Facilitators should also ask questions that cause students to interact. A facilitator s goal should be ensuring that students do not participate in synthetic or evaluative discussion until confirming that the basic concepts and key points of the article are clarified and fully understood. Don t forget to be patient after posing a question and use silence to your advantage. Lastly, remember it s the facilitator s job to include everyone in the discussion. Adapted from The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools, Richard Paul and Linda Elder, Foundation of Critical Thinking, 2001. 1. The main purpose of this article is. (State as clearly as possible the author s purpose for writing the article.) 2. The Key question that the author is addressing is. (Figure out the key question in the mind of the author when s/he wrote the article.) 3. The most important information in this article is. (Figure out the facts, experiences, data the author is using to support his/her conclusions.) 4. The main inferences/conclusions in this article are. (Identify the key conclusions the author comes to and presents in the article.) 5. The key concept(s) we need to understand in this articles is (are). By these concepts the author means. (Figure out the most important ideas you would have to understand in order to understand the author s line of reasoning.) 6. The main assumptions(s) underlying the author s thinking is (are). (Figure out what the author is taking for granted [that might be questioned].) 7. a) If we take this line of reasoning seriously, the implications are. (What consequences are likely to follow if people take the author s line of reasoning seriously?) b) If we fail to take this line of reasoning seriously, the implications are. (What consequences are likely to follow if people ignore the author s reasoning?) 8. The main point(s) of view presented in this article is (are). (What is the author looking at, and how is s/he seeing it?) 9. Last and certainly not least, what s the point of reading this article and how can it be applied to our profession and for improving critical thinking?

34 ARMY March 2012

By LTG David G. Perkins and CPT Nathan K. Finney t is not hard to find a negative news report today that describes the effects of a decade of war on our Army: elevated suicide rates, the damaging effects of traumatic brain injury and the impact of multiple deployments on families. While these are most assuredly issues of great concern and trends that we are institutionally working diligently to reverse there are also positive lessons to be drawn from a war-tested force. Among these are the knowledge and experience gained by our soldiers after a decade fighting a wily and unscrupulous enemy, while simultaneously working to protect and build the capacity and capability of peoples very different from us. These experiences provide us a unique opportunity to leverage our past to prepare for the future. As an Army we have learned valuable lessons and developed a better understanding of 21st-century warfare, and with the assistance of Web-based technology, we have a unique opportunity to March 2012 ARMY 35

rapidly codify this knowledge into doctrine and preserve it for future generations. To capitalize on this opportunity and revolutionize the way we develop and share our doctrine, we must first restructure our body of knowledge and identify the principles critical to our Army as the nation s land force of decisive action. To do this, the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command developed Doctrine 2015, an initiative As an Army we have learned valuable lessons and developed a better understanding of 21st-century warfare, and with the assistance of Web-based technology, we have a unique opportunity to rapidly codify this knowledge into doctrine and preserve it for future generations. that will transform our doctrinal base to deliver critical knowledge concise, accessible and current to the point of need. This process streamlines the number and length of current doctrinal manuals while leveraging current technologies, such as the MilWiki platform, to inject fresh and contemporary knowledge changes that have been developed, applied and proven in the field by soldiers into our doctrine. LTG David G. Perkins is the commander, U.S. Army Combined Arms Center and Fort Leavenworth, Kan. Previously he commanded the 4th Infantry Division and was the U.S. Division- North commander in northern Iraq. CPT Nathan K. Finney is an Army strategist currently serving at the Combined Arms Center as the commanding general s speechwriter. Restructuring our Knowledge Doctrine 2015 transcends the traditional Army paradigm, whereby we developed and published approximately 550 doctrinal manuals on a multiyear cycle, revitalizing our doctrinal base with a series of tabletop publications, digital applications and online resources designed to revolutionize how we address the learning needs of a dynamic force. This doctrine at the speed of war provides intellectual currency at the point of need: the soldier on the ground. The new structure incorporates four levels, broken out to support three overall levels of knowledge necessary to conduct land operations. The first level of Army doctrine will be Army Doctrine Publications (ADPs), which are 15 foundational manuals that capture the enduring principles inherent in land warfare in the 21st century. These ADPs will have a familiar naming and numbering convention, similar to our traditional doctrinal manuals, but they will be only about 10 pages in length and will focus on time-proven, fundamental principles the big ideas that make up the core of our knowledge base. Beneath each ADP will be supporting publications called Army Doctrine Reference Publications (ADRPs), which expand upon the more general principles in the linked ADP and describe the operational concepts that underlie them. These publications are necessarily longer, each containing approximately 100 pages of information. In addition, digital content will illustrate the basic principles in a way that is clear and engaging. Then, to codify time-tested tactics and procedures and fully explain the most current tactics and procedures used 36 ARMY March 2012

in the field, a small body of field manuals will undergird both the ADPs and ADRPs. Unlike today s several hundred field manuals that address all the details of our warfighting functions, Doctrine 2015 will include only 50, each limited to 200 pages. They will capture all of the same details as concisely and clearly as possible. These manuals will also contain Army procedures, such as medical evacuation or call for fire, that must be applied precisely and consistently across the force to perform our military functions. Underneath these principles, operational concepts, and tactics and procedures are the rapidly changing techniques developed in the field and at training centers. These will be captured in Army Technique Publications (ATPs), which are maintained on a MilWiki site by the Centers of Excellence and can be accessed and added to by anyone in the force, whether deployed or training at home station. These user-generated comments are then validated and published in the Department of the Army-approved ATP by the responsible Centers of Excellence. All of the Army publications will be made available and enhanced by leveraging digital applications and off-the-shelf media technologies (smartphones, electronic tablets or other portable devices). This will greatly increase the accessibility of doctrine across the force, particularly among our younger generations, who have grown up interacting with information in this format. A Unifying Operational Concept The flagship manual developed through the Doctrine 2015 process was ADP 3-0 Unified Land Operations. This publication contains the central unifying concept that will drive the development of every other aspect of Doctrine 2015. The central idea of Unified Land Operations is that Army units seize, retain and exploit the initiative in any operation. Initiative is crucial to gain and maintain a position of relative advantage in sustained land operations and thereby create conditions for favorable conflict resolution. There is nothing new about the concept of seizing, retaining and exploiting the initiative in order to achieve military goals. It is the essence of what Army leaders do and have done throughout history. We force our adversaries to fight on our terms, at times and places of our choosing, and in ways that place them at the greatest disadvantage. We achieve a superior position through the destruction of enemy forces, capabilities or sources by seizing key terrain, protecting key populations, building partner capacity or through a tailored combination of these. Unified Land Operations uses lessons learned from a decade of war to evolve the best from past doctrine and direct those principles toward anticipated future threats to our nation. As a unifying operational concept, Unified Land Operations is a natural evolution of our doctrinal thought from AirLand Battle in the 1980s to full spectrum operations about a decade ago. As in previous doctrine, unified land operations are executed through decisive action in the offense, defense, stability and defense support to civil authorities, separately and in combination. This decisive action is achieved by means of the Army s core competencies, combined arms maneuver (CAM) and wide-area security (WAS). These are enabled, in turn, by the commander through mission command. Leaders and units employ CAM to achieve a position of physical, temporal or physiological advantage over the enemy. Artful execution of CAM surprises the enemy by attacking from an unexpected direction and time or by employing combat power in unforeseen ways. WAS is used to consolidate and maintain advantage over an enemy or to deny the enemy a position of advantage. ADP 3-0 Unified Land Operations represents the Army s contribution to the joint community and the concept of unified action, that is, the synchronization, coordination and/or integration of the activities of governmental and nongovernmental entities with military operations to achieve unity of effort. Unified Land Operations provides depth and versatility to combatant and joint task force commanders across the globe. If we successfully implement and internalize this doctrine, we will achieve an adaptable Army capable of being the nation s go-to force for every mission. Foundation of the Army The restructuring of our doctrine and the development of a solid unifying operational concept are not meant to merely create a perception of progress. Leaders across the Army, from the Chief of Staff of the Army to our youngest sergeants, recognize that we must seize the initiative we now enjoy as we reflect on our decade of war. From this effort we are establishing a foundation for training, education and equipment that will affect our Army for decades to come. Doctrine 2015 will accomplish this by improving our soldiers and leaders understanding of current doctrine through increased accessibility and more current links to today s operational environment. Beginning with ADP 3-0, the Army is articulating our unifying operational concept, providing tools that are tailorable to the needs of each individual soldier, and creating products adaptable to the unique learning needs of a new generation of soldiers and leaders. Our force has been operating at the speed of war for a decade it s time our doctrine caught up. 38 ARMY March 2012