ETHICS COMMITTEE: ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS K.R.CHANDRAMOHANAN NAIR DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Similar documents
Ethics Committee Composition Roles & Responsibilities. Dr Girish Dayma Dr Sanjay Juvekar KEM Hospital Research Centre Pune

NABH Accreditation Standards for Clinical Trials and application form. Indian Society for Clinical Research

GCP INSPECTION CHECKLIST

FERCI MODEL SOPs. [The IEC members (author/s, reviewer/s) and Chairperson will sign and date the SOP on this first page]

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE REVIEWING CLINICAL TRIALS ON HUMAN PARTICIPANTS

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

Roles & Responsibilities of Investigator & IRB

PHARMACY, MEDICINES & POISONS BOARD GUIDELINES FOR REVIEW/EVALUATION CLINICAL TRIAL APPLICATIONS FOR VACCINES AND BIOLOGICALS MALAWI

Drugs and Cosmetics rules, 2013 India

managing or activities.

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

Trial Management: Trial Master Files and Investigator Site Files

Document Title: Site Selection and Initiation for RFL Sponsored Studies Document Number: 026

NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

General Procedure - Institutional Review Board

Unofficial copy not valid

IRB 101. Rachel Langhofer Joan Rankin Shapiro Research Administration UA College of Medicine - Phoenix

Study Start-Up SS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR PRE-STUDY SITE VISIT (PSSV)

Institutional Review Board (previously referred to as Human Participants Research Board) Updated January 2004

Document Number: 006. Version: 1. Date ratified: Name of originator/author: Heidi Saunders, Senior Portfolio Coordinator

Hertfordshire Hospitals R&D Consortium Incorporating West Herts Hospitals NHS Trust and East & North Herts NHS Trust

Research Governance Framework 2 nd Edition, Medicine for Human Use (Clinical Trial) Regulations 2004

Dr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015

Training components for GCP. inspectors in PMDA. Tomonori Tateishi, MD, PhD Office of Conformity Audit, PMDA

"Getting Your Protocol Through the IRB"

Preliminary Questionnaire

SOP: New Revised Reviewed Effective Date: 08 October Approved by : Supervisor/Manager Risk/Ethics Sr. Mgmt Committees Board/Councils

Setting up a CITI account for users not enrolled at or employed by Georgia Tech. Georgia Institute of Technology December 2016

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

A Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky

Utilizing the NCI CIRB

Course program. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) course for surgeons

ETHICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS

INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

ISO14155: 2011 Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects - Good Clinical Practice - ISO TC194 WG4 Madoka Murakami PMDA, Japan

Version Number: 004 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board

Site Closedown Checklist for UoL Sponsored CTIMP Studies

Clinical Trial Readiness Checklist October 2014

University of South Carolina. Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events Guidelines

Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View

Institutional Review Board Application for Exempt Status Determination

University of Illinois at Chicago Human Subjects Protection Program Plan

NN SS 401 NEURONEXT NETWORK STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR SITE SELECTION AND QUALIFICATION

MARKEY CANCER CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP No.: MCCCRO-D

Document Title: Document Number:

Implementing the Revised Common Rule Exemptions with Limited IRB Review

Local VA VA ORD CSP Other VA ORD. IRB of Record Registration Number: IRB Operated by: Local VA Non-local VA Academic Affiliate VHA Central IRB

Comprehensive Protocol Feasibility Questionnaire

This Agreement dated DD/MM/YYYY (the Effective Date ) is between

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

Self-Monitoring Tool

Governance %%.4- r2&% Queen s University Belfast. Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance. r2.aoc7. Research and Enterprise

Chapter 2: Guiding Principles Chapter 3: Authority and Delegation

Sponsor Responsibilities. Roles and Responsibilities. EU Directives. UK Law

HIC Standard Operating Procedure. For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

Record or Document Type Retention Period Relevant Legal Citation(s) IRB Records: Training Records;

Guidelines for Review of Research Involving Human Subjects

Study Responsibilities. Choose all that apply. f. Draw/collect laboratory specimens

ERB Submission Guidance

Human Research Governance Review Policy

Standard Operating Procedure. Essential Documents: Setting Up a Trial Master File. SOP effective: 19 February 2016 Review date: 19 February 2018

Investigator-Initiated Studies: When you re the Sponsor. Cheri Robert & Tammy Mah-Fraser

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH LAST REVISION DATE 5/3/17

Standard Operating Procedure INVESTIGATOR OVERSIGHT OF RESEARCH. Chief and Principal Investigators of research sponsored and/or hosted by UHBristol

Trial set-up, conduct and Trial Master File for HEY-sponsored CTIMPs

National Cancer Institute. Central Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedures

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Title: Investigator Responsibilities. SOP Number: 1501 Effective Date: June 2, 2017

Joint Statement on the Application of Good Clinical Practice to Training for Researchers

Document Title: Investigator Site File. Document Number: 019

Office of Human Research Office of Human Research Policy and Procedure Manual. Version: 4/4/18

GCP Inspection by PMDA

Genesis Health System. Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedures

University of California, San Diego Human Research Protections Program Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Policies and Procedures

IRB Process for SURF April 21, 2015

Washington University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures. April 20, 2015

APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in Clinical Trials

Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Common Findings

Risk Assessment and Monitoring

STUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)

AN OVERVIEW OF CLINICAL STUDY TASKS AND ACTIVITIES

Frequently Asked Questions. The CIRB is located at 168 Jalan Bukit Merah #06-08 Tower 3 Connection One Singapore

Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance

Safety Reporting in Clinical Research Policy Final Version 4.0

004 Licensing of Evaluation Facilities

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 710. Good Clinical Practice AUDIT AND INSPECTION. NNUH UEA Joint Research Office. Acting Research Services Manager

MEDICINES FOR HUMAN USE (CLINICAL TRIALS) REGULATIONS Memorandum of understanding between MHRA, COREC and GTAC

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

GCP: Investigator Responsibilities. Susan Tebbs Nicola Kaganson

New Study Submissions to the IRB

Reporting to the IRB How to Report the Essentials and Improve the Protection of Human Subjects

Document Title: Research Database Application (ReDA) Document Number: 043

Transcription:

ETHICS COMMITTEE: ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS K.R.CHANDRAMOHANAN NAIR DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Outline Introduction Composition Responsibilities of IEC Responsibilities of IEC Members Changed Responsibilities of IEC as per Sch.Y Check lists of protocol submission Functions of IEC

Ethics Committee Committee comprising of medical, non-medical, scientific and non-scientific members whose responsibility is to ensure the protection of the rights, safety and well- being of human subjects involved in a clinical trial. IEC IERB, IRB, ERB, REB IEC(Ind)

Composition of EC

Composition (as per ICMR guidelines) 8-12 Members 1. chairperson 2. one-two persons from basic medical sciences 3. one-two clinicians 4. one legal expert or retired judge 5. one social scientist/ representative of NGO 6. one philosopher/ ethicist/ theologian 7. one lay person from the community 8. member secretary

Composition (as per revised Schedule Y of D&C Act, 1940) 2005 At least one representative from the following groups: 1. one basic scientist 2. one clinician 3. one legal expert or retired judge 4. one social scientist/ representative of NGO/ philosopher/ ethicist/ theologian 5. one lay person from the community

Composition Chairman - Outside the institution Not head of the institution Member Secretary - Inside the institution Conduct the business of the committee Lay person - Representative of community Independence and Competence

Composition IECs can have members from other institutions Based on the requirement of research area, members from specific patient groups can be included in the committee Eg. HIV, Genetic disorders, etc.

Composition Age and gender representation in the EC to safeguard the interests and welfare of all sections of the community/ society If required subject experts could be invited to offer their views. Eg, Cardiologist for cardiac disorders. (No voting right and no role in decision making process) Members should be conversant with GCP, Sch Y and ethics guidelines for human participant protection

Responsibilities of IEC

Basic Responsibilities of IEC To ensure competent review of all ethical aspects of the project proposals. Advice the researchers on all aspects of the welfare and safety of the research participants (after ensuring the scientific soundness of the proposed research through appropriate SRC). Dual responsibility- scientific and ethics review Abide relevant regulations and institutional policies

Responsibilities of IEC To protect the dignity, rights and wellbeing of the potential research participants. To ensure that universal ethical values and international scientific standards are expressed in terms of local community values and customs. To assist in the development and the education of a research community responsible for local healthcare requirements.

Responsibilities of IEC Members

Responsibilities of IEC Chairperson Preside over fully convened meetings Ensure IEC carries out its responsibilities Review and approve protocols that qualify for expedited and full review Delegate such authority to a qualified IEC member to conduct review and approval Ensure the members of the IEC recruited, appointed and oriented such that the IEC is duly qualified to fulfil its obligations to review research protocols

Responsibilities of IEC Chairperson Serve as liaison between research community to promote communication and understanding of the concerns of IEC. Ensure that reports related to safety, noncompliance, unanticipated problem in research and adverse events are reviewed, attended to and reported as per existing guidelines and laws. Respond local and governmental investigations relating to protocols and actions. Communication of causality of injury and compensation. Revise IEC SOPs as appropriate to current societal thinking, changes in guidelines & regulatory and national best practices.

Responsibilities of IEC Members Provide competent review of all ethical aspects of the project Undertake review free from bias and influence Maintain confidentiality Advice researchers on all aspects of welfare and safety of research participants

Responsibilities of IEC Members Declare COI COI is - a set of conditions, in which, - professional judgement concerning a primary interest (such as validity of the research) - tends to be unduly influenced by secondary interest (such as financial gain)

Specific Roles of IEC Members Medical, non-medical, clinician, basic scientistsscience and ethics Legal experts- CTA, insurance policy, institutional policies, other agreements if any Non- scientists- IC documents

The Terms of Reference Should include terms of appointment like: duration of term policy for removal replacement resignation procedure frequency of meetings payment of fees to the IEC for review honorarium/ consultancy to the members/ invited experts IEC should function according to written SOPs- which should be made available to each member. SOPs are to be updated periodically based on the changing requirements.

Schedule Y (3 rd amendment, 8 th Feb. 2013) Rule 122 DD : Registration of ethics Committees i. No EC shall review and accord its approval for a CT without prior registration with the licensing authority as defined in clause(b) of rule 21.

Changed Responsibilities of IEC as per Sch.Y

Requirements Compulsory registration with CDSCO of all ECs reviewing regulatory clinical trials to approve CT Registration of ECs in accordance with requirements of appendix VIII of Schedule Y The ECs do not want to approve CTs need not register with CDSCO

Changed Responsibilities Registered ECs have to analyse SAE and forward its opinion to DCGI (As per newly added appendix XII) ECs will allow CDSCO to inspect/ verify its records Initial registration of all ECs is granted for 3 years by DCGI Any change in the EC members should be notified to DCGI Maintain all documents for audit/ inspection by DCGI

Changed Responsibilities Qualifications of basic medical scientist and clinician- MBBS+ PG COI policy- all EC members should sign COI declaration form Persons with COI: - Prior disclosure to chairperson - Should not take part in decision making process - Record COI in minutes of the meeting

Check lists of protocol submission

Submission of Application (checklists) The protocol submitted to ECs should have: 1. The title with signature of PI and Co-PI as attestation for the conduct of the study 2. Clear research objectives and rationale for undertaking the investigation in human participants in the light of existing knowledge 3. Recent CV of the investigators 4. Participant recruitment procedure and brochures, if any 5. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for entry of participants

Checklists contd 6. Precise description of methodology of the proposed research with sample size study design, intended intervention, dosage of drugs, route of administration, duration of treatments 7. Plan to withdraw or withheld standard therapies during the course of research 8. Plan for statistical analysis of data 9. Procedure for seeking and obtaining IC with sample of PIS. IC forms in English and local languages. 10. Safety of proposed intervention and any drug or vaccine to be tested including results of relevant laboratory, animal and human research

Checklists contd 11. For research involving more than minimal risk, an account of management of such risk/ injury 12. Proposed compensation and reimbursement of incidental expenses and management of research related injury/ unrelated injury/ illness during and after the research period. 13. An account of storage and maintenance of data collected during the trial 14. Plans for publication of results by maintaining the privacy and confidentiality of the study participants 15. A statement on probable ethical issues and steps taken to tackle the same like justification for washout of standard drugs or the use of placebo control

Checklists contd 16. All other relevant documents related to the study protocol like investigators brochure for trial on drugs/ devices/ vaccines/ herbal medicines and statement of relevant regulatory clearances 17. Agreement to comply with national and international GCP protocols for clinical trials 18. Details of funding agency/ sponsors and fund allocation 19.International Collaborative Study details of foreign collaboration and documents for review of HMSC and DCGI 20. For exchange of biological material in International Collaborative Study- MoU/MTA between partners. 21. A statement on COI, if any. Appropriate regulatory approach also need to be obtained before commencing a proposal.

Functioning of EC

Types of Review Depending on the risks involved, proposals are categorised into: -Exempted -Expedited -Full review

Types of Review Minimal risks are one which may be anticipated as harm or discomfort not greater than that encountered in routine daily life activities of general population An investigator cannot decide that his/ her proposal falls in the exempted category without approval from the IEC

Types of Review 1.Exempted from review Proposals present less than minimal risk eg:- Research on educational practices - educational strategies - effectiveness of instructional techniques - comparison among instructional techniques - curricula - classroom management methods

Types of Review 2. Expedited Review Proposals presenting no more than minimal risk a. minor deviation from originally approved research during the period of approval b. revised proposal previously approved through full review by the IEC where there is no additional risks. c. research involving clinical materials. Eg:- data, documents, records or specimens collected for clinical purposes.

Expedited Review contd... d. In emergency situations like serious outbreaks/ disaster A full review of the proposal is not possible Prior written permission of IEC may be taken before use of test intervention Approval given only for pilot study or preliminary work to study the safety and efficacy of the intervention The same participants should not be involved in the clinical trial that may be initiated later based on the findings of the pilot study

Expedited Review- Emergency situations Research should be essential Community participation must be evident Research should protect privacy and confidentiality Research should confer direct or indirect benefit to the community affected International collaboration must be with local partner on equal partnership basis Transfer of biological material must respect GOI rules

Types of Review 3.Full Review All research presenting with more than minimal risk Proposals do not qualify for exempted/expedited review Proposals involving vulnerable population & special groups Full review done by all the members of The IEC

Reporting Protocol Violations and Deviations Protocol deviations Must be reported at the time of the annual reports to the IEC or as required by the study sponsor. Protocol violations Must be reported to the IEC within ten (10) working days of discovery It is the responsibility of the PI to ensure proper reporting to the IEC Reports of protocol deviations and violations should be submitted to the sponsor as outlined in the sponsor s protocol

Special Consideration Additional safeguards/protection and special consideration for the IEC require in research involving: Children Pregnant and lactating women Vulnerable participants Persons with diminished autonomy Issues pertaining to commercialization of research International collaboration

Monitoring After IEC gives a certificate of approval it is the duty of the IEC to monitor the approved studies An oversight mechanism should be in place Site visits in the event of reporting of adverse events or violations of human rights Require submission of periodic status reports, SAE reports Appropriate action should be taken by the IEC based on the reports For SAE, IEC is responsible to check for to see if appropriate compensation was provided.

Record Keeping Documentation Documents and communication of IEC- dated, filed and preserved according to written SOPs Confidentiality Strict confidentiality to be maintained during access and retrieval procedures.

Records to be Maintained by EC Composition of members of EC CV of all EC Members SOPs National and international guidelines Copy of CRF, IB, Protocol, data collection formats, etc. Agenda and minutes of all EC meetings- sign of chairperson on each page of minutes

Records to be Maintained by EC Copy of all communication with EC members and PI All notifications for suspend/ termination of a study with reasons Final report of study - hard and soft copy Time of record maintenance- minimum 5 years from the date of termination of a study.

Administration and Management For an IEC to function well : Full time secretariat Space for record keeping Members to be compensated reasonably for their time Reasonable fees for review and administrative processes Allocation of reasonable amount of funds by the concerned institution

Accreditation Global organisations undertake accreditations of ECs are: SIDCER AAHRPP

Acknowledgements Dr. Nandini Kumar Thank You