Renal cancer surgery patient experience February 2014-February 2015

Similar documents
National Patient Experience Survey UL Hospitals, Nenagh.

You can complete this survey online at Patient Feedback Fill in this survey and help us improve hospital services

National Patient Experience Survey Mater Misericordiae University Hospital.

Fordingbridge. Hearts At Home Care Limited. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Requires Improvement

National findings from the 2013 Inpatients survey

BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAPER COVER SHEET. Meeting Date: 27 May 2009

PATIENT QUESTIONNAIRE Please help us make hospital care better.

National Patient Experience Survey South Tipperary General Hospital.

NHS Emergency Department Questionnaire

Review of Patient Experience of Elective Orthopaedic Services at Manchester Elective Orthopaedics Centre.

Survey of adult inpatients in the NHS, Care Quality Commission comparing results between national surveys from 2009 to 2010

Patient survey report 2004

Goldsborough - Hatfield

Patient survey report Survey of adult inpatients in the NHS 2009 Airedale NHS Trust

Healthwatch Knowsley St Helens & Knowsley NHS Trust Patient Experience Report Qtr

Patient survey report National children's inpatient and day case survey 2014 The Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust

Contents. Contents. Executive Summary page 2. 1 Introduction page 3. 2 Background information page 4. 3 What we did page 7. 4 What we found out page 8

Maidstone Home Care Limited

Patient survey report Inpatient survey 2008 Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust

Angel Care Tamworth Limited

NATIONAL PATIENT SURVEY, 2004

Resident Surveys to May 2017 Twenty-Four Resident Surveys were returned

Heart Homecare Ltd. Heart Homecare Ltd. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Good

Gerry Bennett Ward (Mile End Hospital) - Enter and View Report

Patient survey report Survey of adult inpatients in the NHS 2010 Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Home Instead Birmingham

Enter and View Visit Mandarin A Ward: Renal and General Queens Hospital Friday 16 th September 2016

Enhanced Recovery Programme for total hip and knee replacement Orthopaedic Department Patient Information Leaflet

Patient survey report Survey of adult inpatients 2011 The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Healthwatch Knowsley Aintree University Hospitals Trust Service User Report Qtr. 1 ( )

National Patient Experience Survey Letterkenny University Hospital.

FAMILY MEMBERS % STAFF % PROFESSIONALS % TOTAL %

Patient Experience Survey Results

TRUST BOARD PUBLIC APRIL 2014 Agenda Item Number: 79/14 Enclosure Number: (8) Subject: National inpatient Experience Survey 2013 Prepared by:

National Cancer Patient Experience Survey National Results Summary

Inpatient Experience Survey 2016 Results for Dr Gray's Hospital, Elgin

Inpatient Experience Survey 2016 Results for Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

Inpatient Experience Survey 2016 Results for Western General Hospital, Edinburgh

Swindon Link Homecare

A1 Home Care. A1 Home Care Ltd. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Good

Brookfield Nursing Home

National Inpatient Survey. Director of Nursing and Quality

National Cancer Patient Experience Survey National Results Summary

St Quentin Senior Living, Residential & Nursing Homes

Sheffield. Juventa 4 Care Ltd. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Good

PATIENT PARTICIPATION REPORT 2013/14

Inpatient Patient Experience Survey 2014 Results for NHS Grampian

HIGHLAND USERS GROUP (HUG) WARD ROUNDS

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

Care2Home Ltd Known As Heritage Healthcare Solihull

Supporting people who need Palliative and End of Life Care in the Community. Giving people a choice

Summary of Responses to Open Ended Questions

Kestrel House. A S Care Limited. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Good

Somerset Care Community (Taunton Deane)

Tendercare Home Ltd. Tendercare Home Limited. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Good

Patient Information. Having a Laparoscopy

HARTLEPOOL HOME CARE SURVEY SERVICE USER/CARER QUESTIONNAIRE Summary Sheet

Contents Page Executive Summary Introduction Rationale Methodology 6 Results Analysis

Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Lister House Surgery & Oakwood Medical Centre Patient Questionnaire May/June 2015

Care on a hospital ward

Patient Minor Surgery Satisfaction Outcome Questionnaire 2014/15

Story Street Walk-in Service

Enter & View Report Discharge Process Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals Hull Royal Infirmary Anlaby Road Hull

Oxford University Hospitals. NHS Trust. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Hepato-biliary Surgery Open Liver Resection.

Patient copy. Periurethral bulking agent for stress urinary incontinence. Patient Information to be retained by patient

Maternity Services - Friends and Family Test - Mar-18 to May-18

Patient Experience & Patient Information. Amy Sherman, Macmillan Project Manager, LCA

Patient survey report Survey of adult inpatients 2013 North Bristol NHS Trust

St Quentin Senior Living, Residential & Nursing Homes

Tenckhoff Catheter Insertion

AUTHOR : HELEN BYARD - Lead Cancer Nurse Manager/Head of Nursing Diagnostic and Support Business Unit

Homecare Support Support Service Care at Home 152a Lower Granton Road Edinburgh EH5 1EY

Orchard Home Care Services Limited

Caremark Watford & Hertsmere

Chinese HomeCare Specialists

Lynx Care(UK) Ltd. Lynx Care (UK) Ltd. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Requires Improvement

Paediatric Directorate /1791

National Patient Experience Survey Mayo University Hospital.

Glengarry Rest Home and Hospital Resident Satisfaction Survey Results 2013

Evoke Home Care. Mr Roger Henry Pickford. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Inadequate

Abdomino-perineal Resection/Excision of the Rectum

Patient survey report Survey of adult inpatients 2012 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Enhanced recovery after bowel surgery

Specialist renal multidisciplanary

FREEING OF FORESKIN ADHESIONS

Local Anaesthesia for your eye operation. An information guide

INTERNAL VALIDATION REPORT (MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM)

London Borough of Bexley

N/A 98.6% July - 31 July. Radiology Day Case Unit. Your recommend scores. Scores for all services (with > 4 reviews)

Hickman line insertion in the interventional radiology department

Discharge from hospital

Independent Home Care Team

Equinox Care. Equinox Care. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Inadequate

Young Peoples Transition project: Focus Group Summary

Sanctuary Home Care Ltd - Enfield

The McDonaldisation of medicine: Time and the day surgery patient

Stroke Pathway Patient Engagement. Newcastle Gateshead Clinical Commissioning Group Gateshead Stroke Association November 2016

Partial glossectomy. Your operation explained. Information for patients Head and Neck Centre

Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Transcription:

Renal cancer surgery patient experience February 2014-February 2015 The specialist renal cancer team have set high patient experience as one of the key objectives of the specialist renal cancer centre. In February 2014 we started collecting data from patients regarding inpatient and outpatient experience Data collected using a validated cancer patient experience tool http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/cancer_care_improvement/progra mme_resources/cancer_qpis.aspx The out-patient tool (appendix 1) focuses on 3 domains -Communication, Information giving and shared decision making. The second questionnaire concentrated on the in-patient experience (appendix 2) at the Royal Free during the period of their surgical intervention. Instead of a postal route the patients were asked to complete the surveys at their initial specialist MDT clinic visit and their post-operative clinic visit. Mid-year report Achievement against the action plan for mid-year report (appendix 3). 12 month end of year report Estimated 85% response rate. Out-patient total: In-patient total: responses 93 patients responses 77 Patients Friends and family test 98% of our patients would recommend the services to friends and family who require the same treatment Summary key achievements Maintained a high volume response. Overall high scoring responses for each domain majority score 98-100%maintained since mid-year report. Communication: 100% of patients reported, concerns were listened to, healthcare professional was open and honest, discussion was done in a sensitive manner Information giving: 100% of patients reported, given enough information and it was easy to understand. Health care professional explained fully everything I wanted to know Shared decision making: 100% of patients reported their view was taken into account; they had enough time to reach a decision Summary key concerns Lowest scoring responses: lack of Information on support services, approved sources of information opportunity to take part in research, communication with GP. 1

February 2015 action plan: KEY AREAS AIMS ACTION TARGET DATE Service development and improvement 1 Continue to develop patient support group living with and beyond cancer. Aim to improve advertising, promote the success of the group and highlight benefits to patients March 2015 Explore the options of alternating venue within other 2 Improvement in communication with general practitioners London cancer trusts a series of evening educational /networking evening events are planned to update on changing pattern of care in renal cancer. September 2015 Improve recruitment to clinical trials Improve quality of inpatient nursing care Improve patient involvement and feedback Clinical research notice 3 rd floor Research governance group established Clinical Trials to be a standing item monthly academic SMDT Recruitment of new staff to included renal cancer nursing Planned orientation for all new nurses Renal cancer nursing orientation package for all new staff Advanced communication skills training for key members of ward staff All ward nurse offered online renal cancer nursing module Weekly meeting CNS and ward sister to discuss report concerns Clinical nurse specialist to review all ward patients daily basis Continued training and development of ward nursing specific to renal cancer Continue patient survey Audit achievement against action plan Use patient support group as focus group for patient involvement Develop a focus group for patient information April 2016 Review September 2015 September 2015 2

In-patients renal cancer Total responses percentage of responses strongly agree/agree 1 2 3 4 I felt I was given enough information in advance to prepare me for my admission From the time I arrived at the hospital for admission I felt it was well organised The nurses and doctors helped me understand about my operation The nurses and doctors helped me understand about the anaesthetic 98% 92% 100% 100% 5 They discussed pain control with me and what to expect. 98% 6 7 After the operation a member of staff explained to me how it went During my hospital stay my family and friends had the opportunity to be informed about my care 95% 98% 8 I saw a consultant surgeon on a daily basis 97% 9 10 I felt the hospital staff did everything they could to help control my pain I felt well supported by the clinical nurse specialist during my hospital stay. 97% 94% 11 Overall I was happy with the quality of care I received 93% 12 I was given written information on what to expect after my discharge 90% 13 I was treated with respect and dignity by the hospital staff 95% 14 I would recommend the services to friends and family who require the same treatment? 97% 3

Table 1 Out-patients renal cancer Measurement tool: COMMUNICATION Total responses 93 percentage of responses strongly agree/agree 1 The health care professional introduced themselves to me 100% 2 3 I was told all I wanted to know about my condition and treatment The health care professional helped me understand my condition and treatment 99% 99% 4 My worries and fears or concerns were listened to today 100% 5 6 7 I was told about any danger signals to watch for when I got home I was given advice on ways to manage my condition at home My questions were answered in a way I could easily understand 94% 97% 99% 8 I had enough time with the health care professional 99% 9 I know who to contact if I have any further questions 97% 10 11 12 Health care professionals gave me consistent information about my condition Health care professionals from the hospital and my GP had a common understanding of my condition and treatment plans so that I did not have to repeat myself My family member, carer or friend were involved in discussions with health care professionals as much as I wanted them to be 98% 91% 98% 13 Health care professionals were open and honest 100% 14 15 16 Health care professionals considered my feelings in the way that they spoke to me I feel any information discussed was done in a sensitive manner I felt comfortable to talk about things that mattered to me e.g. money or work concerns, my emotions 100% 100% 99% 4

Table 2 Out-patients renal cancer Measurement tool: INFORMATION GIVING Total responses 63 percentage of responses strongly agree/agree 1 2 I received information to help me understand what would happen at today s appointment I was given enough information about my condition and treatment 96% 100% 3 The information I was given today was easy to understand 100% 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I was offered information in a format that suited me e.g. large print, Braille, etc. The health care professional explained fully everything I wanted to know about my condition, treatment and care I was offered information on how to access other support services, e.g. financial advice or support groups I felt able to ask about the results of any tests or ongoing treatment I know who to contact out-of-hours if I m worried about my condition I was given the contact details of the clinical nurse specialist, my key worker I have been given details of other approved sources of information 97% 100% 90% 80% September 2014 99% 93% 94% 89% 11 I was offered the opportunity to take part in research/clinical trials 75% 5

Table 3 Out-patients renal cancer Measurement tool: SHARED DECISION MAKING Total responses 63 1 I felt included in discussions about my treatment and care percentage of responses strongly agree/agree 98% 2 3 4 5 The health care professional explained the risks and benefits of treatments in an understandable way I was given enough information to help me make an informed choice My views were taken into account by the health care professional I had enough time to reach my decision 99% 99% 100% 100% 6 I was involved in decisions as much as I wanted to be 99% 7 I was told about possible side effects and how to manage them 96% 8 I felt that the health care professional I saw today knew enough about my case to provide good clinical care 100% 9 I feel my personal circumstances were taken into consideration 99% 6

OUT-PATIENTS COMMENTS Was there anything particularly GOOD about your care? First class care as both inpatient and outpatient. have received a professional consultation with all my questions answered, no rush Clear and concise advice and positive encouragement I was extremely happy with care and advice given to me today The assurance and care from Consultant Mr Mumtaz is excellent and very grateful to him. P.S. Nurse Jonah is very helpful I received excellent care and the staff were very friendly Felt built up a good relationship with my nurse Jonah Prompt Generally very good and positive in all aspects Positive attitude of staff part Mr Mumtaz my treatment and care was provided with care and in a very professional manner As I was early and waiting longer for my appointment, a nurse came round if people had been waiting a long time and enquired when I would be seen, which was next. Very polite staff The urgency and speed of treatment Clear and concise Every person new their job which made me feel at ease with what was ahead of me. I can not fault the care & understanding I have received at the Royal Free. I can not thank you all enough. v. professional department, excellent surgeon (guy Webster) OUT-PATIENTS COMMENTS Was there anything that could have been IMPROVED? Phone system in order to request a new appointment Waiting time 1 hr 30mins delay. Sometimes feel time with consultant is rushed hospital food needs improving a lot On the computer registering arrival it stated I had refused ethnicity origin which I have filled in in forms and any telephone numbers were missing. I registered my ethnicity but left the phone numbers blank. It went through successfully though had a long wait because my notes were missing OK. One comment here; I was distressed about a patient that was brought into the ward while I was recovering. He was disruptive in that he shouted out often and loudly and kept me awake for two nights. I was not able to rest and would have greatly appreciated a solution. If this is something that could be fixed for the future I think that it would aid recovery. Thank you. No, it was overall a good organised schedule. Very Helpful and Professional 7

IN-PATIENTS COMMENTS Was there anything that could have been IMPROVED? Nursing care could be improved Whilst not in your control, once I was discharged I had no nursing care. District Nurse wouldn't come out as I could walk, so my wife had to change dressings. Think the communication between hospital and GP should be better Not sure it can but staff under massive pressure and workload that even with best will unable to give all patients attention they would like During the doctors rounds if the staff were coming round with breakfast & teas they did not return to your bed if they missed you out. Also tablets were given to you at 07.00 am but no food or drink until 8.30am earliest no hospital food needs to be better admission date was changed without letting me know The toilet on ward 10 South bed 1-4 didn't always flush on demand. Slow to refill cistern. I completed an online survey in the ward before my discharge. My aunt had trouble getting through to hospital on phone and was cut off after the nurse said "I had gone down" (for operation). I did not say "goodbye" properly as I was sent to Day room to wait for my son to pick me up as new patient was coming in. Overall, I would recommend this hospital. The ward nurses seemed to have no time to relate to the patients. I hallucinated that I was behind a clear membrane and that every few hours a nurse came and punched it, making a dent but never quite hitting me. Nursing care is not adequate. More nursing staff are needed and that, too, dedicated and taking care of patients Yes. Don't think being questioned directly after op to fill out questionnaire good idea. Also, being put in a ward with screaming patient in next bed. Felt discharged too early. One more day would have been better. The bin in room wasn't emptied for 4 days (it was full). I was in recovery for a long time before a bed was found. Everything OK The hospital bed was most uncomfortable. The call button was never easily accessible. Yes. The discharge process was too long, without much explanation. It could be better organised as the medication took forever to be sorted out. Not enough staff on the ward I went to after ICU. Epidural removed prior to pain killers being issued. Staff shortage on ward. nothing, everything was great post operationally there was huge issues with ward nurses1.nurses were putting needle for administration of painkillers they were leaving air bubbles in the system. I was afraid they would enter my circulation and asked repeatedly to be removed. The nurse (white coat) said there was no problem but then came back and said I was right and needs to be removed(the bubble). 2. I was left in pain for 4 hours shortly after my operation. They did not know about prescription from the surgery team. 3. Three nights after operation (11july on the night shift when I asked help from the nurses due to blisters on my back she was very aggressive putting in my face the bed 8

control module(buttons) saying to use that if I have such an issue. afterwards when exiting the room she was laughing with other nurses.( ward nurses completely ignored me on several occasions leaving me without painkillers for 4 hours post operation. my clinical nurse specialist had to intervene for me to have my painkillers. for surgery team and specialist they are amazing disagree with ward On the wards there appears to be more agency staff than hospital staff which seems a shame as they were always very busy + staff changed too often to get to know the patient Everything was very good Very pleased with doctors and with outpatient care, disappointed with nurse care(overall I was happy with the quality of care I received?) Not by the nurses after care on ward 10 Answering the phone. After a period of 12 minutes hanging on for information disconnected call. Waited nearly 1 hr. for a partner to transfer me to the lobby on being discharged. In patient agency nursing poor. Found the meals rather tasteless and therefore difficult to eat, especially savoury. Presentation and choices good though. The ladies serving the breakfast were quiet unfriendly. They made me feel uncomfortable asking for boiled water instead of tea. No clip removal details documented on discharge otherwise completely satisfied no food no no I have been aware the communication with my immediate family was non existent. They were not made aware of my well being or whereabouts after operation. 9

Appendix 1 Out-patient patient experience survey 2014 What is the survey about? This survey is about your experience of the treatment and care you received for your kidney cancer at the specialist centre at the Royal Free. Your views are very important in helping us to find out how well the services work and how they can be improved. Your answers will be treated in confidence Your participation in this survey is voluntary. If you choose not to take part in this survey it will not affect the care you receive from the NHS in any way. If you do not wish to take part, or you do not want to answer some of the questions, you do not have to give us a reason. Completing the questionnaire For each question please tick inside one box. Don t worry if you make a mistake; simply cross out the mistake and put a tick in the correct box. There is space at the end of the questionnaire for you to write other comments and suggestions. If you have any queries about the survey or the questionnaire, please call the Kidney cancer clinical nurse specialist Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust Direct line 020 7317 7779 Email: rf.renalcancernursing@nhs.net Please post the questionnaire into the patient feedback box in the clinic Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey. 10

Part 1 measurement tool COMMUNICATION Please read the statements below and select the answer which you feel best describes how you feel about the care you received today Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Please note any additional comments below 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 The health care professional introduced themselves to me I was told all I wanted to know about my condition and treatment The health care professional helped me understand my condition and treatment My worries and fears or concerns were listened to today I was told about any danger signals to watch for when I got home I was given advice on ways to manage my condition at home My questions were answered in a way I could easily understand I had enough time with the health care professional I know who to contact if I have any further questions Health care professionals gave me consistent information about my condition Health care professionals from the hospital and my GP had a common understanding of my condition and treatment plans so that I did not have to repeat myself My family member, carer or friend were involved in discussions with health care 11

13 14 15 16 professionals as much as I wanted them to be Health care professionals were open and honest Health care professionals considered my feelings in the way that they spoke to me I feel any information discussed was done in a sensitive manner I felt comfortable to talk about things that mattered to me e.g. money or work concerns, my emotions Part 2 measurement tool INFORMATION Please read the statements below and select the answer which you feel best describes how you feel about the care you received today Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Please note any additional comments below 1 I received information to help me understand what would happen at today s appointment 2 3 I was given enough information about my condition and treatment The information I was given today was easy to understand 4 5 6 I was offered information in a format that suited me e.g. large print, Braille, etc. The health care professional explained fully everything I wanted to know about my condition, treatment and care I was offered information on how to access other support services, e.g. financial advice or support groups 7 I felt able to ask about the results of any tests or ongoing treatment 12

8 I know who to contact out-of-hours if I m worried about my condition 9 I was given the contact details of the Clinical Nurse Specialist, my key worker 10 11 I have been given details of other approved sources of information I was offered the opportunity to take part in research/clinical trials Part 3 measurement tool SHARED DECISION MAKING Please read the statements below and select the answer which you feel best describes how you feel about the care you received today Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Please note any additional comments below 1 I felt included in discussions about my treatment and care 2 The health care professional explained the risks and benefits of treatments in an understandable way 3 4 5 6 7 I was given enough information to help me make an informed choice My views were taken into account by the health care professional I had enough time to reach my decision I was involved in decisions as much as I wanted to be I was told about possible side effects and how to manage them 8 I felt that the health care professional I saw today knew enough about my case to provide good clinical care 9 I feel my personal circumstances were taken into consideration Please turn over the page if there are any comments you wish to make. 13

OTHER COMMENTS Was there anything particularly good about your care? Was there anything that could have been improved? 14

Appendix 2 In-patient patient experience survey 2014 What is the survey about? This survey is about your experience of the treatment and care you received for your kidney cancer at the specialist centre at the Royal Free. Your views are very important in helping us to find out how well the services work and how they can be improved. Your answers will be treated in confidence Your participation in this survey is voluntary. If you choose not to take part in this survey it will not affect the care you receive from the NHS in any way. If you do not wish to take part, or you do not want to answer some of the questions, you do not have to give us a reason. Completing the questionnaire For each question please tick inside one box. Don t worry if you make a mistake; simply cross out the mistake and put a tick in the correct box. There is space at the end of the questionnaire for you to write other comments and suggestions. If you have any queries about the survey or the questionnaire, please call the Kidney cancer clinical nurse specialist Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust Direct line 020 7317 7779 Email: rf.renalcancernursing@nhs.net Please post the questionnaire into the patient feedback box in the clinic Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey. 15

Please read the statements below and select the answer which you feel best describes how you feel about the care you received today Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Please note any additional comments below 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I felt I was given enough information in advance to prepare me for my admission From the time I arrived at the hospital for admission I felt it was well organised The nurses and doctors helped me understand about my operation The nurses and doctors helped me understand about the anaesthetic They discussed pain control with me and what to expect. After the operation a member of staff explained to me how it went During my hospital stay my family and friends had the opportunity to be informed about my care I saw a consultant surgeon on a daily basis I felt the hospital staff did everything they could to help control my pain I felt well supported by the clinical nurse specialist during my hospital stay. Overall I was happy with the quality of care I received I was given written information on what to expect after my discharge 16

13 14 I was treated with respect and dignity by the hospital staff I would recommend the services to friends and family who require the same treatment? OTHER COMMENTS Was there anything particularly good about your care? Was there anything that could have been improved? 17

Appendix 3 Achievement against action plan: mid-year report September 2014 KEY AREAS AIMS ACTION TARGET DATE Service 1 Establish a patient Patient expression of interest 1 st meeting development support group living flyer and poster on ward and November and with and beyond in clinic Mail 2014 improvement cancer. out invitation to patient treated over past two years establish meeting at Barnet Hospital and the Royal Free Hospital 2 Improvement in communication with general practitioners a series of evening educational/networking evening events are planned to update on changing pattern of care in renal cancer. September 2015 Achievement Group is now established, Meetings held November February and April at RFL Ongoing 3 Improve recruitment to clinical trials 4 Improve quality of inpatient nursing care 5 Improve patient involvement and feedback Clinical research notice 3 rd floor Patient information on Biobanking sent with all new clinic appointments Clinical trials to be a standing item monthly academic SMDT Recruitment of new staff to included renal cancer nursing Planned orientation for all new nurses All ward nurse offered online renal cancer nursing module Weekly meeting CNS and ward sister to discuss report concerns Clinical nurse specialist to review all ward patients daily basis Renal cancer nursing ward education Continue patient survey Audit achievement against action plan Use patient support group as focus group for patient involvement Develop a focus group for patient information April 2015 September 2015 September 2015 Established research governance group at RFL. New studies open for recruitment. Recruitment is ongoing Established 100% compliance CNS daily ward round incorporates ward education. Annual survey reported. Established support group. Requested patient interest in joining focus group. 18