Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Similar documents
MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Wildland Fire Assistance

MK 83 WARHEAD EFFECTIVENESS TESTS

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Development of guidelines for field storage of ammunition and explosives during military missions out of area. 1 Introduction. 2 Problem definition

Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

The U.S. Army Materiel Command Safety Reshape and the Ammunition and Explosives Safety Policy Action Committee (AMMOPAC) CHART 1 -- Title

Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Improving Safety of Demil Operations Through Automation. Mark M. Zaugg July 14, 2010

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Explosives Safety Planner Community Development and Sustainment

Army Environmental Liability Recognition, Valuation, and Reporting June 2010

Report Documentation Page

Report No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager


THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Joint Basing and Explosives Safety from the US Navy Perspective

at the Missile Defense Agency

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

Preliminary Observations on DOD Estimates of Contract Termination Liability

Information Technology

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM CREDIBLE EVENT FOR HAZARD DIVISION 1.6 EXPLOSIVE ARTICLES?

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

Tannis Danley, Calibre Systems. 10 May Technology Transition Supporting DoD Readiness, Sustainability, and the Warfighter. DoD Executive Agent

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Environmental and Explosives Safety Management on Operational Ranges Outside the United States

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Report No. D-2011-RAM-004 November 29, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Projects--Georgia Army National Guard

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

Defense Threat Reduction Agency s. Defense Threat Reduction Information Analysis Center

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

DODIG March 9, Defense Contract Management Agency's Investigation and Control of Nonconforming Materials

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND

The Landscape of the DoD Civilian Workforce

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

Transcription:

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction Presented by Colonel Paul W. Ihrke, United States Army Military Representative, Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board at the Twenty Seventh Department of Defense Explosives Safety Seminar August 22, 1996 Las Vegas, Nevada

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE AUG 1996 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-1996 to 00-00-1996 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) DOD Explosives Safety Board,2461 Eisenhower Avenue,Alexandria,VA,22331-0600 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM000767. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh DoD Explosives Safety Seminar Held in Las Vegas, NV on 22-26 August 1996. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 5 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Introduction With the exception of wartime, range operations represent the greatest source of Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) hazard to the public and the DoD workforce. Explosive ordnance is unique because it is specifically designed to be deadly and destructive. Because of this characteristic, the DoD has a unique responsibility to protect its personnel and the public from the potential harmful effects of UXO. The DoD is issuing an Instruction titled Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges (copy attached) to fulfill that responsibility. The Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB) is promulgating this Instruction under Title 10 of the United States Code 172 - the legal authority for the DDESB. This Instruction applies to all ranges used by the Military Departments, including inactive ranges, and is applicable to the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the Military Departments, the Unified Combatant Commands, and the Defense Agencies. Background This Instruction is being developed as a parallel and complimentary effort to the Range Rule (a DoD sponsored rule under Title 10 Section 172 of the United States Code) which addresses closed and transferring ranges. The DDESB was tasked to draft the Instruction by the Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health Policy Board (ESOHPB), chaired by Mr. Gary Vest, Principal Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Environmental Security), in November 1995. Much of this policy is already being implemented by the Services and their policies were used in developing this Instruction. Additionally, the DDESB Chairman and members of the Secretariat have shown the draft to range management personnel during Explosives Safety Surveys and discovered no conflicting issues. UXO Defined Based on a number of comments and legitimate concerns regarding the issue of residue and constituents from explosive operations, a further clarification is necessary to ensure everyone understands the definition of UXO and the scope of this Instruction. The best way to do this is to restate the Joint Service definition of UXO (the same definition used in the Range Rule) and then to emphasize what UXO is not, and why. The accepted definition of UXO is: Explosive ordnance which has been primed, fuzed, armed, or otherwise prepared for action and which has been fired, dropped, launched, projected or placed in such a manner as to constitute a hazard to operations, installations, personnel, or material and remains unexploded either by malfunction or design or for any other cause. Therefore, UXO is not explosive ordnance which is in a DEMIL account or which would be treated by a licensed disposal facility, whether that be located on a range or elsewhere. UXO on a range is there, not as hazardous waste, but as a consequence of its intended use. 1

UXO is not a residue or a constituent associated with explosive ordnance. When such residues or constituents are present and a hazard exists to human health or the environment, other laws and regulations will apply such as the DoD Environmental Restoration Program. Policy The cardinal rule of explosives safety is to limit exposure to the minimum number of people for the minimum amount of time to the minimum amount of explosives. This Instruction is based on this cardinal rule consistent with the mission requirements associated with our range operations. Therefore, it is DoD policy to limit authorized access to ranges to the minimum number of people necessary to accomplish the mission and restrict unauthorized access, using signs and guard patrols, or other means, as determined by the responsible commander. This same policy applies to range clearance operations. We do not clear ranges except where necessary for the safe, effective operation of the range. Since public support is vital to our overall mission, we require a public outreach program. This program is designed to alert the public to the hazards associated with explosive operations on ranges and to gain rapport with the neighboring communities. Record keeping is an essential requirement for responsible range operations. Should we ever decide to use the range for non-explosive operations or turn the range over to the public or private sector, some level of clearance is usually required. The first step in determining the extent of UXO saturation is the historical data associated with the range operations. The Instruction covers the minimum requirements for keeping records. Improved Conventional Munitions (ICM) and submunitions are among the most dangerous items of UXO and require special restrictions. It is DoD policy to use these munitions on test ranges only, except in those circumstances where their use elsewhere is absolutely essential to mission readiness. Since range operations represent the deliberate detonation of explosive ordnance, greater safety precautions are taken than required for protection against an accidental detonation. Precautions must be taken in all cases to protect the public and DoD personnel during explosive operations. This means if a given operation will present a hazard, then either a different range must be used or other measures taken to afford protection. If UXO is discovered off the range, a rapid response by Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) personnel is essential to protect the public and foster community support. The Instruction as originally written covered only UXO explosives safety as provided for in the DDESB s legal authority under Title 10 of the US Code as mentioned above. It did not attempt to address other environmental concerns associated with range operations. However, based on a number of questions concerning hazardous residue and 2

constituents as a result of explosive operations and concerning hazardous substances that might be on a range, paragraph 10 under Policy was inserted. This paragraph covers the Department s responsibility to protect the public and the environment from hazardous residue and/or constituents from explosive operations and hazardous substances that may migrate off of a range. There is still some debate over the final scope of the Instruction and it may expand to cover other areas. But for now, with the exception of paragraph 10 under Policy, the Instruction represents the explosives safety standards applicable to UXO on ranges within the authority of the DDESB. UXO Safety vs Environmental Concerns It is important to remember that UXO safety is the primary safety concern on firing ranges and extreme caution must be taken when attempting to remediate an environmental problem or perform other types of environmental activities (or any other work) on a range. The occupational risk to those performing the work must be weighed against the benefits gained from the work. Where there is a conflict, explosives safety will normally take precedence. This principle is the basis for our policy to not clear ranges unless necessary for the safe operation of the range to support readiness requirements. We believe this policy is more protective of human health than if we were to require ranges to be cleared periodically for the sake of limiting a future cleanup operation should another use be determined. Where an environmental condition on a range threatens imminent and substantial harm to human health or the environment off the range, that condition must be addressed, but addressed in a manner consistent with the protection of those performing the work. Responsibilities The Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology), or designee working through the DDESB has principal staff responsibility for UXO safety policy within OSD. The DDESB monitors compliance during its explosives safety survey program. The Military Departments and Directors of the Defense Agencies will ensure compliance with this Instruction. Commanders of the Unified Combatant Commands will ensure compliance at joint use ranges within their areas of responsibility. This Instruction represents the minimum standards applicable to UXO safety on ranges and the DoD components have the latitude to determine how to implement the Instruction within their commands and facilities. Information Requirements Recordkeeping and mishap reporting must be compatible with the Defense Explosives Safety Management System (DESMS) which is compatible with the Defense Environmental Security Corporate Information Management (DESCIM) system. The Military Departments and the Defense Agencies along OSD must ensure that all data 3

system initiatives associated with UXO operations on ranges are compatible with these systems. Status With the exception of the controversy over paragraph 10 under Policy (how to address hazardous residue and constituents), the Instruction has been staffed and coordinated throughout the Department. The Instruction, essentially as written now, will be briefed to the next ESOHPB. The Policy Board will then decide whether or not the residue issue is adequately covered or whether it needs to be covered at all. Once that is done, the Instruction will be modified as necessary and sent out for final staffing and coordination. The goal of the department is to publish the Instruction as soon as possible. 4