Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)

Similar documents
Updating the BRAC Cleanup Plan:

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HUNTSVILLE CENTER, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1600 HUNTSVILLE. ALABAMA 3S

DoD and EPA Management Principles for Implementing Response Actions at Closed, Transferring, and Transferred (CTT) Ranges

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

EXPLOSIVES SAFETY SUBMISSION

Vol. 62 No. 29 Wednesday, February 12, 1997 p ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 40 CFR Parts 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, and 270

Subj: EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REVIEW, OVERSIGHT, AND VERIFICATION OF MUNITIONS RESPONSES

Foreword. Mario P. Fiori Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment)

Wildland Firefighting

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

State Perspective of DoD MMRP PA/SI Program

Army. Environmental. Cleanup. Strategy

Defense Environmental Restoration Program/Formerly Used Defense Sites Program, NC

STATEMENT OF MR. RAYMOND F. DUBOIS, JR. DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (INSTALLATIONS AND ENVIRONMENT)

DOD MANUAL DOD MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES

CRS Report for Congress

Remediation at Radford High School Makalapa Crater Geographic Study Area, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, harbor-hickam, Oahu, Hawaii

Navy Munitions Response Program Explosives Safety Submissions

EPA. Used or Fired Munitions and Unexploded Ordnance at Closed, Transferred, and Transferring Military Ranges

Welcome Thanks for joining us. ITRC s Internet-based Training Program. Site Investigation and Remediation for Munitions Response Projects

1 July Department of Defense Policy to Implement the EPA s Military Munitions Rule

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

EPA. Used or Fired Munitions and Unexploded Ordnance at Closed, Transferred, and Transferring Military Ranges

Government of Azerbaijan

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

JMAC-EST 19 March 2014

Former Five Points Outlying Field

Beaches on Isla Culebrita and Flamenco Beach on Culebra Island Culebra Island, Puerto Rico. DERP-FUDS Property #I02PR0068

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

FY2013 LTA - MARION ENGR DEPOT EAST

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Technical Paper 18 1 September 2016 DDESB. Minimum Qualifications for Personnel Conducting Munitions and Explosives of Concern-Related Activities

Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

Technical Paper 18 1 September 2015 DDESB. Minimum Qualifications for Personnel Conducting Munitions and Explosives of Concern-Related Activities

Environmental Restoration Program

IMAS Second Edition 01 October 2008 Amendment 4, June 2013

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Record of Decision Del Rey Oaks Munitions Response Area Track 2 Munitions Response Site. Former Fort Ord, California

The attached is updated text for incorporation into the subject document. Replace current text pages with the change text pages as described below:

Meeting Minutes April 26, Project: Former Camp Butner Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)

MCO C465 AUG MARINE CORPS ORDER From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List

Navy Munitions Response Program Explosives Safety Oversight

Final Environmental Restoration Program Recordkeeping Manual

DEC CCO 3571.lA 3B. COMBAT CENTER ORDER 3571.lA. From: To: Commanding General Distribution List. Subj: EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL

Naval Facilities Engineering Command - Atlantic Vieques, Puerto Rico. Status Report for the Vieques Restoration Advisory Board. Through December 2008

Fiscal Year 2012 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

MARCH Updated Guidance. EPCRA Compliance for Ranges

Construction Industry

ITRC Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response (GCMR) Team

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Kansas AAP, KS Conveyance Progress Report

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

1 San Diego, CA One Corps Serving The Army and The Nation

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Environmental and Explosives Safety Management on Operational Ranges Outside the United States

Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials State Federal Coordination Focus Group and Removal Action Focus Group

DOD DIRECTIVE E EXPLOSIVES SAFETY MANAGEMENT (ESM)

Society of American Military Engineers 2008 Missouri River/TEXOMA Regional Conference

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Army Environmental Liability Recognition, Valuation, and Reporting June 2010

ACQUISITION OF THE ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM. Report No. D February 28, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Ordnance. Cleaning Up

PREPRINT MAGNETIC UXO RECOVERY SYSTEM (MURS) (BRIEFING SLIDES)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. DoD Executive Agent for the Unexploded Ordnance Center of Excellence (UXOCOE)

3Rs Explosives Safety Guide. Recycling Industry R R R. ecognize etreat eport

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Quality Assurance Specialist (Ammunition Surveillance)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) FY 2012 OCO

and Headquarters United States Marine Corps 2 Navy Annex Washington, DC

Ordnance Holdings, Inc. (OHI)

Fort George G. Meade and secure DoD facility former Mortar Range Site User Training Guide

MMRP Site Inspections at FUDS Challenges, Status, and Lessons Learned

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

ASTSWMO Annual Meeting October 25, 2006

Title: Open Burning/Open Detonation

Environmental & Munitions Center of Expertise (EM CX) Information Fact Sheet US Army Corps of Engineers

Cleanup Successes and Challenges. James D. Werner Director, Air & Waste Management Division

Record of Decision Group 3 Del Rey Oaks / Monterey, Laguna Seca Parking, and Military Operations in Urban Terrain Site Munitions Response Areas

Summary Report for Individual Task D-3100 Implement the Munitions Rule (MR) Status: Approved

Management Standards. EHS Policy and Program

APPENDIX E. Resumes of Key Personnel

BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 12 MAY 1994

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM CREDIBLE EVENT FOR HAZARD DIVISION 1.6 EXPLOSIVE ARTICLES?

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

Department of Defense MANUAL

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan

Explosive Remnants of War (ERW) A Quick Look Threat Analysis

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND PROTECTION PROGRAM

Navy Operational Range Clearance (ORC) Plans Improve Sustainability A Case Study

INTERSERVICE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Appendix D: Restoration Budget Overview

Chapter I SUBMUNITION UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE (UXO) HAZARDS

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001

IMPROVED INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS PERFORMANCE OF AN HE ROCKET WARHEAD

Transcription:

BRAC Environmental Fact Sheet SPRING 1999 OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY) Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) The Department of Defense (DoD) defines military munitions/explosive ordnance as any munition, weapon delivery system, or ordnance item that contains explosives, propellants, or chemical agents. UXO is military munitions/explosive ordnance that has been primed, fused, armed, or otherwise prepared for action, and that has been fired, dropped, launched, projected, or placed in such a manner as to constitute a hazard to operations, installations, personnel, or material, and remains unexploded either by malfunction, design, or for any other cause. UXO vs HTRW With respect to its threat to human health and the environment, UXO differs from other hazards in several ways that can be inferred from the quick comparison chart below. Hazardous, toxic, and radiological wastes (HTRW) generally present a threat to human health and the environment through repeated and accumulated exposures to certain contaminants above acceptable exposure limits. UXO presents an immediate risk of acute physical injury from fire or explosion resulting from accidental or unintentional detonation. UXO General Characteristics HTRW Not very mobile Very mobile Not chemical specific Chemical specific Not concentration dependent Concentration dependent Single exposure Multiple exposure Narrow target population Broad target population Immediate acute physical Long-term health effects injury Box 1 UXO Safety and Reporting It is important to understand how to react responsibly in the presence of UXO. If you encounter UXO: STOP! Do not move closer. DO NOT touch, move, or disturb UXO. Do not transmit radio frequencies (walkietalkies, citizens band radio, cellular telephones, etc.). Do not attempt to remove anything near UXO. Clearly mark the UXO area. Complete Reporting Memorandum listing: - Time of encounter (date, time) - Location (coordinates, street/grid names) - Individuals present (names, organizations) - Ordnance condition (buried, partially buried, exposed) - Type of ordnance (rocket, grenade, projectile) - Estimated size of ordnance (length, width, height) - Distinctive features of ordnance (shape, color, markings) - Nearby structures (landmarks, names, types, distance from ordnance). Forward the completed memorandum to the nearest EOD personnel (if available) or public safety office. In case of emergency, call (404) 362-3333 (52nd Ordnance Group) UXO Risk Assessments Risk models use site-specific data on the distribution and density of UXO to estimate the threat to human health and the environment according to current and reasonably anticipated future land use. The models are used to determine risk on the basis of the characteristics of the UXO present (amount, depth, size, and type), the characteristics of the site (topography, vegetation, soil type, and climate), and the range of potential exposure (current and future land use, and population size and proximity to site). UXO Response Process DoD Components conduct UXO response actions to address explosives safety hazards posed to public health, welfare, or the environment. Depending on the amount of time available for responding to the threat, response actions may take place within a few hours or may last several years. Where UXO presents an imminent, immediate threat to human health or the environment, the DoD Component may initiate an Emergency Response to address the immediate, unacceptable hazards (e.g., possibility of acute Local reproduction of this fact sheet is authorized and encouraged 1

Form SF298 Citation Data

Report Date ("DD MON YYYY") 00 Mar 1999 Title and Subtitle Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Authors Report Type N/A Dates Covered (from... to) ("DD MON YYYY") Contract or Grant Number Program Element Number Project Number Task Number Work Unit Number Performing Organization Name(s) and Address(es) Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Acquisition and Technology 3000 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-2000 Sponsoring/Monitoring Agency Name(s) and Address(es) Performing Organization Number(s) Monitoring Agency Acronym Monitoring Agency Report Number(s) Distribution/Availability Statement Approved for public release, distribution unlimited Supplementary Notes Document has color Abstract The Department of Defense (DoD) defines military munitions/explosive ordnance as any munition, weapon delivery system, or ordnance item that contains explosives, propellants, or chemical agents. UXO is military munitions/explosive ordnance that has been primed, fused, armed, or otherwise prepared for action, and that has been fired, dropped, launched, projected, or placed in such a manner as to constitute a hazard to operations, installations, personnel, or material, and remains unexploded either by malfunction, design, or for any other cause. Subject Terms Document Classification unclassified Classification of Abstract unclassified Classification of SF298 unclassified Limitation of Abstract unlimited Number of Pages 4

BRAC Environmental Fact Sheet Non-Time-Critical Removal Action [ Time-Critical Removal Action Public Involvement PA SI EE/CA RD RA AM Post-RA No Further Action Figure 1. UXO Assessment and Removal Process physical injury, death, destruction of property). Under circumstances that only allow a response within a few months, the Component may initiate a Time-Critical Removal Action (TCRA), which may involve surface clearance, fencing or other measures to deny access, restrictive signs to warn of the hazards, or a combination of the foregoing. However, Components typically conduct UXO response activities as Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions (NTCRA), following a longer process that involves the public and regulatory communities early and continually throughout the process, as depicted in Figure 1. Even during the NTCRA process, circumstances may give rise to the need to conduct a more expedited response, such as an Emergency Response or a TCRA. The standard phases of the NTCRA are explained below: Removal Preliminary Assessment (PA) This phase involves recognizing the existence of the site in question, determining whether a UXO hazard is present, and identifying whether further action is needed. Removal Site Investigation (SI) During this phase, an Archives Search Report (ASR) is begun. Information from the ASR is combined with results from a preliminary risk assessment to verify the extent of the suspected UXO hazard. Components of the ASR include a historical records search, interviews with knowledgeable personnel, and interpretation of aerial photos and old maps to gain a better understanding of the types and amounts of UXO hazards potentially present. Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) A geophysical survey is performed in suspected UXO areas. A geostatistically based sampling program can be used to develop a sampling strategy to characterize areas suspected of containing UXO. In this phase, a range of site-specific response actions, consistent with future land use, are evaluated according to criteria in the National Contingency Plan. This evaluation compares and contrasts the alternatives with respect to their overall protectiveness, implementability, and cost. The evaluation results provide the basis for selection of the action to be taken. The EE/CA is made available for public comment to solicit input on the potential response and reasonably anticipated future land uses. After the installation has responded to the public comments, the response action is finalized in an Action Memorandum (AM). Removal Design (RD) During the design phase, an RD plan is prepared that will achieve the UXO response objectives outlined in the Action Memorandum. The plan defines the contract specifications, response plans, safety and personnel qualifications, and anticipated depth of clearance. During this phase, an explosives safety submission must be prepared for the DoD Explosives Safety Board (DDESB) to review and approve prior to start of the Removal Action. Removal Action (RA) During this phase, the selected solution is implemented according to the specifications defined in the RD plan. The removal action may consist of detonating UXO in place or at off-site demolition grounds, provided that DDESB approves the explosive safety submission. Post-Removal Action (Post-RA) This phase may be required in the Action Memorandum and can include public education, periodic UXO sweeps, long-term monitoring, land use restrictions, and additional UXO actions if land use changes. Public Involvement Public involvement is a key component in the entire removal process. Each UXO project phase has a specific requirement to keep the public informed and to seek public support. Communication with the public and regulators is critical to successful and timely project completion. This can be accomplished through the use of Restoration Advisory Boards, which consist of volunteer public and government stakeholders for a specific site. 2

SPRING 1999 HYPOTHETICAL AREA CONTAINING UXO Less than 1 foot gradiometers magnetometers electromagnetic induction ground-penetrating multiple sensors infrared sensors synthetic aperture sampling up to 4 feet gradiometers magnetometers multiple sensors groundpenetrating sampling UXO Clearance Standards Figure 2 shows a hypothetical area with UXO. If a response involves clearance, the preferred method of determining clearance depth is to use site-specific information, including site conditions and planned land use. This figure illustrates the generic clearance depths recommended by DDESB, when site-specific planning is not possible, to support different future land uses. The figure also shows the current assessment technologies available for identifying and characterizing the presence of UXO at the stated depths. Recent Developments The following DoD and Federal regulations also influence the UXO response process. Figure 2. Determining Clearance Depths Based on Future Land Use DoD 6055.9-STD DoD Ammunition and Explosives Safety Standards, effective August 1997, establishes uniform safety standards applicable to ammunition and explosives and to both associated and unassociated personnel and property. This standard supersedes DoD 6055.9-STD Ammunition and Explosives Safety Standards, October 1992. This information is available on the DDESB web page. up to 10 feet multiple sensors ground-penetrating sampling Note: Size of ordnance items is exaggerated for clarity. 1 If construction will occur, UXO must be cleared to 4 feet below planned excavation depths. 2 Does not include emerging active or passive assessment technologies. EPA's Military Munitions Rule, finalized August 12, 1997, identifies the point at which conventional and chemical military munitions become a solid waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and provides for the safe storage and transportation of such waste. The DoD Range Rule, proposed September 26, 1997, includes Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)-like methodology and focuses on the specific needs of range evaluation and response. The Range Rule is being developed by DoD, in consultation with EPA, other Federal agencies, states, and Native American tribes to identify appropriate response actions on military ranges that (1) have been taken out of service and put to a new use, (2) are formerly used defense sites, and/or (3) are slated for transfer out of military control. The Range Rule public comment period ended in December 1997. When it is finalized, the Range Rule is expected to become the assessment and response standard for these ranges. A new, comprehensive UXO risk model is being developed in conjunction with the Range Rule. Box 2 outlines the five phases of the proposed Range Rule. 3

BRAC Environmental Fact Sheet SPRING 1999 Proposed Range Rule Process Assessment Stages Definition Range Identification Range Assessment & Accelerated Response Range Evaluation & Site-specific Response Recurring Review Administrative Closeout This phase focuses on identifying all closed, transferred, and transferring ranges. During this phase, DoD assesses the explosives safety, human health, and environmental risks the range might pose. An accelerated response is any readily available, proven method of addressing the identified risks, particularly explosives risks posed by military munitions or other materials on military ranges. This phase includes detailed investigations into the types of munitions used on the range, materials associated with these munitions, and the environmental setting. The site-specific response evaluation examines various alternatives for addressing risks that have not been reduced or eliminated by responses taken earlier in this process. The purpose of recurring reviews is to ensure that range response actions continue to ensure explosives safety and protection of human health and the environment. Following a review to ensure that the range is unlikely to pose further risk and that the response objectives were achieved, DoD ends the response action. Box 2 Where to Learn More Federal Regulations and Guidance Military Munitions Rule: Hazardous Waste Identification and Management; Explosives Emergencies; Manifest Exemptions for Transport of Hazardous Waste on Right-of-Ways on Contiguous Properties. 62 FR 6621 (Feb 12, 1997), 40 CFR Part 266, Subpart M, and EPA/530/F-97/004, February 1997. Closed, Transferred, and Transferring Ranges Containing Military Munitions, Proposed Rule. Federal Register, Volume 62, Number 187, Pages 50795-50843. CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual. EPA/542/R-92/005, October 1992. Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions Under CERCLA. EPA/540/R-93/057, August 1993. DoD Instruction 6055.14, "Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Safety on Ranges," January 23, 1998. DoD 6055.9 - STD, "DoD Ammunition and Explosives Safety Standards," August 1997. Other Information Unexploded Ordnance (UXO): An Overview. Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division. October 1996. BRAC Environmental Fact Sheet: Expediting BRAC Cleanups Using CERCLA Removal Authority, Spring 1997. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Clearance, Active Range UXO Clearance, and Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Programs. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology. April 1998. DDESB Web Page: http://www.acq.osd.mil/ens/esb/esbhompb.html U.S. Army Environmental Center Web Page: http://aec-www.apgea.army.mil:8080/ Points of Contact Navy Ordnance Environmental Support Office: (301) 744-4450/4534 U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center Huntsville: (205) 895-1545 This and other documents on the BRAC Environmental Program are available at: http://www.dtic.mil/envirodod/brac/ We welcome and invite your comments on this fact sheet, as we seek ways to improve the information provided. Please send comments to the following address: OADUSD (Environmental Cleanup) Attn: Fast-Track Cleanup 3400 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-3400 4 printed on recycled paper