What s New in Statistical Quality Control Guidance: CLSI s C24 Updates. August 2, 2016

Similar documents
SAMPLE. Statistical Quality Control for Quantitative Measurement Procedures: Principles and Definitions

5/8/2015. Individualized Quality Control Plans (IQCP) Changes to the CMS Quality Requirements. CLIA Quality Control Evolution of the Process

IQCP. Ensuring Your Laboratory s Compliance With Individualized Quality Control Plans. November/December 2016

Learning Objectives. Individualized Quality Control Plans. Agenda. Another Way To Determine QC? Hooray!!!! What is QC?

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Addressing POCT Needs; The Good, The Bad, and The Risky

SAMPLE. Use of Delta Checks in the Medical Laboratory

CLIA s New IQCP Requirements Are in Effect, or Are They?: Implementing Laboratory Risk Management Now to Ensure Success

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY KEY COMPONENTS OF AN INDIVIDUALIZED QUALITY CONTROL PLAN

Laboratory Risk Assessment: IQCP and Beyond. Ron S. Quicho, MS Associate Project Director Standards and Survey Methods, Laboratory July 18, 2017

QC Explained Quality Control for Point of Care Testing

Incident Reporting Systems

Pro-QCP SAMPLE REPORT

IQCP January Is Coming Fast What Do I Do?!? Jean Ball Bold, MBA, MT(HHS), MLT(ASCP

Plan for Quality to Improve Patient Safety at the POC

Risk Assessment Scoring and Matrix

3/14/2016. The Joint Commission and IQCP. Objectives. Before Getting Started

Internal Lab Inspections: Are You Inspection Ready? Presented by: Jeanne Mumford, MT(ASCP) Manager, Point of Care Testing, JHM

insights INTO Quality Control MAY/JUNE 2013 COLA S

Internal Quality Assurance Framework Microbiology

CLIA & Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP) Karen W. Dyer MT(ASCP), DLM Director (Acting) Division of Laboratory Services

CLIA & Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP) Judith Yost Director Division of Laboratory Services

C H A P T E R HAZARD ANALYSIS

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Homeland Security Recommendations Related to Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism

Plan for Quality to Improve Patient Safety at the POC

CAP Forensic Drug Testing Accreditation Program Standards for Accreditation

Engaging Staff in EHR Implementation and Reducing Risk: Making Your Laboratory Data SAFER

Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP) Frequently Asked Questions Date: May 5, 2015 (last updated 08/21/2017)

Quality Assurance Program For Hospital Based Point of Care Testing. Presented by: Jeanne Mumford, MT(ASCP) Pathology Supervisor, QA Specialist

SAMPLE. Essential Tools for Implementation and Management of a Point-of-Care Testing Program

Point of Care Testing. BOPCC May 31, 2011 Beatrice O Keefe, Chief Laboratory Field Services California Department of Public Health

Policy Subject Index Number Section Subsection Category Contact Last Revised References Applicable To Detail MISSION STATEMENT: OVERVIEW:

What s New and Improved for the Laboratory Program in 2013 April 23, 2013

Lessons Learned with the Application of MIL-STD-882D at the Weapon System Explosives Safety Review Board

Standards for Forensic Drug Testing Accreditation

Moderate injury requiring professional intervention. Requiring time off work for 4-14 days. Increase in length of hospital stay by 4-15 days

Standards for Laboratory Accreditation

Phlebotomy Top Gun 8/15/2013

The Laboratorian as a Clinical Consultant

Reducing Risk in the Laboratory: IQCP In Action! 9/24/2015

CAP Accreditation and Checklists Update. Lyn Wielgos, MT(ASCP) Checklist Editor, CAP Accreditation Programs

Hur kan man bäst följa och åtgärda preanalytiska felkällor?

Patient Safety Hazard Risk Assessment FY 2018

The CLSI Consensus Process: Making a Difference in Health Care David Sterry, MT(ASCP) Director, Standards Development, CLSI

Potential challenges when assessing organisational processes for assurance of clinical competence in labs with limited clinical staff resource

Division of Laboratory Systems Protecting America s Health by Strengthening Clinical and Public Health Laboratories

Quality Impact Assessment Policy

Promoting Data Integrity for the Department of Defense

Scholarship and Awards Descriptions

Healthcare Coalition Tools to support CMS Emergency Preparedness Rule Compliance

01/12/14. Nomen Omen: Analytical performance goals Performance goals. Performance criteria. Quality specifications

Preanalytical Errors in Laboratory - Their Consequences and Measures to Reduce Them

Organisation of a Clinical Laboratory. Peter O Loughlin SA Pathology

Quality and Equality Integrated Impact Assessment Policy

COMMISSION ON LABORATORY ACCREDITATION. Laboratory Accreditation Program TEAM LEADER ASSESSMENT OF DIRECTOR & QUALITY CHECKLIST

Total Quality Control: Evolution of Quality Management Systems

TNI Environmental Laboratory Program- Accreditation Procedure

Quality Management Partnership: Pathology Quality Management Program U of T Pathology Update

Welcome to. Patient Identification and Transfusion Safety: Six years of Experience with Bar Code Scanning. March 24, 2011.

Q&A regarding Maternity Safety Strategy actions and Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST) incentive scheme

National Patient Safety Agency Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Investigation

Hemolysis: The Elephant in the Room That s Eating Your Lunch. Presenter Dennis J. Ernst MT(ASCP), NCPT(NCCCT)

The Job Market Experiences of Gulf War II Era Veterans

Heart of America POC Group Quality Management Making it Meaningful

Conformity Assessment Approaches and Best Practices NIST Public Workshop. Session 4: Conformity Assessment Case Study Personal Protective Technologies

STATISTICAL PRESS NOTICE MONTHLY CRITICAL CARE BEDS AND CANCELLED URGENT OPERATIONS DATA, ENGLAND March 2018

3/15/2017. Predict, Prevent and Prepare: Improving Laboratory Biosafety and Biosecurity Across the Nation. Disclosure Statement.

Understanding the High Reliability Organization and Why It's Important to Your Lab

3/14/2016. About Seattle Children s. The national send-outs problem

The CLIA regulations..

Identifying Errors: A Case for Medication Reconciliation Technicians

CAIR Conference Anaheim, CA, Nov. 6-9, 2012

Roundtable Discussion_Test Utilization_Zhang 7/29/2014

Safety Department. Issue Date: 29 Sep. 14 Approval Date: 29 Sep. 14. Occupational Hygiene

: Suzanna Immanuel Place, date of birth : Jakarta, 11 th March 1953 Education : MD FMUI 1978 Profession : Clinical Pathologist (SpPK) FMUI 1984

Cardinal Bank & George Mason University

BOROUGH OF ROSELLE PUBLIC NOTICE ANNUAL NOTICE OF CALENDAR YEAR 2018 WORKSHOP SESSIONS, PRE-AGENDA MEETINGS AND REGULAR MEETINGS

Reports. Doing Good The Benefits of Volunteering for Your Life, Your Career, Your World. Melissa D Archangelo (CLSI, Wayne, PA)

Emergency Response Planning: Crisis Management for Hazardous Environments

Point of Care Testing

Medicaid and CHIP Managed Care Final Rule MLTSS

Joint Commission: Insight into the Top Cited Elements of Performance and SAFER Scoring

2/15/2017. Reducing Mislabeled and Unlabeled Specimens In Acuity Adaptable Units

Emory Medicine at Grady: Quality and Performance Improvement

Enhancing Patient Quality and Safety with Compliance

SUCCESSION PLANNING: FILLING A LABORATORY DIRECTOR S SHOES PART ONE

Patient safety and risk management in medical laboratories: theory and practical application

Quality assurance in medical laboratories

Mississippi Emergency Support Function #14 Long Term Recovery Annex

SOUTH EAST COAST AMBULANCE SERVICE NHS TRUST. General Risk Assessment Form

Master. Point-of-Care-Testing Checklist. CAP Accreditation Program

Karen W. Dyer MT(ASCP), DLM Director, Division of Laboratory Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CLIA

Pharmaceutical Services Report to Joint Conference Committee September 2010

Thursday, May 24. Best Practices in Tube Handling + What Would You Do? Dennis J. Ernst, MT(ASCP), NCPT(NCCT)

THE IAEA FUKUSHIMA REPORT AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Master. Point-of-Care-Testing Checklist. CAP Accreditation Program

Medication Management: Is It in Your Toolbox?

Lab Strategies In an Era of Health Care Reform

College of American Pathologists 325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois Advancing Excellence

2017 Tsinghua International Summer School

Transcription:

1 What s New in Statistical Quality Control Guidance: CLSI s C24 Updates August 2, 2016

CLSI C24-4 th Edition Statistical Quality Control for Quantitative Measurement Procedures: Principles and Definitions Curtis A. Parvin, PhD Nils B. Person, PhD, FACB Nikola Baumann, PhD Lili Duan, PhD A. Paul Durham Valerio M. Genta, MD Jeremie Gras, MD Greg Miller, PhD Megan E. Sawchuk, MT(ASCP) 2

CLSI C24-4 th Edition Document Status Project Phase Activities Dates Proposed Draft Voting Delegates and Committee Dec 1, 2015 Feb 1, 2016 members vote on Proposed Draft Comment Resolution Committee resolves February, 2016 April, 2016 comments and updates draft Preparation for Final Draft Voting Editing, Final approval from chairholder May, 2016 August, 2016 Final Draft Vote Preparation for Publication Consensus Council Approves Publication Editors prepare publication format Aug 26 Sep 15, 2016 September, 2016 Publish September, 2016 3

What s New? Notable changes and additions Alignment with principles introduced in CLSI EP23: Laboratory Quality Control Based on Risk Management Additional performance measures related to patient risk Expanded guidance on setting target values and SDs Greater focus on QC frequency and QC schedules More emphasis on recovering from an out-of-control condition 4

Patient Risk Sequence of Events Creating Risk of Harm for a Patient (Example) Hazardous Situation P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Initiating cause Testing process failure generated reported Misdiagnosis Hazardous medical action Patient harmed CLSI EP23, Figure 6 5

Managing Patient Risk CLSI EP23, Table 3. Risk Acceptability Matrix Severity of Harm Probability of Harm Negligible Minor Serious Critical Catastrophic Frequent unacceptable unacceptable unacceptable unacceptable unacceptable Probable acceptable unacceptable unacceptable unacceptable unacceptable Occasional acceptable acceptable acceptable unacceptable unacceptable Remote acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable unacceptable Improbable acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable 6

Patient Risk Sequence of Events Creating Risk of Harm for a Patient (Example) Hazardous Situation P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Initiating cause Testing process failure generated reported Misdiagnosis Hazardous medical action Patient harmed CLSI EP23, Figure 6 7

Patient Risk Sequence of Events Creating Risk of Harm for a Patient (Example) Hazardous Situation P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Initiating cause Testing process failure generated reported Misdiagnosis Hazardous medical action Patient harmed CLSI EP23, Figure 6 Laboratory QC 78

Patient Risk Sequence of Events Creating Risk of Harm for a Patient (Example) Hazardous Situation P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Initiating cause Testing process failure generated reported Misdiagnosis Hazardous medical action Patient harmed CLSI EP23, Figure 6 Probability of detecting a testing process failure 79

Patient Risk Sequence of Events Creating Risk of Harm for a Patient (Example) Hazardous Situation P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Initiating cause Testing process failure generated reported Misdiagnosis Hazardous medical action Patient harmed CLSI EP23, Figure 6 Probability (number) of incorrect patient s reported before the testing process failure is detected 710

Patient Risk Sequence of Events Creating Risk of Harm for a Patient (Example) Hazardous Situation P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Initiating cause Testing process failure generated reported Misdiagnosis Hazardous medical action Patient harmed CLSI EP23, Figure 6 Probability (number) of incorrect patient s identified and corrected before misdiagnosis or hazardous action 711

Patient Risk Sequence of Events Creating Risk of Harm for a Patient (Example) Hazardous Situation P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Initiating cause Testing process failure generated reported Misdiagnosis Hazardous medical action Patient harmed CLSI EP23, Figure 6 Focus on the measurement procedure 712

Patient Risk Sequence of Events Creating Risk of Harm for a Patient (Example) Hazardous Situation P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Initiating cause Testing process failure generated reported Misdiagnosis Hazardous medical action Patient harmed CLSI EP23, Figure 6 Focus on risk of harm to patients 713

Patient Risk Based QC Performance Measures Number of erroneous patient s generated before detecting an out-of-control condition Depends on Magnitude of out-of-control condition QC Strategy # of QCs evaluated QC rule(s) Frequency of QC evaluations (QC schedule) Allowable total error for the analyte 814

Patient Risk Based QC Performance Measures Number of erroneous final patient s reported before detecting an out-of-control condition Depends on When patient s are reported What recovery strategy the laboratory employs for identifying and correcting erroneous patient s 915

CLSI C24-4 th Edition Main Chapters (Draft) 3. Purpose of Statistical Quality Control 4. Assessing Quality Control Performance 5. Planning a Statistical Quality Control Strategy 6. Recovering from an Out-of-Control Condition 7. Ongoing Assessment of Quality Control Programs 8. Worked Examples 10 16

CLSI C24-4 th Edition Main Chapters (Draft) 3. Purpose of Statistical Quality Control 4. Assessing Quality Control Performance 5. Planning a Statistical Quality Control Strategy 6. Recovering from an Out-of-Control Condition 7. Ongoing Assessment of Quality Control Programs 8. Worked Examples 10 17

CLSI C24-4 th Edition Main Chapters (Draft) 3. Purpose of Statistical Quality Control 4. Assessing Quality Control Performance 5. Planning a Statistical Quality Control Strategy 6. Recovering from an Out-of-Control Condition 7. Ongoing Assessment of Quality Control Programs 8. Worked Examples Greg Miller: Planning a Statistical Quality Control Strategy 10 18

CLSI C24-4 th Edition Main Chapters (Draft) 3. Purpose of Statistical Quality Control 4. Assessing Quality Control Performance 5. Planning a Statistical Quality Control Strategy 6. Recovering from an Out-of-Control Condition 7. Ongoing Assessment of Quality Control Programs 8. Worked Examples Niki Baumann: Recovery From Out of Control Conditions 10 19

Our Speakers Nikola Baumann, PhD, DABCC PhD from University of Wisconsin in Madison Postdoc in Clinical Chemistry at Washington University Asst. Prof. of Lab Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Co-Director Central Clinical Laboratory, Director of Central Processing, Director of the Clinical Chemistry Fellowship Program Active in AACC at both the regional and national level An influential contributor to the topic of preparing for and recovering from large-scale testing errors 11 20

Our Speakers Greg Miller, PhD PhD from University of Arizona in Tucson Postdoc in Clinical Chemistry at Ohio State University Professor of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth Director of Clinical Chemistry and Pathology Information Systems Past President of AACC (2012) and CLSI (2015) Key contributor to committees and working groups for several professional organizations involved with standardization, harmonization, quality control, and external quality assessment 12 21