, pp.184-188 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/astl.2015.116.37 Type D Personality, Self-Resilience, and Health- Promoting Behaviors in Nursing Students Eun Ju Lim RN PhD 1, Jun Hee Noh RN PhD 2, Yong Sun Jeong RN PhD 3 1 Assistant Professor, Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-ang University, Seoul, Korea, 2 Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Woosuk University, Wanju-gun, Jeollabukdo, Korea 3 Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Dongshin University, Naju-si Jeollanam-do, Korea Abstract. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among type D personality, self-resilience, and health promoting behaviors in nursing students. Grade, self-esteem, Type D personality, and self-resilience were significant predictors of health promoting behaviors, accounting for 34.8% of its variance (F = 25.714, P < 0.001). Of these four variables, self-resilience was the most significant contributor to health promoting behaviors in nursing students. Health promotion programs for nursing students should be designed and developed with consideration of interventions for psychological variables such as Type D personality and self-resilience. Keywords: Health promotion, nursing students, personality, resilience 1. Introduction As future professional nurses who will assume the role of a healthcare provider in the community, college nursing students should prepare themselves to exhibit exemplary health promoting behaviors in their daily lives [1][2]. Thus, it is worthwhile to measure their level of health promoting behaviors and to identify the factors affecting it. The purposes of this study were to examine comprehensively the relationship among nursing students Type D personality, self-resilience, and health promoting behaviors, and ultimately to provide some basic knowledge about materials for the physical and psychological healthcare of nursing students, who will play key roles as healthcare providers in the future. 2 Corresponding author: Jun Hee Noh, RN, Ph.D. Department of Nursing, Woosuk University, Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do, Korea E-mail: snow-1004@daum.net ISSN: 2287-1233 ASTL Copyright 2015 SERSC
2. Methods 2.1 Data collection and participants To ensure the reliability of this study, data were collected across the country with consideration of regional similarities and differences. The selected regions ranged from metropolitan areas to small and medium-sized cities. Nursing students from universities of three different cities were randomly selected to participate in the survey. The data were collected from March to June 2013, and 538 nursing students participated in this study. After excluding 21 incomplete questionnaires (valid response rate: 96.1%), data from 517 nursing students were analyzed. 2.2 Measurements Type D personality. Type D personality was measured using the questionnaire developed by Denollet [3]; the Korean version was translated by Lim et al. [4]. We used this questionnaire with the Korean version and the original author s permission. This questionnaire consists of 14 items: 7 items on the domain of negative affectivity, indicating the tendency to experience negative affect, depending on the time and situation; and 7 items on the domain of social inhibition, indicating the tendency to inhibit the expression of emotion or behavior in social interactions in order to avoid rebuke. Each question was answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (No) to 4 (Yes); if the score of each domain was 10 or higher, the respondent was classified as having Type D personality. The Cronbach s for this tool was.88 for negative affectivity and.86 for social inhibition during its development, and it was.82 and.85, respectively, for the present study. Self-resilience. Self-resilience refers to a tendency to respond flexibly to situational demands or stressful situations [5]. In this study, self-resilience was measured using the questionnaire developed by Wagnild and Young [5], for which we paid a copyright royalty to use; the Korean version was translated by Shin [6]. This questionnaire consists of 25 items: 17 items on personal self-resilience and 8 on the respondent s acceptance of his/her own life. Each item was answered on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Not at all) to 7 (Absolutely yes) and the total score ranged from 25 to 175. A high score indicates a high level of self-resilience. The Cronbach s for this tool was.91 during its development and.88 in this study. Health promoting behaviors. Health promoting behaviors was measured using the Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) developed by Walker, Sechrist, and Pender [7] and translated into Korean and revised by Seo [8] with the original author s permission. This questionnaire consists of 47 items in 6 domains, including 11 items on spiritual growth, 10 on health responsibility, 5 on physical activity, 7 on nutrition, 7 on interpersonal relations, and 7 on stress management. Each item is answered on a 4-point scale, and the total score ranges from 47 to 188. A high score indicates a high level of health promoting behaviors. The Cronbach s of this tool was.90 in Seo s Copyright 2015 SERSC 185
[8] study and.90 in this study. 2.3. Data analysis Data analysis was conducted using SPSS for Windows version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Multiple regression analysis by the concurrent input method was used to derive factors affecting health promoting behaviors. 3. Results 3.1 The relationships among Type D Personality, Self-Resilience, and Health- Promoting Behaviors There were statistically significant negative correlations between type D personality and resilience (r=-0.410, p<.001), health promoting behavior (r=-0.377, p<.001). There was statistically significant positive correlations between resilience and health promoting behavior (r=0.536, p<.001). 3.2 Factors Affecting Health Promoting Behaviors Grade (β = 0.103, t = 2.307, P = 0.021), self-esteem (β = 0.115, t = 2.519, P = 0.012), Type D personality (β = -0.128, t = -2.932, P = 0.004), and self-resilience (β = 0.393, t = 8.617, P < 0.001) significantly accounted for 34.8% of the variance in health promoting behaviors (F = 25.714, P < 0.001) (Table 1). Of these four variables, selfresilience was the most significant contributor to health promoting behaviors in nursing students. 4. Limitations A limitation of this study is the inability to generalize the results to all nursing students. This is because the participants of this study do not reflect the diversity of school systems and all of them were students at 4-year colleges. Furthermore, given its cross-sectional design, this study could not examine changes in the observations that might have occurred over the students 4-year course of education. Finally, we cannot exclude the possibility that psychological variables such as depression might affect Type D personality and the health-related behaviors that were observed. 186 Copyright 2015 SERSC
Table 1. Factors Affecting Health Promoting Behaviors (N = 517) Health promoting behaviors Unstandardized Standardized Predictors coefficient B Standard error coefficient β t p Constant 59.632 9.124 6.536 <.001 Age -0.015 0.253-0.003-0.057 0.954 Gender 2.318 2.016 0.045 1.150 0.251 Grade 1.451 0.629 0.103 2.307 0.021 Economic level 1.812 1.530 0.046 1.184 0.237 Social support 1.062 1.178 0.038 0.902 0.368 Student satisfactionlevels 1.196 1.092 0.045 1.095 0.274 with their courses Subjective health status 1.026 0.836 0.047 1.227 0.220 Self-esteem 2.351 0.933 0.115 2.519 0.012 Type D personality -0.248 0.085-0.128-2.932 0.004 Self-resilience 0.386 0.045 0.393 8.617 <.001 F (p) = 25.714 (<.001) R 2 =.348, adj. R 2 =.334 References 1. Lee, S. J.: Drinking Behavior and Health Promoting Lifestyle between Korean and Japanese Female Nursing Students. Journal of Contents, Vol.12, pp. 236-245 (2012) 2. Hong, S. H.: The Relationship between Perceived Health Status and Health Promoting Behaviors among Nursing Students. Journal of Korean Academic Society Nursing Edu, Vol. 19, pp. 78-86 (2013) Copyright 2015 SERSC 187
3. Denollet, J.: DS14: Standard Assessment of Negative Affectivity, Social Inhibition, and Type D Personality. Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol.67, pp. 89-97 (2005) 4. Lim, H. E., Lee, M. S., Ko, Y. H., Park, Y. M., Joe, S. H., Kim, Y. K., Han, C. S., Lee, H. Y., Pedersen, S. S., Denollet, J.: Assessment of the Type D personality Construct in the Korean Population: A Validation Study of the Korean DS14. Journal of Korean Medicine Science, Vol.26, pp. 116-123. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2011.26.1.116 (2011) 5. Wagnild, G. M., Young, H. M.: Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, Vol.1, pp.165-178 (1993) 6. Shin, N. Y.: The Relationships among Health Locus of Control and Resilience, Social Support and Health Promoting Behavior in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease, (Unpublished master s thesis). Ewha Womans University, Seoul. (2011) 7. Walker, S. N., Sechrist, K. S., Pender, N. J.: The Health-promoting Lifestyle Profile: Development and Psychometric Characteristics. Nursing Research, Vol.36, pp.76-81 (1987) 8. Seo, Y. O.: Health Promoting Lifestyle, Hardiness and Gender Role Characteristics in Middle-aged Women. Journal of Korean Academy Women s Health Nursing, Vol.2, pp.119-130 (1994) 188 Copyright 2015 SERSC