MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

Similar documents
Integrating National C2 and Simulation Systems for BML Experimentation

What is C-BML? An overview

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

The Swedish Armed Forces Operational Challenges for Command and Control

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Intelligence, Information Operations, and Information Assurance

DETENTION OPERATIONS IN A COUNTERINSURGENCY

Adding Reports to Coalition Battle Management Language for NATO MSG-048

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Wildland Fire Assistance

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

The Need for NMCI. N Bukovac CG February 2009

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance

A Military C2 Professional s Thoughts on Visualization

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Analysis of the Operational Effect of the Joint Chemical Agent Detector Using the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS) MORS: June 2008

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

711 HPW COUNTERPROLIFERATION BRANCH

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Presented to: Presented by: February 5, Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

2010 Fall/Winter 2011 Edition A army Space Journal

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

OneSAF Killer/Victim Scoreboard Capability For C2 Experimentation

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND

BW Threat & Vulnerability

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15. Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION and MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND CORROSION PROGRAM

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

An Expanded C2-Simulation Experimental Environment Based on BML

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Transcription:

MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb 24-25 2010 Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE FEB 2010 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) NATO/RTO 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADA564685. 2010 Coalition Battle Management Language Workshop (Atelier 2010 sur le langage de gestion du champ de bataille pour les operations en coalition). RTO-MP-MSG-079 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT SAR a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 18 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

MSG-048 Objective A. Evaluate the available specification of a Coalition BML (from Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO) or Nations) B. Assess operational benefits to C2 and M&S communities In order to support these objectives, the program is divided into four parts 1. Substantiation of the requirements for NATO C-BML 2. Design for a NATO C-BML demonstration 3. Implementation of C-BML interface standard in C2 and M&S systems and services 4. Conduct an experimentation and assessments and provide a final demonstration

Experimentation objectives Showing the benefit for a coalition having improved interconnectedness between all C4I systems and being able to exchange orders and reports in an unambiguous way. Showing the benefit of having improved decision aids eg. Course of Action analysis. Showing the benefit of being able to support mission rehearsal objectively. Showing the benefit of improved (faster, more efficient, unambiguous) training support

Input for experimentation Military expertise Scenario development for experiment preparation Playing and assessment during experiment (outsiders) Multinational input Know how Systems Personnel System design agreements (requirements) Experimentation plan Evaluation Measures of Merit Questionnaires

Caspian Sea Scenario Fictional but detailed scenario with history of area and road to war. Scenario is Multi-Service and Multi-National. Donovia

Caspian Sea Scenario 1 HBCT Execution The 1HBCT will move quickly through zone while fixing and bypassing squad or smaller sized enemy elements in zone and establishing our forces on the International b`order. Terrain objectives are for orientation only. Destroy enemy armor that engages our elements or occupies positions on key terrain in objectives CAT and DOG. At the conclusion of the operation, 1HBCT will have - Destroyed enemy armor occupying key terrain in Zone; - Established hasty defensive positions in objectives LION and TIGER; Be at least 80% combat power;

ORBAT 1HBCT NOR 1-22 Combined Arms Battalion 29 MBT; 28 IFV. FRA 1-66 Combined Arms Battalion 29 MBT; 28 IFV. USA Armored Reconnaissance Squadron GBR CAS (25 sorties per day fixed/rotary) CAN UAV (several sorties per day)

UNCLASSIFIED FOR TRAINING UNCLASSIFIED FOR TRAINING ANNEX C (Operations) to OPORD 2010-14 TROJAN HORSE - 1HBCT OBJ CAT OBJ DOG

Caspian Sea Scenario 1 HBCT assignments to subordinate commanders You are the commander of 1-66 CAB. You are assigned to attack along axis of advance PORSCHE as the main effort to seize objective DOG. You are the commander of 1-22 CAB. You are assigned to conduct a supporting attack along axis CORVETTE to seize objective CAT. You are the commander of 4 Aviation Wing. You are assigned to support ground operations throughout the 1HBCT AO with 25 Sorties daily; You are the commander of A-104 Military Intelligence. You are assigned to detect enemy formations throughout the 1HBCT AO through extensive use of UAV to identify Arianan defensive positions.

Scenario / Courses of Action NOR 1-22 2 COAs 2 ECOAs FRA 1-66 2 COAs 2 ECOAs USA Armored Reconnaissance Squadron Fixed COA GBR Aviation Wing Ad hoc Support CAN Air Support Tactical Air Reconnaissance and Fire Support

PL Ruby 1-66 COA1 PL Denver PL Jade HIGHWAY SCHIEF NORTH Successive destructions to clear the area. Slow but safe. W N E S HIGHWAY SCHIEF SOUTH PL Boston PL Austin PL Pearl PL Atlanta

1-66 COA2 PL Denver PL Jade HIGHWAY SCHIEF NORTH Same approach as COA1 up to PL Atlanta. Then bypassing effort in the North part of the AOR. W N E HIGHWAY SCHIEF SOUTH PL Boston S PL Austin PL Pearl PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PL Atlanta PL Ruby

Three initial use cases Planning Training (use of chosen COA from planning phase) Mission rehearsal

Participating systems JC3IEDM MNF C2IS BattleView ABCS C2LG DIS SIM EXERCISE OneSAF UAV-Sim ICC BML WEB SERVICES JSAF NORTaC SICF SIMBAD OPFOR C2IS APLET ISIS C2LG ICC C2LG JSAF provided by provided by provided by

Planning JC3IEDM + SICF BML WEB SERVICES ISIS NORTaC APLET

Training ICC JC3IEDM + Battleview UAV Sim BML WEB SERVICES DIS NORTaC SICF ISIS JSAF

Mission rehearsal ICC JC3IEDM + OneSAF Battleview ABCS BML WEB SERVICES UAV Sim JSAF DIS NORTaC SICF ISIS SIMBAD

Click here Movie from experiment