CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. John N, McMahon Deputy Director for Operations

Similar documents
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

I is classified I d d a n d is to be used only

A Cardboard Castle? AN INSIDE HISTORY OF THE WARSAW PACT, Edited by VOJTECH MASTNY and MALCOLM BYRNE

International History Declassified

Subj: NAVY NUCLEAR COMMAND, CONTROL, AND COMMUNICATIONS EXECUTIVE STEERING COMMITTEE

ComDoneiicv MCWP gy. U.S. Marine Corps. jffljj. s^*#v. ^^»Hr7. **:.>? ;N y^.^ rt-;.-... >-v:-. '-»»ft*.., ' V-i' -. Ik. - 'ij.

Foreign Policy and Homeland Security

September 03, 1985 Military Exercise Druzhba-85 Plan to conduct a one-sided, multi-stage combined-arms army exercise codenamed "Druzhba-85"

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

Introduction. General Bernard W. Rogers, Follow-On Forces Attack: Myths lnd Realities, NATO Review, No. 6, December 1984, pp. 1-9.

Subj: DISCLOSURE OF MILITARY INFORMATION TO FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS AND INTERESTS

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy (ASD(ISP))

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: DoD Policy and Responsibilities Relating to Security Cooperation

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

*Note: An update of the English text of this Act is being prepared. Text in Bulgarian: Закон за отбраната и въоръжените сили на Република България

Ship's Organization and Regulations 119

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

LESSON 2 INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION OF THE BATTLEFIELD OVERVIEW

THE ESTONIAN DEFENCE FORCES

Memorandum, R. Malinovsky and M. Zakharov to Commander. of Group of Soviet Forces in Cuba, 8 September Personally

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

LESSON 2: THE U.S. ARMY PART 1 - THE ACTIVE ARMY

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE NUMBER 304

Use of Military Force Authorization Language in the 2001 AUMF

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC OPNAVINST DNS-3 11 Aug 2011

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Student Guide: Introduction to Army Foreign Disclosure and Contact Officers

NOTE BY THE SECRETARY. to the NORTH ATLANTIC DEFENSE COMMITTEE THE STRATEGIC CONCEPT FOR THE DEFENCE OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC AREA

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

APPENDIX: FUNCTIONAL COMMUNITIES Last Updated: 21 December 2015

Name: Reading Questions 9Y

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Disclosure of Classified Military Information to Foreign Governments and International Organizations

November 30, 1987 Information on the 20th Session of the Committee of the Ministers of Defense of Warsaw Pact Member States

Information Operations in Support of Special Operations

George C. Marshall Research Foundation. Collection Summary Sheet

Department of the Army TRADOC Regulation Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, Virginia

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

9. Guidance to the NATO Military Authorities from the Defence Planning Committee 1967

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release January 17, January 17, 2014

Rebuilding Capabilities of Russian Navy to Be Long Process

The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics,

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

OPNAVINST A N Oct 2014

FINAL DECISION ON MC 48/2. A Report by the Military Committee MEASURES TO IMPLEMENT THE STRATEGIC CONCEPT

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

Host Nation Support UNCLASSIFIED. Army Regulation Manpower and Equipment Control

ICS MANUAL CHAPTER 2 EMS OGP March 23, 2006 ICS POSITION DESCRIPTION AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD(P))

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

* 43 0') * ~tvssiar $TUDENT RESEARCH REPUT- F'om 1. 5 Mar 79. USARI Form 1., ARMISCH, GERMANY APO NEW YORK

A Field Artillery Division

Unit Six: Canada Matures: Growth in the Post-War Period ( )

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

OPNAVINST C N43 18 Jun Subj: NAVY EXPEDITIONARY TABLE OF ALLOWANCE AND ADVANCED BASE FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT POLICY

On June 20, 1963, at Geneva the American and Soviet.. representatives to the ENDC completed negotiations and signed the

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. Trends in Spending by the Department of Defense for Operation and Maintenance

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

United States Army Signal Command Organizational Structure

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

GAO WARFIGHTER SUPPORT. DOD Needs to Improve Its Planning for Using Contractors to Support Future Military Operations

Explain why Japan decided to attack Pearl Harbor, and describe the attack itself.

Advance Questions for Buddie J. Penn Nominee for Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Installations and Environment

Subj: UNIFORM MATERIEL MOVEMENT AND ISSUE PRIORITY SYSTEM

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Single Manager Responsibility for Military Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology and Training (EODT&T)

Airspace Control in the Combat Zone

MILPER Message Number Proponent AHRC-PDP-A. Title Implementation of Department of Defense Guidance for the Newly Established C and R Devices

Describe the picture. Who is responsible for the creation of the Iron Curtain? Which superpower s perspective is this cartoon from?

Department of Defense

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (DON COOP) PROGRAM

The Army Proponent System

Subj: THREAT SUPPORT TO THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM

Contemporary Warfare and Current Issues for the Defense of the Country

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE NUMBER 501

PUBLIC LAW OCT. 1, 1986

Marine Corps Componency

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

The 8 th International Scientific Conference DEFENSE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE 21st CENTURY Braşov, November 14 th 2013

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE NAVAL SAFETY CENTER

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DBQ 20: THE COLD WAR BEGINS

Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Munitions Support for Joint Operations

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

THREAT SUPPORT TO THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM

Transcription:

a ToTe ITTIST.1TT %IAN/. 1,0^T TT TIMTT^T,,,,T.T LA a. l.a 31,, N,SJS-1.1-oi VIA, /II N./ a La. 1AL. J'JL4 4-11-, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505 6 September 1978 MEMORANDUM FOR: The Director of Central Intelligence FROM SUBJECT John N, McMahon Deputy Director for Operations Draft Statute on the Warsaw Pact Combined Armed Forces and Combined Command for Wartime 1. The enclosed Intelligence Information Special Report is a translation of a TOP SECRET document which provides an indication of high-level Warsaw Pact thinking regarding the \preparation of a statute to govern the wartime activities of the \Combined Armed Forces and Combined Command, The statute, in recognizing two theater high commands, would delineate the authority and responsibilities of the respective commanders-in-chief in centralizing military control and define their relationships with the national commands involved, 2. Because the source of this report is extremely sensitive, this document should be handled on a strict need-to-know basis within recipient agencies, [John N, Mcnaho, FIRDB-312/02098-78 - Cony # e 1 of 9 Pages

PST FIRDB-312/02098-78 Distribution: The Director of Central Intelligence The Joint Chiefs of Staff The Director, Defense Intelligence Agency The Assistant to the Chief of Staff for Intelligence Department of the Army Director of Naval Intelligence Department of the Navy The Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence U. S. Air Force Director, National Security Agency Deputy Director of Central Intelligence Director of the National Foreign Assessment Center Director of Strategic Research Page 2 of 9 Pages Copy # Zi

,P LAI - &TAT 1.1 1F1 11. "5. 1,7 1 11 LAJtr1J1.1.1./1 11 1.11%1 Intelligence Information Special Report Page 3 of 9 Pages COUNTRY USSR/WARSAW PACT MRDB - 312/02098-78 DATE OF INFO. Current SUBJECT DATE 6 September 1978 Draft Statute on the Warsaw Pact Combined Armed Forces and Combined Command for Wartime SOURCE Documentary Summary: The following report is a translation from Russian of a TOP SECRET document containing excerpts from a speech delivered by the Combined Armed Forces First Deputy Chief of Staff regarding the preparation of the draft of a statute to govern the wartime activities of the Combined Armed Forces and Combined Command. The statute, in recognizing two high commands, in the Western and' Southwestern theaters, would delineate the authority and responsibilities of the respective commanders-in-chief and theit staffs in centralizing control and define their relationships with the national commands involved, Provision would be made for coordination of troop control and staff work through the exchange of operations groups and representatives, End of Summary Comment: A reliable source reported that General Semen Fedorovich Romanov, who was appointed First Deputy Chief of Staff as a colonel general in October 1977, prepared the presentation, His speech represents an extension of discussions on the reorganization of the Warsaw Pact military command structure ap-pfoved at the Tmth aessionlaf_the_commltee nf npfense Ministers in 19771 1 L_ )1-0541140qT 1 Copy #02-

FIRDB-312/02098-78 Page 4 of 9 Pages TO-P SECREf EXCERPTS FROM THE PRESENTATION OF THE STAFF OF THE COMBINED ARMED FORCES OF THE WARSAW PACT MEMBER STATES DELIVERED BY THE FIRST DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE COMBINED ARMED FORCES, General of the Army S.F. ROMANOV, on the Matter of Preparing a Draft "Statute on the Combined Armed Forces and Combined Command for Wartime" We have stated before that a future war will require maximum mobilization of all the military, economic, and spiritual forces of the socialist coalition. Objectively speaking, the direction of such a war will be possible only by an organ which is vested with complete political, state, and military authority, that is, the highest military-political leadership of the coalition. In conformity with this, the command of the Combined Armed Forces in strategic _operations in theaters of military operations must be centralized and must be exercised by a persokalrectly subordinateto_thchighest military-political e leadership. This person musthave broad powers and bear personal responsibility for the command of the Combined Armed Forces and for the fulfilment of tasks assigned by the highest military-political leadership. This person, we believe, must be the Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Armed Forces for the Western and 'Southwestern theaters of military operations, respectively. Considering the sociopolitical homogeneity of the Warsaw Pact member states, the existence in peacetime of the Combined Armed Forces and Combined Command, and the experience acquired in exercises, it apparently will be relative1y simple for us to formulate the specific functional responsibilities of the High Commands in the theaters of military operations. When deciding these matters the examination of the experience of the combined combat actions of the Soviet Army and the armies of the socialist commonwealth in the final stage of the Great Patriotic War will be of distinct value. RET Copy

FIRDB-312/02098-78 Page 5 of 9 Pages In particular, it seems to us, we must utilize the available experience in controlling troops of a coalition complement both in the Western Theater of Military Operations, where Polish and Czechoslovak formations and large units operated successfully as part of the Belorussian and the Ukrainian fronts of the Soviet Army, as well as in the Southwestern TheatT7757-Military Operations, where, on the very same basis, Romanian, Hungarian and Bulgarian formations, large units, and units successfully conducted combat actions shoulder to shoulder with the Soviet troops. In the large-scale operational-strategic command-staff exercises conducted in recent years, the structure and the possible functional responsibilities of the high commands of the Combined Armed Forces in the theaters of military operations were repeatedly studied, and this makes it possible right now for us to answer for the most part the question as to the range of the most important tasks of the hilhcommaagll in the theaters of military operations. It seems to us that the most important function of the Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Armed Forces in a theater of military operations will be to supervise the planning and conduct of combat actions in the theater. He will determine the Specific uginfi- Or.ithe'Arthed forces on each axis and the most effective methods of achieving operational and strategic objectives, and P-61-tib1i-V iiii ants of operational and strategic cooperation, he willassign and precisely define tasks for the fronts, individual armies, and formations of the branches of the alle3z-1orces, in a word, for all troops and naval_forces placed in subordination to him. (- In addition he will make decisionson the employment of joperationally subordinate large units (formations of the branches of the armed forces), develop and coordinate with the national commands measures for the training of troops, the forwarding of reserves to the active army (front) and for the materiel-technical support of combat actions. Of course, there, may be other tasks dictated by the specific situation which has developed. To exercise control of the Combined Armed Forces in a strategic operation in a theater of military operations, an Copy #_24

FIRDB-31.2/02098-78 Page 6 of 9 Pages efficient Combined Armed Forces staff and other control organs are necessary. A very large portion of the control activity will fall on the staff and it should become the main working organ of the commander-in-chief. When this staff is at the requisite strength in personnel and in technical means of control, it can be charged with the analysis and preparation of assessments of the military-political and strategic situation in the theater; with the planning and organization of control of the combat actions of the troops and naval forces; with the synthesis of the experience in conducting combat actions and, based on this, with the development of appropriate recommendations, etc. When preparing for and in the course of a strategic o eration a great variety of matters pertaining to the direction o t e branches of armed forces in a theater of military operations will have to be resolved in a very competent manner. This will include coordinating the cooperation of the air defenses of the allied countries with the field air defense; -- planning and supporting the coordinated employment of the air forces in operations in the theater, exercising direct control of air operations, and coordinating with national military organs the matters of employing aviation in the theater of military operations; -- working out proposals on the employment of the forces of the Combined Fleet and organizing the cooperation of the fleet's forces with the other branches of the armed forces in the theater of military operations; -- planning the organization of the rear services in d strategic operation, resolving matters of rear services support of the operational formations, and monitoring the materiel-technical and medical support of the troops and naval forces; -- organizing the technical support of troops in operations and the repair and rehabilitation of equipment and weapons, replenishing losses, supplying the troops with spare parts, etc. In the exercises we have conducted and in particular in exercise SOYUZ-78 (ALLIANCE-78) direct accomplishment of the tasks of preparing the control organs of the branches of the armed forces, as well as of preparing rear services and technical support, were assigned to the appropriate deputy directors of the exercise. Some of them were appointed from among the deputy 1)PET Copy #.2..4

FIRDB-312/02098-78 Page 7 of 9 Pages commanders-in-chief of the Combined Armed Forces of the Warsaw Pact countries, the deputy defense ministers, or the commanders-in-chief of the branches of the armed forces. This practice has fully justified itself, It is obvious that the draft Statute for wartime must provide for the appointment of the appropriate officials with competent control bodies for the skilled resolution of the matters of the combat employment of formations and large units of the branches of the armed forces as well as matters of materiel-technical support for strategic operations in the theaters of military operations, I would like to learn your views on this matter. In theory we think that the control organs of the Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Armed Forces in a theater of military operations must be established in advance so that they would be able in the critical period of conversion of the armed forces from peacetime to wartime status to assume control of troops and naval forces. The training exercise with the participation of the general staffs held in April of this year showed how complicated it is to organize firm control of a large number of operational formations. A system of control posts and a supporting communications network for the control of groupings of the Combined Armed Forces Tarn" established during peacetime, It must be reliably tied in with the system for early warning of enemy missile attack, with the space monitoring system, and with the general (main) staffs of the allied armies. The high command of the Combined Armed Forces in a theater of military operations obviously will have to have both protected and mobile control posts, In the draft "Statute" for wartime the matter of control of the Combined Armed Forces in the theaters of military operations must occupy a central position, Stated therein must be the relationships of the hie command of the Combined Armed Forces in a theater or military operations with the national commands of the Warsaw Pact countries. Copy #...jad

FIRDB-312/02098-78 Page 8 of 9 Pages The principle of centralized control of the armed forces in a strate ic o eration presupposes that the Commander-in-Chief of the om lned Armed Forces in a theater of military operations has the authority, from the moment he assumes command, to issue 'Prders, directives, instructions, and directions which must be carried out by the troops and naval forces allocated to the complement of the Combined Armed Forces in the this means that the Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Armed Forces in the theater must exercise direct control of the fronts, fleets, individual armies, formations, and large units ot tne branches of the armed forces placed under his command regardless of which allied state allocated- them to the Combined Armed Forces. Despite the fact that there is no experience in this regard, there are a number of matters which the commander-in-chief in a theater of military operations will have to resolve jointly with the general staffs and other organs of military leadership of the allied countries. It seems to us that the main activity of the national commands will be directed, first of all, toward entufteit The successful performance of the operational-strategic tasks assigned to the Combined Armed Forces in the theaters of military operations. This may find concrete expression also in supporting the operational deployment of groupings of troops in the theaters of military operations, and in accomplishing the tasks of materiel-technical support and the timely restoration of the combat effectiveness of national large units and formations. The resolution of these and other matters will require onstant coordination of them between the high command of the Com me 'n a theater of military operations and the national commands, For the adoption of realistic decisions the general (main) staffs of the allied armies will have to receive all the necessary information on the plans of the Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Armed Forces in the theater of military operations, about the situation at the front, about the condition of the troops and naval forces allocated to the Combined Armed Forces, about the requirements for materiel-technical means, the Copy #

t. -.* --T OP'S RET FIRDB-312/02098-78 Page 9 of 9 Pages replacement resources in personnel and weapons, and other matters. In connection with this, it seems to us that the control organs of the Combined Armed Forces should have persons representing the respective national commands and the associated operations groups. In the draft statute for wartime it would be advisable to define as concretely as possible the interrelationships of the high command of the Combined Armed Forces in a theater of military operations and the national commands based on the experience that the general (main) staffs have, At the present time there is a body of representatives of the Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Armed Forces of the Warsaw Pact member states in each of the allied armies. These representatives are highly qualified and experienced generals, admirals, and officers. Upon the conversion of the Combined Armed Forces from peacetime to wartime status and in the course of combat actions, there apparently would be no justification for discontinuing their activities. In connection with this we should jointly determine their place and role in wartime. The experience of the wars waged with the participation of coalition armed forces, as well as the experience of the combined exercises we have conducted, attest to the advisability of exchanging operations groups among the staffs, There must be such groups at all levels of control beginning with the high command of the Combined Armed Forces in the theater of military operations and the general (main) staffs and ending with the large unit, if this large unit is operating as part of a formation of a different national affiliation, or has adjacent to it a large unit of another allied army. Of course, every one of these operations groups must be appropriately manned with trained generals, admirals, and officers, and it must have the necessary authority and communications means. TO ET Copy #.4ale