Conservation Appendix C: Conservation Budget Overview

Similar documents
Defense Environmental Funding

Compliance Appendix E: Compliance Budget Overview

Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

Introduction DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS. Introduction Funding Conservation Restoration. Compliance. Prevention. Pollution. Forward.

Fiscal Year 2012 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

Appendix D: Restoration Budget Overview

Department of Defense

DOD INSTRUCTION THE READINESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INTEGRATION (REPI) PROGRAM AND ENCROACHMENT MANAGEMENT

Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress for FY 2015

Section 7. ESA Implementation: Section 7. Red-cockaded Woodpecker Cyanea superba Gopher Tortoise Photo Courtesy of USFWS

Land and Water Conservation Fund: Appropriations for Other Purposes

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. c. Implements new Natural Resources Conservation metrics.

APPENDIX D. MCAS MIRAMAR INRMP PROJECTS

COORDINATION PLAN. As of November 14, 2011

Acres for America Grantee Webinar June 4, 2014

DoD Natural Resource Programs & INRMP Implementation:

Department of Defense. Natural Resources Funding Manual

EMS Element 5. Roles, Responsibilities, and Resources

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Environmental Compliance

Department of Defense MANUAL

Guidelines. Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Land Stewardship and Habitat Restoration Program (LSHRP) Ontario.

Part IV. Appendix C: Funding Sources

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (ODASA) for Environment, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) NAOC.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO. with committee amendments DATED: NOVEMBER 9, 2015

Rio Grande Water Fund Request for Proposals 2018

APPENDIX P NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION DISTRICTS STRATEGIC PLAN P age 75 Years of Locally Led Conservation

Executive Summary. Purpose

American Farmland Trust Conference October 20-23, 2014 Lexington, KY

Project Priority Scoring System Texas Recreation & Parks Account Non-Urban Indoor Recreation Grant Program (Effective May 1, 2014)

Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration (REPI) Program Overview. NMFWA Webinar 16 July 2013

BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 20 JULY 1994

L. Peter Boice Deputy Director, Natural Resources

S One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION

REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF INTEREST NUMBER N R-800X PROJECT TO BE INITIATED IN FISCAL YEAR 2018

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNITS NETWORK

Civil Works Program. non-federal sponsors for specific projects and the total civil program is about $5 billion a year.

Template modified: 27 May :30 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE JULY 1994.

Environmental Program Priorities. Environmental Quality and Cleanup. Plan Do Check Act process Objectives, targets, success indicators Conclusion

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

RECOMMENDATION FOR CLOSURE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTERS

4Cultural Resources. Promote mission-supporting re-use of historic properties. Manage and maintain cultural resources in a sustainable manor

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SOUTH BAY SALT POND RESTORATION PROJECT

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application

Florida Communities Trust Grant Award Project Annual Stewardship Report

Advance Questions for Buddie J. Penn Nominee for Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Installations and Environment

Army Compatible Use Buffer Program

WRP Natural Resources Committee s Southeastern Arizona/New Mexico (SoAZ/NM Project)

TOWN OF REHOBOTH COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE

An Overview of USDA-NRCS Programs Regional Conservation Partnership Program Statewide Priorities

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

An Invitation: Establishing a community forest with the U.S. Forest Service

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA GREENSPACE ACQUISITION PROGRAM POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Presenter. Teal Edelen Manager, Central Partnership Office National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Panelists:

Fleet Readiness Centers

The Use of Sikes Act Cooperative Agreements for Implementing INRMP Projects

INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR MARINE CORPS AIR STATION MIRAMAR

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

Desert Southwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit. Strategic Plan Approved November 2016

Federal Collaboration in State Wildlife Management: Cooperation through Compatible Objectives

Great Peninsula Conservancy Strategic Plan November 17, 2015

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

Introduction. Background. Natural Resource Conservation, Individual/Team, East Region INRMP Team

GULF COAST ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION COUNCIL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPONENT PROGRAM

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Measure M2 Freeway Environmental Mitigation Program Status Update. PowerPoint

TOWNSEND BOMBING RANGE MODERNIZATION

5Native Americans. Meet its trust responsibilities. Build stable and enduring relationships with tribes through government-to-government contact

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

Marin County Parks ANNUAL REPORT

CONSERVATION INTRODUCTION FY 2001 ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS

Direct Component Project Evaluation Form

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application

3 Year On-Call Contract - Threatened and Endangered Species Services

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1104 NORTH WESTOVER BOULEVARD, UNIT 9 ALBANY, GEORGIA SEPT 1ER

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Florida; (3) Elmendorf AFB, Alaska; (4) Mountain Home AFB, Idaho; (5) Tyndall AFB, Florida; and (6) Nellis AFB, Nevada.

INSTRUCTION. Department of Defense. NUMBER September 18, 2008 Incorporating Change 1, November 21, 2017 USD(AT&L)

Acquisition & Assistance Tools. Sikes Act Training: Acquisition & Assistance Tools

WILDLIFE HABITAT CANADA

WHOLE WATERSHED RESTORATION INITIATIVE Request for Proposals for Community-based Habitat Restoration Projects in Oregon and Washington

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Sustaining the Readiness of North Carolina s Military September 10, 2013

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application

Compatibility Planning Near Military Bases (S562) Sponsored by Zoning Practice. APA National Planning Conference Monday, April 16, 2012

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application

Preliminary Review and. Reference Guide Sections 4.2 and 4.3

Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017

Encroachment Management

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNITS NETWORK

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application

-2- 4) The Corps will ensure the biological assessment is prepared in accordance with the Corps' "Biological Assessment Template."

BDWW-GP-1 Number Fish Habitat Enhancement Structures N Days 43. BDWM-GP-6 BDWM-GP-7 Agricultural Minor Road Crossings and Ramps N 43

Regulatory Guidance Letter 92-01

WikiLeaks Document Release

Copyright 2004 The Trust for Public Land

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT 7400 LEAKE AVE NEW ORLEANS LA September 17, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Transcription:

The Department of Defense (DoD) is a major user of land, sea, and air spaces and manages 30 million acres of land on more than 425 major military installations and is the third largest federal land management department in the United States. For this reason, DoD has a responsibility to protect, maintain, and enhance the natural and cultural resources located on its installations. The Department manages these resources through the Conservation Program in a manner that supports the military mission. This appendix displays the costs of the Conservation Program in two main categories: recurring and nonrecurring costs. Recurring conservation costs pay for those relatively constant activities that an installation must complete to oversee the management of vital resources. They include preparing and updating natural and cultural resource management plans, coordinating with conservation regulatory agencies, monitoring threatened and endangered (T&E) species, and conducting other management activities, such as the continued protection of an archaeological site. While all recurring costs associated with Manpower, and Education and Training were reported in compliance programs in previous years, these costs were distributed across the appropriate environmental program budgets beginning in (FY). Nonrecurring conservation costs are one-time efforts to address unique or specific requirements, such as consultation activities under the Endangered Species Act, correction of soil erosion on ranges or sensitive habitats, reforestation of ranges, or easements to protect against encroachment from the surrounding community. The nonrecurring category of conservation activities is broken into two subcategories to identify costs for natural resources and historical and cultural resources. Natural resources costs include T&E species, wetland protection, and other natural resources. Examples of other natural resources costs are biological resource management plans, biodiversity, ecosystem management, habitat restoration, and public awareness programs. Historical and cultural resources costs are comprised of baseline inventories of historic buildings, initial archaeological materials curation, and consultations with Native American groups. Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress C-1

Conservation FY Actual FY Actual FY Actual FY Actual FY Estimated FY Requested Conservation Program Costs FY Actual FY Actual FY Actual FY Actual FY Estimated FY Requested Figure C-1 DoD Conservation Budget Summary (millions) Manpower -- -- -- $75.7 $76.2 $82.1 Education and Training -- -- -- $1.3 $1.3 $1.3 Other Recurring $39.7 $54.2 $49.7 $51.7 $53.8 $63.9 Total $39.7 $54.2 $49.7 $128.7 $131.3 $147.3 Conservation FY Actual FY Actual FY Actual FY Actual FY Estimated FY Requested $67.5 $80.4 $105.7 $112.8 $108.9 $119.8 Threatened and Endangered Species $6.9 $7.9 $7.5 $11.0 $6.1 $9.5 Wetlands $6.4 $4.7 $3.6 $4.7 $3.2 $7.3 Other $54.1 $67.8 $94.6 $97.1 $99.7 $102.9 Historical and $50.4 $53.3 $48.7 $58.1 $53.4 $62.9 Total $117.9 $133.7 $154.4 $170.9 $162.3 $182.7 Recurring $39.7 $54.2 $49.7 $128.7 $131.3 $147.3 Nonrecurring $117.9 $133.7 $154.4 $170.9 $162.3 $182.7 Total $157.6 $187.9 $204.1 $299.6 $293.6 $330.0 Beginning in FY, recurring costs include Manpower, and Education and Training. Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress C-2

DoD In FY, the Department obligated $299.6 million for conservation efforts, a 47 percent increase from the previous year. DoD s conservation budget includes recurring and nonrecurring costs, as shown in Figures C-1 and C-2. Most of the funds were obligated for nonrecurring projects in order to perform one-time activities. Funding for recurring projects increased by $79.0 million in FY due to the inclusion of Manpower, and Education and Training costs. Figure C-2 DoD Conservation Recurring and $350 $280 $210 $140 $117.9 $133.7 $154.4 $170.9 $128.7 $162.3 $131.3 $182.7 $147.3 Figure C-3 illustrates the Department s conservation nonrecurring funding levels by natural resources and historical and cultural resources for FY through FY. DoD invested $112.8 million in natural resources in FY. During FY, the budget for natural resources increased by $7.1 million. This reflected the Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI), which serves to protect installations and ranges from encroachment. The historical and cultural resources budget increased from $48.7 million in FY to $58.1 million in FY as the Components increased the execution of projects identified in the Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plans (ICRMPs). DoD obligated $11.0 million and $4.7 million in nonrecurring costs to T&E species and wetland protection, respectively. The Department s budget for other natural resources remained relatively stable, totaling $97.1 million in nonrecurring costs. In addition to the $11.0 million in funding for T&E species, a major portion of recurring and other natural resources funding also contributes to T&E species management. This reflects the significant value of military and civilian personnel in compliance with the Endangered Species Act. $70 $39.7 Beginning in FY, recurring costs include Manpower, and Education and Training. Figure C-3 DoD Conservation $150 $120 $90 $60 $30 $67.5 $50.4 $80.4 $54.2 $49.7 $53.3 $105.7 $48.7 $112.8 $58.1 $108.9 $53.4 $119.8 $62.9 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress C-3

Army Army Conservation Programs are a vital element to meeting the Army s sustainability triple bottom line of mission, environment, and community. As depicted in Figure C-4, the Army obligated $166.6 million for its conservation programs in FY, which was $74.9 million more than the previous year. Beginning in FY, recurring costs include Manpower, and Education and Training activities, accounting for the $56.6 million increase compared to FY. Although similar costs were incurred in previous years, they are not reflected in Figure C-4. The Army also increased obligations for nonrecurring activities from $79.2 million in FY to $97.5 million in FY. The amount of funding requested for FY increased so the Army can address natural and cultural resource requirements identified in Integrated Natural Resource Management Plans (INRMPs) and ICRMPs, assure missions can comply with the Endangered Species Act, and to respond to the increasing need for training range support. In addition to the costs in Figure C-4, there is other funding for Army conservation efforts within the Integrated Training Area Management Program; facilities management; and forestry, agricultural, grazing, and fish and wildlife self-sustaining accounts. Figure C-5 illustrates the total and estimated costs for both natural resources, and historical and cultural resources, which increased by $5.8 million and $12.5 million in FY, respectively. The FY increases in nonrecurring costs for natural resources and historical and cultural resources are a result of increased funding to more aggressively implement INRMPs and ICRMPs. Further implementation of INRMPs and ICRMPs results in improved access to and sustainablity of Army training lands. The Army obligated $41.4 million and $3.7 million in recurring and nonrecurring expenses, respectively for T&E species management in FY. In addition, it obligated $45.6 million and $2.3 million for other natural resources and wetland protection, respectively. Funding for all three subcategories increased from the previous year. Figure C-4 Army Conservation Recurring and $200 $160 $120 $80 $40 $74.8 $11.4 $72.2 Beginning in FY, recurring costs include Manpower, and Education and Training. Figure C-5 Army Conservation $75 $50 $25 $40.3 $34.5 $39.3 $79.2 $10.4 $12.5 $45.8 $32.9 $33.4 $97.5 $69.1 $51.6 $45.9 $81.0 $66.5 $43.0 $38.0 $104.1 $78.3 $57.7 $46.4 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress C-4

Navy The Department of the Navy (DON) invests its conservation funds in natural, historical, and cultural resources for both the Navy and the Marine Corps. DON invested approximately $39.9 million in conservation efforts, with $24.7 million in recurring costs and $15.2 million in nonrecurring projects, as seen in Figure C-6. The recurring efforts included updating existing INRMPs and ICRMPs, ongoing T&E species recovery efforts, and habitat support. The nonrecurring projects included preparation of new INRMPs and ICRMPs, as well as implementing projects identified in those documents for natural, cultural and historical resources. The total request for conservation efforts in FY is $44.9 million, DON s largest such request to date. The increase, which began in FY, is for nonrecurring projects to address natural and cultural resource projects. Figure C-6 Navy Conservation Recurring and $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $12.1 $8.7 $14.6 $13.5 $14.9 $15.6 $15.2 $24.7 $14.6 $29.3 $15.0 $29.9 Figure C-7 illustrates Navy s nonrecurring costs under the Conservation Program. Navy invested approximately 57 percent of its natural resource funds in T&E species, 4 percent in wetlands protection and approximately for other natural resources. Beginning in FY, the amount invested in T&E species declines, reflecting the completion of several one-time projects. Navy obligated $6.5 million for T&E species, compared to $3.5 million in FY. Of the remaining $4.0 million of FY funds, Navy invested $575,000 in wetlands protection and $3.5 million in other natural resources. Other natural resources consist of new INRMPs, projects identified in those INRMPs, and projects not directly related to wetlands or T&E Species. Beginning in FY, recurring costs include Manpower, Education and Training. Department of the Navy includes Navy and Marine Corps. Figure C-7 Navy Conservation $15 $10 $5 $8.4 $3.6 $9.9 Department of the Navy includes Navy and Marine Corps. $4.8 $9.7 $3.9 $10.6 $4.7 $7.8 $6.8 $8.1 $6.9 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress C-5

Air Force The Air Force conservation funds are invested in recurring and nonrecurring conservation activities. As shown in Figure C-8, the Air Force obligated $48.9 million for its Conservation Program in FY, $11.5 million more than the amount funded in FY due to the inclusion of Manpower, and Education and Training costs. Approximately $34.6 million of the conservation budget was invested in support of recurring costs, while $14.3 million was allocated to nonrecurring costs for innovative natural, historical, and cultural projects. Figure C-8 Air Force Conservation Recurring and $60 $25.4 $21.5 $40 $16.0 $28.8 $21.4 $19.2 $20 $14.3 $34.6 $12.6 $35.2 $14.1 $38.8 Increased implementation of approved INRMPs and ICRMPs in FY resulted in decreased funds for these activities in FY through FY. The Air Force also transferred funds from the Conservation Program to the Compliance Program to meet all level 0 and level 1 environmental requirements and to realign National Environmental Policy Act cost accounting. The natural resources budget increased by $2.6 million, while the budget for the historical and cultural resources experienced a decrease of $4.3 million. Figure C-9 reflects this change. The Air Force s aggressive implementation of projects during prior years allows them to meet all requirements with decreased funding in FY and FY. The Air Force obligated $552,000; $1.8 million; and $7.1 million to T&E species, wetland protection, and other natural resources, respectively. Other natural resources include completing INRMPs and other projects not specifically related to T&E species and wetland protection. Beginning in FY, recurring costs include Manpower, and Education and Training. Figure C-9 Air Force Conservation $15 $10 $5 $10.8 $10.7 $11.9 $13.5 $6.8 $9.2 $9.4 $4.9 $7.6 $5.0 $8.4 $5.7 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress C-6

DLA In order to continue to promote DoD s conservation goals to protect, maintain, and enhance the natural and cultural resources located on and near its installations, the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) obligated $542,000 in FY for conservation efforts, as shown in Figure C-10. As part of its conservation efforts, DLA funded preparation and maintenance of natural and cultural resource management plans, coordination with regulatory agencies, and other management and consultation activities. DLA s recurring costs are generally low because of the small size and location of DLA installations. DLA obligated $294,000 to natural resources projects and $130,000 to historical and cultural resources, as illustrated in Figure C-11. DLA funding is adequate to meet historical and cultural resource requirements. DLA expects to decrease the natural resources budget in FY with an estimate of $192,000 resources and a slight increase for historical and cultural resources of $177,000. Of the $294,000 obligated for natural resources in FY, DLA invested $160,000 in T&E species; in wetlands; and $134,000 in other natural resources. Funding for T&E species has declined steadily since FY, and is expected to continue decreasing through FY due to completion of habitat restoration efforts. Other natural resources include biological resource management plans and public awareness programs. The locations of DLA installations generally do not require wetland protection. Figure C-10 DLA Conservation Recurring and Thousands of Dollars $600 $400 $200 $318.0.0 $351.0.0.0 $313.0 Beginning in FY, recurring costs include Manpower, and Education and Training. Figure C-11 DLA Conservation Thousands of Dollars $450 $360 $270 $180 $90 $251.0 $67.0 $211.0 $140.0 $191.0 $122.0 $424.0 $118.0 $294.0 $130.0 $522.0 $369.0 $1.0 $1.0 $342.0 $192.0 $177.0 $180.0 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress C-7

Other Defense-Wide Programs Other Defense-wide programs are comprised of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, including the Legacy Program and REPI; the Missile Defense Agency; the Defense Health Program; and other small agencies. Figure C-12 shows the total conservation budget for FY through FY, distinguishing both recurring and nonrecurring costs. While other Defense-wide organizations spent $45.6 million in FY, these organizations obligated $43.7 million to conservation efforts in FY. The large funding increases since FY reflect expenditures for Readiness and Range Preservation Initiative. Recurring costs are relatively low due to the small staff of the programs involved. Figure C-12 Other Defense-Wide Programs Recurring and $60 $48 $45.4 $36 $24 $21.1 $12 $9.2.4.2.2 $43.4.3 $53.7 $49.0.3.3 Nonrecurring costs are further divided into natural resources costs, and historical and cultural resources costs. As illustrated in Figure C-13, other Defensewide programs obligated $41.0 million to natural resource costs, a decrease driven by a small reduction in the Legacy Program. Historical and cultural costs remained stable at $2.5 million. Beginning in FY, recurring costs include Manpower, and Education and Training. Figure C-13 Other Defense-Wide Programs Conservation Nonrecurring $55 Costs $51.4 In addition to the $20,000 for T&E Species and $25,000 for wetlands protection in other Defense-wide programs, the Range Environmental Protection Initiative and Legacy programs invested $40.9 million in Other. Legacy also contributed $2.5 million to Historical and. $44 $33 $22 $11 $7.7 $1.5 $19.1 $43.2 $2.0 $2.1 $41.0 $2.5 $2.4 $46.5 $2.5 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress C-8