Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Adverse Event Reporting

Similar documents
TITLE: Reporting Adverse Events SOP #: RCO-204 Page: 1 of 5 Effective Date: 01/31/18

University of South Carolina. Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events Guidelines

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility

ACRIN ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING MANUAL. 1 March 2006 v.3

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REPORTING UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS INCLUDING ADVERSE EVENTS

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE ON SOPs: Preparing, Maintaining and Training

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Document Development and Change Control

Study Start-Up SS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR PRE-STUDY SITE VISIT (PSSV)

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

Biomedical IRB MS #

Study Management PP STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Safeguarding Protected Health Information

I. Scope This policy defines unanticipated problems and adverse events and establishes the reporting process and timeline.

Sponsor Responsibilities. Roles and Responsibilities. EU Directives. UK Law

KBEMS Pilot Programs- Adverse Event Notification

11/18/2016. UC Irvine s Clinical Research Coordinator Certification Preparation Series PI Roles and Responsibilities SESSION 4

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Safety Reporting in Clinical Research Policy Final Version 4.0

Adverse Event Reporting

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Details: Approval: Distribution & Storage: Pharmacovigilance for Researchers for UoL / LTHT Sponsored CTIMPs. Standard Operating Procedure

Standard Operating Procedure

DCP Safety Committee. Update and Review. January 19, 2017

FERCI MODEL SOPs. [The IEC members (author/s, reviewer/s) and Chairperson will sign and date the SOP on this first page]

IDENTIFYING, RECORDING AND REPORTING ADVERSE EVENTS FOR CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF MEDICAL DEVICES

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

Various Views on Adverse Events: a collection of definitions.

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 205

M. Rickard, Research Governance and GCP Manager R. Fay Research Governance and GCP Manager Elizabeth Clough, Governance Operations Manager

POLICY ON RESEARCH RELATED ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

STUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)

Drugs and Cosmetics rules, 2013 India

SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CANCER RESEARCH PROGRAM POLICY

Section 11. Adverse Event Reporting and Safety Monitoring

Marie-Claire Rickard, RG and GCP Manager Jimena Lovos, Quality Assurance Manager Elizabeth Clough, R&D Governance Operations Manager

Research Adverse Event and Safety Reporting Procedures Outcome Statement: Title:

FINAL DOCUMENT. Global Harmonization Task Force

GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS: SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING

Adverse Event Reporting

VCU Clinical Research Quality Assurance Assessment

Reference Number: UHB 253 Version Number: 1 Date of Next Review: 22/01/2018 Previous Trust/LHB Reference Number: SR-RG-015

Roles of Investigators in the Managements of Clinical Trials

Record or Document Type Retention Period Relevant Legal Citation(s) IRB Records: Training Records;

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

Regulatory Binder Checklist for FDA-Regulated Sponsor/Sponsor-Investigator Studies

Prepared by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Protocol Development and Regulatory Compliance Department

Overview of Draft Pharmacovigilance Protocol

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

Effective Date: 11/09 Policy Chronicle:

Initially Submitted on 11/24/2009 Final Submission By Test6 CA on 11/24/2009 1:51 PM Approval By student13 student13 on 11/24/2009 1:52 PM Attendees

National Cancer Institute. Central Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedures

Mastering Clinical Research April 19, :30 am

Version Number: 003. On: September 2017 Review Date: September 2020 Distribution: Essential Reading for: Information for: Page 1 of 13

Serious Adverse Events

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

COATS Coordinating Center Memo #3

Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View

NN SS 401 NEURONEXT NETWORK STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR SITE SELECTION AND QUALIFICATION

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

RITAZAREM CRF Completion Guidelines

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

University of Colorado Denver Human Research Protection Program Investigator Responsibilities for the Protection of Human Subjects

Version 4 January 18, Principal Investigator: James F. Marion, M.D. The Mount Sinai School of Medicine

3 HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Data and Safety Monitoring Plan

Public Input for Changes to Reportable Events Policy

SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board

SOP Title: Reporting Adverse Events and New Safety Information

Good Documentation Practices. Human Subject Research. for

SUNY Upstate Medical University GUIDELINES & POLICIES

Application Guide Global Awards in Transthyretin (TTR) Amyloidosis Research Research. A Competitive Grants Program Supported by Pfizer

MARKEY CANCER CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP No.: MCCCRO-D

Reporting to the IRB How to Report the Essentials and Improve the Protection of Human Subjects

managing or activities.

2017/2018 Prostate Cancer Innovation Fund Terms of Reference

Drugs and Cosmetics (First Amendment) Rules, 2013

ICH Topic E 2 D Post Approval Safety Data Management. Step 5 NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS FOR EXPEDITED REPORTING (CPMP/ICH/3945/03)

Local VA VA ORD CSP Other VA ORD. IRB of Record Registration Number: IRB Operated by: Local VA Non-local VA Academic Affiliate VHA Central IRB

I2S2 TRAINING Good Clinical Practice tips. Deirdre Thom Neonatal Nurse Coordinator

Clinical Research Seminar

Human Research Governance Review Policy

Utilizing the NCI CIRB

Introduction to Post-marketing Drug Safety Surveillance: Pharmacovigilance in FDA/CDER

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES WARNING LETTER. (b) (4) clinical investigation (Protocol entitled A Phase II, Multicenter,

New European Union Clinical Trial Regulations

WIRBinar. How to Survive an FDA Inspection. Upcoming Trainings: Contact Us: (360)

WARNING LETTER CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. Ref: 06-HFD

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

SOP Problems and Adverse Events, Record and Report

Human Research Ethics Review Policy

The SOP applies to all human subject research falling under the purview of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board.

Standard Operating Procedures

Building Quality into Clinical Trials. Amy C. Hoeper, MSN, RN, CCRC, Quality Manager Cincinnati Children s Gamble Program for Clinical Studies

Helping physicians care for patients Aider les médecins à prendre soin des patients

Study Monitoring Plan Template

Transcription:

Study Management SM 306.00 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Adverse Event Reporting Approval: Nancy Paris, MS, FACHE President and CEO 24 May 2017 (Signature and Date) Approval: Frederick M. Schnell, MD, FACP Chief Medical Officer 30 May 2017 (Signature and Date) Issue Date: 01 June 2017 Effective Date: 01 June 2017 Expiration Date: 01 June 2019 Document Review Date: 01 March 2017 Reviewer: Joni N. Shortt, BSN, RN, CCRC Page 1 of 11

Primary Author: Anita Clavier, BSN, MPH Previous Reviewer: Alice S. Kerber, MN, APRN (March 2014) 1. INTRODUCTION Subject safety is of the greatest importance for both the individual subject and the goals of the clinical study. Investigators are required to report to the sponsor all adverse events occurring during a study. If the event is serious and unexpected, prompt reporting to pharma (the manufacturer of the investigational product) and to the IRB is mandatory. This standard operating procedure (SOP) describes the steps Georgia CORE follows to fulfill the regulatory and clinical requirements for adverse event reporting. 2. SCOPE This standard operating procedure (SOP) describes the responsibilities of Georgia CORE for managing, reporting and documenting adverse events from the time Georgia CORE is notified that an adverse event is identified until all follow-up activities associated with its resolution have been completed. This SOP also describes the mechanisms used to provide the information necessary for Georgia CORE to prepare Investigational New Drug (IND) safety reports. Finally, the procedures for Georgia CORE to process and transmit IND safety reports received from pharma to the IRB are defined. 3. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES 21 CFR 312.32 IND safety reports 21 CFR 312.33 Annual reports 21 CFR 312.44 Termination 21 CFR 50.25 Elements of informed consent 21 CFR 56.108 IRB functions and operations 21 CFR 56.109 IRB review of research 21 CFR 56.115 IRB records 45 CFR 46.103 Assuring compliance with this policy-research conducted or supported by any Federal Department or Agency 45 CFR 46.109 IRB review of research 45 CFR 46.115 IRB records 45 CFR 46.116 General requirements for informed consent 01 March 2014 NCI Guidelines for Auditing Clinical Trials for the NCI National Clinical Trial Network for the (NCTN) Program, Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP/NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) and Research Bases. 23 November 2016 Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Adverse Event Reporting System (CTEP-AERS): NCI Guidelines for Page 2 of 11

October 1998 May 1997 January 15, 2007 January, 2009 Investigators: Adverse Event Reporting Requirements for DCTD (CTEP and CIP) and DCP INDs and IDEs https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_a pplications/adverse_events.htm FDA Information Sheets: Continuing Review After Study Approval International Conference on Harmonization; Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guideline Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS): Guidance on Reviewing and Reporting Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events FDA Guidance for Clinical Investigators, Sponsors, and IRBs: Adverse Event Reporting to IRBs Improving Human Subject Protection 4. REFERENCES TO OTHER APPLICABLE SOPS GA-102 SM-301 SM-302 SM-304 SM-305 DM-401 5. ATTACHMENTS Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility Communication Interactions with the IRB Routine Monitoring Visits Closeout Visits Data Management A. Procedures for Managing Adverse Events B. FDA Form 3500 C. FDA Form 3500A D. Algorithm for Review and Distribution of IND Safety and MedWatch Reports 6. RESPONSIBILITY This SOP applies to Georgia CORE leadership and staff members involved in ensuring the appropriate management of adverse events. This includes the following: President and CEO Chief Medical Officer (CMO) Georgia CORE staff and consultants Page 3 of 11

7. DEFINITIONS AND GLOSSARY The following definitions from the Code of Federal Regulations and the International Conference on Harmonization, Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guideline apply to this SOP. Adverse event: An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. Associated with the use of the drug: There is a reasonable possibility that the experience may have been caused by the drug. Disability: A substantial disruption of a person s ability to conduct normal life functions. Life-threatening adverse drug experience: Any adverse drug experience that places the patient, in the view of the investigator, at immediate risk of death from the reaction as it occurred, i.e., it does not include a reaction that, had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death. Serious adverse drug experience (ADE) (also known as Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Any experience that results in death, in a life-threatening ADE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, a persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or congenital anomaly. Sponsor: An individual, company, institution, or organization which takes responsibility for the initiation, management, and/or financing of a clinical trial. Unexpected adverse drug experience: Any adverse experience the specificity or severity of which is not consistent with the current Investigator Brochure, or if an Investigator Brochure is not required, that is not consistent with the specificity or severity in the risk information described in the general investigational plan or elsewhere in the current application, as amended. 8. PROCESS OVERVIEW A. Managing adverse events B. Handling IND safety reports from Pharma C. Reporting to the IRB 9. PROCEDURES A. Managing adverse events Research Staff/Consultant When a site reports an adverse change in a subject from Page 4 of 11

B. Handling IND safety reports from pharma baseline or pretreatment condition, check that all appropriate resources have been directed toward subject safety and well-being and that the subject is followed until the event is resolved. (Attachment A Site procedures for managing adverse events applicable to Non-NCTN trials only) If necessary for the immediate medical care of the subject only, facilitate breaking the drug blind after consultation (if possible) with the Investigator who initiated the study or Chief Medical Officer. Determine if the adverse event is serious and/or unexpected with the assistance of the Investigator who initiated the study and/or Chief Medical Officer, if needed, and inform pharma as directed in the protocol. Provide as much information as is available from the site using the Med Watch Form FDA 3500 or 3500A (Attachment B/C) and/or the Serious Adverse Event Report Form in the protocol, if applicable. For NCI NCTN trials report online at CTEP-AERs within 24 hours for Research staff learning of SAE: https://ctepcore.nci.nih.gov/ctepaers/pages/task?rand=14 90109392775 At the next site visit, ensure that details of the adverse event are recorded in the source documentation and the appropriate CRFs are completed. At the next site visit, ensure that originals or photocopies of all relevant documentation, including facsimile confirmations have been filed in the study binder and document findings in the monitoring report. Research Staff/Consultant Promptly review IND safety reports received from pharma and follow the Algorithm for Review and Distribution of IND Safety and MedWatch Reports (Attachment D). File IND safety reports and MedWatch Reports and related communication in the Georgia CORE IND Safety Report electronic folder for the appropriate trial. C. Reporting to the IRB Page 5 of 11

Research Staff/Consultant Notify the central IRB of all serious or alarming events occurring at a Georgia CORE network site, which is using the central IRB, according to the central IRB guidelines. For NCTN trials approved by the local IRB or NCI CIRB notify the local IRB of all serious or alarming events. If no local IRB of record report SAEs and any updates to Georgia CORE by including them on the CTEP-AERS report. Ensure that all IND safety reports received from pharma are submitted to the central IRB according to the central IRB guidelines and the Algorithm for Review and Distribution of IND Safety and MedWatch Reports (Attachment D). Ensure that all routine adverse events are reported to the central IRB as part of the periodic or annual reporting requirements as outlined in the central IRB guidelines. Obtain documentation from Georgia CORE network sites, using local IRBs, showing that they have completed reports to the local IRB as noted in the above 3 action items. File documentation in the Georgia CORE IND Safety Report electronic folder for the appropriate trial. 10. History of Changes Version Section Number Modification Approval Date Number 306.00 All Original Version 306.00 All No change was 09 March 2012 necessary 306.00 All No change was 01 June 2014 necessary 306.00 3, 7, 9A, C Additional guidelines added, clarification, NCTN and NCI CIRB reporting guidelines added 21 March 2017 Page 6 of 11

Attachment A PROCEDURES for MANAGING ADVERSE EVENTS 1. Identification, assessment and management of an adverse event by the Georgia CORE Network Sites REGULATIONS PROCEDURES Definition of an adverse event (AE): Any adverse change from baseline (pretreatment) intercurrent illness which occurs during the course of a clinical study after treatment has started, whether considered related to treatment or not Any effect that is unintended and unfavorable, such as a sign, a symptom, a laboratory abnormality or a disease or condition Serious adverse events (SAEs) include: Death Life-threatening experience Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation Persistent or significant disability/incapacity Congenital anomaly/birth defect Events that would require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above Ensure that the following are appropriately investigated: Spontaneous reports by subjects Observations by clinical research staff Reports to research staff by family or medical care providers Possible AEs documented in medical records, progress notes, etc. Reports of a subject death within four weeks after stopping treatment or during the protocol-defined follow-up period, whichever is longer, whether considered treatmentrelated or not Manage the adverse event to ensure that all appropriate resources are directed toward subject safety and well-being. Institute therapeutic intervention/support measures. If applicable: Discontinue the investigational product, comparator, or placebo Reduce dosage (as per protocol) Interrupt drug (as per protocol) Challenge (as per protocol) Follow the subject and assess the adverse event until stabilized/resolved. Page 7 of 11

2. Site SAE Reporting to Sponsor (Georgia CORE) Report serious and unexpected adverse experiences, whether considered drug-related or not, to the Sponsor as directed in the protocol. Provide details to the Sponsor as they become available. If additional information cannot be obtained for whatever reason, document this. Inform the Sponsor when no other information is expected. SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES Sponsors are required to notify the FDA by IND safety reports of any serious adverse experience associated with use of the drug in the clinical studies conducted under an IND as soon as possible but no later than 10 calendar days after initial receipt of the information. When Georgia CORE is the sponsor, Georgia CORE is required to notify pharma within the time period specified in the protocol. If the event is fatal or life-threatening and associated with use of the drug, sponsors are required to notify the FDA by telephone or fax within 7 calendar days of initial receipt of the information. SITE RESPONSIBILITIES To meet expedited reporting requirements, inform the sponsor as soon as possible after the subject is stabilized. Provide as much of the following information as is available: Protocol name and number The possible test articles: investigational product, comparator, or placebo Lot number and expiration date Subject identifiers Demographic data The nature of the event The severity of the event The probable relationship of the AE to the investigational product The date (and time) of AE onset The date (and time) of AE resolution, if available The dose, frequency, and route of administration The start and stop dates of test article administration Concomitant medications and therapies Clinical assessment of the subject at this time The results of any laboratory and/or diagnostic procedures, treatment, autopsy findings The follow-up plan The outcome Page 8 of 11

3. Site Research documentation SOURCE DOCUMENTATION CASE REPORT FORM COMPLETION Record in the source documentation, noting The nature of the event The severity of the event The probable relationship of the AE to the investigational product The date (and time) of AE onset The date (and time) of AE resolution, if available The possible test articles: investigational product, comparator, or placebo, the dose, frequency, and route of administration The start and stop dates of test article administration Concomitant medications and therapies Clinical assessment of the subject at this time The results of any laboratory tests and/or diagnostic procedures The follow-up plan The outcome Complete the appropriate case report form(s) The site-prepared data collection form for SAEs or The sponsor-generated CRF for routine AEs 4. Pharma-generated IND safety reports RESPONSIBILITIES TO IRB Submit IND safety reports to the IRB if applicable, see Algorithm for Review and Distribution of IND Safety and MedWatch Reports (Attachment D) and retain a copy of the transmittal memo in the study regulatory binder. RESPONSIBILITIES TO Pharma Acknowledge receipt of expedited safety report to Pharma with letter/facsimile. Copy Pharma on the transmittal memo to the IRB, if required. Inform Pharma of action required by the IRB, such as revisions to the informed consent form. Follow up with the Pharma as required. Page 9 of 11

Attachment B FORM FDA 3500 Attachment C FORM FDA 3500B To retrieve the above forms go to the appropriate web site: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/aboutfda/reportsmanualsforms/forms/ucm163919. pdf https://www.fda.gov/downloads/aboutfda/reportsmanualsforms/forms/ucm163919. pdf Download the appropriate form. Page 10 of 11

Attachment D IND Safety and/or MedWatch Reports sent to Georgia CORE and the Principal Investigator (i.e. the Investigator who initiated the study) by pharma Algorithm for Review and Distribution of IND Safety and MedWatch Reports 48 hours of receipt Georgia CORE determines if action plan (e.g., recommended change to NO protocol and/or informed consent) is present NO PI reviews documents to determine if adverse events place subjects or others at greater risk of physical or psychological harm than was previously known or recognized as it applies to the Georgia CORE PI initiated study YES YES PI modifies protocol and/or informed consent 10 days (7days if life 10 days (7 days if threatening or fatal) life Send revised protocol and/or informed consent to PI s IRB with IND safety report NO Georgia CORE sends documents to community investigators with note that states that upon review by the PI there is no need to change the protocol and/or informed consent Community investigators review the documents and determine if they need to discuss a potential need for a change with the PI NO YES Georgia CORE sends IRB approved revised protocol and/or informed consent to the central IRB for community investigators Georgia CORE sends IRB approved revised protocol and/or informed consent to community investigators (who sends them to their local IRB, if applicable) Community investigators send documents to local IRB, if required by their local IRB guidelines Page 11 of 11