SADC Collaborative Medicines Registration Initiative (Zazibona) Dr Sinah Selelo Drugs Regulatory Unit Ministry of Health & Wellness GALVmed/OIE stakeholder workshop on the harmonisation of the registration of veterinary medicinal products. Johannesburg 9 th May 2017
Presentation Outline Brief Background Objectives of the Collaborative procedure ZAZIBONA Process Achievements The Future
Brief Background SADC is a regional economic group with 15 Member States (MS) Varying regulatory capacities in the region 11 MS actively issue marketing authorizations Harmonisation of registration of medicines Directive issued by SADC Ministers of Health in 1999 Work focused on development of technical guidelines (> 22 guidelines developed)
1 SADC Public Health Protocol on Health 1999 o SADC Pharmaceutical Business Plan 2015-2019 2 SADC Economic & Industry Interests Industrialization Strategy and Roadmap 2015 2063 o Strategy on Regional Manufacturing of Essential Medicines and Health Commodities (2016-2020)
The challenge is to achieve balance Access Economic and industrial interests Market Control Public health
WHO prequalified Reviews & inspection by each NMRA Duplication of effort Approved by wellresourced Authorities
If you want to go quickly, go alone. If you want to go far, go together. ~ African proverb
A single stick may smoke, but it will not burn. ~ African proverb
SADC Collaborative Medicines Registration Initiative (Zazibona) Endorsed by SADC Ministers of Health & Ministers Responsible for HIV & AIDS in January 2015 Expand to other SADC Member States beyond the 4 founding Member States 5 Active Participating Member States Botswana Namibia South Africa (joined June 2016) Zambia Zimbabwe 1 non-active participating Member State Swaziland (joined Nov 2016)
Objectives Initiative to collaborate in assessment and inspections for medicines registrations with objectives to: Reduce workload Reduce timelines to registrations Develop mutual trust and confidence in regulatory collaboration Platform for training and collaboration in other regulatory fields
How does this work? Common Submission Essential medicine Manufacturer s Consent Consensus Consolidated Assessment reports (CAR) Consolidated list of Q to applicant (CLOQ) 1 Primary Assessment 5 Countries 5 CAR
Timelines Day 0 of Zazibona process: Meeting 1: Agreement on Rapporteur, assumed that screening in countries is OK Day 75: Rap circulates the AR1 to Zazibona NRAs and reviewer, reviewer assesses the AR1 and LoQ1 Day 90 = Meeting 2: Discussion and common position Position on compliance and inspection triggers Day 105: LoQ1 forwarded to the applicant, response time 45 days (90 days maximum) Day 150: Rap receives Responses1 from the applicant and starts assessment Day 165: Rap circulates AR2 (assessment of responses1) and LoQ2 to Zazibona NRAs and reviewer, reviewer assesses the AR2 and LoQ2 Day 180: Meeting 3: Discussion and common position 12
Timelines Day 195: LoQ2 forwarded to the applicant, response time 45 days (90 days maximum) Day 240: Rap receives Responses2 from the applicant and starts assessment Day 255: Rap circulates AR3 (assessment of responses2) and proposed position on registration to Zazibona NRAs and reviewer, reviewer assesses the AR3 and proposed position Day 270: Meeting 4: Discussion and adoption of position on non/recommendation of registration Day 285: Rapporteur circulates final Zazibona position Day 330: Countries are expected to decide on registration and reject/register Day 360: Meeting 5: Collection of information on national registrations (differences recorded) and dates 13
Applications Rapporteur notified Zazibona process design Applicant's agenda 1cLoQ 2cLoQ Registration decisions Response time 1 Response time 2 assessment discussion discussion Proposed position Screening OK Selection of Rapporteur AR + 1 LoQ from rapporteur AR + 2 LoQ from rapporteur Possible inspection Zazibona agenda Zazibona position Final AR from rapporteur Feedback on final registrations
Identification of common products List of common products Evaluation of product eligibility Product acceptable? YES Allocation of rapporteurship NO Submission of Applications in 2 or more MS Product not acceptable for evaluation NO Assessment report (AR) Assessment of product dossiers YES Consent provided? Inform and request consent from manufacturer YES Circulation of AR for review Consolidated AR (CAR) and List of Questions (CLOQ) Consensus on CAR and CLOQ (TC/plenary) More data required? Request additional data from manufacturer YES NO GMP inspection required? NO Product acceptable? YES YES Inspection of manufacturing facility Inspection report GMP compliant? NO NO CAPAs, no reinspection CAPAs cannot be addressed CAPAs, re-inspection required Recommend approval YES NO Recommend non-approval
WHO PQT-m performs QA on the Assessment Reports Outcomes of Assessments and Inspections would be made available (Transparency on Decision Making)
ZAZIBONA: Real Work 2 meetings/year of Heads of Agencies (HOA) Sharing in Practice! 10 Training Sessions Since 2013 # of Assessment Manufacturers inspected 13 Sessions: 4 year 13 for GMP compliance: 4 schedules year 12 Average # of products per session ZAZIBONA 56% vs 33% Positive Negative vs 11% Withdrawn 154 in Total (Nov 2016) = 64 Pending Responses from Manufacturers + 90 Product Finalised
Results continued Median time to recommendation: 9 months (including regulators and manufacturer/ applicant s time to respond to queries) [Target is 270 days (9 months)] The mean review cycles were 2.5 per product [target is 2 cycles] Average response time: 3 months for manufacturers to respond to queries [target is 3 months] Median time for final approval at the national level (after Zazibona process) was 1.5 months (range 0.2 6 months) [target is 2 months]. (based on data from two countries)
What ZAZIBONA is not Replacement of the NMRAs Only focuses on the review and inspection process Actual registration is done at the national level i.e., requires actual submission of product application to the countries following applicable national requirements i.e. application fees etc., Centralised procedure There is no central single submission ( yet) But same dossier submission to all the countries based on the SADC CTD and registration guidelines
Concluding Points Potential mechanism for improving the regulatory systems in LMICs Efficiency & effectiveness Sustainability & Ownership Costs effectiveness (value for money) Average cost of the process USD$4, 500 per product (i.e. for the Zazibona meetings excluding NMRA costs, GMP costs and coordination costs) Reduce the number of assessors per Zazibona session from three to two per country for 2017 Meetings (incl. the conferencing costs) organised and hosted by Member States Risk based approach Transparency Regulatory capacity
Regulators Manufacturers Patients
Acknowledgements NRAs in Southern Africa (Zazibona initiative) DFID Funded SARPAM Programme Co-financing the 2014 Work Plan WHO Prequalification Team Medicines Technical & financial Support AMRH Partners SADC Secretariat, NEPAD Agency