FY18 Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program

Similar documents
2016 Council of State Governments Justice Center

Justice & Mental Health Collaboration Program Category 2 Law Enforcement Planning Grantees FY2017 Orientation Webinar

FY2017 Justice & Mental Health Collaboration Program

Second Chance Act Grants: State, Local, and Tribal Reentry Courts

CTAS FY 2017: Funding Opportunities for VAWA Special Domestic Violence Criminal Jurisdiction February 1, 2017

Applying for the FY17 SCA Statewide Adult Recidivism Reduction (SRR) Strategic Planning Program Solicitation

2016 Community Court Grant Program

FY 2017 Second Chance Act Orientation Webinar for Reentry Program for Adults with Co-occurring Substance Use and Mental Disorders

Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program Grant Management and Budget Webinar

From the Resource Development/ School Fiscal Consulting Desk March 18, 2010 Miriam Shabo, ,

CTAS FY 2016: Funding Opportunities for Healing to Wellness Courts December 8, 2015

2018 Community Court Grant Program

Substance Use. Effective Training. Community Supervision and. Disorders: Collaborating for. and Responses. November 3, 2016

*Chapter 3 - Community Corrections

FY2017 Appropriations for the Department of Justice Grant Programs

Office of Criminal Justice System Improvements Pretrial Drug and Alcohol Initiative. Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Solicitation

Speaker: Ruby Qazilbash. Ruby Qazilbash Associate Deputy Director Bureau of Justice Assistance Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice

Adult Drug Court Discretionary Grant Program FY 2018 Competitive Grant Announcement. Frequently Asked Questions

Dougherty Superior Court Mental Health/ Substance Abuse Treatment Court Program

Criminal Justice Division

Criminal Justice Division

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Plan. Assembly Bill 109 and 117. FY Realignment Implementation

Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Program. Michael S. Carona, Sheriff~Coroner Orange County Sheriff s s Department

JAG EBDM Jail Reentry Pilot Sites Project (2016)

Current Funding Opportunities for Healing to Wellness Courts FY2014 CTAS Purpose Area #3 February 18, 2013

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM IMPLEMENTATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY REENTRY COURT PROGRAM (DISTRICT: ALL)

OPENING DOORS TO PUBLIC HOUSING Request for Proposals (RFP) for Technical Assistance

Justice Reinvestment in Indiana Analyses & Policy Framework

April 16, The Honorable Shirley Weber Chair Assembly Budget, Subcommittee No. 5 on Public Safety State Capitol, Room 3123 Sacramento CA 95814

Prisoner Reentry and Adult Education. With our time together, we propose

Leaving No Veteran Behind: The Policy Implications Identified at the 5th Annual Justice Involved Veterans Conference. Andrew Keller, PhD May 14, 2014

OVW FY 2009 Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies and Enforcement of Protection Orders Program

Chairman Wolf, Ranking Member Fattah and Members of the Subcommittee,

Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of U.S. Department of Justice Fact Sheet

The Role of Crime Victims and Advocates in Pretrial Justice Reform

STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN FORMULA GRANTS

WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY DOUGLAS SMITH, MSSW TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COALITION

Criminal Justice Division

Justice-Involved Veterans

REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT

Developing a Plan and Writing a Proposal

CALL FOR PRESENTERS TRAINING INSTITUTE THEME

Criminal Justice Review & Status Report

Criminal Justice Division

Bureau of Justice Assistance. David P. Lewis Senior Policy Advisor, Justice Information Sharing Team

OVC Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Specialized Services for Victims of Human Trafficking

SAC (Senate Appropriations Committee) PROGRAM PRESIDENT HAC (House Appropriations Committee) DOJ Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants Coverdell

Harris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Harris County Sequential Intercept Model

Second Chance Act Grants: Guidance for Smart Proba7on Applicants

STOP/VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN FORMULA GRANTS. U.S. Department of Justice. N.C. Department of Public Safety. Governor s Crime Commission

COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT RESPONDS TO INCREASED GANG ACTIVITY

Defining the Nathaniel ACT ATI Program

Eligibility. U.S. Department of Justice Office on Violence Against Women (OVW)

Overview of Recommendations to Champaign County Regarding the Criminal Justice System

APPA 2019 WINTER TRAINING INSTITUTE CALL FOR PRESENTERS

The Department of Juvenile Justice shall provide services for each Superior Court youth placed in a Youth Development Campus.

Office of Criminal Justice Services

Chapter 13: Agreements Overview

SAC (Senate Appropriations Committee) PROGRAM PRESIDENT HAC (House Appropriations Committee) DOJ Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants Coverdell

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT. Data Collection Efforts

Adult DUI/Drug Court Certification Application

LOUISIANA COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE STRATEGIC PLAN

Circuit Court of Cook County Performance Metrics Department Adult Probation

Domestic and Sexual Violence Resources for Henrico County Residents

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

Office of the Governor Criminal Justice Division. Funding Announcement: Crime Stoppers Assistance Fund

2 nd Circuit Court- District Division- Plymouth PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK 5/11/16

Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109)

Introduction. Jail Transition: Challenges and Opportunities. National Institute

Community Public Safety Repair Plan

DOC & PRISONER REENTRY

Florida Sheriff Departments

The Criminal Justice Information System at the Department of Public Safety and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. May 2016 Report No.

Deputy Probation Officer I/II

Agenda: Community Supervision Subgroup

EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL (JAG) GRANT

Testimony of Michael C. Potteiger, Chairman Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole House Appropriations Committee February 12, 2014

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SPOUSAL ABUSER PROSECUTION PROGRAM PROGRAM GUIDELINES

CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

2014 JAG APPLICATION PROGRAM NARRATIVE

Characteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995

Capital Area Council of Governments Criminal Justice Advisory Committee (CJAC) PY 2019 Policy Statement

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2013 to FISCAL YEAR 2022

North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission

Missouri faces a number of significant criminal justice

STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES

OVERVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS SYSTEM OF THAILAND

1998 Report: Violence Against Women Act of 1994

September 2011 Report No

Justice Reinvestment in West Virginia

Tarrant County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

Indiana Victim Assistance Basic Academy

[CCP STRATEGIC PLANNING MATRIX]

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Act

BJA is currently undergoing a comprehensive review of the enclosed curriculum for official approval at which point the BJA logo may be added.

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

Randomized Controlled Trials to Test Interventions for Frequent Utilizers of Multiple Health, Criminal Justice, and Social Service Systems

Domestic Violence Symposium Panel Discussion

GENESEE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICE 2017 PROGRAM BUDGET

Transcription:

May 2, 2018 FY18 Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program Solicitation Webinar 2018 The Council of State Governments Justice Center

Speakers Maria Fryer, Policy Advisor for Substance Abuse and Mental Health THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE NiKisha Love, Policy Advisor for Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE Nicola Smith-Kea, Program Manager, Law Enforcement Portfolio THE COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS JUSTICE CENTER Sarah Wurzburg, Deputy Program Director, Behavioral Health THE COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS JUSTICE CENTER Tiffany M. Russell, Planning and Development Director/PIO, Office of the District Court Administrator, Atlanta Judicial Circuit, Superior Court of Fulton County SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA Kayce Rane, Consultant SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE, CALIFORNIA Brooke O'Byrne, Director of Court Services SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, NEVADA 2

Overview JMHCP Grant Program Additional Award Information Budget and Review Criteria Questions and Answers 3

Bureau of Justice Assistance BJA helps to make American communities safer by strengthening the nation's criminal justice system: Its grants, training and technical assistance, and policy development services provide state, local, and tribal governments with the cutting edge tools and best practices they need to reduce violent and drug-related crime, support law enforcement, and combat victimization. To learn more about BJA, visit www.bja.gov, or follow us on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/dojbja/) and Twitter (@DOJBJA). BJA is part of the Department of Justice s Office of Justice Programs. 4

National nonprofit, nonpartisan membership association of state government officials Represents all three branches of state government Provides practical advice informed by the best available evidence 5 5

6

Eligibility States, units of local government, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments (as determined by the Secretary of the Interior) BJA will only accept applications that will be administered jointly by an agency with responsibility for criminal or juvenile justice activities and a mental health agency. 7

Overview JMHCP Supports cross-system collaboration to improve responses and outcomes for individuals with mental illnesses (MI) or co-occurring mental illness and substance abuse (CMISA) who come into contact with the justice system. This contact can occur because a crime was committed, or because law enforcement officers were first responders to a call for service involving a person with mental illness but in which no crime was committed. This program supports public safety and violence reduction through service partnerships that enhance and increase law enforcement responses to people with MI and CMISA. 8

Program-Specific Information JMHCP promotes officer and public safety through the coordination of system resources for people who are accessing multiple services including hospital emergency departments, jails, and mental health crisis services. cross-discipline training for justice and treatment professionals; and facilitates communication, collaboration, and the delivery of support services among justice professionals, and treatment and related service providers. 9

Grant Categories Category 1: Collaborative County Approaches to Reducing the Prevalence of Individuals with Serious Mental Illness in Jails Category 2: Strategic Planning for Police and Mental Health Collaboration Competition Category 3: Implementation and Expansion 10

Category 1: Collaborative County Approaches Objective: To increase and maintain jail capacity for violent offenders, and develop a systemwide coordinated approach to safely reduce the prevalence of non-criminal individuals with MI and CMISA in local jails. 11

Stepping Up: A National Initiative to Reduce the Number of People with Mental Illnesses in Jails Released in January 2017 To read the full report, please visit: https://stepuptogether.org/updates/stepping_up_releases_foundational_report 12

Category 1 Phases Phase 1: Within 8 months of receiving final approval of the project s budget from OJP, spend up to $100,000 in support of the below activities: receive intensive technical assistance (TA) from BJA s national TTA provider, follow and document the steps laid out in the Category 1 Planning and Implementation Guide. Phase 2: After BJA approval of the Planning and Implementation Guide, spend the remaining grant funds on directly related implementation activities. 13

Category 1: Phase 1 Deliverables 1. Establish a team (or utilize a pre-existing team) of county leaders, relevant stakeholders, and decision makers from multiple agencies to engage in the planning process. 2. Develop a plan to conduct timely screening and assessments for MI and CMISA and for risk of recidivism. 3. Establish baseline measures of: the number of people with MI and CMISA booked into jail, their average length of stay, percentage of people connected to treatment, and their recidivism rates. 4. Conduct a comprehensive process analysis and inventory of services to determine existing policies, practices, programs and treatments that exist; and identify service capacity and gaps as well as evidence-based programs and practices. 5. Prioritize policy, practice and funding improvements and estimate the impact of new strategies. 6. Establish a process for tracking the impact of the plan on four key outcomes (on the next slide) 14

Four Key Measures Outcomes To Track Progress 1. Reduce the number of people with mental illness booked into jail 2. Shorten the average length of stay for people with mental illnesses in jails 3. Increase the percentage of people with mental illnesses in jail connected to the right services and supports 4. Lower rates of recidivism 15

Tiffany M. Russell, Planning and Development Director/PIO, Office of the District Court Administrator, Atlanta Judicial Circuit, Superior Court of Fulton County FY16 JMHCP Category 1 Grantee: Fulton County Superior Court, Georgia 16

Category 2: Strategic Planning for Law Enforcement and Mental Health Collaboration Objective: To free up law enforcement time to focus on responding to violent crime; and, to improve officer and citizen safety during calls for service involving people with MI and CMISA. Upon receiving a grant award, and with intensive technical assistance provided by BJA s national training and technical assistance provider, develop and document a Police Mental Health Collaboration (PMHC) using the Category 2 Strategic Planning Guide. 17

Police Mental Health Collaboration (PMHC) Framework Is our leadership committed to the police-mental health collaboration (PMHC)? Are we following clear protocols to respond to people who have mental illnesses? Are we providing staff with quality mental health and de-escalation training? Do we have the resources and service connections for people who have mental illnesses? Do we collect and analyze data? Do we have a process for reviewing and improving performance? 18

Category 2: Deliverables 1. Establish an interagency workgroup including law enforcement (LE), behavioral health (BH), and all other major stakeholders 2. Designate LE agency project coordinator to review data on performance, adherence to policies and procedures, ensure partner engagement and run day to day operations. 3. Review (and revise as needed) existing protocols to respond to people who have MI and CMISA, including interagency agreements, screening and guidance for mental health calls for service, and information sharing. 4. Review (and revise as needed) existing, and develop or revise as needed, officer and call-taker mental health and de-escalation training. 5. Assess existing behavioral care resources, identify gaps in services, and prioritize behavioral health resources for the PMHC. 6. Assess ability to track mental health-related calls for service and dispositions and develop additional capacity to analyze and track. 7. Develop a process for reviewing and improving performance data to promote additional PMHC capacity and long-term sustainability. 19

Kayce Rane, Consultant FY17 JMHCP Category 2 Grantee: San Joaquin County District Attorney s Office, California 20

Category 3: Implementation & Expansion Objective: To increase public safety and reduce recidivism among high risk people with MI and CMISA. Category 3 grants can support law enforcement, prosecution, court-based, corrections, parole and probation initiatives. Grant funds may be used to support a combination of the allowable use categories, or be concentrated on one specific category. 21

Category 3 Grant Phases Phase 1: Upon receiving a grant award, and within 6 months of receiving final approval of the project s budget from OJP, spend up to $150,000 in support of the below activities, receive technical assistance from BJA s national training and technical assistance provider, and follow and document the steps laid out in the Category 3 Planning and Implementation Guide. Phase 2: After completion and BJA approval of the Planning and Implementation Guide, remaining grant funds may be used to support the following allowable activities: 22

Behavioral Health Diversion Strategies 23

Invest in full range of system improvements Law Enforcement Law Enforcement Jail-based Initial Contact with Law Enforce ment Arrest Initial Detention Community-Based Continuum of Treatment, Services, and Housing Outpatient Treatment Intensive Outpatient Treatment Court-based First Court Appearance Integrated MH & SU Services Peer Support Services Pretrial Jail - Pretrial Supported Employment Case Management Court-based Jail-based Jail/Reentry Dispositional Court Prison/Reentry Specialty Court Crisis Services Psychophar ma-cology Supportive Housing Probation Parole 24

Category 3: Deliverables Phase 3 Training for criminal justice, mental health, and substance abuse treatment personnel. Specialized training for law enforcement Staff training targeting mental health and criminogenic needs Cross-system training law enforcement, corrections-based staff, courts personnel, community supervision personnel, and community-based mental health and substance abuse providers Training for judges and prosecutors Screening, assessment, and information sharing processes Specialized caseloads Case management and service coordination Information sharing 25

Priority Considerations 1. Use of Criminogenic and Violence Risk Assessments to Identify and Prioritize Treatment and Case Management Services for Individuals at Risk for Committing Future Violence 2. Program Evaluation 3. Provision of Services for Female Offenders 26

Target Population Category 3 Current research points toward the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model for how corrections and judicial authorities should be identifying and prioritizing individuals to receive appropriate interventions. When prioritizing individuals with behavioral health needs in the justice system for scarce programming and treatment resources, priority should be given to those at higher risk for recidivism and higher criminogenic need, as determined by validated actuarial risk and need assessment. 27

Brooke O'Byrne, Director of Court Services, 6th Judicial District Court FY17 JMHCP Category 3 Grantee: Humboldt County, Nevada 28

Overview JMHCP Grant Program Additional Award Information Budget and Review Criteria Questions and Answers 29

Target Population: 21 st Century Cures Act Grant funds must be used to support a target population that includes adults or juveniles who: Have been diagnosed as having a MI or CMISA or manifest obvious signs of MI or CMISA during arrest or confinement or before any court; Have been unanimously approved for participation in a program funded under this solicitation by (as appropriate) the relevant prosecuting attorney, defense attorney, probation or corrections official, judge, and a representative from the relevant mental health agency, and having been determined by each of these relevant individuals to not pose a risk of violence to any person in the program, or the public, ; and Have not been charged with or convicted of any sex offense (as defined at 34 U.S.C. 20911) or any offense relating to the sexual exploitation of children, or murder or assault with intent to commit murder. 30

Target Population: Court-Based Programs 1. whether the participation of the defendant in the program would pose a substantial risk of violence to the community; 2. the criminal history of the defendant and the nature and severity of the offense for which the defendant is charged; 3. the views of any relevant victims to the offense; 4. the extent to which the defendant would benefit from participation in the program; 5. the extent to which the community would realize cost savings because of the defendant's participation in the program; and 6. whether the defendant satisfies the eligibility criteria for program participation unanimously established by the relevant prosecuting attorney, defense attorney, probation or corrections official, judge and mental health or substance abuse agency representative. 31

Evidence-Based Programs or Practices OJP strongly emphasizes the use of data and evidence in policy making and program development in criminal justice, juvenile justice, and crime victim services. OJP is committed to: Improving the quantity and quality of evidence OJP generates. Integrating evidence into program, practice, and policy decisions within OJP and the field. Improving the translation of evidence into practice. 32

Information Regarding Potential Evaluation of Programs and Activities The Department of Justice has prioritized the use of evidence-based programming and deems it critical to continue to build and expand the evidence informing criminal and juvenile justice programs to reach the highest level of rigor possible. Office of Justice Programs may conduct or support an evaluation of the programs and activities funded under this solicitation. 33

Federal Award Information CATEGORY 1: Collaborative County Approaches to Reducing the Prevalence of Individuals with Serious Mental Illnesses in Jails Grant amount: Up to $300,000 for jurisdictions with populations less than 100,000, up to $400,000 for jurisdictions with populations between 100,000 and 499,999, and up to $500,000 for jurisdictions with populations of 500,000 or more. Project period: 24 months. CATEGORY 2: Strategic Planning for Law Enforcement and Metal Health Collaboration Grant amount: Up to $100,000. Project period: 12 months. CATEGORY 3: Implementation and Expansion Grant amount: Up to $750,000. Project period: 36 months. 34

Overview JMHCP Grant Program Additional Award Information Budget and Review Criteria Questions and Answers 35

Budget Information Applicants for Categories 1 and 3 must explain their inability to fund the collaboration program adequately without Federal assistance; specify how the Federal support will be used to supplement, and not supplant, State, local, Indian tribe, or tribal organization sources of funding that would otherwise be available, including billing third-party resources for services already covered; and outline plans for obtaining necessary support to continue the proposed collaboration program following federal support. 36

Additional Budget Requirements For all applicants, include the amount and source of matching funding Category 1 and 3 applicants must set aside an adequate amount of funding to implement a data collection plan. Category 1 applicants should structure their budget to accommodate access to a portion of the budget: up to $100,000 of the total grant award, in order to complete and submit a required portion of the Planning and Implementation guide within 8 months of receiving final OJP approval of the project budget. Category 3 applicants should structure their budgets to accommodate access to a portion of the budget: up to $150,000 of the total grant award in order to complete and submit a required Planning and Implementation guide within 6 months of receiving final OJP approval of the project budget. Program budget approval and coordination with a technical assistance coordinator are required to complete and submit a Planning and Implementation Guide. 37

Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement (cash or in-kind) Federal funds awarded under this solicitation may not cover more than 80 percent of the total costs of the project. An applicant must identify the source of the 20 percent non-federal portion of the total project costs and how it will use match funds. If a successful applicant s proposed match exceeds the required match amount, and OJP approves the budget, the total match amount incorporated into the approved budget becomes mandatory and subject to audit. Indian tribes and tribal organizations that otherwise are eligible for an award may be able to apply certain types of funds received from the federal government (for example, certain funds received under an Indian "self-determination contract") to satisfy all or part of a required "non-federal" match. Grants Financial Guide at https://ojp.gov/financialguide/doj/postawardrequirements/chapter3.3b. htm for examples of in-kind services. 38

What an Application Should Include For this solicitation, BJA has designated the following application elements as critical: Program Narrative, Budget Detail Worksheet, and Budget Narrative. 1. Information to Complete the Application for Federal Assistance 2. Project Abstract 3. Program Narrative 4. Budget and Associated Documentation 5. Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) 6. Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable) 7. Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire (including applicant disclosure of high risk status) 8. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities 9. Additional Required Attachments 39

Review Criteria Description of the Issue (15 percent) Project Design and Implementation (40 percent) Capabilities and Competencies (30 percent) Plan for Collecting the Data required for this Solicitation s Performance Measures (5 percent) Budget (10 percent) 40

How to Apply Applicants must register in and submit applications through Grants.gov, a primary source to find federal funding opportunities and apply for funding. Find complete instructions on how to register and submit an application at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/support.html. Applicants that experience technical difficulties during this process should call the Grants.gov Customer Support Hotline at 800 518 4726 or 606 545 5035, which operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, except on federal holidays. 41

Deadline Applicants must register with Grants.gov at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.htm prior to submitting an application. All applications are due by 11:59 p.m. eastern time on May 29, 2018. OJP encourages all applicants to read this Important Notice: Applying for Grants in Grants.gov. For additional information, see How to Apply in Section D. Application and Submission Information 42

Contact Information For technical assistance with applications, contact the Grants.gov Customer Support Hotline: 800 518 4726, 606 545 5035, at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/support.html, or at support@grants.gov. The Grants.gov Support Hotline operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, except on federal holidays. For assistance with any unforeseen Grants.gov technical issues beyond an applicant s control National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) Response Center: toll-free at 800 851 3420; via TTY at 301 240 6310 (hearing impaired only); email grants@ncjrs.gov; fax to 301 240 5830; or web chat at https://webcontact.ncjrs.gov/ncjchat/chat.jsp. The NCJRS Response Center hours of operation10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. eastern time, Monday through Friday, and 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. eastern time on the solicitation close date. 43

Overview JMHCP Grant Program Additional Award Information Budget and Review Criteria Questions and Answers 44

Questions and Answers 45

Resources Criminogenic Risk and Behavioral Health Needs Framework Collaborative Comprehensive Case Plans Police Mental Health Collaboration (PMHC) Toolkit Law Enforcement/Mental Health Learning Sites Criminal Justice/Mental Health Learning Sites Reducing the Number of People with Mental Illnesses in Jails: Six Questions County Leaders Need to Ask 46

Contact Information Maria Fryer Policy Advisor, Mental Health and Substance Abuse The Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance Maria.Fryer@usdoj.gov NiKisha Love, State Policy Advisor for Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program The Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance Nikisha.Love@usdoj.gov Nicola Smith-Kea Program Manager, Law Enforcement Portfolio The Council of State Governments Justice Center nsmith-kea@csg.org Sarah Wurzburg Deputy Program Director, Behavioral Health The Council of State Governments Justice Center swurzburg@csg.org 47

Join our distribution list to receive CSG Justice Center updates and announcements! www.csgjusticecenter.org/subscribe The presentation was developed by members of The Council of State Governments Justice Center staff. The statements made reflect the views of the authors, and should not be considered the official position of The Council of State Governments Justice Center, the members of The Council of State Governments, or the funding agency supporting the work.