REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Similar documents
Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION and MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND CORROSION PROGRAM

Fleet Readiness Centers

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

CURRICULUM VITAE. Senior Evaluator Pilot. Senior Instructor Pilot

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

Non-Traditional Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance: A Challenge to USMC Fixed Wing Tactical Aircraft

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

5750 Ser 00/ SEX) 00. From: Commanding Officer, Strike Fighter Squadron 25 To: Director of Naval History (N09BH)

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control

at the Missile Defense Agency

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND

RESPONDING TO COMPOSITE FIRES: FIRST RESPONDER TRAINING MODULE

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Report Documentation Page

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance

The Use of Sikes Act Cooperative Agreements for Implementing INRMP Projects

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

NAVY MEDICINE OPERATIONAL TRAINING CENTER COMMAND BRIEF JULY 2018

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

MV-22 Osprey: More than Marine Air s Medium-lift replacement. Captain D. W. Pope

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)


Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

PEO Missiles and Space Overview Briefing for the 2010 Corrosion Summit February 2010 Huntsville, AL

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Wildland Fire Assistance

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

Presented to: Presented by: February 5, Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY. Ref: (a) SECNAV Washington DC Z Jul 2005 (ALNAV 055/05)

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

2010 Fall/Winter 2011 Edition A army Space Journal

Joint United States (US) Air Force, US Army, US Navy, and US Marine Corps Air Combat Training

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

Embedded Training Solution for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) A3

Navy and dmarine Corps Spectrum Offices (NMCSO) Status

Joint Terminal Attack Controller, A Primary MOS For The Future. EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain M.J. Carroll to Major P.M.

AMCOM Corrosion Program

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Subj: REQUIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY AND PROJECTED OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT STATEMENTS FOR FLEET AIR RECONNAISSANCE SQUADRON SEVEN (VQ-7)

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4

IMPROVING SPACE TRAINING

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

Transcription:

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penally for failing to comply with a collection of information if it docs not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED Professional Paper 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Department of the Navy NITE Lab Training 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) Joseph Antonio, MD 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division 22347 Cedar Point Road, Unit #6 Patuxent River, Maryland 20670-1161 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Naval Air Systems Command 47123 Buse Road Unit IPT Patuxent River, Maryland 20670-1547 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT This purpose of this briefing is to provide an update on night vision goggle training conducted in the Marine Corps and Navy Night Imaging and Threat Evaluation (NITE) Lab training facilities, and to describe changes in the mechanism in which courseware and instruction is standardized. The NITE Lab concept has continuedto evolve since its development in the mid-1980s. Today, it is thoroughly integrated with simulator and flight training, all combined to provide aircrew with as much information and practical experience as possible before the first tactical sortie. Additionally, the designation of a model manager position will help insure that quality instruction is provided to all aircrew and that funding will be available to support the necessary efforts. 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Joseph Antonio, MD 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (include area code) (301)342-9283 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18

NIGHT VISION 1999 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION Westfields Marriott Hotel, Chantilly, USA 7-8 October 1999 Department of Navy NITE Lab Training Joseph C. Antonio, MD Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division Patuxent River, MD, USA Introduction The purpose of this briefing is to provide an update on night vision goggle training conducted in the Marine Corps and Navy Night Imaging and Threat Evaluation (NITE) Lab training facilities, and to describe changes in the mechanism in which courseware and instruction is standardized. Background The NITE Lab concept evolved secondary to a series of USMC NVG-related mishaps in the early 1980s. Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One (MAWTS-1) was tasked to develop a method of NVG training that would better prepare aircrew for flying with goggles. The result was the creation of the NITE Lab concept. Initial planning and evaluation of the training content included a LASER threat simulation (hence the "threat evaluation" portion of the name). The threat simulation portion was eventually eliminated but other threat training has since been incorporated (e.g., LASER Safety, TOPSCENE introduction, etc.). Eventually, NITE Lab facilities were placed in locations where initial NVG flight training was being conducted. NITE Lab Overview A NITE Lab, in general, consists of a classroom area for academic instruction, a terrain board for demonstrating NVG-specific effects, and an eyelane for teaching NVG adjustment procedures. The different components can be co-located in a single room or separated into different rooms depending on the available space. a. Classroom. Academics are provided using the latest in audiovisual capability. Some lessons are taught using slides generated by computer (e.g., Power Point) or by CD-ROM. Video is used extensively to support the slide presentations and is shown using various modes (e.g., videotape, videodisc, CD-ROM, etc.). b. Eyelane. An eyelane provides a space for instructors to more easily and effectively teach NVG adjustment procedures. An ANV-20/20 NVD Infinity Focus unit is also demonstrated in order to teach students how to use the device, but it does not take the place of the eyelane. In addition to adjustment procedures, the eyelane is used for NVG performance demonstrations (e.g., illumination versus contrast), compatible versus incompatible lighting demonstrations and the demonstration of various devices used during NVG operations (e.g., IR signal devices, IR LASER pointers, etc.). c. Terrain Board. The use of video provides for a means for demonstrating a wide range of NVG effects and can demonstrate many things not possible on a terrain board. However, many of the visual effects vital for students to understand (e.g., illumination level changes, shadowing, lunar azimuth, cultural lighting effects, etc.) are best portrayed while viewing a scene using the same equipment with which they will fly. Consequently, the terrain board continues to provide the best means of demonstrating and reinforcing many of the important effects determined from mishaps and operational lessons learned. **«. > 20000407 179

Standardization of Sensor Ground Training In an effort to standardize NVG and other sensor ground training, the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) and the Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC)/Training and Education designated the Commanding Officer (CO) of MAWTS-1 as the Aviation Training Model manager (ATMM) for both USN and USMC Sensor Ground Training. The MAWTS-1 Aerospace Medical Safety Officer (AMSO) was subsequently identified as the ATMM Project Officer, representing the CO for management of the training program. As a result, responsibility for the standardization of USN and USMC sensor ground training now goes through a single point of contact. Since most of the ground training currently conducted concerns the use of NVGs, many of the efforts and much of the curriculum revolves around goggle training. However, forward-looking infrared (FLIR) training and TOPSCENE training has recently begun, and training for other sensors will likely be incorporated as they are introduced to the fleet. ATTM Model Manager Responsibilities To provide direction for the model manager and guidance for those responsible for managing NITE labs, the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Night Imaging and Threat Evaluation (NITE) Lab Training was developed. This document outlines the specifics for insuring that sensor ground training has a mechanism in place that will help the standardization process. As the single point of contact for USN and USMC sensor ground training, the ATTM Model Manager has several duties: a. Curriculum Development and Standardization. One of the lessons learned from past NVGrelated mishaps was the lack of standardized ground training that focused on those issues relevant to safely and effectively using NVGs (e.g., image limitations, weather effects, misperceptions, etc.). Consequently, one of the first large undertakings was to develop a training strategy and then to fund the development and acquisition of the necessary equipment and courseware. Existing courseware was standardized and plans were made for upgrading the content and the methods of delivery. One of the initial results was the development of a NVG Indoctrinational Course that is now used not only by the USN and USMC, but also by the USAF. Other lessons have also been developed and will be described later in the paper. b. NITE Lab Facility Certification. The ATTM Model Manager makes periodic trips to existing NITE Lab locations to insure academic instruction is meeting expectations, that the various curriculum modules are available and being used, and that the facility has all the necessary supporting hardware. In addition, assistance is provided when establishing a new facility. In both cases, the facilities must meet criteria established in the SOP. c. Instructor Standardization. An initiative was recently undertaken to help insure the quality of instruction and to help insure that all those responsible for instructing at the NITE Lab locations have been properly prepared. It was decided to establish an "Instructor Course" at MAWTS-1 that would prepare instructors to use the various curriculum modules, and to familiarize them with hardware specific to the Navy and Marine Corps (e.g., NVGs, helmets, mounts, signaling devices, etc.). Additionally, the instructors could be prepared to better support the community to which they are being assigned (e.g., TACAIR versus rotor wing, F/A-18 versus AV-8B, etc.). The first class will be given early next year. NITE Lab Locations Currently there are ten USMC NITE Lab locations and seven USN locations: USMC USN MCAS Yuma, AZ NAS North Island, CA MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA NAS Lemoore, CA MCAS Tustin, CA NAS Fallon, NV MCAF Quantico, VA NAS Whidbey Island, WA MCAS New River, NC NAS Oceana, VA MCAS Cherry Point, NC NAS Norfolk, VA MCAS Beaufort, SC NAS Cecil Field, FL

MCAS Futema, Okinawa MCBH Kaneohe Bay, HI MCAS Iwakuni, Japan Training Curricula There are several training curricula and lessons currently in use in the NITE Labs and several that will be available within the next few months: a. Current Courses/Lessons NVG Indoctrination Course FLIR Training Course NVG Refresher Training MXU-810U to AN/AVS-9 Transition Training b. Future Courses/Lessons NVG Indoctrination Course NITE Lab Instructor Course NVG Class A Mishap Lessons Learned: Fixed Wing NVG Class A Lessons Learned: Rotor Wing NVG/FLIR Sensor Integration Operational Considerations Update Classes (TACAIR / RW-3) This is the standardized course that all aircrew will attend prior to beginning NVG flight training. The course contains the following modules: a. Academics Module. Video is used extensively to demonstrate both the capabilities and limitations associated with the use of NVGs. The module consists of the following six lectures: Course Introduction Human Visual System Introduction to NVGs Night Environment NVG Misperceptions and Illusions Night Operations b. NVG Pre-Flight and Demonstration Module. This contains at a minimum the following components: Hands-On Preflight Alignment, Adjustment and Focus Training NVG Performance Demonstrations Compatible/Incompatible Lighting Demonstration Device Demonstrations c. Terrain Board Demonstration Module. The following is a partial list of the items demonstrated during this module: Lunar azimuth Illumination levels Shadowing Terrain discrimination Cultural lighting effects Environmental effects

FLIR Training Course This course is designed to augment FLIR courses embedded in the flight syllabuses of existing training, and to provide initial training for aircrew for which FLIR devices have been recently integrated into their platform. Operationally relevant video is used to demonstrate the various teaching points. In addition to the normal discussion of FLIR theory, techniques for flight planning and for adjusting the FLIR imagery for specific purposes (e.g., navigation versus hot spot detection) are provided. LASER safety is also covered. The module consists of the following lectures: Introduction and FLIR Theory FLIR Systems and Image Optimization Operational Considerations and Sensor Integration Introduction to LASER Systems and Safety Other Lessons Currently Available Other lessons currently available include the following: a. NVG Refresher Training. This is a "short course" for NVG-experienced aircrew that have been out of the cockpit or have not flown with NVGs for a year or longer. It covers the following topics: NVD Technology Update NVD Mishap Lessons Learned Sensor Integration Misperceptions and Illusions Terrain Board Demonstrations b. MXU-810U to AN/AVS-9 Transition Training. This was developed specifically for aircrew transitioning from the use of Cats Eyes NVG to the AN/AVS-9. Differences in goggle design (e.g., indirect versus direct view), adjustment procedures, and image differences (e.g., field of view, low light performance, etc.) make it imperative that these changes are clearly and thoroughly discussed. Training includes the following two briefs: Introduction to the AN/AVS-9 AN/AVS-9 Adjustment Procedures Future Courses/Lessons The following are under development and should be available for use in the NITE Lab facilities within the next few months: a. NITE Lab Instructor Course. This will provide a one week long course that will prepare instructors for NITE Lab assignments. In addition to covering the available curricula and their contents, students will be required to teach a portion of the NVG Indoctrination Course. They will be graded on their performance so that main topical areas and teaching methods may be emphasized to the entire class. All associated hardware will also be demonstrated. b. NVG Class A Mishap Lessons Learned: Fixed Wing. This lessons covers all but the most recent USN/USMC fixed wing NVG-related Class A mishaps. Each mishap is discussed from an operationally relevant perspective. Lessons learned from each mishap are then combined and trends noted. Finally, guidance is provided to help aircrew avoid similar problems. Video is used when appropriate to demonstrate specific points. c. NVG Class A Lessons Learned: Rotor Wing. This is similar in organization to the fixed wing lesson. It uses selected helicopter mishaps that represent the most common types associated with the use of

NVGs. Each mishap is discussed from an operationally relevant perspective. Lessons learned from each mishap are then combined and trends noted. Finally, guidance is provided to help aircrew avoid similar problems. Video is used when appropriate to demonstrate specific points. d. NVG/FLIR Sensor Integration. This lesson was developed to provide information to aircrew that use both NVGs and FLIR sensors. The purpose is to provide a review of the sensors, paying particular attention to their differences, and then to provide guidance for conducting thorough and meaningful preflight planning. Additionally, information is provided to help with in-flight decision-making (e.g., when changes in environmental conditions may favor one sensor over the other, how a change in the target may impact the sensor of choice, etc.). Integration with Flight Training Navy and Marine Corps NVG training is conducted both at the schoolhouse and at the squadron level. In all cases however, initial training incorporates the use of a NITE Lab training facility and the standardized curriculum. As such, the curriculum provided is not a "stand-alone" product but is an integral part of the overall training process and part of the entire package of ground, simulator and flight training. Summary The NITE Lab concept has continued to evolve since its development in the mid-1980s. Today it is thoroughly integrated with simulator and flight training, all combined to provide aircrew with as much information and practical experience as possible before the first tactical sortie. Additionally, the designation of a model manager position will help insure that quality instruction is provided to all aircrew and that funding will be available to support the necessary efforts.