) / E/c % 3 g,3 25X1. Approved For. DIA review() completed. 3 April 1963 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT:

Similar documents
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

BETWEEN: Complainant COMPLAINANT. AND: College of Registered Nurses of British Columbia COLLEGE. AND: Nurse REGISTRANT

Martin Nesbitt Tape 36. Q: You ve been NCNA s legislator of the year 3 times?

Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland Carer Responses Analysis: Summary of Findings

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Information Security Program and Protection of Sensitive Compartmented Information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Review of Patient Experience of Elective Orthopaedic Services at Manchester Elective Orthopaedics Centre.

HIGHLAND USERS GROUP (HUG) WARD ROUNDS

Internships - Student Assessment of Clinical Experiences. Facility: Health South in Tempe. Clinical Instructors: Dan Angulo PT

Allied Healthcare Leicester

Cover Article DD FORM 1149 FACT OR FICTION. By Ed Winters, CPPM, CF. 8 The Property Professional Volume 22, Issue 5

Health Professions Review Board

Moorleigh Residential Care Home Limited

Local Government Ombudsman Service Complaint Review. February Executive Summary

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

Fordingbridge. Hearts At Home Care Limited. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Requires Improvement

Making every moment count

Fuelling Innovation to Transform our Economy A Discussion Paper on a Research and Development Tax Incentive for New Zealand

Family Inpatient Communication Survey. Instructions and Instrument

1. Purpose. To implement the guidance set forth in references (a) through (e) by:

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Broken Promises: A Family in Crisis

Surveyors Ombudsman Service. Customer Satisfaction 2010

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense MANUAL

Swindon Link Homecare

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Participation in Professional Conferences By Government Scientists and Engineers

This publication is available digitally on the AFDPO WWW site at:

WRITTEN TESTIMONY OF DANIEL J. BAUMGARTNER JR. LT COL (RETIRED) UNITED STATES AIR FORCE BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SENATE, COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES

UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Intelligence Analysis Thomas Patrick Carroll 1

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Angel Care Tamworth Limited

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Continuation of Essential DoD Contractor Services During Crises

Complainant v. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia

Magdalen House Care Home Service

the organizer You must carefully read and understand the VFW Congressional Charter, By-Laws, Manual of Procedure and Ritual.

Mental Health Act 2007: Workbook. Section 12(2) Approved Doctors Module

Again, Secretary Johnson, thanks so much for continuing to serve and taking care of our country. I appreciate it very much.

Donald Mancuso Deputy Inspector General Department of Defense

WRITING A WINNING PROPOSAL

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

Guidance for Monitoring the Toll-Free Helpline and Online Complaint Process. Content

WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION Recommendation Follow-Up

DOD INSTRUCTION DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND REGIONAL

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Agranat Commission of Inquiry Interim Report (April 1974)

Approve~ For ~lease 20~!6 " :, ;I. IA-RDP85B0080~Y01001~ ' t: ~ ' ~- ~. <:: \:f j t' Ji"',t

A1 Home Care. A1 Home Care Ltd. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Good

DOD MANUAL DOD ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (ELAP)

CHIEF PROSECUTOR MARK MARTINS REMARKS AT GUANTANAMO BAY 16 MAY 2016

THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON. December 11, 1993

ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY OF INVESTIGATION BY THE VA OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL IN RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS REGARDING PATIENT WAIT TIMES

Aberlour Sycamore Service Care Home Service Children and Young People Veronica Crescent Kirkcaldy KY1 2LJ Telephone:

Subj: ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATED TO MEDICAL DEPARTMENT SPECIALTY LEADERS

MEMORANDUM. BASE OPS/ International Spy Museum. Operation Minute by Minute. 01 October, 1962 (time travel skills required)

Volunteering in NHS Scotland Developing Volunteering Toolkit Summary of Pilot

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Counterintelligence (CI) in the Combatant Commands and Other DoD Components

of Communications-Electronic s AFI , Requirements Development and Processing AFI , Planning Logistics Support

Highland Care Agency Ltd Nurse Agency 219 Colinton Road Edinburgh EH14 1DJ

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND **APPLICATIONS WILL ONLY BE ACCEPTED DURING THE CAREER FAIR**

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COUNTERINTELLIGENCE

Teen Challenge UK - Whitchester House Housing Support Service Whitchester House Duns TD11 3SF Telephone:

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Emergency-Essential (E-E) DoD U.S. Citizen Civilian Employees

Asian Professional Counselling Association Code of Conduct

COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF NOVA SCOTIA SUMMARY OF DECISION OF INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE D. Dr. Courtney Mazeroll

9 December Strengthened, But More Needs to be Done, GAO/NSIAD-85-46, 5 March

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE NAVAL INSPECTOR GENERAL

Procedures Governing DIA Intelligence Activities That Affect U.S. Persons

Shasta Wildlife Rescue & Rehabilitation Guidelines, Policies and Procedures Section I - General Policies

Subj: NAVY HEADQUARTERS CRISIS MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES AND ORGANIZATION. a. The clarification of Navy service watch cell and conditions I and II watch.

NATIONAL PATIENT SURVEY, 2004

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Maidstone Home Care Limited

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PERSONNEL COMMISSION. 635 LAW AND RULES December 12, Chapter VI EMPLOYMENT LISTS (Rules 635 to 681)

World History

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (DON) PERSONNEL SECURITY PROGRAM (PSP) INSTRUCTION

Community Foundations and United Way: Getting From Competition To Collaboration

Radis Community Care (Leeds)

Care service inspection report

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Contents. Contents. Executive Summary page 2. 1 Introduction page 3. 2 Background information page 4. 3 What we did page 7. 4 What we found out page 8

The Russell County Commission Meeting Minutes March 28, :30 A.M. EDT

Carewatch (Edinburgh, Mid & East Lothian) Housing Support Service 29 Drumsheugh Gardens Edinburgh EH3 7RN

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures

Goldsborough - Hatfield

COAKLEY UPDATES FROM BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETINGS

Airman Second Class Elton L. Blanchard 416 th Fighter Bomber Squadron Chambley Air Base France 1956 to 1958

Transcription:

Approved For E/c % 3 April 1963 ) / MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Review of CIA-DIA Relations with Lt. Gen. Joseph Carroll, 1245-1545, 2 April 1963 1. In setting up this luncheon meeting with General Carroll, I told him there were several major areas of mutual interest which I would like to review with him, and suggested that we do it alone initially in order to reach a basis for discussion before bringing in the working level. He indicated that he thought this would be advisable, and the following sum marizes the highlights of a meeting which lasted three hours. Z. In general, I found General Carroll s attitude friendly; he seemed ready and willing to be cooperative, still heavily committed to working out the details of the organization and mission of DIA, and quite sensitive to any indication that his own organization might be in error or engaged in activities outside of its charter. At no time during our discussion did he indicate any hostility towards CIA, and in every instance in which there was any implied criticism of the Agency, he balanced it with a statement to the effect that he understood why the Agency had taken that particular position. While he never put it in so many words, it was quite apparent that he admires the professionalism and work of the Agency--particularly in the clandestine intelligence field and in NPIC. In leaving, he made the rather significant comment that up until this time he had never dared to be away from his desk for any length of time because there were so many matters which he felt required his personal attention. 3. For convenience of use of this memorandum, I have dealt with each subject discussed on a separate page and will distribute these to the appro priate units. Because General Carroll was speaking to me as a friend and in complete confidence, I request that this memorandum be closely held, and that no action be taken on items in it by the working level without prior clearance with me. 25X1 DIA review() completed. J4lnan 13. Kirkpatrick Executive Director 3 g,3 TS#188292 Approved For Release 2004101 I20: ClA-RDP86B00269R0008O0GOO4-3

Approved For Release juj ci Clandestine Collection 1. I mentioned to General Carroll that we had received his memo randumi I 25X1 He said he thought the time lag in this instance was reprehensive and con sidered it entirely the fault of Defense. He pointed out that it was over a year since the operation had first been proposedi nd that it 25X1 had only now reached this level for adjudication. He said this was almost completely the fault of the military system whereby this had to go through several command echelons before it was forwarded back to Washington for resolution. He noted that CIA had the procedure whereby the station chiefs immediately forwarded back to Washington any problem in the coordination field, and that our centralized system therefore gave us a greater ability to act more quickly than theirs. He said it was his intention to eventually set up the unified and specified commands as coordination points. We discussed briefly whether there was any value in the CIA officers in these commands having any coordination responsibilities and, interestingly enough, he said he didn t think this would work because our officers in the commands would not have the detailed familiarity with the operations that our station chiefs possessed. Z. I asked him whether he thought there was any weakness in our system in handling these coordination efforts, and he gave me the clear impression that he felt there had to be a lot of housecleaning in DOD before he was ready to find fault with us. He mentioned that many of his own staff had urged him to take over the direction of clandestine operations, but that he had resisted this--feeling that it was better to allow these opera tions to continue to be run by the individual services, with DIA in a super visory role. He noted that clandestine operations were almost exclusively those of the Army, with some by the Air Force, and very few by the Navy. He gave me the impression that his objective will be to develop a clan destine effort more parallel to ours, and will attempt to develop the same type of professionalism and continuity of service that we have in our clandestine services. This led into a general discussion of training. 3. General Carroll said there were times when he felt that he would like to be personally briefed on the identification of sources. He noted that CIA s source descriptions were generally excellent, but said that on quite a few occasions he would like to know more about the source, and particularly more about the follow-up that was being undertaken. Approved For Release 2Oö4!O1T2: CIA-R0P86B00269R000800060004-3

Training Approved For Release 200 t I 120 : CIA-RDP86B00269R000800060004-3 kei 25X1 1. I asked his views of the decision that had been reached after a joint study had been made by DOD and our Office of Training to the effect that joint training by CIA and DIA for clandestine operations was impractical. He said that, as he recalled the study, it is now about a year old, the team from Fort Holabird which had done it had concluded that our security require ments would have necessitated compartmentation of the DJA trainees and he felt this was most undesirable and, if required, he would indicate the advisability of separate training. General Carroll said he understood quite well why CIA would want to compartment their clandestine personnel, particularly when the DIA personnel might be temporary or move on to other assignments. He said this was one of the things he was working on in order to get personnel on a career basis, and until he could do this he was in agreement with our position. He then described the paper which he had sub mitted to the Joint Chiefs of Staff whereby DIA would have been given the career management of all services personnel assigned to it; he noted that this had evoked a violent reaction on the part of the services and had been sent back to him for reply, which he had done maintaining his position that he could not develop a career intelligence organization without control over the personnel. This had now gone through the JCS again and to the Secretary of Defense for a decision. He said that as an interim measure he might like to assign a few of his qualified senior personnel to take our clandestine training, and asked about the length of the courses. I told him very briefly I weeks. He noted that in the study on our courses, the observation had been made that certain portions probably were not adaptable to military intelligence training. He went on to comment that there had already been one noticeable improvement as a result of DIA having been given the responsibility for all intelligence training, and this was the fact that the Attaches from all three services now went to the same school and consequently arrived in the field with a much better understanding of each other s responsibilities. 2. General Carroll mentioned that the Army may have to close Fort Holabird and relocate the Intelligence School somewhere else. He raised the question as to whether this might not be a good opportunity to review the whole interrelationship of our training, and possibly to consider whether the training schools might be placed contiguous to each other for greater cooperation. 3. General Carroll commented on his system for selection of personnel and said that he insisted on personally reviewing the files of all civilian personnel that were hired and of every military officer assigned. He said that he refused to accept any but the best, and had received some complaints k -& r Approved For Release 2004I01I20 : CIA-RDP86B00269R000800060004-3

Approved For Release Training fcon t) from the Navy that they were not getting as many officers into MA as the other services. He said he had told them that when they gave him as highly qualified candidates as the others, they would get as many officers in. He also said the Navy had initially refused to let him see the personnel files, and that he had refused to accept any Navy officers until he saw their files. He commented that he had refused to send any DIA civilians to the Naval War College until he was more certain of their qualifications and permanence, and noted that the present strength of DIA was 1700- -many of whom he had acquired as units were transferred from the services. iij Approved For Release 2004101120: CIA-RDP86BOO2S9R000$00060004-3

2004r Approved For Release P86BOO269ROOO8OOO6OOO4-3 Current Intelligence 1. General Carroll mentioned that I had said one of the things I wanted to talk about was current intelligence; that he had received instructions from Secretary Gilpatric for himself and Horwitz to get together with Cline and myself, and he wondered what the subject was. I told him that the Director and Mr. Gilpatric had had several discussions on the daily Intelligence Bulletins, and that they wanted us to examine the possibility of one daily Bulletin, jointly produced, which would go to all of the common users. He asked whether this stemmed from any criticism of the Defense Intelligence Bulletin, and I said that it was not so much a criticism as a desire to provide the top policy makers with one Bulletin reflecting the views of the whole intelligence community, and would not in any way inhibit DIA from producing the specialized intelligence required by the military services or the commands. I noted that in the space of a month there were a large number of items duplicated in the Defense Intelligence Bulletin and the Central Intelligence Bulletin, and that occasionally different views and interpretations would arise. 2. General Carroll then went into a rather lengthy dissertation on his production center which he is just getting organized, and which he envisages will be an all-source center in which the analysts will work directly with r the SIGINT, P1 and other specialists, and provide a detailed back up in depth for the intelligence production. He expressed concern about the tendency for raw intelligence reports to go to high policy levels and start actions which were unwarranted, and mentioned I Icalling Gen. Taylor 25X1 as a result of a raw intelligence report which had not been evaluated by the analysts. He said that he felt the same criticism could be directed at NSA, 25X1 3. Carroll pointed out that his entire organization had to be designed to be responsive to DOD and the commands, and would produce all military intelligence including order of battle, except for scientific and technical intelligence, which would still be produced by the services, but which DIA would monitor. -5- Approved For Release 2004101120 CIA-RDP86B00269R000800060004-3

Approved For Release 2004101120 : CIA- DP86B00269R000800060004-3 TOP SECRE Current Intelligence (co&t) 4. He asked what preparation he should do for discussion with Cline and mysell, and I suggested that we had already prepared proposals which we would submit to them and that studies on their part were premature. I suggested we get together next week, and he commented that he had to appear before the House Armed Services Committee on Monday or Tuesday 25X1 I jior the DIA building, and Horwitz was still tied up in the TFX inquiry. We left it that I would be in touch with him. 1? Approved For Release 2004I01120 CIA-RDP86B00269R000800060004-3

Approved For Release IcRJjRE-RDP86B0O269ROOO8OOO6OOO4-3 NPIC 1. I told him that another area I wanted to discuss was the future of NPIC and how the expansion would be handled. He then commented at some length on how, during the Cuban crisis, he had had no P1 assets inasmuch as the services controlled them. These personnel have now been transferred to DIA, and Carroll said it is his intention to build up the number of DIA PIs at NPIC to about 165, and to keep 35 to 50 PIs in his own production center where they will be working next to the analysts. He commented that it was unfortunate that the PIs and analysts couldn t all be together and that even a separation of four or five miles was difficult. He noted that on many occasions during the Cuban crisis the intelligence community was put in a position of depending exclusively upon the PIs without the analysts having a chance to comment on the Interpretation. He noted the excellent work of GMAIC and JAEIC during the crisis. 2. After extolling both the fine work of Lundahi and NPIC, he voiced four criticisms which he felt reflected problems that had come up during the Cuban crisis which he hoped could be avoided in the future. (1) He was required to brief the Joint Chiefs, the Chairman of JCS and the Secretary of Defense each morning at hours when the daily NPIC product had not yet reached him. He said that as a result of this he started to make his own boards and Lundahl called Mm and asked to put the NPIC name on them, to which he agreed. But he pointed out that he still was not getting the support that he needed for these morning briefings. (2) He worked out an arrangement with Lundahi to send ten PIs to NAVPIC. For some reason this was turned down in CIA, and the people did not show up, but he had not been consulted on the turn-down. He finally got It straightened out and the people assigned, but felt the method of handling was a little sloppy. (3) He felt very strongly that some of the inhibitions and restrictions on dissemination of information had blighted the comments, and pointed out that he had to take it on Ms own responsibility to send the material on offensive missiles. He noted that if he had not been doing this, General Sweeney would not have had the material to work with at a time when he had been told by the President that he might have to attack the next day. Approved For Release t4ioi2o7: çla-rdp86b00269r000800060004-3

Approved For Release 2004 10P86B00269R000800O600O4-3 NPIC (4) He commented on the fact that NPIC had gone from a Z4-hour a day basis to an 8-hour a day basis without consultation with him and at a time when he had commitments to supply the commands. He felt, again, that there should have been consultation with him personally on this. 3. We then discussed the long-term plan of the expansion of NPIC to about double its present size, and it was apparent that he plans to utilize it to the fullest for DIA, but at the same time keeping PIs in his production center to work next to the analysts. TT) cq nrt Approved For Release 2004101 12 : CIA-RDP86B00269R000800060004-3