Data Quality and Information Flow

Similar documents
NHS HIGHLAND ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONS MUSCULOSKELETAL REDESIGN

Access to Psychological Therapies DCAQ in NHS Ayrshire & Arran

NICE guideline Published: 22 September 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng74

REFERRAL TO TREATMENT ACCESS POLICY

NHS 111 Clinical Governance Information Pack

CREATING EFFICIENT OUTPATIENT SERVICES

The National Musculoskeletal (MSK) NHS Lanarkshire Pilot. Dr Sarah L Mitchell National Programme Manager Rehabilitation Framework

Sandwell Secondary Mental Health Service Re-design consultation

Internal Audit. Public Dental Service Accounts Receivable. December 2015

Islington Practice Based Mental Health Care: Roll-out plans and progress

Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service

Committee is requested to action as follows: Richard Walker. Dylan Williams

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes

AUDIT SCOTLAND REPORT MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS ON WAITING LISTS, FEBRUARY 2013 AND USE OF UNAVAILABILITY WITHIN NHS HIGHLAND.

OFFICIAL. Integrated Urgent Care Key Performance Indicators and Quality Standards Page 1 of 20

Health and Social Care. Looked After Children (Health) Procedures

Mental Health Crisis Pathway Analysis

The interface between primary and secondary care Key messages for NHS clinicians and managers

Measuring and monitoring quality in mental health: preparing to implement the new access & waiting time standards

Proposal to Develop a Specialist Outpatient Referral Management Service. Draft Business Rules Discussion Paper

service users greater clarity on what to expect from services

Service Agreements. Mike Davies, MD FACP

Document Management Section (if applicable) Previous policy number NA Previous version

Clinical Advisory Forum DRAFT Terms of Reference

Clinical Coding Policy

Implementation of the right to access services within maximum waiting times

Cheshire and Wirral Partnership CAMHS Choice Clinic

Report by Iain Ross, Head of ehealth on behalf of Deborah Jones, Director of Strategic Commissioning, Planning and Performance

Review of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

Utilisation Management

Referral Management and Pathway Development

21 March NHS Providers ON THE DAY BRIEFING Page 1

Rapid improvement guide to appointment slot issues

Principles of Shared Care Protocols

Review of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Hywel Dda University Health Board. Audit year: Issued: October 2015 Document reference: 491A2015

Approve Ratify For Discussion For Information

NHS Standard Contract for 2015/16

What is this Guide for?

Meeting in Common of the Boards of NHS England and NHS Improvement. 1. This paper updates the NHS England and NHS Improvement Boards on:

Working together for better patient care

PRISM: GPs - your questions answered

Physiotherapy outpatient services survey 2012

abcdefghijklm abcde abc a Health Department NHS HDL (2002)70 3 October 2002 Dear Colleague, THE MANAGEMENT OF WAITING LISTS IN NHSSCOTLAND Summary

Emergency admissions to hospital: managing the demand

Warrington Children and Young People s Mental Health and Wellbeing Local Transformation Plan

Access, Booking and Choice Policy and Operational Procedures

Prime Minister s Challenge Fund (PMCF): Improving Access to General Practice. Innovation Showcase Series Effective Leadership

Clinical Assessment Services

NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL NHS TRUST. PATIENT ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY (Previously known as Waiting List Management Policy) Documentation Control

Committee of Public Accounts

MENTAL HEALTH PRIMARY CARE SUPPORT SERVICE (PART 1 MENTAL HEALTH MEASURE) PERFORMANCE REVIEW

NHS Pathways and Directory of Services

A Collaboration between Portsmouth City, Southampton City and Hampshire Primary Care Trusts (PCTs)

Family Nurse Partnership Caseload Management

Patient Interview/Readmission Chart Review. Hospital Review:

REPORT SUMMARY SHEET

Psychological Therapies for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in People with Longterm Physical Health Conditions or with Medically Unexplained Symptoms

2. This year the LDP has three elements, which are underpinned by finance and workforce planning.

NHS Northern, Eastern and Western Devon Clinical Commissioning Group

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes. A guide from NatPaCT

Referral Received. Triage. Non-Urgent Referral. MDT Meeting. Complete Core Information (Protocol for Completion) Complete Risk Assessment.

Guide to the Continuing NHS Healthcare Assessment Process

QOF Quality and Productivity (QP) Indicators. Supplementary Guidance and Frequently Asked Questions for PCTs and Practices in England

Approaches to reducing DNA and CNA

MSK AHP REFERRAL HUB (ADMIN)

Background and progress

Outpatient Clinic Policy

Report by Margaret Brown, Head of Service Planning & Donna Smith, Divisional General Manager, Patient Services, Raigmore

Welsh Government Response to the Report of the National Assembly for Wales Public Accounts Committee Report on Unscheduled Care: Committee Report

Review of Local Enhanced Services

Discharge to Assess Standards for Greater Manchester

TEES, ESK & WEAR VALLEYS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST: DEVELOPING A MODEL LINE FOR RECOVERY- FOCUSED CARE

Executive Summary / Recommendations

Report to NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde

Delivering a choice of four providers: A practical implementation guide for PCTs. October 2005

Mental Health URGENT CARE AND ASSESSMENT Business Case. CCG Summary paper

VANGUARD: Better Care Together

A Step-by-Step Guide to Tackling your Challenges

Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Waiting Times in NHSScotland

Mental Health Social Work: Community Support. Summary

Methods: Commissioning through Evaluation

CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR FULL ACCREDITATION AS A BEHAVIOURAL AND/OR COGNITIVE PSYCHOTHERAPIST

GOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 27 September 2017 Agenda Item 5.2

MODULE ELEVEN. Getting Credit for the Work You Do: Entering Units of Service

BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Sue Watkinson Chief Operating Officer

Using QI tools: Action Effect Diagrams

Re-designing Adult Mental Health Secondary Care Services through co-production and consultation. 1 Adult Mental Health Secondary Care Services

Trust Policy and Procedure Document Ref. No: PP (17) 283. Central Alerting System (CAS) Policy and Procedure. For use in: For use by: For use for:

Bristol CCG North Somerset CGG South Gloucestershire CCG. Draft Commissioning Intentions for 2017/2018 and 2018/2019

Policy for Supporting Pupils with Medical Conditions

NHS. Top tips to overcome the challenge of commissioning diagnostic services. NHS Improvement - Diagnostics. NHS Improvement Diagnostics CANCER

Author: Kelvin Grabham, Associate Director of Performance & Information

How to write and review an access policy in line with best practice for referral to treatment and cancer pathways. July 2018

Babylon Healthcare Services

CHAPTER TWO: WAITING LISTS AND BOOKING

Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Waiting Times in NHSScotland

REDESIGNING ALLIED HEALTH OUTPATIENTS - Lean Thinking Applications to Allied Health

Front Door Streaming to Primary Care Hub Pilot DRAFT GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK.

WORK EXPERIENCE PLACEMENT - DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES. Work Experience Placement, Psychological Assistant

OFFICIAL. NHS e-referral Service: guidance for managing referrals

Transcription:

Data Quality and Information Flow NHS Lothian s community based specialist Mental Health services use Patient Information Management System (PIMS) as their electronic patient record and administrative system. During phase one of the DCAQ project, a number of pieces of analysis were undertaken, using data from PIMS for both services involved in the project. However, a combination of how the system works and how it was being used led to the following barriers to progressing with DCAQ analysis; It was not possible to identify how many referrals were going specifically to the psychological therapies service(s) for assessment (PT services are delivered as part of wider mental health services). It was not possible within PIMS to identify how many people were waiting for a Psychological Therapy, how long for and for what It was difficult for clinicians to get information back on activity, which led to low motivation to record or use data to inform service delivery and to localised development of unsupported, standalone data recording tools There were several different ways of capturing activity, which led to inconsistencies in how data was recorded There was a lack of clarity around clinical ownership of the data at service level Although there was a function for capturing clinical outcomes within PIMS, it was not routinely used or reported As a result, a number of recommendations were made in the Phase One report to address these issues. Specifically the recommendations targeted improvement in the quality and accessibility of demand, activity and queue data, and of clinical outcomes data. As this is likely to be an issue encountered by a number of mental health services, this document outlines the steps that were taken to address the issues surrounding data quality and information flow. 1. For each service, PIMS data was checked against case notes. Variation across each team in current information capture processes were documented. 2. A Psychology Assistant undertook a piece of work to map the current practice for using PIMS with each service. This involved speaking with key individuals along the patient pathway both from admin support and with clinicians from each part of each service, asking each person, for each step in the pathway: a) what information is recorded? b) where is it recorded? c) who records it? d) approximately how long does it take?

e) what sort of timeframe is it recorded in? (eg 2 days after receipt of referral) Some of the questions asked either could not be answered or had several different answers. This was useful in highlighting gaps and inconsistencies in the data collection process. From the information gathered from interviews, a current state information flow diagram (below) and document for discussion was developed. A structured meeting was then facilitated amongst the clinical team, the PIMS manager, the administrative support staff, informed by the pre-work. The meeting afforded the opportunity for issues and concerns to be captured and parked so that the discussion remained constructive. Clear aims of the meeting were set and shared prior to the meeting. These were: 1. Agreed an information flow for Midlothian Psychological Therapies Service, along with timings for data entry 2. Identified a clear set of training needs in relation to using PIMS. (After the meeting we will then formulate a plan to address those training needs) 3. Identified what changes need to be made to PIMS to support the DCAQ work and ongoing management of demand data (again, post-meeting the project team will work with PIMS to develop a plan to address these changes) The key actions were captured, and a plan was then agreed, with timescales and task owners. Using the diagram as a guide, the PIMS manager made some changes to the PIMS system to enable the team to follow the new process, and training was then made available for all of the team on how to use PIMS in line with the new process. Supporting training guides were produced for reference along with a period of telephone support by the PIMS training team. A similar approach was applied in East Lothian Psychological Therapies Service, supported by input from the Transformation Station on particular aspects of training and embedding of clinical outcomes data collection. The new information flow process was then implemented. Data quality reports were produced to help identify issues with the new data collection process, along with random checks of case notes against data quality. As a result of the work done, NHS Lothian now has a robust information flow process, easily articulated and demonstrated, supported by training materials and expertise which will enable the approach to be rolled out across the other teams offering Psychological Therapies within the Health Board.

There are also now a set of routine reports for each service which cover demand, activity and queue data, data quality and completeness for ongoing monitoring, and clinical outcomes data. QuEST December 2012

Mapping Information-flow for Midlothian PTS CURRENT STATE Note: All staff, except Psychologists, will be referred to as Psychological Therapists (PT) in this document Referral pre-allocation The secretaries receive all referrals from Sky Gateway. They input all referrals into the local database and set up an Excel spreadsheet for them that is passed on to Medical Records. Medical Records will then record all the referrals on PiMS and send out the patient files to the service. Date taken from: Local database / PiMS Secretaries / Medical records Referral letter Time between Referral and Allocation: approx. 1 week Allocation All referrals are being considered at the allocation meeting and their appropriateness for the service decided upon. Appropriate referrals are aligned to matrix level, type of therapy and therapist. Referral post allocation After the allocation meeting, the secretaries update the local database with the outcome of the allocation meeting and make up the patient notes for all of them (both appropriate and inappropriate referrals). They will then return the inappropriate referrals to the GP by sending them a letter and record this on PiMS. This is usually done within 2-3 days. How: Local database / PiMS / patient file / letter to GP Matrix alignment, therapy alignment and therapist alignment are being recorded and inappropriate referrals managed accordingly Secretary 2 3 days after allocation How can it be established how many referrals go to either PT, Psychology or are inappropriate referrals?

Team is specified in local database. Inappropriate referrals can be identified on the basis of not having an opt in date, no 1st appt and no discharge date. Opt-In Within 2-3 days the secretaries send out opt-in letters to all allocated ( appropriate ) referrals, send a copy of it to the GP and put one into patient file. How: Local database / patient file / letter to GP Date of when the opt-in letter was sent is being recorded Secretary 2 3 days after allocation The opt-in letter gives clients 14 days to respond, but secretaries usually allow for about 21 days before discharging them. Appointment letter In response to the opt-in letters, appointments are arranged over the phone by the secretary. The secretaries hold a list of each clinician s availabilities to do assessments. Appointment letters are then send out to the clients and copies of it forwarded to the GP and put in patient file. The patient notes are then passed on the clinician assessing. The date of the arranged appointment is added to the local database. Patient file / local database / letter to GP Secretary 2 days after opt-in First assessment appointment dates are given within 18 weeks from referral. First appointment / assessment: Most clinicians will make a note of the date of this appointment in their diaries. After assessment, the clinician adds the client to their case-load on PiMS and records attendance details there (here we have inconsistencies as some clinicians do add them to their caseload on PiMS and others don t because they need to be taken off again if intervention will be done by someone else - NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED!!!).

Clinician will also write case notes and adds them to the patient file and writes a letter to the GP. How: Clinicians diary / PiMS / patient file / letter to GP Clinicians add the client to their caseload on PiMS at this point (?) and record date of appointment and attendance on it after assessment (what option is chosen in PiMS to indicate Purpose of session when it is a first appointment/assessment? Teams?) Secretary / Clinician All recording and letter to GP should be completed within 1 week (ie adhering to documentations standards) Waiting list The waiting list is determined by the Matrix level and type of therapy/intervention needed. Patients requiring long-term interventions on Levels 3 and 4 are put on the waiting list after assessment, while patients requiring short-term intervention on Level 2 are usually seen straight away. Patients on Level 2 and 3 requiring a group intervention may be put on the waiting list, depending on group availability (there may be a wait determined by the start date of the next group). The clinician will pass on this information to the secretary after assessment who will record it accordingly on the local database (adding them to the appropriate waiting list there if required). How: Local database Matrix level and reason for wait (type of intervention required) for most of the cases (this may need a bit more consistency). The length of time waiting is automatically generated as weeks go by. Secretary 2 3 days after assessment??? Waiting list management: Once a clinician has capacity to offer a follow-up appointment to a client or a place in a group becomes available they will inform the secretary of this so that an appointment letter can be send out. The secretary will update this on the local database and remove the client from the waiting list. Group Intervention

Referrals to groups are made internally. There are a range of groups offered to clients on Level 2 and 3, and one group to clients on Level 3 and 4. The groups run for 6 to 15 weeks, once a week, lasting approx. 1 to 2 hours each. They are usually facilitated by two members of staff / session. Excel sheets (separate one for each group) (PT groups only) / PiMS (PT and Psychology) / patient file (outcome measures) / clinicians diary How: For each client attending one of the PT groups (Level 2 and 3) it is recorded what group they attended, number of attendances and DNAs. The outcome measures are being kept in the patient file. Currently, psychology records group attendance in PiMS under individual contact rather than groups. Clinician Follow-up appointments / Therapy Once the clinician has capacity the secretary is informed and will send out a appointment letter. This letter will be copied to the GP and in the patient file. The clinician usually keeps a record of the appointment date in their diary. After the follow-up appointment, the clinician will add the client to their case loads on PiMS (should they not be on there yet TO BE CONFIRMED) and record date of appointment and attendance there. Case notes will be written for the patient file. Recorded when: How: PiMS / patient file / clinicians diary After session. Date of appointment and attendance is recorded in diary and PiMS (what is being chosen as Purpose of session on PiMS?). Case notes are filed in patient file. Any recording should be done within 1 week. Clinician All recording is to be done within 1 week (ie adhering to documentations standards) DNAs and CNAs

DNA/CNA are recorded on PiMS accordingly, by the clinician. It is also noted in front of the patient file for Psychology and on the outpatient sheet for PT (only DNAs). Some clinicians will keep a note of it in their diaries too. : PiMS / patient file / clinicians diary Clinician In the case of a DNA, the clinician will pass this information to the secretary, requesting an opt-in letter to be send out (see procedures for opt-in). Secretaries will send out letter, asking for people to opt-in again. If they don t, within 14 days, they will be discharged. Outcome Measures Clinician is responsible for collecting the data at assessment and last appointment (at discharge), using DASS and CORE34. In Psychology, the clinician will record the scores of the outcome measures on a sheet provided for it, which will be passed on to the secretary at discharge. The secretary will then record the scores in local database, when inputting the discharge information. When: Information sheet / local database At discharge Clinician / Secretary Discharge Clinician discharges from PiMS, sends a discharge letter to GP (copy of which goes in patient file) and - in Psychology - completes a sheet that is handed to Secretary, who records in local database When: Date taken from: PiMS / local database at discharge Clinician / Secretary Discharge letter

More clarity and consistency is needed for when it is recorded and what date is used! Storage of files Current and discharge files are being kept locally (Psychology discharge files in secretary office). Currently, secondary storage space is not available (since moving out of Rosslynlee). The old files are at the REH at the moment, but this is a temporary measure only. It is unclear where their secondary storage will be. The location of the files is usually recorded in PiMS by the secretary (for Psychology) and Medical Records (for PT). Generally, it is important to know whether all of the information above is recorded routinely, coherently and consistently. And establish the reasons for why it isn t should that be the case. To discuss with team leads / teams

Referrals Pre-allocation Secretary records all referrals and date of referral in local database. Medical Records record this on PiMS Allocation (every week) Matrix alignment therapy alignment and therapist alignment are considered and decided upon Referrals Post allocation (2-3 days after allocation) Outcome of allocation meeting is inputted in local database for allocated referrals and in PiMS for inappropriate referrals by secretary. Patient notes are made up for all by secretary. Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Inappropriate Returned to GP / referrer Opt-in (2-3 days after allocation) Secretary records date of the letter sent in local database, sends copy of letter to GP and puts one copy in patient file Appointment letter (2 days after opt-in) Secretary sends out appointment letter, sends one copy to GP and puts copy of it in patient file First appointment / Assessment DNA / CNA Clinician records DNA in diary, on PiMS and in patient file (recorded within 1 week) Secretary records date of first assessment in local database. Clinician records contact in own diary, PiMS and patient file. Matrix level is confirmed and type of therapy decided upon. (All recording done within 1 week) Group Clinician records attendance on PiMS and local database. Clients may go on wait list, depending on start date of group Level 2 Shortterm intervention Clients are usually seen straight away and do not often go on waiting list Level 3 and 4 Longterm intervention Clients go straight on waiting list. The Secretary records this on the local database (within 2-3 days after assessment) DNA / CNA Clinician records this in diary, on PiMS and patient file (within 1 week) Opt-in Secretary sends out letter and records in local database. Copy of letter send to GP and kept in patient file Follow-up appointment Clinician reports contact in diary, on PiMS and patient file (recorded within 1 week) Discharge Clinician discharges client from PiMS and sends discharge letter to GP. Copy of discharge letter in patient file. Secretary records discharge info in local database (recorded within 1 week) Date of discharge should be the date of the discharge letter. Outcome measures Clinician collects data at assessment and last contact and records on information sheet. Secretary records this in local database at discharge

FUTURE STATE A future state information flow diagram was then developed at the meeting and pulled together by the Psychology Assistant directly after the meeting, then circulated for comment. The diagram was then finalised as follows:

Referrals Pre-allocation SCI Gateway sends all referrals directly to Medical Records, who record them on PiMS and then pass them on to PTS (will patient files where possible) Allocation (every week) Matrix alignment, therapy alignment and therapist alignment are considered and decided upon. Referrals Post allocation (2-3 days after allocation) Secretary adds all allocated referrals to team caseload on PiMS and records Matrix level, therapy and therapist alignment there. Inappropriate referrals are recorded on PiMS and returned to GP/referrer. Patient notes are made up for all by secretary. Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Inappropriate Returned to GP / referrer Opt-in (2-3 days after allocation) Secretary records date of letter sent out on PiMS, sends copy of it to GP and puts a copy in patient file. Secretary records whether patient opts in (Yes/No option) on PiMS, discharging opt-outs from team caseload. Appointment letter (2 days after opt-in) Secretary records date of first arranged appointment on PiMS, sends out appointment letter to opt-ins, sends copy to GP and puts copy of it in patient file. DNA / CNA Clinician records DNA in diary, on PiMS and in patient file (recorded within 1 week) First appointment (Assessment) (recorded within 1 week) Clinician notes appointment in own diary, records details of it as contact on PiMS and puts case notes in patient file. Outcome of assessment is recorded on PiMS (waiting list or not level 2,3 or 4 -, group, discharge). Level 2 Short-term intervention Straight into treatment (add to clinician caseload) Level 3 and 4 Longterm intervention Clients go straight on waiting list on PiMS. Group Clinician records all group information on PiMS. Clients may go on wait list, depending on start date of group. Waiting list To be managed by PiMS only. DNA / CNA Clinician records this in diary, on PiMS and patient file (within 1 week) Follow-up appointment (recorded within 1 week) Clinician makes note of appointment in diary, adds patient to their caseload on PiMS, records all details there (attendance; type of therapy) and puts case notes and correspondence in patient file Outcome measures Clinician collects data at assessment and last contact and records scores on PiMS. Opt-in Secretary sends out letter and records on PiMS. Copy of letter send to GP and kept in patient file Discharge (recorded within 1 week) Clinician discharges client from PiMS and sends discharge letter to GP. Copy of discharge letter in patient file. Date of discharge should be the date of the discharge letter.