Jackson MPO Transportation Alternatives (TA)

Similar documents
Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

Lancaster County Smart Growth Transportation Program (Updated March 2017)

2. Transportation Alternatives Program Activities Regulations and Guidelines... 4, 5 & Eligible and Ineligible Items...

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

South Dakota Transportation Alternatives

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

AMERICA BIKES SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAMS SAFETEA LU VS. MAP 21

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Northeast Minnesota Workshop

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for

Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program

OahuMPO Transportation Alternatives Program

Florida s Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Application

LPA Programs How They Work

CITY OF LA CENTER PUBLIC WORKS

Sources of Funding Through MDOT Office of Economic Development

Fiscal Year 2014 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program Application & Guidance

Livability Through Smart Transportation (SMART) Program Guidance

Transportation Alternatives Program 2016 Frequently Asked Questions

Memorandum. Date: May 13, INFORMATION: Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside Implementation Guidance (Revised by the FAST Act)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program 2020 TA PROJECT APPLICATION FORM

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form

SPC SMART and TAP Project Updates

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

PROGRAM GUIDANCE AND PROCEDURES: TRANSPORATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM

2016 Legislative Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE MARCH LANE/EAST BAY MUD BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATH CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS.

Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

TxDOT Statewide 2017 TA Set-Aside Questions & Answers

Tentative Project Schedule. Non-Discrimination i i Laws. Para Preguntas en español

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions

APPENDIX METROFUTURE OVERVIEW OVERVIEW

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

Federal Funding & Project Administration 101. Presented By: Kyle Johnson, P.E. (Bolton & Menk) Dan Erickson, P.E. (Metro District State Aid Engineer)

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Michigan Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

Citizens Advisory Committee May 23, 2012

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

Navigating MAP 21. Securing Federal Funding for Community Walking & Biking Projects

Re: Annual Development of the 2013 to 2016 TIP Project Listing

2017 Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

SMART SCALE Application Guide

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR INSTALLATION & UPGRADE OF BICYCLE FACILITIES (CLASS II & CLASS III) Issued by:

CHAPTER 19 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND REIMBURSEMENT PROCESSING

New Jersey Department of Transportation. Division of Local Aid and Economic Development. Transportation Alternatives Program Handbook 2016

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

New Jersey Department of Transportation. Division of Local Aid and Economic Development. Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside Program Handbook 2018

2014 TRAC Funding Application. Cost ODOT greater than $12 million dollars Increase roadway capacity or reduce congestion.

Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2017) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2017) Application Seminars

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

Florida Department of Transportation 3400 West Commercial Blvd. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook

2018 Guidance TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM. Revised 12/27/17

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

Memorandum June 1, 2017

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

Transportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department

Safety Projects and the Local Agency Program (LAP)

ODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process

Trail Legacy Grants FY2015 Program Manual

Transportation Enhancement Program Sponsor Workshop

Updated August Metro State Aid Payment Guide

Bureau of Rail Freight, Ports and Waterways Grant Program Policy

Youngstown Infrastructure Enhancement Plan. March 1, 2016

Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works David Martin, Director of Planning and Community Development

Memo. Office of State Aid Metro District 1500 West County Rd B2 Roseville, MN Date: April 24, METRO DISTRICT COUNTIES and CITIES

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

Planning Phase (Route Study and Pond Siting Analysis & Report) Determines Preferred Alignment Public Workshop and Board Approval Required Completion:

Contents NATIONAL RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM SPONSOR GUIDELINES MANUAL. Introduction Page 1. Overview Page 2

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING

JARC Grant Application

.?-& Approved as to Fonn. R. ZIEGLER, County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMD~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NUMBER:

Unified Planning Work Program AMENDMENT

EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 9

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION

Georgia DOT Local Maintenance Improvement Grant Program. Todd Long, P.E., Deputy Commissioner

Updated December 2017

ITEM 12 - Information March 18, 2015

Iowa DOT Update 2016 APWA Fall Conference JOHN E. DOSTART, P.E.

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: May 26, 2016

February 12, Request for Proposal Overview Pre-bid Conference

Cass County Rural Task Force Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

The Downtown Revitalization Collaborative

15 1. John Yehall Chin Elementary Safe Routes to School Project;

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

HB2 Application Guide

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

Transcription:

Jackson MPO Transportation Alternatives (TA) The following information must be completed for all Jackson MPO proposed Transportation Alternatives projects. MPO staff will use the information contained in the project application to assign points to proposed projects based on the Project Submittal Guidelines. The establishment of project eligibility and each project score will then be used by the Intermodal Technical Committee and the Metropolitan Planning Policy Committee to program projects to be funded with Jackson MPO TA funds. Applicant Information 1. Project Sponsor 2. Sponsor Contact 3. Telephone 4. Email 5. Mailing Address 6. Partnering Agencies 7. Partnering Agencies Contact Name(s) Project Description 8. Project Title 9. Project Type 10. County 11. Municipality 12. Project Location 13. Detailed Project Description 1

Project Budget 14. Overall Project Budget Description Federal Funds Local Funds Environmental Design Right-of-Way Acquisition Eligible for TA funding Construction Engineering Construction Other, please specify TOTAL Estimated Cost 2

TA Funds Requested Amount % 15. Federal TA Funds Requested 16. Local Match Provided by the Submitting Agency Cannot exceed 80% 17. Match Provided by a Partnering Agency 18. TOTAL for TA Portion of Project 100% 19. Source of Local Funds 20. Date Available 3

Project Schedule 21. Milestone Dates Completion of Preliminary Design Completion of Environmental Clearances Completion of Final Design Initiation of Right-of-Way Plan Review Completion of Right-of-Way Plan Review Initiation of Utilities Relocation Completion of Utilities Relocation Completion of Plans, Specifications and Estimates and/or Authorization for Advertisement Anticipated Construction Advertisement Date or Purchase Date Project Readiness 22. Right-of-Way Acquisition Yes or No 22 a. Does the proposed project require right-of-way acquisition? 22 b. If Yes, has right-of-way acquisition begun? 22 c. What percentage of right-of-way acquisition has been completed? 22 d. If right-of-way acquisition has begun, please provide a brief explanation of the steps completed to date and whether or not it has been approved by MDOT. 23. Utility Relocation Yes or No 23 a. Does the proposed project require utility relocation? 4

23 b. If Yes, has utility relocation begun? 23 c. What percentage of utility relocation has been completed? 23 d. If utility relocation has begun, please provide a brief explanation of the steps completed to date and whether or not it has been approved by MDOT. 24. Project Design Yes or No 24 a. Has final design/engineering been completed and approved by the MDOT? 24 b. Has final design/engineering been completed and approved by local board only? 24 c. If No, to both 24 a. and 24 b., has preliminary design/engineering work begun? 24 d. If Yes to 24 c., please provide a brief description of the work performed to-date. 25. Environmental Yes or No 25 a. Does the proposed project meet a categorical exclusion? 25 b. If No, has the environmental process begun? 25 c. If the environmental process has begun, please provide a brief explanation of the steps completed to-date. 25 d. Has the project received Federal approval for environmental? 5

26. Describe any potential delays that have been identified that would interfere with the schedule for this project or the readiness of the project to proceed to construction. Connectivity 27. a. Existing Bike and Pedestrian Facilities Yes or No Project connects to more than one existing bike and pedestrian facility. Project connects to a single existing bike and pedestrian facility. Project does not connect to any existing bike and pedestrian facilities. 27. b. Public Transportation Yes or No Project improves access to more than one existing transit service location/stop Project improves access to a single transit service location/stop Project does not improve access to a transit service location/stop 27. c. Schools Yes or No Livability Project improves access to more than one school Project improves access to a single school Project does not improve access to schools 28. Type of Facility Yes or No Proposed facility to be built is a bike path/separate facility Proposed facility to be built is a paved shoulder Proposed facility to be built is a striped bike lane Proposed facility to be built is a signed bike route 6

29. Enhances Landscaping Yes or No 29. a. Project improves visual environment through the inclusion of vegetation management practices (Must comply with FHWA guidelines) 29. b. If yes, please list in detail vegetation to be included in development of project. 30. Includes Support Facilities Yes or No 30. a. The proposed project includes one or more support facilities. 30. b. If yes, please list in detail support facilities to be included in development of project. 7