NOTE BY THE SECRETARY. to the NORTH ATLANTIC DEFENSE COMMITTEE THE STRATEGIC CONCEPT FOR THE DEFENCE OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC AREA

Similar documents
9. Guidance to the NATO Military Authorities from the Defence Planning Committee 1967

FINAL DECISION ON MC 48/2. A Report by the Military Committee MEASURES TO IMPLEMENT THE STRATEGIC CONCEPT

NATO's Nuclear Forces in the New Security Environment

NATO UNCLASSIFIED. 6 January 2016 MC 0472/1 (Final)

THE ESTONIAN DEFENCE FORCES

SACT s remarks at the ACT 15 th Anniversary Flag Raising Ceremony Norfolk, 13 June 2018

Wales Summit Declaration

The main tasks and joint force application of the Hungarian Air Force

December 21, 2004 NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE NSPD-41 HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE HSPD-13

UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified

Student Guide: Introduction to Army Foreign Disclosure and Contact Officers

SACT s remarks to UN ambassadors and military advisors from NATO countries. New York City, 18 Apr 2018

WEAPONS TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES Agreement Between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROMANIA

U.S. Pacific Command NDIA Science & Engineering Technology Conference

Reconsidering the Relevancy of Air Power German Air Force Development

PART ONE THE AMPHIBIOUS OPERATION CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

The State Defence Concept Executive Summary

Cyber Strategy & Policy: International Law Dimensions. Written Testimony Before the Senate Armed Services Committee

MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA. The State Defence Concept

Partners for a Compatible Future NAF El Centro

Adopted by the Security Council at its 4987th meeting, on 8 June 2004

Frameworks for Responses to Armed Attack Situations

The 19th edition of the Army s capstone operational doctrine

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Restructuring and Modernization of the Romanian Armed Forces for Euro-Atlantic Integration Capt.assist. Aurelian RAŢIU

CONCLUDING ACT OF THE NEGOTIATION ON PERSONNEL STRENGTH OF CONVENTIONAL ARMED FORCES IN EUROPE

Foreign Policy and Homeland Security

Revising the National Strategy for Homeland Security

National Armed Forces Law

Statement by. Brigadier General Otis G. Mannon (USAF) Deputy Director, Special Operations, J-3. Joint Staff. Before the 109 th Congress

OPNAVINST C N2/N6 31 Mar Subj: UNITED STATES NAVAL COOPERATION AND GUIDANCE FOR SHIPPING

HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-4. Subject: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

New Opportunities and Challenges (Ver. 2.0)

*Note: An update of the English text of this Act is being prepared. Text in Bulgarian: Закон за отбраната и въоръжените сили на Република България

GLOSSARY - M Last Updated: 6 November 2015 ABBREVIATIONS

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures

The United States Enters the War Ch 23-3

SA ARMY SEMINAR 21. The Revision of the South African Defence Review and International Trends in Force Design: Implications for the SA Army

December 17, 2003 Homeland Security Presidential Directive/Hspd-8

LESSON 2: THE U.S. ARMY PART 1 - THE ACTIVE ARMY

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

Enhancing Multinational Force Capability through Standardization and Interoperability

Decree No of 5 October 1972 for the Peacetime Regulation of the Passage of Foreign Warships through the Territorial Waters and of their Calls

Preamble. The Czech Republic and the United States of America (hereafter referred to as the Parties ):

THE MILITARY STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA

National Defence Headquarters Ottawa, Ontario KI A OK2. Quartler general de la Defense nationale Ottawa (Ontario) K1AOK2

Headline Goal approved by General Affairs and External Relations Council on 17 May 2004 endorsed by the European Council of 17 and 18 June 2004

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM US ARMY AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE OPERATIONS

3. Subsequently at its 12th Session on 9 December 1955 the Military Committee approved M.C. 48/1, subject to one amendment.

DSMA NOTICE 01. Military Operations, Plans & Capabilities

GAO. OVERSEAS PRESENCE More Data and Analysis Needed to Determine Whether Cost-Effective Alternatives Exist. Report to Congressional Committees

Information Operations

Annual Report 2015 Japan's Actions against Piracy off the Coast of Somalia and in the Gulf of Aden

National Security Policy: American National Security Policy 1

A FUTURE MARITIME CONFLICT

SS.7.C.4.3 Describe examples of how the United States has dealt with international conflicts.

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Postwar America ( ) Lesson 3 The Cold War Intensifies

Cyber Operations in the Canadian Armed Forces. Master Warrant Officer Alex Arndt. Canadian Forces Network Operations Centre

SERIES 1300 DIRECTOR, DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (DDR&E) DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (NC )

K Security Assurances

Airspace Control in the Combat Zone

NATO MEASURES ON ISSUES RELATING TO THE LINKAGE BETWEEN THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM AND THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

SECNAVINST B OJAG (Code 10) 27 Dec Subj: LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT (LAW OF WAR) PROGRAM TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE BY THE NAVAL ESTABLISHMENT

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD(P))

Statements and Addresses by President Lyndon B. Johnson leading to:

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Introduction. General Bernard W. Rogers, Follow-On Forces Attack: Myths lnd Realities, NATO Review, No. 6, December 1984, pp. 1-9.

Chapter 6 Canada at War

Contemporary Warfare and Current Issues for the Defense of the Country

TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS ON THE LIMITATION OF ANTI-BALLISTIC MISSILE SYSTEMS

PUBLIC LAW OCT. 1, 1986

HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE 19

FORWARD, READY, NOW!

European Parliament Nov 30, 2010

ALLIED JOINT PUBLICATION FOR OPERATIONS PLANNING (AJP 5) AS NEW CHALLENGES FOR MILITARY PLANNERS

L Security Assurances

Draft Rules for the Limitation of the Dangers incurred by the Civilian Population in Time of War. ICRC, 1956 PREAMBLE

A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.2

LOS ANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT BUILT ENVIRONMENT HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCE POLICY

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Participation in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Infrastructure Program

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Navy Medicine. Commander s Guidance

On 21 November, Ukraine

Estonian Defence Forces Organisation Act

Organization of Marine Corps Forces

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

FM AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY BRIGADE OPERATIONS

Source: Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents (May 14, 2007), v.43 n.19, p

Bridging the Security Divide

THE GROWING IMPORTANCE OF THE MARITIME (AS DELIVERED) 22 OCTOBER 2015 I. INTRO A. THANK YOU ALL FOR HAVING ME HERE TODAY, IT S A PRIVILEGE TO SPEAK

AIR POWER DEFINITIONS AND TERMS

OPNAVINST G N514 8 Jan Subj: RELEASE OF INFORMATION ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND ON NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES OF U.S. NAVY FORCES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Mon. April 18 Unit 3

Unit Six: Canada Matures: Growth in the Post-War Period ( )

ASSIGNMENT An element that enables a seadependent nation to project its political, economic, and military strengths seaward is known as 1-5.

Transcription:

1 December 1949 Pages 1-7, incl. NOTE BY THE SECRETARY to the NORTH ATLANTIC DEFENSE COMMITTEE on THE STRATEGIC CONCEPT FOR THE DEFENCE OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC AREA The enclosed report is a revision of DC 6 as approved by the North Atlantic Defense Committee at its meeting on 1 Decembr 1949. C.H. DONNELLY, Colonel, USA Secretary - 1 - NATO Strategy Documents 1949-1969 5 7

5 8 NATO Strategy Documents 1949-1969

ENCLOSURE STRATEGIC CONCEPT FOR THE DEFENSE OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC AREA I PREAMBLE 1. The attainment of the objectives of the North Atlantic Treaty requires the integration by the parties to the Treaty of those political, economic, and psychological, as well as purely military means, which are essential to the defense of the North Atlantic area. Of particular significance is the requirement that the objectives of the North Atlantic Treaty be accomplished in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations. The parties to the Atlantic Treaty have declared: They are determined to safeguard the freedom, common heritage, and civilization of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty, and the rule of law. They seek to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic Area. The are resolved to unite their efforts for collective defense and for the preservation of peace and security. 2. For the purpose of, first, preventing war, and, second, insuring in the event of war the effective application of the military and industrial strength of the Treaty nations in a common defense, the military means available to the nations of the North Atlantic Treaty must be effectively coordinated. As a basis for such coordination a common strategic concept for the defense of the North Atlantic area must serve as the - 2 - NATO Strategy Documents 1949-1969 5 9

keystone for the plans of the Military Committee and the Regional Planning Groups. It is the purpose of this document to outline a broad concept for the over-all defense of the North Atlantic area. 3. This broad concept is built on considerations of geographical position, industrial capacity, population, and the military capabilities of the Treaty nations, and recognizing that each nation s contributions should be in proportion to these considerations. The objective is adequate military strength accompanied by economy of effort, resources and manpower. It is desirable that each nation develop its military strength to the maximum extent consistent with over-all strategic plans in order to provide for its own defense and to participate in the common defense. 4. This concept is the initial step in the initiation of realistic, vital and productive defense planning aimed at securing peace and lessening the possibility of aggression. It is aimed at providing the basic strategic guidance needed by the regional planning groups in order to assure coordinated planning in consonance with the principles set forth in Title II below. The measures required to implement this concept will require constant review. II NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY DEFENSE PRINCIPLES 5. Certain general principles are recognized as underlying the North Atlantic Treaty defensive organizations. These principles are accepted as fundamental to the successful functioning of the organization and the development of a common defense program. As such, those applicable to defense planning are set out in the following paragraphs as an integral part of the basic guidance for regional planning groups. - 3-6 0 NATO Strategy Documents 1949-1969

(a) The main principle is common action in defense against armed attack through self-help and mutual aid. The immediate objective is the achievement of arrangements for collective self-defense among the Atlantic Treaty nations. (b) In accordance with the general objective of Article 3 of the North Atlantic Treaty, each nation will contribute in the most effective form, consistent with its situation, responsibilities and resources, such aid as can reasonably be expected of it. (c) In developing their military strength consistent with overall strategic plans the participating nations should bear in mind that economic recovery and the attainment of economic stability constitute important elements of their security. (d) The armed forces of those nations so located as to permit mutual support in the event of aggression should be developed on a coordinated basis in order that they can operate most economically and efficiently in accordance with a common strategic plan. (e) A successful defense of the North Atlantic Treaty nations through maximum efficiency of their armed forces, with the minimum necessary expenditures of manpower, money and materials, is the goal of defense planning. (f) A basic principle of North Atlantic Treaty planning should be that each nation should undertake the task, or tasks, for which it is best suited. Certain nations, because of the geographic location or because of their capabilities, will appropriate specific missions. - 4 - NATO Strategy Documents 1949-1969 6 1

III OBJECTIVES OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY DEFENSIVE CONCEPT 6. The purpose of the North Atlantic Treaty defensive organization is to unite the strength of the North Atlantic Treaty nations in order to promote the preservation of peace and to provide for the security of the North Atlantic area. The general objectives of the defensive concept are: (a) To coordinate, in time of peace, our military and economic strength with a view to creating a powerful deterrent to any nation or group of nations threatening the peace, independence and stability of the North Atlantic family of nations. (b) To develop plans, for use in the event of war, which will provide for the combined employment of military forces available to the North Atlantic nations to counter enemy threats, to defend and maintain the peoples and home territories of the North Atlantic Treaty nations and the security of the North Atlantic Treaty area. IV MILITARY MEASURES TO IMPLEMENT DEFENSE CONCEPT Basic Undertakings 7. Over-all defense plans must provide in advance of war emergency, specifically for the following basic undertakings in furtherance of the common objective to defend the North Atlantic area. The successful conduct of these undertakings should be assured by close coordination of military action as set forth in over-all plans. (a) Insure the ability to carry out strategic bombing promptly by all means possible with all types of weapons, without exception. This is primarily a U.S. responsibility assisted as practicable by other nations. (b) Arrest and counter as soon as practicable the enemy offensives against North Atlantic Treaty powers by all means - 5-6 2 NATO Strategy Documents 1949-1969

available, including air, naval, land and psychological operations. Initially, the hard core of ground forces will come from the European nations. Other nations will give aid with the least possible delay and in accordance with over-all plans. (c) Neutralize as soon as practicable enemy air operations against North Atlantic Treaty powers. In this undertaking the European nations should initially provide the bulk of the tactical air support and air defense; other nations aiding with the least possible delay in accordance with over-all plans. (d) Secure and control sea and air lines of communication, and ports and harbors, essential to the implementation of common defense plans. The defense and control of sea and air LOC s will be performed through common cooperation in accordance with each nation s capabilities and agreed responsibilities. In this regard it is recognized that the United States and United Kingdom will be primarily responsible for the organization and control of ocean lines of communication. Other nations will secure and maintain their own harbor defenses and coastal LOC s and participate in the organization and control of vital LOC s to their territories as may be indicated in over-all plans. (e) Secure, maintain and defend such main support areas, air bases, naval bases and other facilities as are essential to the successful accomplishment of the basic undertaking. These undertakings will be a responsibility of the nations having sovereignty over these essential bases, areas and facilities, aided as necessary and to the extent set forth in collective defense plans. (f) Mobilize and expand the over-all power of the Treaty nations in accordance with their planned contribution to later offensive operations designed to maintain security of the North Atlantic Treaty area. - 6 - NATO Strategy Documents 1949-1969 6 3

Cooperative Measures 8. The essence of our over-all concept is to develop a maximum of strength through collective defense planning. As a prerequisite to the successful implementation of common plans, it is recognized that certain cooperative measures must be undertaken in advance. These measures are: (a) Standardization, insofar as practicable, of military doctrines and procedures. (b) Conduct of combined training exercises, when deemed desirable. (c) Compilation and exchange of intelligence information and data peculiar to the conduct of contemplated Atlantic Treaty organization defense planning and operations resulting therefrom. (d) Cooperation in the construction, maintenance, and operation of military installations of mutual concern, in conformity with the agreements between the interested countries. (e) Standardization of maintenance, repair, and service facilities which will be of mutual concern in the event contemplated defense plans have to be implemented. (f) Standardization, insofar as practicable, of military material and equipment for use in operations as developed by common defense plans. (g) Collective cooperation in arranging for military operating arrangements mutually agreed between countries in peacetime, in furtherance of common defense requirements. (h) Cooperation, within the legal limitations and administrative restrictions of each country, in research and development of new weapons and in the development of new methods of warfare. (i) Cooperation, insofar as is practicable, in planning for the conduct of psychological and other special operations. - 7-6 4 NATO Strategy Documents 1949-1969