Analysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

Similar documents
Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157)

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK

In Brief: Highlights of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act

Nuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

1 Nuclear Weapons. Chapter 1 Issues in the International Community. Part I Security Environment Surrounding Japan

Missile Defense: Time to Go Big

Setting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization. By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February

FY 2008 NNSA Budget Request Overview

Physics 280: Session 29

STATEMENT J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

Current Budget Issues

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL: THE END OF HISTORY?

FISCAL YEAR 2012 DOD BUDGET

Other Defense Spending

THE FUTURE OF U.S.-RUSSIAN ARMS CONTROL

Ready to Profit: Corporate Beneficiaries of Congressional Add-Ons to 1. the FY 2018 Pentagon Budget

mm*. «Stag GAO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Information on Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and Other Theater Missile Defense Systems 1150%

May 8, 2018 NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM/NSPM-11

The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going forward

CRS Report for Con. The Bush Administration's Proposal For ICBM Modernization, SDI, and the B-2 Bomber

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release December 5, 2016

Congress Fails to Undo President Obama s Damage on Missile Defense

What if the Obama Administration Changes US Nuclear Policy? Potential Effects on the Strategic Nuclear War Plan

Arms Control Today. Arms Control and the 1980 Election

BUDGET UNCERTAINTY AND MISSILE DEFENSE

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

Media Backgrounder: Nuclear Weapons and the Foreign Policy Debate

Indefensible Missile Defense

Russian Compliance with the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty: Background and Issues for Congress

AMERICA S ARMY: THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION AS OF: AUGUST

NATO's Nuclear Forces in the New Security Environment

US Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message

Issue Briefs. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More Published on Arms Control Association (

APPENDIX 1. Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty A chronology

V. Chinese nuclear forces

Russian Compliance with the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty: Background and Issues for Congress

Policy Responses to Nuclear Threats: Nuclear Posturing After the Cold War

FY16 Senate Armed Services National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)

Reducing the waste in nuclear weapons modernization

PENTAGON SPENDING AT HISTORICALLY HIGH LEVELS FOR OVER A DECADE

1. INSPECTIONS AND VERIFICATION Inspectors must be permitted unimpeded access to suspect sites.

Achieving the Vision of a World Free of Nuclear Weapons International Conference on Nuclear Disarmament, Oslo February

Russian Compliance with the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty: Background and Issues for Congress

A Ready, Modern Force!

Department of Energy's FY 2017 Nuclear Weapons Budget Request

Cooperative Threat Reduction

Phased Adaptive Approach Overview For The Atlantic Council

US-Russian Nuclear Disarmament: Current Record and Possible Further Steps 1. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov

Arms Control and Proliferation Profile: The United Kingdom

Modernization of US Nuclear Forces: Costs in Perspective

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy (ASD(ISP))

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD(P))

Russia s New Conventional Capability

COMMUNICATION OF 14 MARCH 2000 RECEIVED FROM THE PERMANENT MISSION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY

Perspectives on the 2013 Budget Request and President Obama s Guidance on the Future of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program

Russian defense industrial complex s possibilities for development of advanced BMD weapon systems

THE NUCLEAR WORLD IN THE EARLY 21 ST CENTURY

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

AMERICA S ARMY: THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION Army G-3/5/7. AS OF: August 2010 HQDA G-35 (DAMO-SSD)

Also this week, we celebrate the signing of the New START Treaty, which was ratified and entered into force in 2011.

HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-4. Subject: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

Italy s Nuclear Anniversary: Fake Reassurance For a King s Ransom

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

SUB Hamburg A/ Nuclear Armament. GREENHAVEN PRESS A part of Gale, Cengage Learning. GALE CENGAGE Learning-

Ladies and gentlemen, it is a pleasure to once again six years for me now to

ARMS CONTROL, SECURITY COOPERATION AND U.S. RUSSIAN RELATIONS

Banning Ballistic Missiles? Missile Control for a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World

Joint Statement for the Record

U.S. Nuclear Policy and World Nuclear Situation

Extending NASA s Exemption from the Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act

Russian Compliance with the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty: Background and Issues for Congress

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT POLICY BEYOND THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES UNITED STATES SENATE

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN Steven Pifer Senior Fellow Director, Arms Control Initiative October 10, 2012

Future Russian Strategic Challenges Mark B.Schneider

GREAT DECISIONS WEEK 8 NUCLEAR SECURITY

Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES. for FY 2011 and beyond

Arms Control Today. U.S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance

SEC UNIFORM STANDARDS FOR THE INTERROGATION OF PERSONS UNDER THE DETENTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

NPT/CONF.2015/PC.I/WP.12*

MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018

FORWARD, READY, NOW!

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

Statement by Ambassador Linton F. Brooks Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration U. S. Department of Energy Before the

Use of Military Force Authorization Language in the 2001 AUMF

Report of the United States of America. Pursuant to Actions 5, 20, and 21. of the NPT Review Conference Final Document

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Management of Environmental Compliance at Overseas Installations

Legislative Report. President s Budget Request for Fiscal Year 2018 OVERVIEW. As of June 8, 2017

Testimony before the House Committee on International Relations Hearing on the US-India Global Partnership and its Impact on Non- Proliferation

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

President Obama and National Security

Trusted Partner in guided weapons

LEGISLATIVE REPORT. U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations Fiscal Year 2018 Defense Appropriations (H.R. 3219)

Steven Pifer on the China-U.S.-Russia Triangle and Strategy on Nuclear Arms Control

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

Missile Defense Program Overview For The European Union, Committee On Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee On Security And Defence

Transcription:

Analysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR 2810 Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions A. Treaties: 1. Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty House: Sections 1243 and 1244: Authorizes $25 million to establish a program of record to develop a conventional road-mobile ground-launched cruise missile system that, if tested or deployed, would violate the INF Treaty. Senate: Section 1635: Authorizes $65 million to establish a program of record for research and development of a dual-capable road-mobile ground-launched missile system that, if tested or deployed, would violate the INF Treaty. This section also requires a report to be issued by the Secretary of Defense within 120 days of enactment before any appropriations are authorized. Conference: Section 1243: Establishes a program of record to develop a conventional road mobile ground-launched cruise missile with a range of between 500 and 5,500 km, including research and development activities for such cruise missile system. Authorizes $58 million for active defense, counterforce and countervailing strike defenses to respond to Russian INF actions. House: Section 1245: If Russia remains in violation of INF Treaty, Article VI of the INF Treaty (which prohibits production or flight-testing of any INF-range missiles) is no longer binding law of the United States. Conference: Section 1243: Expresses the sense of Congress, rather than a statement of policy, that 1) the Russian Federation s violation of the INF Treaty constitutes material breach and sense of Congress, and 2) the U.S. is legally entitled to suspend operation of the INF Treaty. 2. Open Skies Treaty House: Section 1235: Restricts funding for implementation of the Open Skies Treaty until the President submits a plan that includes objectives for all planned U.S. flights under the treaty for a fiscal year. 1

Conference: Section 1235: Fences funding for new flights pending a Presidential certification of a plan for flights and limits modifications of aircraft for purposes of implementing the Open Skies Treaty 3. New Strategic Arms Reductions Treaty (New START) House: Section 1246: Prevents funding to extend New START beyond 2021 unless Russia has verifiably come back into compliance with the INF Treaty. Conference: Drops House provision. 4. Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) House: Section 1270A: Restricts funding for the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), except for the International Monitoring System (IMS). Conference: Section 1279E: Bars U.S. funding for the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, allowing only funding for the International Monitoring System and disseminating related analysis. B. General Nuclear: 1. Ground Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD) House: Section 1671: Prohibits funding to retain the option for, or develop, a mobile variant of GBSD. Conference: Section 1663: Accepts House provision but restricts prohibition to fiscal year 2017 2019. 2. Intercontinental ballistic missiles House: Bars any reductions in numbers below 400, alert levels or responsiveness of intercontinental ballistic missiles. Conference: Section 1664: Accepts House provision. 2

C. Non-Proliferation: 1. HEU to LEU Reactors House: Section 3116: Authorizes $5 million for research and development to develop an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium from funds authorized from nonproliferation. Conference: Section 3115: Authorizes $5 million and up to $30 million more. 2. Nuclear Security Cooperation with Russia House: Section 3117: Restricts funding to work with Russia on nuclear security, unless the Secretary of Energy, with the concurrence of the Secretaries of State and Defense, certifies that a nuclear-related threat has arisen in Russia. Conference: Section 3122: Accepts House position. 3. Non-Proliferation Program Budgetary Differences (in Thousands of Dollars) Red=Lower Program House Senate Conference International 46,339 66,339 46,339 Nuclear Security Radiological 146,340 166,340 166,340 Security Nuclear 139,429 204,429 139,429 Smuggling Detection Nuclear Material 37,925 32,925 32,925 Removal Nonproliferation 129,703 200,000 129,703 and Arms Control Defense Nuclear 451,095 446,095 451,095 Nonproliferation R&D Low Enriched Uranium R&D for Naval Reactors 5,000 0 5,000 3

D. Missile Defense: 1. Ground-based Midcourse Defense House: Section 1699 F: Authorizes the increase of Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) interceptors by up to 28. Senate: Section 1653: Similar provision, but this section takes an additional step by mandating that the Secretary of Defense deploys 14 additional interceptors by December 31, 2021 as soon as technically feasible. Conference: Section 1686: Authorizes 28 new interceptors if consistent with the recommendations of the ongoing Ballistic Missile Defense Review and asks for a plan to field up to 104 interceptors. Section 1689: requires a fly before you buy approach to adequately test and assess the elements of the ballistic missile defense system before final production decisions or operational deployment 2. Space-based missile defense House: Section 1690: Requires development of a space-based ballistic missile intercept layer, establishing a space test bed for space-based ballistic missile intercept, and submitting a plan to develop a space-based ballistic missile intercept layer. Conference: Section 1688: If it is consistent with the direction or recommendations of the ongoing Ballistic Missile Defense Review, requires the development of a space-based ballistic missile intercept layer to the ballistic missile defense system capable of providing boost-phase defense and establishing a spaced test bed. E. MOX (Mixed Oxide Fuel) House: Section 3119: Requires continuation of the MOX facility, but provides a waiver for the Secretary of Energy, pending certification that there is an alternate, viable option that minimizes risks and that costs half the remaining lifecycle costs of the MOX system. Senate: Requires the Secretary of Energy to carry out construction and project support activities for the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility, but provides a waiver for the Secretary of Energy if he certifies an alternative option for plutonium disposition. Conference: Section 3121: Requires construction of the MOX facility unless the Secretary of Energy certifies an alternative plan that disposes as much plutonium as the present planned facility, ensures a sustainable future for the Savannah River site and the alternative would be less than half the current estimated life cycle costs. 4

Other Major Provisions Total funding in the bill National Defense Function 050 $700 billion Departments of Defense and Energy base budgets Overseas Contingency Operations Defense-related activities Total funding for Missile Defense Agency Increase from President s request Budget Control Act ceiling for Fiscal Year 2018 $626.4 billion $65.8 billion $7.9 billion $12.3 billion $26.1 billion $549.1 billion New ceiling subject to House-Senate negotiations later in the year. The Administration s base budget request for FY2018 was a net of $51.3 billion higher than the amount appropriated in FY2017. It also was $54 billion above the Budget Control Act limit. The H.R. 2819 conference report is about $77 billion above the budget caps. Major conventional weapon increases above the Administration s request 90 Joint Strike Fighters $10.1 billion increase of $2.6 billion and 20 more aircraft 17 KC-46A tankers $2.9 billion increase of $400 million and 2 tankers 24 F/A-18 Super Hornets $1.9 billion increase of $739 million and 10 aircraft 10 P-8A Poseidon aircraft $1.8 billion increase of $507 million and 3 aircraft 12 V-22 Osprey aircraft $1.2 billion increase of $522 million and 6 aircraft 14 various battle force ships $26.2 billion increase $6.3 billion and 5 battle force ships 5

Other provisions of interest Section 1025: Codifies the Navy s goal of a 355 ship force, up from 280 today Sections 1034 & 1035: Prohibits funding to construct or modify facilities to house detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, or to transfer or release of individuals detained at the prison. Section 2702: Prohibits a new round of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Fully supports modernization of U.S. nuclear triad $4.6 billion for European Defense Initiative to reassure NATO allies and enhance U.S. forces in Europe $350 million for Ukraine security assistance $1.8 billion to counter ISIS through train and equip programs in Iraq and Syria $5.0 billion for Afghanistan security forces fund $324.6 million for cooperative threat reduction Increases troop end strength over Fiscal 2017 levels by 20,300 Rejects House proposal to establish a Space Corps 6