How does today s reality meet with expectations or concerns from the INSPIRE Preparatory Phase?

Similar documents
1 of Webmaster WHY INSPIRE? WHAT'S NEW OPEN LETTER KEEP INFORMED / REGISTER REQUEST FOR EXPERTS

INSPIRE on the digital agenda in Denmark

New opportunities of regional /multilateral RTD cooperation The Southeast European (SEE) ERA-NET project

Open Data best practices: HOMER, Italy and Regione Piemonte

CALL FICHE 1 SCIENCE IN SOCIETY 2009

Intra-Africa Academic Mobility Scheme. Workshop 2 Promotion and Selection EACEA A.3. Elena PALAVROVA

Current and future standardization issues in the e Health domain: Achieving interoperability. Executive Summary

Brussels, 10 November 2003 COUNCIL THE EUROPEAN UNION 14487/03 TELECOM 144. REPORT from : COREPER date : 7 November 2003

CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE CREATION OF UP TO 25 TRANSFER NETWORKS

High Level Pharmaceutical Forum

21-26 of October 2012: Co-Cities demonstrations at the 19th ITS World Congress in Vienna Validate mobility services with Co-Cities

Deliverable N.: 7.4 & 7.5

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Report on the interim evaluation of the «Daphne III Programme »

2005 ACTIVITY REPORT

Open data and then what? - A Danish view on gains, pains and other experiences

Joint Operational Programme Romania Republic of Moldova

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

SocialChallenges.eu Call for grants 2 nd Cut-off date

Funding Opportunities in Europe for US based researchers

The BASREC CCS NETWORK INITIATIVE

eten View of a Participant

ERA-NET ERA-NET. Cooperation and coordination of national or regional research and innovation activities (i.e. programmes)

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

EUCERD RECOMMENDATIONS on RARE DISEASE EUROPEAN REFERENCE NETWORKS (RD ERNS)

CAPACITIES WORK PROGRAMME PART 3. (European Commission C (2011) 5023 of 19 July 2011) REGIONS OF KNOWLEDGE

Report on Developed Tools for Joint Activities

Deliverable 3.3b: Evaluation of the call procedure

III. The provider of support is the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (hereafter just TA CR ) seated in Prague 6, Evropska 2589/33b.

REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Bilateral screening: Chapter 1 Free Movement of Goods. C L P Classification, Labeling and Packaging of substances and mixtures

Ministerial declaration of the high-level segment submitted by the President of the Council

Bilateral screening: Chapter 27 PRESENTATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures - CLP

STDF MEDIUM-TERM STRATEGY ( )

MANUFUTURE Göteborg, Sweden Nov 30th - Dec 1st Presentation of the CLUSTERPLAST Project

1. Address by Dr. Chris SAID, Parliamentary Secretary for Consumers, Fair Competition and Public Dialogue

Horizon 2020 Excellent Science Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) European Research Council Grants (ERC)

CAPACITIES PROVISIONAL 1 WORK PROGRAMME 2007 PART 2. (European Commission C(2006) 6849) RESEARCH FOR THE BENEFIT OF SMES

ERC THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH COUNCIL

CEF Telecom calls , , & : the evaluation process

KONNECT 1 st PERIODIC REPORT

Support for Applied Research in Smart Specialisation Growth Areas. Chapter 1 General Provisions

The European Research Council Expert Group (ERCEG)

WORK PROGRAMME 2012 CAPACITIES PART 2 RESEARCH FOR THE BENEFIT OF SMES. (European Commission C (2011)5023 of 19 July)

CAPACITIES WORK PROGRAMME (European Commission C(2009)5905 of 29 July 2009)

UNOV / UNICRI Call for Proposals Guidelines for grant applicants

ISEC & JPEN. Financial Instruments of the EC DG JLS

We cordially invite you to submit project proposals for ASA-Kommunal 2015 by 15 July 2014.

APRE Agency for the promotion of European Research. Introduction to FP7 & Rules for participation in the Seventh Framework Programme ( )

Plan of Action for the Information Society in Latin America and the Caribbean elac 2007

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Research Data Alliance from an international and European angle

ERC Grant Schemes. Horizon 2020 European Union funding for Research & Innovation

e-government the state of play

a guide to re-evaluation

1. PUBLISHABLE SUMMARY

Special Edition on 5 New ESPON Calls

CALL FOR PROPOSALS. GRANT FOR ROMACT "SUPPORT ORGANISATIONS" IN SLOVAKIA SRSGRoma/SPU/2017/27. Joint EU/CoE Projects ROMACT3 and ROMACT4

Jean Monnet Networks (policy debate with the academic world)

Guide. urofunding KEYS TO FULLY UNDERSTAND EUROPEAN SUBSIDIES FOR Eurofunding is a Welcomeurope service

ACP-EU Water Facility

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES AND TECHNIQUES. Unit 14.c: PROJECT PROPOSAL PREPARATION - EXAMPLES = IMS & ISSS examples =

2014 GSDI Small Grant Project Final Report

ERC grant management: Recommendations from LERU

Council, 25 September 2014

Sustainable Use of Regional funds - for Nature.

ICRI 2018 Parallel Session 1 - Internationalisation of Research Infrastructures. Maud Evrard (Rapporteur) Head of Policy Affairs / Science Europe

EU-CELAC Joint Initiative on Research and Innovation (JIRI) VI Senior Official Meeting (SOM) on Science and Technology. Brussels, 14 th March 2017

CALL FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST. Seconded National Experts for the ERCEA ERCEA/SNE/143/2017

Standards and Research : a key issue for

Summary Report IUCN Regional Conservation Forum Europe, North and Central Asia 1, Helsinki, December 2015

Introduction to Call for FFU Proposals, Information meetings for applicants April-May 2014 Dar es Salaam, Kathmandu, Accra and Copenhagen

Terms of Reference Mobility Grants Facilitation of Researchers Mobility Supported by INCONET-GCC2

Patient Safety & Quality JA PaSQ

The Helsinki Manifesto We have to move fast, before it is too late.

The R&D strategy in Luxembourg

OPEN CALL FOR PROJECT TEAM EXPERTS European Standard for Patient Summary

Towards faster implementation and uptake of open government

Message from the ESPON Coordination Unit. ESPON Activities in 2013

The European Research Council. ERC and Greece. FP7 achievements and H2020 results. January Theodore PAPAZOGLOU ERCEA Head of Unit A.

Innovation in the Rural Development Networks. Matthias Langemeyer & Iman Boot Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development

Table Of Content. Strengthening voluntary cooperation between Member States to improve the health of EU citizens... 2 Summary... 3 Work Package...

EIT: Synergies and complementarities with EU regional policy

CALL FOR THEMATIC EXPERTS

Date of Publication: 13 December Deadline for tenders: 17 January 2018

Governance and Sustainability of EOSC Ambitions, Challenges and Opportunities

Education and Training Committee, 5 June 2014

The budget for this call is indicative. The final budget awarded to actions implemented through the call for proposals may vary:

ANNUAL WORK PROGRAMME FOR GRANTS 2015 of the Office of the European Union Representative (West Bank, Gaza Strip and UNRWA)

Copernicus Incubation Programme

UNOV / UNICRI Call for Proposals Guidelines for grant applicants

PEOPLE WORK PROGRAMME (European Commission C(2008)4483 of 22 August 2008)

Building European Good Practices through the Member Organisation Fora for Peer Review and Evaluation

HORIZON The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. Which option is best for me? Mary Kavanagh

WORK PROGRAMME 2010 CAPACITIES PART 5 SCIENCE IN SOCIETY. (European Commission C(2009)5905 of 29 July 2009)

THE ACQUIS COMMUNAUTAIRE & DIRECTIVE 2005/36/EC, amended by 2013/55/EU

Research Infrastructures Draft Work Programme

ERN Assessment Manual for Applicants

Call for organisations to cooperate with EIT Health as EIT Health Hubs within the EIT Regional Innovation Scheme 2018

MULTI-ANNUAL WORK PROGRAMME FOR GRANTS IN THE AREA OF COMMUNICATION 1 PERIOD COVERED:

Call for the expression of interest Selection of six model demonstrator regions to receive advisory support from the European Cluster Observatory

Draft outline of the Asia-Pacific Plan of Action for Space Applications ( ) **

Transcription:

How does today s reality meet with expectations or concerns from the INSPIRE Preparatory Phase? Eva Pauknerova, Ph.D. Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre (CUZK) 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 1

Presentation outline 1. Today s perspective (2013) by the Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre (NMCA) 2. Users perspective at the INSPIRE preparatory phase 3. Comparison and conclusions 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 2

Czech Republic parliamentary democracy EU member since 2004 10.5 million inhabitants 14 regions 6252 municipalities 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 3

1. Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre (CUZK) Recent view based on experiences or needs related to: Implementating INSPIRE within the re-newal of Czech e-government RUIAN - Base Registers deal with the authoritative location Being a part of the national coordination structure, but NOT the NCP for INSPIRE Czech NSDI in transition the GeoInfoStrategy the European Location Framework (ELF project) 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 4

CUZK central authority for the Cadastre of Real Estate; provider of related information services 780 million user e-accesses in 2012 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 5

CUZK and ZU data and services effected by both, PSI and INSPIRE Directives Key information systems: ISKN Information System of the Cadastre of Real Estates; RUIAN - Base Register of Territorial Identification, Addresses and Real Estates; ZABAGED Key words: spatial data for e-government; base register(s); public on-line access (VDP) to authoritative data INSPIRE compliant data for CP, HY, GN, AU, AD Two modes for reaching compliance with the INSPIRE DSs http://geoportal.cuzk.cz 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 6

26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 7

RÚIAN and Czech Base Register(s) The Register of Territorial Identification, Addresses and Real Estates (RÚIAN) was launched by CUZK successfully on 1-7-2012. RUIAN represents one of four Base Registers supporting public agendas and services in the Czech Republic. Deployed 24x7, it provides up-to-date information on selected territory: for viewing by the public and open data for further re-use. RUIAN is a significant element of Czech SDI (as plannen already in the NGII program for the years 2001-2005). RUIAN data serve to generate harmonized data sets for the INSPIRE - CP, AD, AU, (BG) and will contribute to the ELF. 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 8

Scheme of Base Registers 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 9

RUIAN open access to data for viewing and re-use 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 10

Cooperation! RUIAN editors: RUIAN Administrator CUZK Municipal offices Building authorities Local specialized Czech statistical office 1..* Kraj_1960 1 1..* 1..* Okres 1 ČUZK Stat 1 1 1..* Region_soudrznosti 1 1..* VUSC 1 1 1..* ORP 1 1..* POU 1 1..* 1..* Obec = about 8000 PA bodies; See: www.ruian.cz 1 Sprav ni_obv od 1 1 0..* 0..1 1 1 0..* 1 MOP 0..1 1..* Katastralni_uzemi 1 1 RUIAN data used by CUZK to generate National INSPIRE compliant data sets and WFSs for several themes: CP, AD, AU 26th June 0..* Ulice INSPIRE 2013, Florence 0..* 11 Geospatial World Forum, Amsterdam 11 11 MOMC Stavebni_objekt Obec Stavební úřad 0..1 0..* 1..* Cast_obce 0..* 0..1 1..* 0..* 0..1 0..* 1 Adresni_misto 1..* 1..* Parcela +identifikacni_parcela 0..* «nullable» 1 č sú ZSJ 1..*

2. User perspectives - the INSPIRE preparatory phase 2004-2006 2007 2007-2008 2008-2013 Preparatory phase Adoption of the Directive Transposition phase Implementation phase Back to the INSPIRE SDICs/LMOs opinion surveys done in 2003-2006: via the Internet Consultation on the INSPIRE initiative in 2003 after the SDIC/LMO Call and at the 11 th EC GI&GIS workshop 2005 during the Czech SDI@INSPIRE Day in 2006, etc. 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 12

26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 13

The Principles of INSPIRE among 18 questions broadly consulted in spring 2003 Data collected once and maintained at the level where most effective. (ok for most themes; HY and TN still challenging) Spatial information from different sources in Europe combined seamless and shared between users/applications. Information collected at one level to be shared between different levels, GI needed for good governance to be available under conditions that do not refrain its extensive use. Easy discovering which geographic information is available, relevant for particular use and under which conditions to acquire and use. 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 14

Q nr. 18: Standardisation A forgotten idea: see page 6/33: In general, the respondents (96%) agree that certain information on standards and key components of data should be made available free of charge and free of restriction on use in order to encourage their use by a wide range of data providers.?!? 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 15

Commission Services co-ordinate INSPIRE Expert Group advises INSPIRE process INSPIRE Committee votes EC adopts Call for Interest Existing Reference Material Drafting Teams Consolidation Team Prototypes test Review Formal Internet Consultation Draft Implementing Rules Implementing Rules Experts are proposed Projects contribute Pilots validate LMOs re-view Spatial Data Interest Communities participate CEN, ISO, OGC contribute Public reviews MS apply Association phase Drafting phase Review phase 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 16

Typology of the main user groups 2005-2006 8% 11% 35% 5% 1) Environment focused organizations and their networks: National LMOs; Pan-European SDICs. EC related councils, pan-eu networks related to specific EU policies. 11% Private companies; Research networks. 2) SDICs/LMOs focused on different territory related themes Statistics; Agriculture; Building Industry; Urban and territorial Planning. 19% Education. 3) National bodies for Geodesy & Cartography and their networks: National LMOs (National Mapping, Cadastre or/and Space Offices/Agencies). European SDICs (the international and pan-european networks of these LMOs). 4) GIT and services providers and their networks: Private companies. National networks, Pan-European networks. 5) International standardization bodies: European; International; global. 6) National or inter-ministerial coordination bodies: Governmental bodies for NSDI or INSPIRE coordination. National or Inter-ministerial committees for Information Society. 7) Regions and their SDI support providers: Regional LMO(s) in networks with local governments and private or public entities acting in the region; Their GIT and SDI supporters (project holders or services providers) 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 17 11%

Questions at the EC GI&GIS workshop 2005 What prompted you to register as a SDIC/LMO? What you can offer to the process of developing the INSPIRE IRs? What are your expectations and concerns in relation to this process? Answers from 2005 seen through CUZK s experience till 2013 LEGEND: Valid; solved; this was considered by the EC team etc. Considered, in progress but still to continue Diversity (partially solved, partially to continue) o Still a big challenge 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 18

NMCAs and their networks (i) Motivation and expectations INSPIRE Directive meets the main interest and it is in focus of the mandate and mission of these organizations. Annexes I and II are in core of their business. There is a commitment for interoperability of GI. INSPIRE will concentrate the geodata access and interoperability expertise in Europe; it will accelerate use and extension of standards and their validation and acknowledgement. Implementation investments for development of new geoportals and services could be secure thanks standards defined by INSPIRE. INSPIRE could balance through its common validated policy the ongoing debates between the federal, regional and local levels of governments and the private sector on SDI(s). 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 19

NMCAs and their networks (ii) Offer to the process Expertise in all the IR fields; experts and their long-term backing during the IR drafting process. National and pan-european projects, the link to EU projects. The well coordinated network of LMOs cross the whole Europe and its commitment for INSPIRE. Experience in normalization, harmonization, and processes development. Awareness raising and sharing best practices. Contribution to the cost/benefit analysis. Experience in integration through partnerships and working in Public-Private-Partnership. 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 20

Main areas of concern 100% Endangered resources and underestimated user needs 80% Conflicting interests or scenarios 60% Big complexity, difficult context and low transparency 40% Underestimated capacities, funding or feasibility 20% Inefficient involvement of SDICs or LMOs 0% Environment focused organizations SDICs/LMOs focused on territory related themes LMOs for Geodesy & Cartography and networks GIT and services providers and their networks International standardization bodies National and inter-ministerial coordination bodies Regions and their SDI support providers 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 21

User recommendations a) For improving the involvement of SDICs/LMOs Improve communication. Clarify roles and cut distance between the CT, DTs and the other SDICs/LMOs. Consider seriously and professionally the resources, concerns, comments, and requirements provided by LMOs/SDICs. Build up a broad support and commitment for INSPIRE. Today s feed back: The size and commitment of the international INSPIRE network and community reflect the transparent process and the fair and consistent communication support by the EC during the past decade. Compliments and thanks! Nevertheless, this should go on. (The A II-III are just starting!) 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 22

User recommendations b) For building up capacities, funding and feasibility Support capacity building; prepare long-term plans for research and education. Develop awareness raising and training together with involved networks. Invite lacking communities. Search for feasibility respecting national needs and specifications. Use cost/benefit criterion in the IR Drafts. Build-up partnerships; develop models and mechanisms for sharing resources, re-use and funding of PSGI. Search for methods supporting sustainable development of SDIs, apply them. Enable funding from the EC programs. 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 23

Survey of user views - List of questions Seminar on INSPIRE and SDIs/GIIs in the CR in March 2006 The name or type of organization you represent Why GI is relevant for your organization? What does INSPIRE mean for your organization (or you)? What you consider positive in/on INSPIRE? What you don t like in/on INSPIRE? What is unclear? What you would like to know better? Which could be the impact of INSPIRE on your work? Which could be the benefit of INSPIRE in your work? Which are areas of concern in the INSPIRE Workprogram? Any recommendations to the development of INSPIRE implementation rules? Comments to this seminar Recommendations for other INSPIRE focused actions Name (optional) 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 24

Why is GI/GII relevant for the organization 14 12 26th June 10 8 6 4 2 0 Private companies Universities Foreign guests Regional Authorities Other public sector bodies INSPIRE 2013, Florence 25 Ispra, 14-15/09/06 Geodesy&Cartography Sector Providing information services Not important A part of services provided or used Object and tool of R&D Tools for cross-checking of evidence in administrative processes For planning and decision making Mandate for their gathering/maintenance

What is seen as positive on INSPIRE 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Private companies Universities Foreign guests Regional Authorities Geodesy&Cartography Sector Other public sector bodies Avoiding data dupplications Standardization - unified rules Data harmonization Coordination & cooperation of organizations within the EU, CR Sharing of geodata 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 26

Fears - possible negative impacts concerning INSPIRE WP 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Private companies Universities Foreign guests Regional Authorities Geodesy&Cartography Sector Other public sector bodies Funding, unclear business model Co-operation in the EU or CR Process of realization and implementation, legal aspects Quality and readyness of data and services None Schedule, deadlines 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 27 Ispra, 14-15/09/06

What to be clarified of improved in relation to INSPIRE 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 legal status of data, considering administrative processes Low awareness or lack of precize information Future Competence of Czech institutions How to reach cooperation and consensus in the EU and CR How to be involved and review Metadata: structure, exchange formats Clear to read texts and translations Implementing Rules: Content, Timing mostly ok diversified Still questions Partially At EU level this was easier in the early stage than in the CZ OK challenging: too many, too long Available (some times rather late) 0 Private companies Universities Foreign guests Regional Authorities 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 28 Geodesy&Cartography Sector Occurrence of a national line/front Institution or a coordination body? Licensing and pricing for data and services Intelectual property rights (Data ownership by state, municipal, private entities) could be better a nat.coordination body since 2011 Still questions

How does today s reality meet with expectations or concerns from the INSPIRE Preparatory Phase? For most aspects, the statements in 2003-2006 correlate with lessons learned (at the national or international levels): Expectations and motivation, Inputs several concerns still valid (capacities, financing). In the planning, development, implementation of any SDIthere are various actors (interest groups) and they have different combinations of motivation, expectations, input and concerns. This is a fact to be considered and managed at any implementation level and during the long-term process. 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 29

The distant goals have become reality! There exist the entire legislation for INSPIRE in the EU(+) and the organitanional structures in the MSs. This provides a formal backbone for enforcing the visibility, interoperability and practical usage and re-use of spatial data (in practice). The communication support by the EC enabling the broad information openess of the INSPIRE process, should sustain. A reminder?!?: standards and key components of data should be made available free of charge and free of restriction on use in order to encourage their use by a wide range of data providers. 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 30

Conclusions? Implementing INSPIRE is a hudge task; but it is feasible. Using the experience from the preparatory process are needed for the new phase of INSPIRE a reasonable involvement of organisations at local and regional levels and from all the new thematic domains. The NSDI-and-INSPIRE development process is a never-ending story. Existing INSPIRE tools in synergy with broader egovernment arrangements provide a revolutionary atmosphere ; they open data for re-use in a variaty of application domains. This is like the hudge change of landscapes and roles at the beginning of the industrial era. Bringing new questions! 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 31

Thank you for you attention http://cuzk.cz http://geoportal.cuzk.cz ISKN - remote public access to the Cadastre (Czech Rep. 2013) Imperial compulsory cadastre-prints 1:2 880 (Bohemia about 1830) Eva.Pauknerova@cuzk.cz 26th June INSPIRE 2013, Florence 32