Reducing Readmissions: Potential Measurements

Similar documents
Essentials for Clinical Documentation Integrity 2017

Transitions Through the Care Continuum: Discussions on Barriers to Patient Care, Communications, and Advocacy

Reducing Medicaid Readmissions

Preventable Readmissions

Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) Hospital Readmissions: Q Q2 2014

The Community Care Navigator Program At Lawrence Memorial Hospital

Executive Summary MEDICARE FEE-FOR-SERVICE (FFS) HOSPITAL READMISSIONS: QUARTER 4 (Q4) 2012 Q STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Readmission Program. Objectives. Todays Inspiration 9/17/2018. Kristi Sidel MHA, BSN, RN Director of Quality Initiatives

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

REDUCING READMISSIONS

Potentially Preventable Readmissions (PPRs) in the Texas Medicaid Population, Fiscal Year Hospital Seminars January 2011

2017 Quality Reporting: Claims and Administrative Data-Based Quality Measures For Medicare Shared Savings Program and Next Generation ACO Model ACOs

Retrospective Bundles

SNF * Readmissions Bootcamp The SNF Readmission Penalty, Post-Acute Networks, and Community Collaboratives

Financial Policy & Financial Reporting. Jay Andrews VP of Financial Policy

Baptist Health System Jacksonville, FL

Clinical Documentation: Beyond The Financials Cheryll A. Rogers, RHIA, CDIP, CCDS, CCS Senior Inpatient Consultant 3M HIS Consulting Services

Balancing State, Federal and Internal Bundle Payment Initiatives

Central Valley/West Valley Care Coordination Coalitions. Quarterly Community Meeting

Bundled Payment Primer

NASHP s 30 th Annual State Health Policy Conference. Timeline of Tennessee Health Care Innovation Initiative

Reducing Preventable Hospital Readmissions in Post Acute Care Kim Barrows RN BSN

Performance Scorecard 2013

Reducing Readmissions One-caseat-a-time Using Midas+ Community Case Management

Health Economics Program

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Session Objectives 10/27/2014. How Can I get Beyond the Basics of Hospital Readmission and Become a Preferred Provider? Kim Barrows RN BSN

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated September 2012

The Pain or the Gain?

New Models in Payment: Joint Replacements. Sharon Eloranta, MD February 18, 2016

The Future of Post-Acute Care Under Value-Based Payment

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

The 5 W s of the CMS Core Quality Process and Outcome Measures

Community Performance Report

FHA HIIN Readmissions Peer Sharing Webinar: Improving Care Transitions through a Discharge Lounge. July 24, 2018

The New World of Value Driven Cardiac Care

Paying for Outcomes not Performance

Factors that Impact Readmission for Medicare and Medicaid HMO Inpatients

MEDICARE UPDATES: VBP, SNF QRP, BUNDLING

Southeast Michigan See You in 7 Hospital Collaborative: Session 8 Webinar. Thursday, December 13 at 8 am

Objectives 2/23/2011. Crossing Paths Intersection of Risk Adjustment and Coding

CPAs & ADVISORS. experience support // ADVANCED PAYMENT MODELS: CJR

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: briefopinion: Hospital Readmissions Survey. Purpose & Methods. Results

Value-Based Purchasing & Payment Reform How Will It Affect You?

Admissions and Readmissions Related to Adverse Events, NMCPHC-EDC-TR

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: APPENDICES TO MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, CHAPTER 4654

Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs

A Regional Payer/Provider Partnership to Reduce Readmissions The Bronx Collaborative Care Transitions Program: Outcomes and Lessons Learned

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

West Valley and Central Valley Care Coordination Coalitions

CMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

HOSPITAL READMISSION REDUCTION STRATEGIC PLANNING

STATISTICAL BRIEF #9. Hospitalizations among Males, Highlights. Introduction. Findings. June 2006

3/14/2014. Preventing Rehospitalizations How to Change Your When in Doubt, Send em Out Way of Thinking. Objectives. Background Information

4/9/2016. The changing health care market THE CHANGING HEALTH CARE MARKET. CPAs & ADVISORS

Bundled Payments to Align Providers and Increase Value to Patients

Understanding HSCRC Quality Programs and Methodology Updates

To Admit or Not to Admit: How Do We Answer this Question?

Performance Scorecard 2009

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

Leveraging Your Facility s 5 Star Analysis to Improve Quality

MEASURING POST ACUTE CARE OUTCOMES IN SNFS. David Gifford MD MPH American Health Care Association Atlantic City, NJ Mar 17 th, 2015

Quality Outcomes and Data Collection

The President s and Other Bipartisan Proposals to Reform Medicare: Post-Acute Care (PAC) Reform. Summary

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated May 2011

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement Program Measures for Acute Care Hospitals - Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Payment Update

Payment Rule Summary. Medicare Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Prospective Payment System: Update Notice for Federal Fiscal Year 2013

REDUCING READMISSIONS

The Wave of the Future: Value-Based Purchasing & the Impact of Quality Reporting Within the Revenue Cycle

Physician Performance Analytics: A Key to Cost Savings

Delivery System Reform The ACA and Beyond: Challenges Strategies Successes Failures Future

HOSPITAL QUALITY MEASURES. Overview of QM s

Re-Hospitalizations and the Bottom Line: What SNFs Can Do to Get Ready. Maureen McCarthy, RN, BS, RAC-CT, CPRA President & CEO Celtic Consulting

The Role of Analytics in the Development of a Successful Readmissions Program

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS HOSPITAL & HEALTH SCIENCES SYSTEM HOSPITAL DASHBOARD

Identifying Potentially Preventable Readmissions

2015 Executive Overview

Welcome and Instructions

Ambulatory-care-sensitive admission rates: A key metric in evaluating health plan medicalmanagement effectiveness

1/14/2013. Emerging Healthcare Issues: How Will They Impact Hospital Reimbursement? EMERGING HEALTHCARE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION

(202) or CMS Proposals to Improve Quality of Care during Hospital Inpatient Stays

Using Clinical Criteria for Evaluating Short Stays and Beyond. Georgeann Edford, RN, MBA, CCS-P. The Clinical Face of Medical Necessity

Reimbursement Policy. Subject: Inpatient Readmissions Committee Approval Obtained: Effective Date: 10/01/13

The Impact of Healthcare-associated Infections in Pennsylvania 2010

Managing Healthcare Payment Opportunity Fundamentals CENTER FOR INDUSTRY TRANSFORMATION

North Carolina Inpatient Hospital Discharge Data - Data Dictionary FY2011 Standard Research File Alphabetic List of Variables and Attributes

Partners in the Continuum of Care: Hospitals and Post-Acute Care Providers

SUCCESS IN A VALUE - BASED PAYMENT ARRANGMENT

Facility State National

How to Win Under Bundled Payments

Learning Objectives. CMS Plans to Transform Healthcare. Leveraging CDI to Improve Performance Under Alternative Payment Model (APM) Methodology

ramping up for bundled payments fostering hospital-physician alignment

HOSPITALS & HEALTH SYSTEMS: DATA-DRIVEN STRATEGY FOR BUNDLED PAYMENT SUCCESS 4/19/2016. April 20, 2016

Glendale Healthier Community Care Coordination Collaborative. Health Services Advisory Group (HSAG) March 06, 2018

National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual

Outcome Measures: Reform at the Core: Page 1. The Triple Aim Goals. Getting Down into the Weeds

Joseph W. Thompson, MD, MPH Arkansas Surgeon General Director, Arkansas Center for Health Improvement

Transcription:

Reducing Readmissions: Potential Measurements Avoid Readmissions Through Collaboration October 27, 2010 Denise Remus, PhD, RN Chief Quality Officer BayCare Health System

Overview Why Focus on Readmissions? FHA Readmission Collaborative Readmission Metrics BayCare Health System: Identifying Opportunities & Implementing Improvements 2

Why Focus on Readmissions? Quality improvement opportunity Provide care at the right place and the right time Nationally, 25% of Heart Failure patients, 20% of Heart Attack patients, and 18% of Pneumonia patients are readmitted within 30 days of discharge 3

Why Focus on Readmissions? (cont.) Publicly reported readmission rates Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Readmission rates for three conditions: Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), Heart Failure (HF) or Pneumonia (PN) Florida s Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) Readmission rates for > 70 conditions and procedures 4

Why Focus on Readmissions? (cont.) Health care reform and value based purchasing Legislation, rules and regulations discuss bundled payments (acute and subacute care) Specific focus on reducing payments for readmissions Commercial payers already declining payment for readmissions 5

Health Care Reform and Readmissions FY 2013 (Oct 12) CMS will reduce payments for readmissions higher than expected Penalty is 1% of all DRG payments, not just the clinical areas measured, increasing to 3% in FY 2015 Anticipated to save Medicare $7.1B over 10 years 6

FHA Readmission Collaborative Support AHCA s public reporting of PPR rates and improve quality of care by reducing readmissions Develop recommendations for public reporting, including use of 3M Potentially Preventable Readmission (PPR) methodology to identify clinically related events Identify key opportunities for improvement Identify best practices for reducing readmissions Forum for knowledge sharing 7

Readmission Metrics: Florida PPR and CMS 8 Florida HealthFinder HospitalCompare Types of readmissions 3M Potentially Preventable Readmissions (PPR) Risk Standardized Readmission Rate (RSSR) Days 15 days 30 days Reasons Related to the same or related to original admission Readmission for any reason Payer/patient All payer categories (Ages 18+) FFS Medicare, Age 65 and older who have a complete claims history for 12 months Time period 12 months 3 years Adjustments 3M APR DRG and Severity of Illness Subclass Hierarchical Regression Model Can hospitals reproduce? Yes No Terms used Lower/higher/As Expected Better than, no different, worse Benchmark Florida statewide readmission rate Florida vs. US National Rate Minimum number of cases 30 25 Conditions/Procedures 70 conditions and procedures Heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia 8

FHA Readmission Collaborative Measures and Goals Five Focus Areas Using 3M PPR: Mar 08 Mar 09 TARGET Heart Failure 13.3% 12.6% <8% Heart Attack 12.8% 10.5% <6.5% Pneumonia 7.5% 6.8% <4% Bypass Surgery 12.6% 12.6% <8% Hip Replacement 5.7% 5.6% <2.5% Goal is to achieve the target readmission rates by December 31, 2010 9

3M PPR Methodology: General Guidelines Readmission Initial Discharge Medical Surgical Medical Surgical PPR except if clearly unrelated acute events PPR except conditions clearly unrelated Not PPR unless initial medical diagnosis clearly should have resulted in surgery PPR if related to complications of prior surgery 10

3M PPR: Initial Discharge Exclusions If any of the following conditions apply to the initial discharge, a subsequent readmission is excluded from consideration as a PPR Died Major or metastatic malignancies Neonates Multiple trauma, burns Left against medical advice Transferred to another acute care hospital Obstetrical Other exclusions: Specific eye procedures and infections Cystic fibrosis-pulmonary diagnosis 11

3M PPR: Example of Relationships Case 1: PPR Initial discharge: Asthma Readmission 8 days post discharge: Asthma Case 2: PPR Initial discharge: Acute MI Readmission 6 days post discharge: Diabetes Mellitus Case 3: Not a PPR Initial discharge: Pneumonia Readmission 4 days post discharge: Fractured femur & skull from MVA Case 4: Not a PPR Initial discharge: CHF Readmission 6 days post discharge: Appendectomy Case 5: PPR Initial discharge: Abdominal Pain Readmission 2 days post discharge: Appendectomy 12

Monitoring Readmissions Identify timeframe of interest 7 days, 15 days, 30 days Select patient identifier - examples Medical Record Number unique to person and hospital Unique patient identifier unique to person regardless of location (e.g., SSN, Medicare Beneficiary Number) Linkage - all-cause vs. potentially preventable and clinically related Evaluate inclusion and exclusion criteria age, conditions 13

Monitoring Readmissions (cont.) All Patients Discharge Alive Patients Readmitted Within 15 Days for Clinically Related Reasons (PPR) - AHCA Real Time Identify Patients Readmitted < 7 days Patients Readmitted Within 30 Days All Cause (no exclusions) - CMS Patients Readmitted Within 30 Days for Clinically Related Reasons (PPR) 14

Monitoring Readmissions (cont.) Ideally use 3M APR-DRG and PPR software If not yet available, consider enhancing internal monitoring by Exclude discharge disposition died, AMA, transfer to another acute care Exclude readmission episodes for conditions such as trauma, OB, major malignancies, transplants Evaluated potentially preventable and clinical relationships Medical followed by medical Surgical followed by medical Surgical followed by surgical if potential complication 15

BayCare Health System - Identifying Opportunities Evaluate all patients within the system Linkage by corporate patient identifier to identify readmissions to any BayCare hospital Apply the 3M PPR software to quarterly data files Standard administrative data input file with patient demographics, diagnoses, present on admission flags, procedures, procedure dates, etc. Run data from 30 days before and 30 days post the quarter of interest Use 30 day period to identify clinically related chains, then flag those patients whose initial readmission occurred within 15 days Evaluate all PPR s not just those selected for AHCA reporting Reconciliation remains a challenge Initial analysis showed major opportunities 16

Major Diagnostic Category of Initial Admission 30% 25% Medicare Other Payers 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Circulatory Respiratory Musculoskeletal Digestive System Kidney / Urinary Tract Nervous System Mental Disorder Infectious / Parasitic Data on Potentially Preventable Readmissions within 30 days Skin / Breast Endocrine Hepatic / Pancreatic Blood / Immunology Inj / Effects Drugs Other 17

Top 5 APR-DRGs of Initial Admission Rank All Cases Medicare Other Payers Description % Description % Description % 1 HEART FAILURE (194) 4.7 HEART FAILURE (194) 6.1 BIPOLAR DISORDERS (753) 3.9 2 CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (140) 4.4 CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (140) 4.9 CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (140) 3.5 3 OTHER PNEUMONIA (139) 2.9 KIDNEY & URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS (463) 3.3 MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS & OTHER/UNSPECIFIED PSYCHOSES (751) 3.4 4 SCHIZOPHRENIA (750) 2.8 OTHER PNEUMONIA (139) 3.1 SCHIZOPHRENIA (750) 2.8 5 KIDNEY & URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS (463) 2.5 SCHIZOPHRENIA (750) 2.7 OTHER PNEUMONIA (139) 2.5 Prevalence conditions of Heart Failure, COPD, Pneumonia, Kidney & Urinary Track Infections, Depression and Schizophrenia Data on Potentially Preventable Readmissions within 30 days 18

Discharge Status of Initial Admission 80% 75.9% 70% 60% Significantly higher than expected: 50% SNF & ICF Home Health Care 40% 40.4% 35.1% Rehab or LTAC 30% 20% 20.6% 12.4% 10% 0% 7.3% 2.3%.9% 1.0% 1.4% 1.8%.6%.1%.3% Home (Self Care) SNF & ICF Home Health Rehab or LTAC Hospice (all) Psych hosp/unit Other Medicare (FFS & HMO) Data on Potentially Preventable Readmissions within 30 days All Other Payers 19

Days from Initial Discharge to First Readmit All cases (all payers, all ages) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 1% 14% 19% 24% 29% 33% 81% 78% 73% 76% 68% 70% 65% 59% 62% 56% 52% 49% 45% 42% 38% All Cases: Median = 11 days, Mean = 12.31 Medicare FFS: Median = 11 days, Mean = 12.39 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 85% 83% 8% 7% 6% 6% 5% 5% 4% 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0 (Same Day) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 First Readmission (%) Data on Potentially Preventable Readmissions within 30 days Cumulative 20

BayCare Health System - Identifying Opportunities PPR data is only available quarterly so case managers use a proxy system to evaluate every patient readmitted within 24 to 48 hours of discharge Gather data on reason for admission, source of admission, sociodemographic, medical, and system factors Apply major exclusions (e.g., trauma, malignancies) Evaluate clinical relationships and potentially preventable Use diagnoses, procedure codes and MS-DRG to evaluate medical to medical, surgical to medical, etc. Focus on high risk patients who may fall into the PPR methodology 21

BayCare Quality Goal Reduce Heart Failure Readmissions 2010 Quality & Safety Plan goal to reduce the 15 day PPR for Heart Failure (APR-DRG 194). Statewide the rate was 11.21% (Oct 08 to Sep 09) BayCare s Baseline (2009) = 10.46% Established 2010 Target = 10.12% Progress to date: Q1-10 = 9.87%, Q2-10 = 8.7%, YTD = 9.33% Established system-wide Reducing Readmissions Steering committee Representatives from across the system CNE s, case management, home health, behavioral health, CQO, black belts 22

HF Patient Journey Home 46% Home Health 23% Skilled Nursing / LTAC / Hospice 21% 23 23

BayCare Health System: Improvement Projects Across the Continuum of Care During Hospitalization At Discharge Post Discharge SJH Implementation of Readmission Risk Assessment SAH HF Telemonitoring Project BCHS Reduce Readmissions Call Center F/U After Discharge BCHS Improve Invision Documentation of Nursing Home and Home Care Discharge Disposition and admit source SAH and Pinellas Point Nursing Rehab Center Readmissions Collaborative project MPH Project BOOST Inpatient Discharge Planning BCHS/SJH Development of a Post Acute Care system within Home Care to Reduce Hospital Readmissions BCHS FHA Readmissions Collaborative 24

Risk Assessment Tool initiated on admission to hospital Example of Tool 25 25

Hospital-Nursing Home Collaborative Recent HF readmission rates for St. Anthony s Hospital patients discharged to home are approximately 11% 12% while patients discharged to Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF) are 22% The variation between these two populations indicate an opportunity to decrease readmissions. (project includes all diagnoses). 26

Critical to Quality Design Requirements Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Protocols for Transfers and Handoffs, Accurate Medication Reconciliation, Team Member Education and Training 27

Sepsis Screening Tool Implementation Pinellas Point Nursing and Rehab Center 28

Implemented Solutions Sepsis Screening Tool at Pinellas Point Nursing and Rehab Center including education and training (signs and symptoms) (1-15 day of stay) Standard lab testing 3 days admitted to ECF for CBC and CMP (WBC included in CBC) Standard St. Anthony s checklist for documentation required for SNU/ECF review (to be used by Unit Secretaries/Social Workers) Accountability for completed checklist (engage project champion) including education and training Liaisons have electronic BEACON access to patient record at St. Anthony s Hospital in Utilization Management 4 th floor (Case Managers/Social Workers) 29

Reducing Readmissions for Hip Replacements 15 day PPR Current FL Rate = 5.6% BayCare = 6% 20% readmitted within 3 days, 37% within 4 days, 55% by day 7 Day of Week: No relationship between discharge day of week and readmission within 15 days (p = 0.07) Risk Factors / AHRQ Comorbidity Categories: Patients significantly more likely to be readmitted (p value of <= 0.5): Heart Failure 11.5% Valve Disease 11.8% Pulmonary/Circulatory Disease 17.9% Renal Failure 14.8% Lytes 9.2% Number of Comorbidities: Readmitted patients = mean of 3.01 vs 2.35 for patients not readmitted (p < 0.00) 30

Reducing Readmissions for Hip Replacements 15 day PPR (cont.) Length of Stay: Patients who were readmitted had a longer length of stay initially (mean = 6.12 days vs. 4.54 days for patients not readmitted, p = 0.001) Longer length of stay likely related to complexity of patients (e.g., higher number of comorbidities and/or potential complications) Age: Readmitted patients were older (mean age of 75.9 yrs vs. 72.47 yrs for patients not readmitted, p = 0.03) Gender No relationship between readmissions and patient gender 31

Establishing FHA Workgroup to Reduce Hip Replacement Readmissions Collaborative with Orthopedic Society Initial focus: Reviewing data If other hospitals are similar to BayCare hospitals, the opportunities are in managing patient s medical conditions when hospitalized for hip surgery, infections are not the issue Need to collaborate with surgeons and primary physicians 32

Questions? 33