MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

Similar documents
MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

Advancing Care Information Measures Data Validation Criteria. Reporting Requirement: Yes/No or Numerator/Denominator

Advancing Care Information- The New Meaningful Use September 2017

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

EHR/Meaningful Use

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

MACRA and MIPS. How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Decoding the QPP Year 2 Quality Measure Benchmarks and Deciles to Maximize Performance

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

Promoting Interoperability Measures

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

2017/2018. KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide. KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc.

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Specialty Practice in a Value Based Payment World. Sandra J Lewis MD FACC FAHA June 22, 2017

MIPS eligibility lookup tool (available in Spring 2018):

Copyright. Last updated: September 28, 2017 MicroMD EMR Objective Measure Calculations Manual: Performance Year 2017

Advancing Care Information Measures

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Quality Payment Program: The future of reimbursement

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Final Meaningful Use Stage 3 Requirements Released August 2018

Advancing Care Information Performance Category Fact Sheet

MACRA & Implications for Telemedicine. June 20, 2016

WHITE PAPER. Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know about the MACRA Advancing Care Information Component

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

MACRA Frequently Asked Questions

Under the MACRAscope:

Michelle Brunsen & Sandy Swallow May 25, , Telligen, Inc.

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: 2018 Performance Year

Overview of the Changes to the Meaningful Use Program Called for in the Proposed Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule April 27, 2018

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

From Surviving to Thriving in the QPP World

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

The MIPS Survival Guide

MIPS Scoring: Explanation and Estimation 2/7/2017 and 2/10/2017

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

MACRA Quality Payment Program

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Medicare Physician Payment Reform

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM

MIPS Advancing Care Information: Tips, Tools and Support Q&A from Live Webinar March 29, 2017

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

MACRA Implementation: A Review of the Quality Payment Program

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

THE ECONOMICS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE UNDER HIPAA/HITECH

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

during the EHR reporting period.

MACRA Quality Payment Program

Quality Payment Program MIPS. Advanced APMs. Quality Payment Program

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Quality Payment Program Year 2: 2018 MIPS Participation. An Introductory Guide for CRNAs in 2018

Meaningful Use: Today and in the Future VMGMA Spring Conference Richmond, VA March 21, 2016

MACRA and the Quality Payment Program. Frequently Asked Questions Edition

The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Survival Guide. August 11, 2016

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Improvement Activities Category Options

The Healthcare Roundtable

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

The History of Meaningful Use

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Overview of Quality Payment Program

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Table 1: MIPS Exemptions. Exemption Individual Determination Group Determination Treatment under MIPS Already Finalized EXEMPTIONS Low-Volume

Kate Goodrich, MD MHS. Director, Center for Clinical Standards & Quality. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) May 6, 2016

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Maximizing Your Potential Under MIPS Oregon MACRA Playbook Conference

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

MIPS Deep Dive: 9 steps to Reporting. Sharon Phelps QPP Webinar Series Webinar 4 June 20, 2017

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

Agenda. Surviving the New Program Requirements and the Financial Penalties Under MIPS 9/9/2016. Steps to take to prepare for MIPS

Meaningful Use and How it Relates to the Quality Payment Program. Erin Dormaier, CHTS-IM, PCMH CCE Transformation Support Services Manager

MACRA Open Call December 5 th, 2016

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

MACRA Fall into Place. By Stephanie Cecchini, CPC, CEMC, CHISP, AAPC Fellow, AAPC MACRA Prof

Transcription:

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Category The 2018 Quality Payment Program (QPP) Year Two final rule continues to implement the programs authorized under the Medicare and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA): the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APMs). For 2018 performance, to impact 2020 payment, CMS agreed with ASCRS and medical community recommendations to continue the transition period for MIPS and provide a pathway for practices implementing the program to meet the MIPS final score threshold and avoid the 5% penalty in 2020 by submitting minimal data. CMS set the 2018 MIPS final score threshold at 15, up from 3 in 2017. To avoid the 5% penalty, physicians must earn at least 15 MIPS. This threshold can be met in a variety of ways, such as: Full participation in the Improvement Activities category, such as submitting one high-weighted activity or two mediumweighted activities for small practices, or two high-weighted activities, four medium-weighted activities, or a combination of high- and medium-weighted activities; The Advancing Care (ACI) category base score and one quality measure meeting the measure threshold, or data completeness, but not benchmarks; ACI base score and one medium-weighted improvement activity; or Six quality measures meeting data completeness, but not measure benchmarks. This guide is developed for ASCRS ASOA members to familiarize themselves with the full requirements of the Advancing Care category (previously known as Meaningful Use), and to assist them in choosing the best participation option for their practice. ASCRS also has developed guides on the other three categories of MIPS. In addition, ASCRS ASOA has developed a guide on Advanced APMs and MIPS APMs. Physicians participating in MIPS APMs, such as Medicare Shared Savings Track 1 ACOs, should consult that guide for details regarding their scoring under the MIPS program. Small Practice Hardship Exemption For 2018, CMS is offering a small practice hardship exemption for the ACI category. Practices of 15 or fewer eligible clinicians must submit a hardship application by December 31, 2018, to have the 25% weight of the ACI category re-weighted to the Quality category. Advancing Care (ACI) Category Weight For 2018, the ACI category score will continue to be weighted at 25% of the overall MIPS final score. If CMS determines that at least 75% of MIPS-eligible clinicians are meaningful users of EHR in future years, the scoring weight for ACI could be lowered to no less than 15% of the overall score. In some cases, CMS may determine a provider is excluded from one or more of the other MIPS categories and will re-weight the individual provider s quality performance score to make up the difference. If a physician or small practice receives the small practice hardship exemption, the 25% weight of the category will be redistributed to Quality. 1

Advancing Care (ACI) Category Performance Period For 2018, physicians must report ACI for at least any 90-day period to be considered full participants. Physicians have the option to report more than 90 days, up to a full year. Use of 2014 or 2015 CEHRT In 2018, CMS will permit physicians and groups to continue using 2014-certified EHR technology. Participants electing to use 2014 technology must report the transition measure set finalized for 2017 performance because 2014 technology will not have all of the functions to complete the measures for 2015 technology. Participants who report using solely 2015 CEHRT will be eligible for a 10-point bonus. CMS plans to require the use of 2015 technology for the 2019 performance Advancing Care Category Score Structure CMS will structure a provider s ACI category score on a base score and at levels above the base score for a performance score. Providers must meet all of the objectives and measures to achieve the base score. Participants may choose which objectives and measures they want to meet for the performance score. Some measures are included in both the base and performance scores. For those measures, providers only need a 1 in the for the base score but will earn additional toward the performance score for higher values in the. There are also several opportunities to earn additional bonus for reporting on certain optional measures. When all the possible for the base and performance scores and potential bonuses are added, there are a total of 165 possible available in the ACI category. To receive full credit for this category, however, a provider only needs to score 100. Any additional earned above 100 will not increase a provider s total MIPS composite score. Advancing Care Base Score CMS will award 50 to providers who achieve all 5 of the measures (listed below) under the base score. To receive the full base score, providers do not need to meet a specific threshold but must report either a yes for measures requiring a yes/no answer or a of at least 1 for /denominator measures. Failure to meet all of the requirements for the base score will earn a provider an ACI category score of zero, and preclude him or her from achieving any additional through the performance score. Advancing Care Performance Score Physicians can earn up to 90 toward the performance score for achievement on certain measures (listed below). Providers may choose which performance score measures to report. Each measure reported will be calculated individually by dividing the by the denominator. A performance rate of 1% to 10% will be scored 1 point, a performance rate of 11% to 20% will earn 2, and so on. Example: If a provider reports that 85 out of 100 possible patients were included in the Patient-Specific Education Measure, then the performance rate would be 85% and earn the provider 9 toward the performance score. The total performance score is the sum of the individual provider s score on each of reported measures. Bonus Points For 2018, CMS modified the bonus structure for the ACI category. Physicians can earn five bonus for reporting to additional public health registries beyond the one identified for the performance score. 2

Physicians and groups can earn 10 bonus each for reporting improvement activities using CEHRT and/or reporting using only 2015-certified EHR technology. Advancing Care Objectives and Measures All providers with 2015 technology must report five measures to achieve the base score. Certain objectives and measures are available to be reported on for the performance score. Objectives and measures included in the base and performance score are noted below. 2018 Base Score Objectives and Measures (2015 CEHRT) Objective Measure Reporting Requirement Exclusion Protect Patient Security Risk Analysis Conduct or review a security risk analysis, including addressing the security (including encryption) of electronic personal health information created or maintained by CEHRT; implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the provider s risk management Yes/No; must answer yes Electronic Prescribing Patient Electronic process. Electronic Prescribing At least one permissible prescription written by the provider is queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT. Patient Measure For at least one unique patient seen by the provider, (1) the patient (or patient-authorized representative) is provided timely access to view online, download, and transmit his or her health information, and (2) the provider ensures the patient s health information is available for the patient (or patientauthorized representative) to access using any application of his or her choice that is configured to meet the technical specifications of the Application Programming Interface (API) in the provider s CEHRT. Send a Summary of Care Measure For at least one transition of care or referral, the provider who transitions or refers his or her patient to another setting of care or health care provider (1) creates a summary of care record using CEHRT, and (2) electronically exchanges the summary of care record. Request/Accept Patient Care Record Measure For at least one transition of care or referral received or patient Any MIPS-eligible clinician who writes fewer than 100 permissible prescriptions during the performance Any MIPS-eligible clinician who transfers a patient to another setting or refers a patient fewer than 100 times during the performance Any MIPS-eligible clinician who receives transitions of care or referrals or has patient 3

2018 Base Score Objectives and Measures (2015 CEHRT) Objective Measure Reporting Requirement Exclusion encounter in which the provider has never before encountered the patient, the provider received, or retrieves and incorporates into the patient s record, an electronic summary of care document. encounters in which the MIPSeligible clinician has never before encountered the patient fewer than 100 times during the performance period Objective Patient Electronic Coordination of Care through Patient Engagement Performance Score Objectives and Measures Measure Patient Measure For at least one unique patient seen by the provider, (1) the patient (or patient-authorized representative) is provided timely access to view online, download, and transmit his or her health information, and (2) the provider ensures the patient s health information is available for the patient (or patientauthorized representative) to access using any application of his or her choice that is configured to meet the technical specifications of the Application Programming Interface (API) in the provider s CEHRT. Patient-Specific Education Measure The provider must use clinically relevant information from the CEHRT to identify patient-specific educational resources, and provide electronic access to those materials, to at least one unique patient seen by the provider. View, Download, Transmit Measure At least one unique patient (or patientauthorized representative) seen by the provider during the performance period actively engages with the EHR made accessible by the provider. A provider may meet the measure by having a patient either (1) view, download, or transmit to a third party his or her health information; or (2) access his or her health information through the use of an API that can be used by applications chosen by the patient and configured to the API in the provider s CEHRT; or (3) a combination of (1) and (2). Secure Messaging Measure For at least one unique patient seen by the provider during the performance period, a secure message was sent using the electronic messaging function of the CEHRT to the patient (or patient-authorized representative), or in response to a secure message sent by the patient (or patientauthorized representative). Patient-Generated Data Measure Patient-generated health data or data from a non-clinical setting is incorporated into the CEHRT for at least one unique patient seen by the provider during the performance period Send a Summary of Care Measure For at least one transition of care or referral, the provider who transitions or refers his or her patient to another setting of care or health care provider (1) creates a summary of care record using CEHRT; and (2) electronically exchanges the summary of care record. Request/Accept Patient Care Record Measure For at least one transition of care or referral received or patient encounter in which the provider has never before encountered the patient, the provider received, or retrieves and incorporates into the patient s record, an electronic summary of care document. Clinical Reconciliation Measure For at least one transition of care or referral received or patient encounter in which the provider has never before Performance Score 4

Objective Public and Clinical Data Registry Reporting Bonus (up to 25%) Performance Score Objectives and Measures Measure encountered the patient, the provider performs clinical information reconciliation. The provider must implement clinical information reconciliation for the following three clinical information sets: (1) Medication Review of the patient s medication, including the name, dosage, frequency, and route of each medication; (2) Medication Allergy Review of the patient s known medication allergies; and (3) Current Problem List Review of the patient s current and active diagnoses. Immunization Registry Reporting The provider is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit immunization data and receive immunization forecasts and histories from the public health immunization registry/immunization information system (IIS). Syndromic Surveillance Reporting Measure The provider is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit syndromic surveillance data from a non-urgent care ambulatory setting where the jurisdiction accepts syndromic data from such settings and the standards are clearly defined. Electronic Case Reporting Measure The provider is in active engagement with a public health agency to electronically submit case reporting of reportable conditions. Public Registry Measure The provider is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit data to public health registries. Clinical Data Registry Measure The provider is in active engagement to submit data to a clinical data registry. Report to one or more additional public health and clinical data registries beyond the Immunization Registry Reporting measure (yes/no statement) Report improvement activities using CEHRT (yes/no statement) Report using only 2015 CEHRT (based on measures submitted) Performance Score 0 or 10 0 or 10 0 or 10 0 or 10 0 or 10 5 point bonus 10 point bonus 10 point bonus Alternative Requirements for 2018 Based on CEHRT Certification Year Providers who do not have 2015-certified EHR technology will not be able to report several of the measures finalized as part of the ACI category. Since providers are not required to have 2015 technology until 2019, CMS has finalized a modified list of objectives and measures for participants using 2014 technology. 2018 Advancing Care Transition Objectives and Measures (for participants with 2014 CEHRT) 2018 ACI Transition Objectives Protect Patient Electronic Prescribing 2018 Transition ACI Measures Security Risk Analysis Required/Not Required for the Base Score Performance Score Reporting Requirement Required 0 Yes/No statement Exclusion E-Prescribing Required 0 Numerator/Denominator Fewer than 100 permissible prescriptions 5

Patient Electronic Provide Patient Required Up to 20 Numerator/Denominator View, Download, Not required Numerator/Denominator or Transmit Patient-Specific Patient-Specific Not required Numerator/Denominator Education Education Secure Messaging Secure Messaging Not required Numerator/Denominator Medication Reconciliation Public Reporting Bonus up to 15% Medication Reconciliation Immunization Registry Reporting Syndromic Surveillance Reporting Specialized Registry Reporting Report to one or more additional public health and clinical data registries beyond the Immunization Registry Reporting measure Report improvement activities using CEHRT during the performance Required Up to 20 Numerator/Denominator Fewer than 100 transitions of care during the performance Not required Numerator/Denominator Not required 0 or 10 Yes/no statement Not required 0 or 10 Yes/no statement Not required 0 or 10 Yes/no statement 5 point bonus Yes/no statement 10 point bonus Yes/no statement Additional Resources For additional information, you may contact Allison Madson, manager of regulatory affairs, at amadson@ascrs.org or 703-591- 2220. 6