SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board

Similar documents
The SOP applies to all human subject research falling under the purview of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board.

Implementing the Revised Common Rule Exemptions with Limited IRB Review

Human Subject Regulations Decision Charts

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

Are you participating in any other research studies? Yes No

IRB 101. Rachel Langhofer Joan Rankin Shapiro Research Administration UA College of Medicine - Phoenix

(Type inside gray boxes, cells will expand) A. EIGHT POINT CRITERIA for IRB Review

Standard Operating Procedure IRB Review of Research Subject to the Revised Common Rule

ETHICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS

HIC Standard Operating Procedure. For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies

DANA-FARBER / HARVARD CANCER CENTER STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

General Procedure - Institutional Review Board

Institutional Review Board (previously referred to as Human Participants Research Board) Updated January 2004

IRB Federal Regulations Comparison Table 4/24/01 as updated through 10/31/01

Purpose: To provide policy and guidelines and helpful information for conducting research at Brooks

APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in Clinical Trials

University of Colorado Denver Human Research Protection Program Investigator Responsibilities for the Protection of Human Subjects

Effective Date: April 2014 Revision: September 29, Executive Chair, Co-Chairs, NSHA REB Members, REB Office Personnel, Researchers.

Issues of. Informed Consent. Mitchell E. Parrish, JD, RAC, CIP Regulatory Attorney


Guidelines for Review of Research Involving Human Subjects

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM

I. Scope This policy defines unanticipated problems and adverse events and establishes the reporting process and timeline.

Final Rule Material: Overview

Geisinger IRB Member Orientation Session 2. Debra L. Henninger, MHS RN CCRC Associate Director, Research Compliance

TITLE: Reporting Adverse Events SOP #: RCO-204 Page: 1 of 5 Effective Date: 01/31/18

Drugs and Cosmetics rules, 2013 India

EXEMPT RESEARCH. 1. Overview

1. Department of Defense (DoD) Human Subjects Protection Regulatory Requirements

HUMAN SUBJECTS INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES

Dr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Document Development and Change Control

HUMAN SUBJECTS INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES

Title: Investigator Responsibilities. SOP Number: 1501 Effective Date: June 2, 2017

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Operational Manual

Human Subjects Research Policy Update. Naomi Coll Director of Research Policy and Compliance

The Queen s Medical Center HIPAA Training Packet for Researchers

LifeBridge Health HIPAA Policy 4. Uses of Protected Health Information for Research

Genesis Health System. Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedures

WIRBinar. How to Survive an FDA Inspection. Upcoming Trainings: Contact Us: (360)

Pablo Tebas, M.D. Joseph Quinn, RN, BSN Yan Jiang, RN, BSN, MSN

REGULATORY AND FUNDING CHANGES FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Study Management PP STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Safeguarding Protected Health Information

Office of Human Research Office of Human Research Policy and Procedure Manual. Version: 4/4/18

DO I NEED TO SUBMIT FOR THIS?... & OTHER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. March 2015 IRB Forum

Good Documentation Practices. Human Subject Research. for

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

Saint Agnes Medical Center. Guidelines for Signers

FDA Inspection Readiness

RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT

The University of Southern Maine Policies, Procedures and Guidance For Human Subjects Research

PART 512 RESEARCH. Subpart B Research. 28 CFR Ch. V ( Edition)

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

1.2.1 It is the policy of the University of Alabama that qualifying research may be reviewed using an expedited procedure.

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REPORTING UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS INCLUDING ADVERSE EVENTS

A Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky

PHOENIXCARE / GOOD SAMARITAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER PALLIATIVE CARE DISEASE MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. Informed Consent

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Adverse Event Reporting

Durable Health Care Power of Attorney and Appointment of Health Care Agent and Proxy

SUBJECT: PATIENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES REFERENCE # PAGE: 1 DEPARTMENT: AMBULATORY SURGERY OF: 5 EFFECTIVE:

Washington University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures. April 20, 2015

managing or activities.

Changes to the Common Rule

Roles & Responsibilities of Investigator & IRB

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. For: As needed Plan Check and Building Inspection Services

The GCP Perspective on Study Monitoring

Summary of the Common Rule Changes

Legally Authorized Representatives in Clinical Trials

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility

AAHRPP Accreditation Procedures Approved April 22, Copyright AAHRPP. All rights reserved.

Efficacy of Tympanostomy Tubes for Children with Recurrent Acute Otitis Media Randomization Phase

Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View

INVESTIGATOR GUIDANCE:

Printed from the Texas Medical Association Web site.

Institutional Review Board Manual. University of the Incarnate Word

AGREEMENT BETWEEN: LA CLÍNICA DE LA RAZA, INC. AND MOUNT DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Utilizing the NCI CIRB

DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE BULLETIN A.B. 5:04B

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board

University of Colorado Denver Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) Policies and Procedures for the Protection of Human Subjects

QUALITY TIPS FOR CLINICAL SITES. Athena Thomas-Visel. Clinical Quality Consultant QUALITY TIPS FOR CLINICAL SITES

STUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)

Overview of the Revised Common Rule

NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

EMORY UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 7/01/2016

WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE. Institutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Guidelines

SECNAVINST E ONR Dec 2017 SECNAV INSTRUCTION E. From: Secretary of the Navy. Subj: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM

REFERENCES: (If applying to assist with religious activities, please include a member of the clergy as a reference.)

HEALTH RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEES Human Research (HREC)

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES WARNING LETTER. (b) (4) clinical investigation (Protocol entitled A Phase II, Multicenter,

NN SS 401 NEURONEXT NETWORK STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR SITE SELECTION AND QUALIFICATION

4.2. Clinical Trial Monitor (or Monitor): The person responsible for monitoring the data on behalf of the sponsor or contract research organization.

Common Rule Overview (Final Rule)

REQUEST TO ACCESS EXISTING MEDICAL RECORDS, CHARTS OR DATABASES FOR RESEARCH

Record or Document Type Retention Period Relevant Legal Citation(s) IRB Records: Training Records;

INFORMED CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A DIABETES RESEARCH REGISTRY

IRB review of international research. Pre-conference P1 FCPA 3 rd Party Due Diligence for Health Entities. Today

Transcription:

SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board Date Effective: April 26, 2001 Index No. R 1217 Date Last Revised: 0 Date Last Reviewed: 0 SUBJECT: INFORMED CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN CLINICAL RESEARCH 1. PURPOSE Define the process of obtaining and documenting the informed consent to participate in clinical research of human subjects participating in research activities. 2. SCOPE All research activities involving human subjects that are performed at Saint Agnes Medical Center (SAMC), or by Investigators using SAMC s Institutional Review Board (IRB) for oversight of studies at sites external to SAMC. 3. POLICY No Investigator may involve a human being as a subject in research unless the investigator has obtained the legally effective informed consent of the subject or the subject s legally authorized representative. Exemption from this policy is permitted only under special circumstances (see IRB SOPs: R-1218, R-1219, R- 1220, and R-1221). In California, the subject must be provided a copy of California s Experimental Subject s Bill of Rights prior to consenting to participate in the research. All research informed consent documents must be reviewed and approved by the SAMC IRB before any subject is enrolled in a research study. The investigator is responsible for ensuring that subject s informed consent to participate in clinical research is obtained before initiation of any research procedures. The consent interview may be formally delegated by the Investigator to a person knowledgeable about the study and appropriately trained to perform this activity. CR SOP R-1217 Page 1 of 5

An Investigator shall seek consent only under circumstances that provide the prospective subject an opportunity to consider whether to participate and that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence. The information given to the subject or the representative shall be in a language understandable to the subject or representative. No informed consent may include exculpatory language through which the subject or the representative is made to waive or appear to waive any of the subject s legal rights, or release or appear to release the Investigator, the Sponsor, or the Institution, or its agents from liability for negligence. 4 PROCEDURE 4.1 Basic Elements of Informed Consent To Participate In Clinical Research The following information shall be provided to each prospective subject after being presented with the California Experimental Subject s Bill of Rights : A statement that the study involves research, and explanation of the purpose of the research, the expected duration of the subject s participation, and the approximate number of subjects involved in the study; A statement regarding financial support of the study and identification of who is receiving funds; A statement that participation is voluntary, refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled, and the subject may discontinue participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled; A description of the procedures to be followed and identification of any procedures which are experimental (i.e., would not be done if the participant was not on the study); A description of any reasonably foreseeable risks and discomforts to the subject; A description of any benefits to the subject or to others which may reasonably be expected from the research; Disclosure of appropriate alternative procedures; Any additional costs to the subject that may result from participation; A description of the extent to which confidentiality of records identifying the subject will be maintained [see HIPPA SOP HI-5-05]; CR SOP R-1217 Page 2 of 5

A statement that the FDA, the IRB, the sponsor, the Investigator, and his/her designated research staff may inspect the medical study records; Explanation of whom to contact if questions arise, if injury occurs, or if there is concern about their rights as a research subject; A statement that the Investigator will attempt to address any harmful consequences the subject may have experienced as a result of research procedures; A statement that the subject's participation may be terminated by the investigator, the sponsor, or the IRB without subject's consent; A statement that the subject will be provided with significant new findings developed during research which may relate to subject's willingness to continue; A statement that patient has had opportunity to ask questions and all questions have been answered to their satisfaction; A statement that patient has read the consent form or has had the consent form read to them; A statement acknowledging that the patient will get a copy of the consent form. 4.2 The Process of Obtaining and Documenting Written Informed Consent In most circumstances, the IRB requires that informed consent to participate in clinical research is documented by the use of a written consent form approved by the IRB and signed by the subject or the subject s legally authorized representative. The investigator must allow the subject or the legally authorized representative adequate opportunity to read the consent document before it is signed and dated. Investigators must use the IRB's Informed Consent template as a model for developing each study s research Informed Consent. An Informed Consent to Participate in Clinical Research document requires a stamp from the IRB indicating the IRB protocol number and date the document expires to be considered valid before use in enrolling any subject in a study. The Informed Consent must be signed and dated by the subject or his/her legally authorized representative [see IRB SOP R-1221] and the person conducting the consent process. The Investigator should be actively involved in the consent process and provide adequate time to review the consent with the patient, answer questions and sign and date the consent after the subject. The only time a CR SOP R-1217 Page 3 of 5

A copy of the signed and dated Informed Consent to Participate in Clinical Research, including the California Experimental Subject s Bill of Rights and Authorization for Use and Disclosure of Health Information must be given to the person signing the form. A copy of the signed and dated consent form must be placed in the SAMC medical record for patients who are participating in a study as an in-patient and in the Clinical Research subject file for a patient consented as an outpatient. The investigator or designee is responsible for ensuring that adequate documentation of the consent process and discussion, including the outcome, is maintained in the subject s medical and/or research chart. 4.3 The Process of Obtaining and Documenting Oral Presentation Using a Short Form Consent As an alternative to standard written informed consent, oral presentation of the elements of informed consent (21 CFR 50.25) may be used, however, it is not the preferred federally recommended method when a reasonable number of an investigator s potential subjects are expected to be non-english speaking. In such cases, a short form written informed consent to participate in clinical research, stating that the elements of consent have been presented orally to the subject or the subject s legally authorized representative. The IRB must approve the written summary of what is presented orally to the subject or the representative. A witness to the oral presentation is required. Only the subject or legally authorized representative must sign the short form. The witness must sign both the short form and a copy of the written summary. The person obtaining consent must sign a copy of the written summary of the information that is presented orally. The person obtaining consent may not be the witness to the consent. Copies of both the summary and the short form shall be given to the subject or the representative. CR SOP R-1217 Page 4 of 5

4.4 Use of Facsimile or Mail to Document Informed Consent The IRB may approve a process that allows the informed consent to be delivered by mail or facsimile to the potential subject or the potential subject s legally authorized representative and to conduct the consent interview by telephone when the subject or the legally authorized representative can read the consent document as it is discussed. All other applicable conditions for documentation of informed consent to participate in clinical research must also be met when using this procedure. 4.5 The Process of Re-Consenting Subjects Previously Enrolled in an On-Going Clinical Research Study When circumstances require additions to the procedures section of the protocol, or there is new information regarding foreseeable risks to those participating in the study, the Investigator must submit for IRB approval an updated Informed Consent. Any research subjects already enrolled in the study and who would be affected by the new procedures and/or additional investigational drug/device treatments, must sign the updated Informed Consent to Participate in Research document. If the subject s participation is limited to only follow-up, then they must be sent a letter making them aware of any new information about the potential risks of having been treated with the investigational drug/device. They do not have to re-sign the updated Informed Consent to Participate in Research. REGULATORY REFERENCES: 45 CFR 46 Protection of Human Subjects ( The Common Rule ) 21 CFR 50.25 Elements of Informed Consent 21 CFR 312.60 Responsibilities of Investigators 21 CFR 812.100 Responsibilities of Investigators FDA Information Sheet A Guide to Informed Consent, The Consent Process HHS, OHRP Staff Memo Obtaining and Documenting Informed Consent of Subjects Who Do Not Speak English (November 1995) ICH E6 Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guidance (April 1996) CA H&S Code Protection of Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation 24170-24179.5 CA H&S Code 111515- Experimental Use of a Drug 111545 CAMH RI.2.180 Protection of Research Subjects CR SOP R-1217 Page 5 of 5