Macro-level support to innovation in frontline teams: the case of the Basque Country 4th March 2011 O+berri Basque Institute for Healthcare Innovation 1 Support to the microsystems from the macro-level Macro-organizational support to Microsystems, among 9 success characteristics of 20 high-performing Microsystems Source: Nelson et al. (2002), Microsystems in Health Care: Part 1. Learning from High-Performing Front-Line Clinical Units 2
INDEX 1. O+Berri: Who we are 2. The Basque Health System 3. History of quality management in the BHS 4. The need for a new organisational paradigm 5. Our way forward: a strategy at macro-level 6. The pillar of change: innovation by health professionals 3 1. O+Berri: Who we are 4
O+Berri, the Basque Institute for Healthcare Innovation O+Berri belongs to a public foundation fully financed by the Department of Health and Consumer Affairs of the Basque Government. O+Berri promotes organisational innovation within the public Basque Health Service, as a means to achieving excellence. Basque Health Service: 23,800 employees. O+Berri s team: 1 director + 1 secretary + 7 researchers/consultants + 1 statistician+ 1 communications officer 5 O+Berri s GRIAL (grail) innovation model CAPTURE AND GENERATE KNOWLEDGE ON ORGANISATIONAL INNOVATION AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT G ather R esearch I mplement A ssess L earning and dissemination Gather and generate ideas and prototypes Piloting of projects Evaluation of Titulo pilots de Proyecto Leaning and dissemination Prospective and analysis of trends Expert analysis Laboratory of ideas and change experimentation Dissemination of good practices Training and capacity building FACILITATING TRANSFORMATION OF THE BASQUE HEALTH SYSTEM PROMOTE AND SPREAD MANAGEMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL INNOVATION 6
2. The Basque Health System 7 EUSKADI BASQUE COUNTRY Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao 8 8
EUSKADI BASQUE COUNTRY Donostia-San Sebastián 9 9 Basque Health System: Which population it serves? POPULATION (2009): 2,178,339 inhabitants 65 years (2009): 18.8% Total fertility rate (2009): 1.32 Old-age dependency ratio (2011): 29.9 Source: INE BIZKAIA Basque Country GIPUZKOA ALAVA Life expectancy at birth (2009) 78.5 for men 85.2 for women Source: INE 10
Spanish Health System Beveridge type Universal access Free health services at the time of use Financed through taxes Competence for organisation at regional level (Basque Government) In the Basque case, public provision of services 11 Spanish Health System: Distribution of competences State General organisation and coordination of health matters International health, and international health relations and agreements. Legislation on pharmaceutical products. Autonomous Communities Health Planning Public Health Health care Provinces Social services Municipalities Complementary public health functions linked to hygiene and the environment, and social services. 12 12
Organisation of Basque Health System The Basque Country as a Regional Government holds Health Planning powers as well as the capacity to Organize its own health services (since year 1988). Planning/Financing/Regulation Provision of Services Basque Ministry of Health (Regional Government) Osakidetza- Basque Health Service 13 13 Key figures about the public Basque Health System Basque Health Service Structure 31 healthcare organisations with management autonomy Primary Health Care 320 Health Centers distributed in 7 geographical health areas Hospitals (20) 12 Acute H. (4,278 beds) 4 medium and long stay H (524 beds) Mental Health 4 psychiatric services in acute hospitals 4 psychiatric Hospitals (777 beds) Ambulatory Mental health Services (54 centers in 3 organisations, one per province) Workforce (civil servants) total 23,803 (2008) 14 14
Public Basque Health System: multiple providers Primary Care Centres (public) Public hospitals Private hospitals Pharmacy (out-of-patient) Mental Health Centres (public) Specialists Emergencies Acute care Medium-long stay Psychiatric hospitals Free provision of services (provider according to place of residence) Co-payment 15 Basque Health System: Public health expenditure per capita 1800 1600 1.675 111% 1400 1200 1000 800 600 777 1.219 57% Basque Country 4.5% of GDP (2007) 400 200 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 EN MILES DE EUROS CORRIENTES EN MILES DE EUROS CONSTANTES Average OECD 6.4% of GDP (2007) Source: Healthcare public expense statistic. Ministry of Healthcare and Consumer Affairs. Contribution to the Healthcare public expenditure. *Data from the last published budget. 16
Basque health system v. OECD Camas Acute agudos/1000 beds h 150 100 Nurses Dues /1000 h 50 0 Estancia Average media LOS (agudos) (acute) Basque Country Source. Eustat 2007, OECD OECD Médicos/1000 Doctors h Ingresos Discharges /1000 h Frecuentación Occupancy rate 17 Basque health system v. other EU regions Indicator Basque country Veneto Wales Number of medical doctors working in public health care system/per 1000 population 2.7 1.58 1.85 Number of nurses working in public health care system/per 1000 population 3.16 5.28 7.2 Total number of hospital beds/100 000 of population 383 459 438 Hospital discharge rate per 1000 population 146.7 117.4 173 Average length of hospital stay, days 6.29 8.3 7.5 Source: Thesis by Polina Putrik, student of Reghealth master 2010, developed in O+Berri 18
3. History of quality management in the Basque Health Service 19 Quality management in the Basque Health Service Experience of 15 years with the EFQM 1983 Creation of the Basque Health Service 1992 Creation of Department of Care Quality 1995 EFQM model of excellence 1996 Biannual self-evaluation with model 1998 Strategic objective of the organisation 2000 External evaluations Training in EFQM and increasing number of quality technicians 20
The EFQM model 21 EFQM model of excellence as framework for quality improvement in the Basque Health Service EFQM awards obtained by Basque Health Service EUROPEAN PRIZE Q GOLDEN Q SILVER 12,9% Excellence > 300 p. Compromise 1 Prize award Hospital Zumárraga 1 Finalist (500 points) 5 hospitals 2 PC 54,8% (400 points) 7 hospitals 3 PC 4 other 89,7% 22
Projects and tools developed Projects developed over time: Training programmes on care quality Clinical management contracts Improvement of information systems technologies Implementation of health technology assessment systems Support to health care research and knowledge Mapping of key processes of care clinical guidelines Standards and indicators of quality of care for some diseases standardization of nursing process of care; surveillance prevention and control strategies for nosocomial infection; strategies to improve waiting lists for surgical procedures and specialised care Tools: surveys for patient Surveys on motivation and people satisfaction in healthcare organizations Development of indicators and standards of patients safety, effectiveness and accessibility 23 Well positioned among Spanish regional health services Source: Sánchez et al. (2006) in International Journal for Quality in Health Care 24
4. The need for a new organisational paradigm 25 Challenges of the Basque Healthcare System Demographic and epidemiological changing environment ageing of population, lifestyles Chronic diseases Sustainability of Basque healthcare system economic crisis, ageing, expensive new technologies 26
Evolution of prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases in the Basque Country 27 Evolution people with chronic illnesses by age Age 28
Distribution of population over 65 by number of chronic illnesses, 2007 None One Two Three or more Approximately, the 77% of the population 65+ has at least one CD 29 Most prevalent chronic illnesses/risk factors (patients 18+) High blood pressure Hypercholesterolemia Osteoarticular Pathology Diabetes Asthma Cardiovascular illnesses Obesity Neurodegenerative dementias Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 30
Burden of Chronic Disease 59% 66% 86% Source: WHO Report 2004 31 What does it imply for the healthcare system? 32
Which healthcare model are we offering? The basic characteristic of the current care model is that it is reactive. Patients have an episodic relationship with the health system. The current system is designed and structured to comply with an epidemiological pattern characterized by acute conditions which does not correspond with today s needs. Furthermore, there is a lack of integration of services within the health system and with other social resources. There is an urgent need to respond to the needs of this increasing group of patients in a different way; in a more integrated way 33 Differential factors interventions chronic patients Require a coordinated approach from all levels of care (primary, specialised, medium stay, mental health, emergencies, social services, health at work, etc.), and a continuum of care with a focus on the individual patient The patient and the carer play an important role in the successful outcome of the intervention with the need to change life styles and adhere to these over long periods. Not only medical, but also social, emotional and material needs of the patient are to be considered. Preventive (primary and secondary), rehabilitative and palliative interventions become fundamental. 34
Our health system does not fit! Need for a new organisational paradigm 35 Chronic care a new approach is advocated TRADITIONAL MODEL Sickness Care Model Physician Centric CHRONIC CARE MODEL Care is Proactive Care delivered by a health care team Care integrated across time, place and conditions Care delivered in group appointments, nurse clinics, telephone, internet, e-mail, remote care technology. Self-management support responsibility and integral part of the delivery system 36
Which way? A new paradigm is needed with less emphasis on acute and episodic care. We know where to go: models of chronic care offer us the guide. 37 What have we learnt from others? Ed Wagner s CCM: A framework for change 38
Evidence on effectiveness of CCM There is evidence of positive impact of using one or several components of the CCM on processes of care, clinical outcomes and use of resources. But it varies depending on intervention, condition and implementation context (Tsai et al. (2005) and Bodenheimer (2009)) There is no evidence that all components of the model are essential for improvement in care to chronic patients (NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement (2006)). Evidence suggests that it is the accumulative effect of different elements of the CCM, rather than each element on its own, what explains its impact (Ham (2009). 39 WHO s Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions (ICCC) Framework WHO (2002), Innovative care for chronic conditions: building blocks for action. Global report 40
Guiding principles of the ICCC model Evidence-based decision making. Population health approach. Focus on prevention. Emphasis on the quality of care and systemic quality. Flexibility/adaptability. Integration as a core and fractal of the model. 41 Population management/stratification: the Kaiser Permanente Pyramid Extended Kaiser Pyramid Prevention Prevention Case Intensive or Case Management Management Assisted Care or Care Disease or Care Management Usual Supported Care with Self Support care Level 3 Complex cases with co-morbidities (3-5%) Level 2 Higher risk cases (15%) Level 1 70-80% of people with long term conditions Health promotion and prevention General population 42
Characteristics of high performing chronic care systems C. Ham (2010) 1. Universal coverage 2. Care that is free at the point of use 3. A delivery system focused on prevention 4. Support for patients, carers and families to self-manage their conditions 5. Priority for primary care 6. Population management is emphasised 7. Care should be integrated 8. IT should underpin the provision of chronic care 9. Care should be effectively coordinated 10.These ten characteristics should be linked into a coherent whole 43 What we learnt from literature and experiences elsewhere Effective interventions exist greatest impact when implemented in COMBINATION need to be adapted to LOCAL CONTEXT 44
5. Our way forward: a strategy at macro-level 45 The vision for change in the Basque Country Framework for transformation of the Basque Health System at medium term Through organisational innovation An opportunity for improvement in quality and sustainability of whole system 2-5 years A Strategy for Tackling the Challenge of Chronicity in the Basque Country (July 2010) 46
Keeping the population in the radar 47 5 Policies I Focus on stratified population health II Promotion and Prevention of chronic illnesses III Responsibility and autonomy for patients IV Continuous care for the chronic patient V Efficient interventions adapted to the patient s needs 48
Implementation process Strategic direction BOTTOM-UP from health professionals Makes use of local leadership Adapted to local context Accepted by clinicians TOP-DOWN from strategic direction Economies of scale Extension of successful local innovations Signals common direction and priorities Clinical practice 49 Implementation through 14 strategic projects VISION Strategic projects Population Focus Prevention and Promotion Patient Responsibility and Autonomy Continuity of care 5. Unified Medical Record Interventions adapted to patients needs 1. Stratification and targeting of the population 2. Interventions aimed at the principal risk factors 3. Self care and patient education: Active Patient 4. Setting up a network of activated patients, connected through Web 2.0 by the patients associations 6. Integrated care 7. Development of sub-acute hospitals 8. Advanced nursing competences 9. Socio-health Collaboration 11. Multi-channel centre 12. e-prescription 13. Chronic illness research centre 10. Financing and contracting 14. Innovation O+berri by the health professionals 50
Expected results Better health results Chronic patients and carers Greater satisfaction and quality of life More time for tasks of higher added value Less routine tasks Health professionals Basque Health System adapted to Chronicity Citizens Efficient use of resources Prevention of chronicity and its progress 51 Implementation gears Innovation by health professionals Investment in IT Financing mechanisms of providers Leadership development Alliances Investing in research on health services 52
6. The pillar of change: innovation by health professionals 53 Bottom-up innovation : an evidence-based process Action-research projects from health professionals Work in progress Process under test Mechanisms of identification, finance and support EDALIA Equipo de Apoyo a la Investigación acción Follow up and evaluation Assessment for scaling up 54
Edalia - capacity building on action-research EDALIA : Team for the support of action-research. Multidisciplinary Trained quality experts and researchers Action research: collaborative and participatory research methods that integrates research and action, with the aim of achieving improvements to be implemented in the health system though a cyclical process of continuing learning. Characteristics of projects supported by EDALIA: Aligned with chronicity strategy Action-research project to be piloted in Basque healthcare system Originated from health professionals (clinicians and managers) Require methodological or organisational support in order to be successful 55 Functions of EDALIA team Identification and promotion of themes and clinical groups for development of action research on healthcare services Support of action-research projects Improve design and launching of initiatives by health professionals Guarantee assessment and production of evidence with a research perspective Assess reach and potential for extension of initiatives Disseminate best practices through the Basque health system Through: Methodological support Economical evaluation Contact and with management in healthcare organisations Ensure coherence with financing mechanisms Strengthen capacity of healthcare organizations in the system on organizational innovation 56
Identification and follow up of bottom-up innovation projects Identification Quality support staff Contracting process (within financing process of providers) Action-research grants (annual call from regional Health Ministry) 73 projects identified in 2010 7 months to 3 years Maximum budget per project 170,000 (average annual budget 36,500 ) Follow up Project assessment: Launching of project Every 6 months Closure Evaluation committee: assessment of potential for extension to the whole system: Team responsible for implementation of Chronicity Strategy within Basque Health Service O+Berri, Basque Institute for Healthcare Innovation To meet at least once per year Recommendations to be forwarded to Ministry of Health and top management of Basque 57 Health Service Others actions to support innovation projects by frontline teams Training on IHI s Collaborative Model for Improvement to 25 Basque health professionals First improvement collaborative project to start in 2011 in COPD 58
Others actions to support innovation projects by frontline teams Visits of Basque Health Minister to healthcare organisations (hospitals and primary healthcare areas) to promote and learn at first hand about innovation projects being developed in the field. Regular follow up meetings between health minister, top managers of health Ministry and health Service with leaders on strategic innovation projects within Basque Strategy for Chronicity Training on leadership development 59 Others actions to support innovation projects by frontline teams Hobe-bi: An example in a primary healthcare province Innovation structure of the primary healthcare area of the province of Bizkaia, for the identification, definition and development of innovative ideas with potential to generate changes in healthcare. Based on pre-existing web-based social network for sharing knowledge, information and ideas among primary healthcare professionals in the province. Social network Knowledge Group IDEAS Promotes generation and definition of ideas through social network. Innovation Group Manages and decides on actions about the innovation process. Project Group At demand of the innovation group, it names the technical team in charge of feasibility study on an idea. Development Group Implements/tests an idea. 60
Others actions to support innovation projects by frontline teams Inspiration forum: An example in a primary healthcare area Exchange of ideas and information in a primary care area (1,014 health professionals) 61 From top-down quality improvement to bottom-up clinical innovation The experience in the Basque Health System 62
III Spanish Conference on Care for Chronic Patients 19-20 May 2011 San Sebastian Information: http://cronicidad.euskadi.net/ 63 Jörgen Tholstrup Jonköping Council Sweden Clinical Microsystems Thomas Bodenheimer University of California US Care management Geraint Lewis Nuffield Trust UK Stratification models International speakers at III Spanish Conference on Care for Chronic Patients Xiao Shaobo Beijing Institute of Technology China ehealth Laura Adams Rhode Island Quality Institute US Health information Harvey Skinner York University Canada Health promotion and ICT Alex Jadad Centre for Global ehealth Innovation Canada64 EHealth, EBM
Additional information A Strategy for Tackling the Challenge of Chronicity in the Basque Country http://cronicidad.euskadi.net Webpage of O+Berri: http://oberri.bioef.org/ E-mail: regina@bioef.org THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION 65