FCS Embedded Training: An Overview

Similar documents
Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

Future Combat Systems

Future Combat Systems Industry Day Briefing

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems

FCS Changing the Face of Live Training

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

FCS Update & Testing. Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

Analysis of the Operational Effect of the Joint Chemical Agent Detector Using the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS) MORS: June 2008

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

UNITED STATES ARMY. FCS - Sensors. LTG Stephen Speakes 14 Nov Army Strong 1

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

C4I System Solutions.

Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Test and Evaluation WIPT

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

Improving the Tank Scout. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain R.L. Burton CG #3, FACADs: Majors A.L. Shaw and W.C. Stophel 7 February 2006

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TRAINING TRANSFORMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

From the onset of the global war on

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Expeditionary Basecamp Passive

Embedded Training Solution for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) A3

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

NDIA Air Targets and UAV Division Symposium. LTC Scott Tufts 4 October 2012

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Lessons learned process ensures future operations build on successes

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Blue on Blue: Tracking Blue Forces Across the MAGTF Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain D.R. Stengrim to: Major Shaw, CG February 2005

From Now to Net-Centric

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Non-System Training Devices - Eng Dev FY 2012 OCO

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

PEO Missiles and Space Overview Briefing for the 2010 Corrosion Summit February 2010 Huntsville, AL

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributive Interactive Simulations (DIS) - Eng Dev FY 2013 OCO

Digitization... A Warfighter s Perspective

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

UNCLASSIFIED. Stephen Beaudoin

Wildland Fire Assistance

Domain Reuse. Mr. Neil Patterson & Mr. Milton Smith

Engineering the Army s Next Generation Medical Vehicle (MV) for Rapid Responses

DoD CBRN Defense Doctrine, Training, Leadership, and Education (DTL&E) Strategic Plan

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Cold Environment Assessment Tool (CEAT) User s Guide

New Tactics for a New Enemy By John C. Decker

Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15. Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

The Need for NMCI. N Bukovac CG February 2009

We are often admonished to improve your foxhole

Transcription:

FCS Embedded Training: An Overview Chuck Moler FCS LSI Training Systems IPT 12/13/2005 Training is THE factor in determining the victor. - DSB Task Force on Training Superiority and Training Surprise Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited, TACOM 05 Dec 2005, case 05-288 1

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE DEC 2005 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2005 to 00-00-2005 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE FCS Embedded Training: An Overview 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Future Combat Systems,Washington,DC,20301 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Modeling and Simulation Conference, 2005 Dec 12-15, Las Cruces, NM 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 20 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Leading Transformation The US Army At War and Transforming 781,000 to 480,000 active duty since 1990 Army s Transformation effort announced in Oct 1999 Leading implementation of network-centric operations Driving Joint interdependency & standards General Peter J. Schoomaker Chief of Staff, U.S. Army FCS is a Significant Opportunity to Support the Soldier 2

Training Enhancements Current Force vs Future Force Current Force Infrequent doctrine/ttp updates Current Force Slow to adapt to needed changes Constrained training capability when deployed Appended TESS Limited training support packages Limited Battle Command Training Capability FCS Equipped BCT Ability to rapidly update doctrine/ttp for deployed forces Respond quickly to the dynamic challenge Ability to train 24/7 with no appended equipment while deployed or at Home Station Embedded TESS capability Fully embedded Live, Virtual, Constructive, Multi-mode training capability Embedded Battle Command Training capability Custom SW for each application - Product line approach to system development - Collective training capability - Basic load of Training Support Packages FCS is providing a new capability that takes Training to the Soldier anywhere, anytime 3

Centerpiece: FCS Equipped BCT Capabilities Transportable by C130/C17/C5 profile FCS-equipped BCT Can Fight on Arrival Close With And Destroy Enemy Forces To Seize Terrain And Dominate The Battlefield Battle Command on the Move Ubiquitous, Distributed C 4 ISR Network Networked Army and Joint Fires Overmatch Enemy in All Conditions and Environments Mutual Support Integrated Survivability: Soldiers and Platforms Leverage Integration of Active and Passive systems and Force Protection Reduced Sustainment Requirements Network Enabled, Embedded, Virtual, Constructive, or Live Training Soldiers as the Centerpiece of the Formation 4

See First Act First Manned Ground Vehicle Systems Understand First Finish Decisively NLOS Cannon Reconnaissance and Surveillance Intelligence gathering Maintenance & Recovery FCS Family of Systems Command and Control Vehicle Long Range Indirect Supporting Fires Medical Medical Treatment Evacuation Robotic Systems Command and Control Vehicle Command and Control Fires & Effects Complementary Systems NLOS MORTAR CL III UAV Intelligent Munitions Indirect Fire Close Support to Dismounted Soldiers Logistics Battle Command Uunattended Ground Sensors Class IV UAV BCT BCT (BDE) (BDE) Level Level Support Mounted Combat Infantry Carrier System Reconnaissance, Vehicle Surveillance & Transport Infantry to Battle Direct Fire Target Acquisition Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited, Supporting TACOM fire 05 Dec c 2005, case 05-288 Close Support t Infantry MULE NLOS AVN BICC FSB CAB Level RECON MORTAR INFANTRY ARMOR CO & PLT Level Armed Robotic Vehicles Class I and II UAV Uunmanned Ground Vehicles Soldier Systems 5

FCS Training Summary up front Embedded Training is the user s default option Enabling technologies are sufficiently mature Procurement strategy is well defined and understood by LSI Integration is the challenge 6

Embedded Training.. a DoD plan ; an Army Commitment Build an Integrated Live, Virtual, and Constructive Training Environment. The ultimate goal is to develop a transformed training capability that provides accurate, timely, relevant, and affordable training and mission rehearsal in support of specific operational needs. Training must be a living process with the ability to adapt and respond quickly to the dynamic challenges of the national security environment. This will require the ability to identify potential crisis situations in real time; conduct course-ofaction analyses; utilize continuously available networks for mission rehearsal, simulation and just-in-time training; and measure performance systematically to improve operational effectiveness. Para 3.2, Strategic Plan for Transforming DoD Training, 1 Mar 02 Expanded training capabilities to enable training anywhere, anytime 7

FCS BCT Training Concept Expanded training availability using organic, integrated, embedded systems - Training, Operations, and Mission Planning/Rehearsal - for full spectrum training including JIM Full range of training task representation - individual, crew, collective, and leaders - embedded or reach via C4ISR system Reduced training burden and cost resulting from product line design approach - maximum commonality between operational and training systems Initial training Part task trainers Embedded systems Individual Crew Stimulators Embedded training C4ISR drivers Stand-alone simulations and simulators CTCs Units and leader teams Knowledge repositories Highly skilled and trained force Home station and institution FCS will provide the first Army embedded training capability that supports individual, crew, collective, unit, and leader training 8

OV-1: Operational Concept Graphic FCS BCT Embedded Training System Plus Operational Rehearsal (Battle Command and Embedded Training shared function) KPP#6: The FCS FoS must have an embedded individual and collective training capability that supports live, virtual and constructive training environments. 9

KPP Critical Enabling Requirements Embedded Training - Live Embedded Training Virtual / Constructive Interoperability & Reach CTC HS Dismounted Training EXERCISE FUNCTIONS Plan Exercise Initialize Simulation Execute Exercise Assess Exercise ENABLERS -Opns& Tng Req ts -TngReq t Scenario Generation Exercise Management OTW View Embedded TESS Computer Generated Forces (CGF) Synthetic Operational Environments (3-D terrain) Datalogger After Action Review (AAR) Intra Vehicle Connectivity Interoperability & Reach 10

Embedded Training Is Achieved Thru. Army Leverage Developing Programs Army Training Information Architecture (ATIA) TNG IPT/PEOSTRI TCC Software Items Based on the SoS Architecture LSI One Team Partners OneSAF Objective System (OOS) Common Training Instrumentation Architecture (CTIA) Exercise Management Sys Training Management Sys Environmental Representation Scenario Generation Sys Computer Generated Forces (CGF) After Action Review (AAR) Datalogger SHARED SOSCOE OneTESS.a sequence of repetitive integration activities with all One Team Partners TCCs are: A Software item Used on multiple Prime Items (variants) Developed as part of a product line by the TCC OneTeam Partner (PEO STRI) to leverage reuse from an existing (TRL 6) program. Integrated/extended by OneTeam Partners to meet the product team s training requirements in support of a system IAW the SOW. 11

IP 10: Conduct Multi-Mode Training OV-1 CONUS Knowledge Repositories Unit Training (FM 7-0) Plan: Conduct long-range planning, short-range planning, and near-term planning Execute: Prepare training, conduct training, and recover from training X FBCT Assess: Conduct organizational assessments, prepare training assessments, and evaluate training NCIE in FCS BCT Individual Training Commander, leader, supervisor and soldier conduct individual training management and soldier participates in self-development, OJT, and cross training to gain new skills 12

IP 10 Process Flow Covered by Training Common Components (TCCs) Training Audience Individual Crew Collective Applications Live Virtual Constructive Multi- Mode Simulation-based Training (Individual, crew, collective) Scenario Generation & Environment Representation CBT Training (Individual) 13

Embedded Training Anywhere, Anytime Embedded Task Training (Crews and Soldier) SaaS-G External Simulations CGF Training Common Components Environment Representation Training Management Data Logger Scenario Development Exercise Management After Action Review (AAR) Range Instrumentation System Distributed Knowledge Repositories Platform Crew-station Distributed, Collective Training (Leaders and Units) Computer Generated Forces and Environmental Representation Live Training [Embedded Tactical Engagement Simulation System (TESS) and CTC Instrumentation Interface] Distributed Learning (Operators, Maintainers, Medics,.) Reach ARFOR HQs FBCT Combat Training Centers M1A2 Home Station FCS BCT will be capable of reach for Training Products (e.g., TSPs) Common, consistent, integrated capabilities 14

Embedded Task Training Crews and Soldier Driver Computer Generated Forces NOTIONAL(CGF) Environmental Representation Cdr / Wpns Effects CAPABILITIES Individual Computer-Based Training (IETMs/CBTs) Mission Systems Trainers (Driver, Weapon, RSTA, C2) Switchable vision blocks provide virtual (out-the-window) view Driver or Crew Chief acts as Instructor Battle Stations override ENABLERS Environmental Representations (terrain, littoral, atmosphere, weather) are essential to operations and training. They will be stored on-board FCS platforms. Computer Generated Forces embedded on-board will provide external entities necessary to training tasks (e.g., targets, Unmanned Vehicles, dismounted Soldiers). Individual / crew training utilizes internal system network 15

Distributed, Collective Training Computer Generated Forces (CGF) Environmental Representation Leaders and Units CAPABILITIES The FCS-equipped unit will be capable of conducting distributed, collective training in either a virtual or constructive training mode anywhere and anytime. ENABLERS Computer Generated Forces- will provide wrap-around friendly combat, combat support and combat service support elements (including joint and coalition) and opposing force elements to create training in a combined arms environment. CGF can be provided from; (1) on-board, (2) adjacent FCS platform(s) not part of the training audience or (3) by interoperating with external simulation connected by the Network Battle Command system Network services (transport layer) Battle Command Services must work in training mode Collective distributed training depends on network services 16

Live Training Wrap-around Forces ACTF (WARSIM/OOS) Training Audience FBCT ARFOR HQs E-TESS CAPABILITIES The FCS-equipped unit will be capable of conducting instrumented live training at home station, at CTCs, and while deployed Legacy Multiple Integrated Laser System (MILES/TESS) capabilities (i.e., sensors, eye-safe engagement laser, signature simulator and kill indicator) will be embedded in FCS platforms through dual use of operational Laser capabilities The FCS network will be capable of acting as a range instrumentation system connecting all FCS platforms for distributed home station and deployed training or interfacing to the existing instrumentation system at the CTCs Absent real supporting or OPFOR entities/units, a separate FCS system, operating in a training mode will provide virtual wrap-around entities/units within the COP (2D view) Live training can be accomplished at home, CTCs or deployed locations 17

Reach Distant Learning (Operators, Maintainers, Medics,.) ARFOR UA Subunit HQs FBCT UE Unit of Action will be capable of reach for distant learning via C4ISR system The FCS-equipped unit will be capable of reaching back to distributed knowledge repositories via the FCS Network system for training support products such as: TSPs for collective training exercises, TSPs for individual training leader or Soldier tasks, or distance learning modules No Fixed Stay-behind Force in O&O HSOC HSOC (FBCT) DISR Auto Request Auto Catalog Updates ARFOR On-board TSP Catalog TSP in Catalog TSP On-board TSP Basic Load TSP Training Support Package ATSC Army Training Support Command HSOC Home Station Operations Capability 18

Training IPT Provides Products Mission and Task Analyses (TRADOC, FD, SEI, Suppliers) Embedded Training (ET) system (L, V, C) Driver Trainer Weapons Trainer RSTA Trainer Battle Command Trainer Stand-Alone Training Systems (reconfigurable) for those tasks which are unsafe, unaffordable or impractical for embedded training; expected primary support for institutions (L, V) High fidelity Desk-top Each contains a progressive performance matrix (a la Conduct of Fire Trainer) Each Stand-alone trainer reuses Embedded Training (ET) software Maintenance Trainers Training Support Packages (TSPs) - Individual and Collective Level V Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (Logistics IPT) Simulation-based Training Support Packages (TSPs) Interactive Multimedia Instruction (IMI) Common Embedded Training Software L = Live V = Virtual C = Constructive 19

Summary Embedded Training is the user s default option Enabling technologies are sufficiently mature Procurement strategy is well defined and understood by LSI Integration is the challenge 20