UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C April 10, 2018

Similar documents
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C July 7, 2011

May 23, Docket No License No. DPR-12

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STANDARD REVIEW PLAN

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STANDARD REVIEW PLAN

CProgress Energy. Qk4~ May 21, F U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. [Docket Nos ; NRC ] Northern States Power Company - Minnesota; Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC ] Preparation of Environmental Reports for Nuclear Power Stations

REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH REGULATORY GUIDE 1.8 (Drafts were issued as DG-1084 and DG-1012)

Preparation of Environmental Reports for Nuclear Power Stations

AnJEDISON 10 CFR CFR March 31, ATTN: Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

Regulatory Approach for License Renewal for Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors in the USA

GUIDANCE AND EXAMPLES FOR IDENTIFYING 10 CFR 50.2 DESIGN BASES

Research and Test Reactor Licensing Actions and Lessons Learned

i6 Ct AR (p. 16): HEMORANDUMI FOR: Chairman Zech Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Carr Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Curtiss FROM:

NEI [Revision 0] Guidelines for a Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program

February 13, 2013 EA

NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY REQUIREMENTS FOR EXEMPT DISTRIBUTION LICENSEE ANNUAL TRANSFER REPORTS

DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is discontinuing a rulemaking

Licensing of Nuclear Installations

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY TRANSPORTATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL QUANTITIES OF CONCERN NRC THREAT ADVISORY AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES SYSTEM

HUMBOLDT BAY INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION LICENSE APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

Radiation Protection Program Updates

Request for Relief No. 20, Revision 0, for Units I and 2 3rd Ten Year Inservice Inspection Interval

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL IRIB

Regulatory Activities Related to Power Reactors Transitioning to Decommissioning

ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL STSB

Approaches and Methods to Conduct Regulatory Safety Review and Assessment

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC ] Dry Storage and Transportation of High Burnup Spent Nuclear Fuel

NRC UPDATE EP REGULATORY ACTIVITIES. Glenn M. Tracy / Kathy Halvey Gibson Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE (MD) Governmental Relations and Public Affairs

Control Number: Item Number: 209. Addendum StartPage: 0

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, DC September 26, 2005

Life Extension of Nuclear Power Plants

NUREG-0800 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STANDARD REVIEW PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES - GENERAL REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING

Regulatory framework and safety requirements for new (gen III) reactors

APPENDIX A ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE MEMORANDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION

TO ALL LICENSEES OF OPERATING PLANTS, APPLICANTS FOR AN OPERATING LICENSE, AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC ] Nuclear Regulatory Commission Insider Threat Program Policy Statement

Nuclear Operating Company

DIRECTIVES. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2009/71/EURATOM of 25 June 2009 establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations

Technical Basis for the Emergency Preparedness Rulemaking

EXTRAORDINARY PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY. ISLAMABAD, THURSDAY, March 1, 2012

NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY RADIATION SAFETY OFFICERS FOR MEDICAL-USE LICENSES UNDER 10 CFR PART 35

Insider Mitigation Program for Nuclear Facilities. Joe Rivers Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Defines adult foster care and license categories Defines licensee

LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS COUNCIL DIRECTIVE establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations

IAEA MISSION TO REVIEW NISA S APPROACH TO THE COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SAFETY OF EXISTING POWER REACTOR FACILITIES

license AUTHORITY FILE CC Apv il., 1982

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Occupational Ionizing Radiation Protection Program

Exelton RS August 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC

PREVENT YOUR DIETARY SUPPLEMENT LABORATORY FROM BECOMING A COMPLIANCE RISK. Marian Boardley 2013

THE IAEA FUKUSHIMA REPORT AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Observations of Implementing the Nuclear Promise for CAP

CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION S RISK BASED APPROACH TO REGULATING FUEL FACILITIES IN CANADA

Convention on Nuclear Safety 7 th Review Meeting 2017

NATIONAL NUCLEAR REGULATOR

LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE FORUM, INC.

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

SUMMARY: By this direct final rule, the Coast Guard is removing. the regulation for the safety zone at Snake Island, also known as

Exelkn. PSLTR: # U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

IAEA MISSION TO REVIEW NISA S APPROACH TO THE COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SAFETY OF EXISTING POWER REACTOR FACILITIES CONDUCTED IN JAPAN

FENOC AOLVS. February 3, 2000 PY-CEI/NRR-2463L. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D. C.

The IAEA OSART Review. Attachment 1 Tokyo Electric Power Company

Jenny Rollins, RCB Manager. Radiology Compliance Branch

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING

Yucca Mountain and Interim Storage Proposed Appropriation Language

Environmental Management Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER DIVISION - WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Regulatory challenges in nuclear safety

Emergency Preparedness Final Rule Implementation

VERIFICATION OF READINESS TO START UP OR RESTART NUCLEAR FACILITIES

Meeting Notes Project Phase 2 of Relay Loadability: Generation Standard Drafting Team December 11-14, 2012

SUMMARY: The Captain of the Port of New Orleans (COTP New. Orleans), under the authority of the Magnuson Act,, established

Record of Proceedings, Including Reasons for Decision

Reform of Japan s Nuclear Safety Regulation

Topical Peer Review 2017 Ageing Management of Nuclear Power Plants

Standard NUC Nuclear Plant Interface Coordination

Brooke County Access I, L.L.C., Brooke County Access Project Monthly Pre-filing Status Report #5 Docket No. PF

Nuclear Regulatory Compliance: Enhancing Safety and Security Through a Clear Regulatory Framework

February 8, 2017 SUBJECT: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT /

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Safety Zones, Facilities on the Outer Continental Shelf in the. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish safety zones

Details of Study Report 1 1 Introduction 2 International Emergency Response Systems 3 Present Situation and Approach in East Asia 4 Conclusion

DIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL

Department of Agriculture

MONDAY, JUNE a.m. 5 p.m. Registration for Emergency Preparedness Training Grand Caribbean Ballroom Foyer

Collection of Information under Review by Office of Management and Budget; OMB

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1002 WEST 23 RD STREET, SUITE 350 PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA

Post- Fukushima accident. Action plan. Follow-up of the peer review of the stress tests performed on European nuclear power plants

Notice of Proposed Rule

ONADE s Data Quality Review

Opening Remarks and Introductions

The Safety Audit. Safety Audits Why Bother? Oh no.. 4/26/2017. I need some help but where can I get it????? Does it really matter? I hate metrics!

Specific Comments on Proposed Amendments

Transcription:

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson Senior Vice President Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 April 10, 2018 SUBJECT: PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 - REGULATORY AUDIT SUMMARY REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT TITLE 10 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTION 50.69 (EPID L-2017-LLA-0281) Dear Mr. Hanson: By letter dated August 30, 2017, as supplemented by letter dated October 24, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession Nos. ML 17243A014 and ML 172978521, respectively), Generation Company, LLC () requested an amendment to the Renewed Facility Operating License for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3, to adopt Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 50.69 for risk-informed categorization and treatment of structures, systems, and components. To support its review, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff conducted a regulatory audit that started January 31, 2018, and ended February 1, 2018, at the office, 300 Way, Kennett Square, PA 19348. The staff reviewed documents and held discussions with members of and its contractors. The regulatory audit summary is enclosed with this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2328 or Jennifer.Tobin@nrc.gov. Sincerely, Docket Nos. 50-277 and 50-278 Enclosure: Regulatory Audit Summary cc: Listseiv Jennifer Tobin, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION REGULATORY AUDIT SUMMARY FOR JANUARY 31 -FEBRUARY 1 1 2018. AUDIT IN SUPPORT OF LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT 10 CFR 50.69 EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-277 AND 50-278 1.0 BACKGROUND By letter dated August 30, 2017 (Reference 1 ), as supplemented by letter dated October 24, 2017 (Reference 2), Generation Company, LLC () requested an amendment to the Renewed Facility Operating License for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (Peach Bottom), Units 2 and 3, to adopt Title 1 O of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 50.69 (10 CFR 50.69) for risk informed categorization and treatment of structures, systems, and components (SSCs ). The proposed license amendment would modify the licensing basis by the addition of a license condition to allow for the implementation of the provisions of 10 CFR 50.69, which allow adjustment of the scope of equipment subject to special treatment controls (e.g., quality assurance, testing, inspection, condition monitoring, assessment, and evaluation). This voluntary risk-informed alternative rule allows power reactor licensees and license applicants to apply a risk-informed categorization process to categorize SSCs based on their safety significance. The final rule was published in the Federal Register on November 22, 2004 (69 FR 68008) (Reference 3). The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) staff issued Regulatory Guide 1.201, Revision 1, "Guidelines for Categorizing Structures, Systems, and Components in Nuclear Power Plants According to Their Safety Significance," in May 2006 (Reference 4). The NRC staff's review of the application has commenced in accordance with the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) Office Instruction LIC-101, "License Amendment Review Procedures." The NRC staff determined that a regulatory audit of 's 10 CFR 50.69 application should be conducted in accordance with NRR Office Instruction LIC-111, "Regulatory Audits," for the staff to gain a better understanding of the licensee's proposed risk-informed categorization process. The regulatory audit was a planned license or regulation-related activity that included the examination and evaluation of primarily non-docketed information. The regulatory audit was conducted with the intent to gain understanding, to verify information, and/or to identify information that will require docketing to support the basis of a licensing or regulatory decision. Performing a regulatory audit of the licensee's information is expected to assist the staff in Enclosure

-2- efficiently conducting its review or gain insights on the licensee's processes or procedures. Information that the NRC staff relies upon to make the safety determination must be submitted on the docket. However, the NRC staff may review supporting information retained as records under 10 CFR 50.71 and/or 10 CFR 54.37, which, although not required to be submitted as part of the licensing action, would help the staff better understand the licensee's submitted information. The purpose of the audit was to gain an understanding of the information needed to support the staff's licensing decision regarding the license amendment request (LAR) and to develop appropriate requests for additional information (RAls), as needed. The information submitted in support of the Peach Bottom LAR is under review, and additional information needed to support the LAR review will be formally communicated by the NRC staff using the RAI process in accordance with NRR Office Instruction LIC-101. An audit team, which consisted of the NRC staff and NRC contractor from Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL), conducted the regulatory audit from January 31, 2018, through February 1, 2018, at the office, 300 Way, Kennett Square, PA 19348. 2.0 AUDIT ACTIVITIES The NRC audit team consisted of five staff from the Division of Risk Assessment, Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Licensing Branch and one PNNL contractor. Several NRC observers including staff from the Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Division of Engineering, and NRC Region 1 were in attendance for 's Integrated Decision-Making Panel (IDP) meeting which occurred during the morning hours of January 31, 2018. Attachment 1 provides the list of attendees from NRC, PNNL,, and other participants. On January 31, conducted a four-hour demonstration of the IDP associated with the Peach Bottom 10 CFR 50.69 categorization for the residual heat removal (RHR) system. The IDP primarily consisted of presentations and technical discussion of the categorization results from the PRA, non-pra, passive, defense-in-depth, and qualitative categorization elements of process for each of the functions associated with RHR including final conclusions of how each function translates into categorization of system safety components. For the PRA results, 's 10 CFR 50.69 team presented results of categorization based both on internal events and fire core damage frequency and large early release frequency. The NRC staff were observers and mostly in listening mode for the entire IDP session. The regulatory audit started in the afternoon immediately following the IDP session, with the NRC audit team and the licensee's staff and contractors. During the audit, team members participated in technical discussions according to the audit plan available in NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) (Reference 5). Technical discussions focused on the following major review areas: technical adequacy of the internal events and fire PRA, categorization process overview, and review of the audit questions with the licensee's 10 CFR 50.69 team. In addition to reviewing the audit questions, NRC discussed lessons learned from 10 CFR 50.69 audits for other licensees. During the audit, the NRC staff discussed several questions associated with the LAR, some of which will be formally sent as RAls. At the conclusion of the audit, the team participated in a summary exit meeting with the audit team on February 1, 2018. The NRC staff provided a brief conclusion of the audit objectives that were met and details on the path forward. There were no open items in the

- 3 - discussion and no deviation from the audit plan. Attachment 2 contains a list of documents reviewed by the team during the audit. 3.0 RESULTS OF THE AUDIT The RAls were issued to the licensee on April 6, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 180968506), with a request to submit the response within 30 days. 4.0 REFERENCES 1. Letter from J. Barstow,, to NRC, "Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 - Application to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, 'Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components (SSCs) for Nuclear Power Plants,"' dated August 30, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 17243A014). 2. Letter from J. Barstow,, to NRC, "Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 - Supplement to Application to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors," dated October 24, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 172978521). 3. Federal Register Notice (69 FR 68008), "Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Plants," dated November 22, 2004 (ADAMS Accession No. ML042960073). 4. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.201, Revision 1, "Guidelines for Categorizing Structures, Systems, and Components in Nuclear Power Plants according to Their Safety Significance," issued May 2006 (ADAMS Accession No. ML061090627). 5. Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3, Regulatory Audit Plan - License Amendment Request to Adopt 10 CFR Section 50.69, dated January 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 18005A077).

List of Participants U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Audit Team Stacey Rosenberg NRC Branch Chief Leslie Fields NRC Audit Team Leader Mihaela Biro NRC Audit Technical Lead Jonathan Evans NRC Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Michael Levine NRC PRA Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Team Garill Coles PNNL PRA NRC Integrated Decision-Making Panel Observation Team Jesse Quichocho NRC Branch Chief Ali Rezai NRC Electrical Engineer Hari Kodali NRC Materials Engineer Ed Miller NRC Project Manager Jenny Tobin NRC Licensing Project Manager NRC Regional Staff in Attendance Frank Arner RI Senior Resident Analyst Chris Cahill RI Senior Resident Analyst Generation Company, LLC - Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 (Peach Bottom) Team Glenn Stewart Shannon Rafferty-Czincila Eugene Kelly Preeti Furtado Kirk Lindemen Joe Janssen Mark Lefever Stephanie Hanson Tom LaMontague Charlotte Couger Monica Hurley Mark Uhrich Chris Thomas Chris Weichler Licensing Lead Risk Management Senior Manager Risk Management Senior Engineer Engineering Manager 10 CFR 50.69 Engineer 10 CFR 50.69 Engineer Engineering Peach Bottom Peach Bottom 10 CFR 50.69 Engineer Peach Bottom Attachment 1

- 2 - Amy Huber Travis Bement Richard Gropp Peach Bottom Jensen Hughes 10 CFR 50.69 Support Team Barry Sloane David Passehl Ken Saunders Charlie Young Brian Albinson Greg Zucal Chris Pupek Director, Risk Management Program Technical Lead, 10 CFR 50.69 PRA Categorization 1 O CFR 50.69 Engineer Operations Support Internal Events/Internal Flooding PRA Model Owner Risk Management Engineer Risk Management Engineer

List of Documents Reviewed During the Audit Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3, Documents Available for Review on the Generation Company, LLC Portal/Laptop The licensee provided an extensive list of supporting documents (e.g., analyses, calculations, reports, drawings, and procedures) on the Limerick document portal available during the week of the audit. Additional Documents/Procedures Reviewed on Site ER-AA-569, 10 CFR 50.69 Program Description PB-5069-10-003, Revision 0, Peach Bottom Atomic Po\/\er Station, Units 2 and 3, Residual Heat Removal (RHR) 50.69 Categorization PB-MISC-032, Revision 0, Peach Bottom RHR Passive 50.69 Categorization PB-PRA-10, Component Data Notebook PB-LAR-DIS, PRA Technical Adequacy in Support of the License Amendment Request to Implement 10 CFR 50.69 as \/\ell as the License Amendment Request to Implement the Risk Informed Completion Time (RICT) Program PB-LAR-015, Revision 2, PRA Technical Adequacy- Table 5.1 Peer Review and Peer Review Findings 032299-RPT-001, Peach Bottom Atomic Po\/\er Station PRA Finding Level F&O Technical Review and Focused Scope Peer Review Attachment 2

SUBJECT: PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 - REGULATORY AUDIT SUMMARY REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT TITLE 10 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTION 50.69 (EPID L-2017-LLA-0281) DATED APRIL 10, 2018 DISTRIBUTION: PUBLIC PM Reading File RidsNrrDorlLpl1 Resource RidsNrrLAIBetts Resource RidsNrrPMPeachBottom Resource ADAMS Accession No.: ML 18072A372 OFFICE DORL/LPL 1/PM DORL/LPL 1/LA NAME JTobin IBetts DATE 03/12/18 03/19/18 DORL/LPL 1/BC JDanna 04/10/18 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DORL/LPL 1/PM JTobin 04/10/18