Quality ID #348: HRS-3 Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Complications Rate National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety

Similar documents
2) The percentage of discharges for which the patient received follow-up within 7 days after

Quality ID #137 (NQF 0650): Melanoma: Continuity of Care Recall System National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

2016 PHYSICIAN QUALITY REPORTING OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES REGISTRY ONLY

Measure #356: Unplanned Hospital Readmission within 30 Days of Principal Procedure National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Quality ID #46 (NQF 0097): Medication Reconciliation Post-Discharge National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Measure #137 (NQF 0650): Melanoma: Continuity of Care Recall System National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Measure #130 (NQF 0419): Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Quality ID #288: Dementia: Caregiver Education and Support National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Measure #137 (NQF 0650): Melanoma: Continuity of Care Recall System National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

DENOMINATOR: All final reports for patients, regardless of age, undergoing a CT procedure

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Outcome

Quality ID #424 (NQF 2681): Perioperative Temperature Management National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety

CPT only copyright 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. 12/23/2014 Page 537 of 593

Measure #46 (NQF 0097): Medication Reconciliation Post-Discharge National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Measure #47 (NQF 0326): Care Plan National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Note: This is an outcome measure and will be calculated solely using registry data.

Quality Payment Program MIPS. Advanced APMs. Quality Payment Program

Measure #46 (NQF 0097): Medication Reconciliation Post-Discharge National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

DENOMINATOR: All final reports for patients, regardless of age, undergoing a CT procedure

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Note: This is an outcome measure and will be calculated solely using registry data.

FY 2014 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Proposed Rule

AQI48a: Percentage of patients, aged 18 and older, who were surveyed on their patient experience and satisfaction with anesthesia care

Falcon Quality Payment Program Checklist- 2017

Guidance for Developing Payment Models for COMPASS Collaborative Care Management for Depression and Diabetes and/or Cardiovascular Disease

Quality Data Model December 2012

Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System for Acute Care Hospitals Final 2016 Rates & Policies 1

3M Health Information Systems. The standard for yesterday, today and tomorrow: 3M All Patient Refined DRGs

2018 MIPS Quality Performance Category Measure Information for the 30-Day All-Cause Hospital Readmission Measure

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

2010 PQRI REPORTING OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS, REGISTRY

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Measure #138: Melanoma: Coordination of Care National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Measure #389: Cataract Surgery: Difference Between Planned and Final Refraction - National Quality Stategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Better Medical Device Data Yield Improved Care The benefits of a national evaluation system

Population and Sampling Specifications

United States Department of Justice Investigation of Implantable Cardiac Defibrilators and it s impact on Hospitals and Physicians

DA: November 29, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services National PACE Association

Release Notes for the 2010B Manual

Malnutrition Quality Improvement Opportunities for the District Hospital Leadership Forum. May 2015 avalere.com

CMS Proposed Home Health Claims-Based Rehospitalization and Emergency Department Use Quality Measures

Quality of Care of Medicare- Medicaid Dual Eligibles with Diabetes. James X. Zhang, PhD, MS The University of Chicago

Prior to implementation of the episode groups for use in resource measurement under MACRA, CMS should:

About the Report. Cardiac Surgery in Pennsylvania

A New Clinical Operating Model Transforms Care Delivery and Improves Performance

Analysis of Final Rule for FY 2009 Revisions to the Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Reducing Readmissions One-caseat-a-time Using Midas+ Community Case Management

2015 Executive Overview

Home Health Value-Based Purchasing Series: HHVBP Model 101. Wednesday, February 3, 2016

ICD-10 Advantages to Providers Looking beyond the isolated patient provider encounter

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

July 2, 2010 Hospital Compare: New ED and Outpatient. Information; Annual Update to Readmission and Mortality Rates

Program Summary. Understanding the Fiscal Year 2019 Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. Page 1 of 8 July Overview

New York State Department of Health Innovation Initiatives

OP ED-THROUGHPUT GENERAL DATA ELEMENT LIST. All Records

Scottish Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR)

Maria Durham OCSQ 3/15/2011

Summary Report of Findings and Recommendations

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program

The Pain or the Gain?

Future of Patient Safety and Healthcare Quality

When to Consider Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Deactivation. A Guide for Patients and Family

When to Consider Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Deactivation. A Guide for Patients and Family

OP ED-Throughput General Data Element List. All Records All Records. All Records All Records All Records. All Records. All Records.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated September 2007

Measure #181: Elder Maltreatment Screen and Follow-Up Plan National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety

Admissions and Readmissions Related to Adverse Events, NMCPHC-EDC-TR

The Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting Program. Overview. Legislative Mandate. Anne Deutsch, RN, PhD, CRRN

Leveraging Clinical Data for Public Health and Hypertension Surveillance

implementing a site-neutral PPS

Terminology in Healthcare and

Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality Reporting (IPFQR) Program: Follow-Up After Hospitalization for Mental Illness (FUH) Measure

EHR Incentives. Profit by using LOGO a certified EHR. EHR vs. EMR. PQRI Incentives. Incentives available

CLINICAL MEDICAL POLICY

Measure Applications Partnership

CARDIAC DEVICE MONITORING

W. Douglas Weaver, MD, MACC. American College of Cardiology SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE

June 22, Leah Binder President and CEO The Leapfrog Group 1660 L Street, N.W., Suite 308 Washington, D.C Dear Ms.

Emergency Department Update 2009 Outpatient Payment System

K-HEN Acute Care/Critical Access Hospitals Measures Alignment with PfP 40/20 Goals AEA Minimum Participation Full Participation 1, 2

2017 Quality Reporting: Claims and Administrative Data-Based Quality Measures For Medicare Shared Savings Program and Next Generation ACO Model ACOs

OP ED-THROUGHPUT GENERAL DATA ELEMENT LIST. All Records

Quality Data Model (QDM) Style Guide. QDM (version MAT) for Meaningful Use Stage 2

CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE (CKD) MEASURES GROUP OVERVIEW

Background and Issues. Aim of the Workshop Analysis Of Effectiveness And Costeffectiveness. Outline. Defining a Registry

GUIDELINES FOR CRITERIA AND CERTIFICATION RULES ANNEX - JAWDA Data Certification for Healthcare Providers - Methodology 2017.

An Overview of NCQA Relative Resource Use Measures. Today s Agenda

Case-mix Analysis Across Patient Populations and Boundaries: A Refined Classification System

Blue Care Network Physical & Occupational Therapy Utilization Management Guide

New Quality Measures Will Soon Impact Nursing Home Compare and the 5-Star Rating System: What providers need to know

Faster, More Efficient Innovation through Better Evidence on Real-World Safety and Effectiveness

3F Auditing Outpatient Surgical Services. Disclaimer. Agenda. 3F Auditing Outpatient Surgical Services November 2013

District of Columbia Medicaid Specialty Hospital Payment Method Frequently Asked Questions

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

EuroHOPE: Hospital performance

Pay-for-Performance. GNYHA Engineering Quality Improvement

Medicare Part A SNF Payment System Reform: Introduction to Resident Classification System - I

Transcription:

Quality ID #348: HRS-3 Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Complications Rate National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety 2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY MEASURE TYPE: Outcome DESCRIPTION: Patients with physician-specific risk-standardized rates of procedural complications following the first time implantation of an ICD INSTRUCTIONS: This measure is to be submitted a minimum of once per performance period for patients with a first time implantation of an ICD during the performance period. This measure may be submitted by eligible clinicians who perform the quality actions described in the measure based on the services provided and the measure-specific denominator coding. NOTE: Include only patients that have had first time implantation through vember 30 for evaluation of complications for 30 days and September 30 for evaluation of complications for 90 days post procedure within the performance period. This will allow the evaluation of ICD implant complications within the performance period. This is a risk adjusted measure. Please refer to the Hierarchical logistic regression at the end of this specification. There are 2 performance rates to be calculated for this measure: AND 1. Complications or mortality at 30 days 2. Complications at 90 days Measure Submission: The listed denominator criteria is used to identify the intended patient population. The numerator options included in this specification are used to submit the quality actions allowed by the measure. The quality-data codes listed do not need to be submitted for registry submissions; however, these codes may be submitted for those registries that utilize claims data. THERE ARE TWO SUBMISSION CRITERIA FOR THIS MEASURE: 1. Patients with first time implants with one or more complications or mortality within 30 days AND 2. Patients with first time implants with one or more complications within 90 days The eligible clinician should submit data on both submission criteria 1 and 2 for a patient that meets the denominator. SUBMISSION CRITERIA 1: ALL PATIENTS WITH FIRST TIME IMPLANTS WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE IDENTIFIED COMPLICATIONS OR MORTALITY WITHIN 30 DAYS DENOMINATOR (SUBMISSION CRITERIA 1): Patients aged 65 years of age with a first time implantation of an ICD performed 31 days prior to the end of the performance period. Criteria (Eligible Cases): Page 1 of 11

Patient aged 65 years on date of encounter AND Procedure code for Implantation of ICD (ICD-10-PCS): 0JH608Z, 0JH609Z, 0JH638Z, 0HJ639Z, 0JH808Z, 0JH809Z, 0JH838Z, or 0JH839Z AND/OR Patient encounter during performance period (CPT): 33240 or 33249, with or without 33216 or 33217 AND NOT DENOMINATOR EXCLUSIONS: Procedure code for removal of prior ICD (ICD-10-PCS): 0JPT0PZ, 0JPT3PZ AND/OR Procedure code for removal of prior ICD (CPT): 33241, 33262, 33263 33264 NUMERATOR (SUBMISSION CRITERIA 1): Number of patients with one or more of the following complications or mortality within 30 days (depending on the complication) following ICD implantation Numerator Instructions: INVERSE MEASURE - A lower calculated performance rate for this measure indicates better clinical care or control. The Performance t Met numerator option for this measure is the representation of the better clinical quality or control. Submitting that numerator option will produce a performance rate that trends closer to 0%, as quality increases. For inverse measures a rate of 100% means all of the denominator eligible patients did not receive the appropriate care or were not in proper control, and therefore an inverse measure at 100% does not qualify for submitting purposes, however any performance rate less than 100% does qualify. Definition: Complications measured for 30 days: 1. Death 2. Pneumothorax or hemothorax plus a chest tube 3. Hematoma plus a blood transfusion or evacuation 4. Cardiac tamponade or pericardiocentesis OR Numerator Options: Performance Met: Performance t Met: OR Documentation of patient with one or more complications or mortality within 30 days (G9267) Documentation of patient without one or more complications and without mortality within 30 days (G9269) SUBMISSION CRITERIA 2: ALL PATIENTS WITH FIRST TIME IMPLANTS WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE IDENTIFIED COMPLICATIONS WITHIN 90 DAYS DENOMINATOR (SUBMISSION CRITERIA 2): Patients aged 65 years of age with a first time implantation of an ICD performed 91 days prior to the end of the performance period. Criteria (Eligible Cases): Patient aged 65 years on date of encounter AND Procedure code for Implantation of ICD (ICD-10-PCS): 0JH608Z, 0JH609Z, 0JH638Z, 0JH639Z, 0JH808Z, 0JH809Z, 0JH838Z, 0JH839Z AND/OR Page 2 of 11

Patient encounter code during performance period (CPT): 33240 or 33249, with or without 33216 or 33217 AND NOT DENOMINATOR EXCLUSIONS: Procedure code for removal of ICD (ICD-10-PCS): 0JPT0PZ or 0JPT3PZ AND/OR Procedure code for removal of ICD (CPT): 33241, 33262, 33263 or 33264 NUMERATOR (SUBMISSION CRITERIA 2): Number of patients with one or more of the following complications within 90 days (depending on the complication) following ICD implantation Numerator Instructions: INVERSE MEASURE - A lower calculated performance rate for this measure indicates better clinical care or control. The Performance t Met numerator option for this measure is the representation of the better clinical quality or control. Submitting that numerator option will produce a performance rate that trends closer to 0%, as quality increases. For inverse measures a rate of 100% means all of the denominator eligible patients did not receive the appropriate care or were not in proper control, and therefore an inverse measure at 100% does not qualify for submitting purposes, however any performance rate less than 100% does qualify. Definition: Complications measured for 90 days: 1. Mechanical complications requiring a system revision 2. Device related infection 3. Additional ICD implantation OR Numerator Options: Performance Met: Performance t Met: Documentation of patient with one or more complications within 90 days (G9268) Documentation of patient without one or more complications within 90 days (G9270) RATIONALE: The proposed measure of ICD complications has the potential to significantly improve the quality of care delivered to patients with advanced heart disease. The model used for risk adjustment meets recognized standards for outcomes measurement and was developed with extensive input from stakeholders with a broad range of expertise and perspectives. The study sample is appropriately defined, consisting of an ICD population that has distinct outcomes that will allow for valid comparisons of physician quality. The definition of the complications, the complication-specific period of assessment, and the risk-adjustment variables all have strong face validity, which may facilitate physician acceptance. We excluded covariates that we would not want to adjust for in a quality measure. In summary, we present an ICD complications measure that is suitable for public submission. The proposed measure capitalizes on the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) ICD Registry data already collected as part of an ongoing collaboration between CMS and NCDR. Accordingly, the incremental burden of data collection on physicians would be minimal and the proposed measure could be implemented by using the direct patient identifiers already being collected by CMS. CLINICAL RECOMMENDATION STATEMENTS: ICD implantation is an expensive procedure performed on patients with advanced cardiovascular disease and, often, significant comorbidities. Despite improvements in technology and increasing experience with device implantation, the procedure carries a significant risk of complications (Hammill, Curtis, 2008). Page 3 of 11

Roughly 150,000 ICDs are implanted each year and approximately two thirds of implantations are performed on Medicare patients. Direct total medical cost per device (2005) (Sanders, Hlatky et al. 2005) is $68,000-$100,000. The total national costs range from $10-$15 billion, of which $7-$10 billion represents fee-for-service Medicare. Complications are expensive and, in one study (Reynolds et al, 2006), associated with increased length of stay (1-10 days) and costs $5,000 20,000 (mean $7,251), adding roughly $80 million in Medicare costs. Reported complication rates following ICD implantation vary from 4% to 30%, depending largely on how complications are defined and the period of assessment. In the NCDR ICD Registry, the incidence of inhospital complications is approximately 4%. However, complications such as device infection, malfunction, or cardiac tamponade are not fully captured by the registry since they may only become evident following hospital discharge. Al-Khatib et al (2008) analyzed administrative claims data and found overall rates of complication within 90 days of ICD implantation ranged from 18.8% in 2002 to 14.2% in 2005 (Al-Khatib et al, 2005). We analyzed Medicare FFS administrative claims to assess complications rates following ICD implantation. From 2006 through 2009, a total of 105,575 implants performed by 3,488 physicians met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The number of eligible implants increased over time from 22,931 in 2006 to 28,383. The overall complication rate decreased modestly over this time period, from 8.60% to 7.55%. The rate of mechanical complications requiring system revision had the largest decrease over time (0.78%), but similar relative declines were seen across all complications. As expected, the characteristics of patients with and without adverse events differed significantly. Most notably, patients receiving a CRT-D device had a significantly higher complication rate than patients receiving a single and dual chamber device (8.09%, 6.30%, and 5.33% respectively). These results demonstrate an opportunity to improve physician-level performance. Hierarchical logistic regression The specification is designed to align with the NQF-endorsed Hospital Risk-Standardized Complication Rate following Implantation of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator performance measure (NQF #0694). The variables apply to both the 30 and 90 day outcomes, but how the variables are to be utilized within the performance calculation is part of a risk model developed by Yale. COPYRIGHT: Heart Rhythm Society, 2015. All rights reserved. Page 4 of 11

2018 Registry Flow for Quality ID #348 HRS-3: Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Complications Rate Submission Criteria One Multiple Performance Rate Start Numerator Patient Aged 65 Years Documentation of One or More Complications or Mortality within 30 Days** Data Completeness Met + Performance Met** G9267 or equivalent (40 patients) a 1 t Included in Eligible Population/ Procedure Code for Implantation of ICD as Listed in * Documentation of Patient Without One or More Complications or Mortality within 30 Days Data Completeness Met + Performance t Met** G9269 or equivalent (40 patients) c 1 Exclusion Encounter as Listed in * (1/1/2018 thru 11/30/2018) Data Completeness t Met Quality-Data Code or equivalent not submitted (0 patients) Removal of ICD * ICD-10-PCS and/or CPT Include in Eligible Population/ (80 patients) d 1 *See the posted Measure Specification for specific coding and instructions to submit this measure. This measure flow illustrates denominator eligible encounters as requiring a diagnosis AND an encounter. Another option, as specified within the measure to determine denominator eligibility, could be a diagnosis OR an encounter. **A lower calculated performance rate for this measure indicates better clinical care or control. NOTE: Submission Frequency: Patient-process The measure diagrams were developed by CMS as a supplemental resource to be used in conjunction with the measure specifications. They should not be used alone or as a substitution for the measure specification. v2 Page 5 of 11

2018 Registry Flow for Quality ID #348 HRS-3: Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Complications Rate Submission Criteria Two Multiple Performance Rate Start Numerator Patient Aged 65 Years Documentation of Patient With One or More Complications Within 90 Days Data Completeness Met + Performance Met** G9268 or equivalent (40 patients) a 2 t Included in Eligible Population/ Procedure Code for Implantation of ICD as Listed in * Documentation of Patient Without One or More Complications Within 90 Days Data Completeness Met + Performance t Met** G9270 or equivalent (40 patients) c 2 Encounter as Listed in * (1/1/2018 thru 11/30/2018) Data Completeness t Met Quality-Data Code or equivalent not submitted (0 patients) Exclusion Implantation Removal of ICD * ICD-10-PCS OJPT0PZ, and/or OJPT0PZ CPT Include in Eligible Population/ (80 patients) d 2 *See the posted Measure Specification for specific coding and instructions to submit this measure. This measure flow illustrates denominator eligible encounters as requiring a diagnosis AND an encounter. Another option as specified within the measure to determine denominator eligibility, could be a diagnosis OR an encounter. **A lower calculated performance rate for this measure indicates better clinical care or control. NOTE: Submission Frequency: Patient Process v2 Page 6 of 11

2018 Registry Flow for Quality ID #348 HRS-3: Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Complications Rate Multiple Performance Rate SAMPLE CALCULATIONS: Complications or Mortality at 30 Days Data Completeness= Performance Met (a 1 = 40 patients) + Performance t Met (c 1 =40 patients) = 80 patients = 100.00% Eligible Population / (d 1 =80 patients) = 80 patients Performance Rate**= Performance Met (a 1 =40 patients) = 40 patients = 50.00% Data Completeness Numerator (80 patients) = 80 patients SAMPLE CALCULATIONS: Complications at 90 Days Data Completeness= Performance Met (a 2 =40 patients) + Performance t Met (c 2 =40 patients) = 80 patients = 100.00% Eligible Population / (d 2 =80 patients) = 80 patients Performance Rate**= Performance Met (a 2 =40 patients) = 40 patients = 50.00% Data Completeness Numerator (80 patients) = 80 patients *See the posted Measure Specification for specific coding and instructions to submit this measure. **A lower calculated performance rate for this measure indicates better clinical care or control. ***It is anticipated for registry reporting that for every performance rate, a data completeness will be submitted. CMS will determine or use the overall data completeness and performance rate. NOTE: Submission Frequency: Patient-process v2 Page 7 of 11

2018 Registry Flow for Quality ID #348: HRS-3: Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Complications Rate Please refer to the specific section of the Specification to identify the denominator and numerator information for use in submitting this Individual Specification. NOTE: A lower calculated performance rate for this measure indicates better clinical care or control. This flow is for registry data submission. Submission Criteria One: 1. Start with 2. Check Patient Age: a. If Patient Age is greater than or equal to 65 Years of age at Date of Service and equals during the measurement period, do not include in Eligible Patient Population. Stop Processing. b. If Patient Age is greater than or equal to 65 Years of age at Date of Service and equals during the measurement period, proceed to check Patient Diagnosis. 3. Check Patient Diagnosis: a. If Diagnosis of Implantation of ICD as Listed in equals, do not include in Eligible Patient Population. Stop Processing. b. If Diagnosis of Implantation of ICD as Listed in equals, proceed to check Encounter Performed. 4. Check Encounter Performed: a. If Encounter as Listed in the equals, do not include in Eligible Population or. Stop Processing. b. If Encounter as Listed in the equals, proceed to check Removal of ICD at an ICD-10-PCS and/or CPT Encounter. 5. Check Removal of ICD at an ICD-10-PCS and/or CPT Encounter: a. If Removal of ICD at an ICD-10-PCS and/or CPT Encounter equals, include in the Eligible Population. b. If Removal of ICD at an ICD-10-PCS and/or CPT Encounter equals, do not include in Eligible Population or. Stop Processing. 6. Population: a. Population is all Eligible Patients in the. is represented as in the Sample Calculation listed at the end of this document. Letter d¹ equals 80 7. Start Numerator 8. Check Documentation of One or More Complications or Mortality within 30 Days: a. If Documentation of One or More Complications or Mortality within 30 Days equals, include in Data Completeness Met and Performance Met. Page 8 of 11

b. Data Completeness Met and Performance Met is represented as Data Completeness and Performance Rate in the Sample Calculation listed at the end of this document. Letter a¹ equals 40 c. If Documentation of One or More Complications or Mortality within 30 Days equals, proceed to check Documentation of Patient Without One or More Complications or Mortality within 30 Days. 9. Check Documentation of Patient Without One or More Complications or Mortality within 30 Days: a. If Documentation of Patient Without One or More Complications or Mortality within 30 Days equals, include in Data Completeness Met and Performance t Met. b. Data Completeness Met and Performance t Met is represented as Data Completeness and Performance Rate in the Sample Calculation listed at the end of this document. Letter c¹ equals 40 c. If Documentation of Patient Without One or More Complications or Mortality within 30 Days equals, proceed to check Data Completeness t Met. 10. Check Data Completeness t Met a. If Data Completeness t Met, the Quality Data Code or equivalent was not submitted.10 patients have been subtracted from the Data Completeness Numerator in the Sample Calculation. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS: Complications or Mortality at 30 Days Data Completeness= Performance Met (a 1 = 40 patients) + Performance t Met (c 1 =40 patients) = 80 patients = 100.00% Eligible Population / (d 1 =80 patients) = 80 patients Performance Rate**= Performance Met (a 1 =40 patients) = 40 patients = 50.00% Data Completeness Numerator (80 patients) = 80 patients Page 9 of 11

2017 Registry Flow for Quality ID #348: HRS-3: Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Complications Rate Please refer to the specific section of the Specification to identify the denominator and numerator information for use in submitting this Individual Specification. NOTE: A lower calculated performance for this measure indicates better clinical care or control. This flow is for registry data submission. Submission Criteria Two: 1. Start with 2. Check Patient Age: a. If Patient Age is greater than or equal to 65 Years of age at Date of Service and equals during the measurement period, do not include in Eligible Patient Population. Stop Processing. b. If Patient Age is greater than or equal to 65 Years of age at Date of Service and equals during the measurement period, proceed to check Patient Diagnosis. 3. Check Patient Diagnosis: a. If Diagnosis of Implantation of ICD as Listed in equals, do not include in Eligible Patient Population. Stop Processing. b. If Diagnosis of Implantation of ICD as Listed in equals, proceed to check Encounter Performed. 4. Check Encounter Performed: a. If Encounter as Listed in the equals, do not include in Eligible Population or. Stop Processing. b. If Encounter as Listed in the equals, proceed to check Removal of ICD at an ICD-10-PCS and/or CPT Encounter. 5. Check Removal of ICD at an ICD-10-PCS and/or CPT Encounter: a. If Removal of ICD at an ICD-10-PCS and/or CPT Encounter equals, include in the Eligible Population. b. If Removal of ICD at an ICD-10-PCS and/or CPT Encounter equals, do not include in Eligible Population or. Stop Processing. 6. Population: a. Population is all Eligible Patients in the. is represented as in the Sample Calculation listed at the end of this document. Letter d 2 equals 80 7. Start Numerator 8. Check Documentation of Patient With One or More Complications within 90 Days: a. If Documentation of Patient With One or More Complications Within 90 Days equals, include in Data Completeness Met and Performance Met. Page 10 of 11

b. Data Completeness Met and Performance Met is represented as Data Completeness and Performance Rate in the Sample Calculation listed at the end of this document. Letter a 2 equals 40 c. If Documentation of Patient With One or More Complications Within 90 Days equals, proceed to check Documentation of Patient Without One or More Complications within 90 Days. 9. Check Documentation of Patient Without One or More Complications within 90 Days: a. If Documentation of Patient Without One or More Complications Within 90 Days equals, include in Data Completeness Met and Performance t Met. b. Data Completeness Met and Performance t Met is represented as Data Completeness and Performance Rate in the Sample Calculation listed at the end of this document. Letter c 2 equals 40 c. If Documentation of Patient Without One or More Complications Within 90 Days equals, proceed to check Data Completeness t Met. 10. Check Data Completeness t Met a. If Data Completeness t Met, the Quality Data Code or equivalent was not submitted. 10 patients have been subtracted from the Data Completeness Numerator in Sample Calculation. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS: Complications at 90 Days Data Completeness= Performance Met (a 2 =40 patients) + Performance t Met (c 2 =40 patients) = 80 patients = 100.00% Eligible Population / (d 2 =80 patients) = 80 patients Performance Rate**= Performance Met (a 2 =40 patients) = 40 patients = 50.00% Data Completeness Numerator (80 patients) = 80 patients Page 11 of 11