Request for Redevelopment Proposal 102 N. Broadway, City of De Pere

Similar documents
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Master Development Plan Written Report

BLUE HILLS MASTER PLAN RFP OUTLINE

Opportunity Winona Redevelopment 60 Main Street Lot #7 Winona, MN. Issuance Date: November 3, 2016 Proposals Due: December 31, 2016

CITY OF GREENVILLE, SC REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO

Request for Qualifications

Cone Mill Master Development

METHODOLOGY - Scope of Work

Development Solicitation Request for Interest. Spencer Creek Business Park Commercial Development Parcel. Port of Kalama, Washington

I-195 Redevelopment District Providence, RI

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)

634 NORTH PARK AVENUE

Request for Proposals (RFP) for Planning Consultant Services Africa Town Neighborhood Revitalization Plan. Bid#NRP2015-1

E-J Industrial Spine BOA Nomination Study

Request for Proposals (RFP) For Restaurant Consulting Services 1657 Ocean Avenue

Request for Proposals # P12-044A. Pre-Qualification - Purchase and. Development of Bloomfield Property

REDEVELOPMENT OF DOWNTOWN PAINESVILLE 257 East Main Street S. State Street

Request for Proposals for Economic Development Consultant. Downtown Revitalization Initiative Durkee Street City of Plattsburgh, NY

TOWN OF NEWMARKET 395 Mulock Drive NEWMARKET DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE FINANCIAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM APPLICATION

Request for Proposals (RFP) Commercial Space Leasing City Lights, Winooski VT

VILLAGE OF FOX CROSSING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CITY OF MONTEBELLO AND MONTEBELLO SUCCESSOR AGENCY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. For. DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, FINANCING, OPERATION and MAINTENANCE of a SPORTS FACILITY

CITY OF MADISON, ALABAMA

Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Consulting Planning, Design and Real Estate Development Services, on an As-Needed Basis

Request for Developer Qualifications-John Deere Commons Development Opportunity

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Stratton Street Mixed-Use Development

Town of the Blue Mountains Community Improvement Plan

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS DOWNTOWN WAYFINDING CONSULTING AND DESIGN

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Town of Brattleboro, VT

Tulsa Development Authority. Request for Proposal

Architectural Services

Cal Poly Pomona Request for Clarification for Lanterman Development Center Land Development Consultant RFC

Request for Qualifications and Preliminary Development Proposals (RFQ/RFP) For the Meadowbrook & Lee Site in Cleveland Heights, Ohio

PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION

REQUEST FOR DEVELOPER PROPOSALS (RFP)

STUDY AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PURCHASE AND DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY OWNED BY EAST SHORE UNITARIAN CHURCH

City of Provo, Utah Parks and Recreation Department. Request for Proposal (RFP) Architectural Services for a New Community Recreation Center

T O W N O F M I D L A N D MIDLAND BAY LANDING A MIDLAND WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY

East Harlem Commercial Opportunity RFP

4:00 p.m. on May 6, 2016

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL FIRM FOR DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Lexington Center Corporation Request for Proposal for Convention Center Naming Rights Request for Proposals

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Single Site Permanent Supportive Housing Project

River North Design Overlay 38 th & Blake Incentive Overlay. Text and Map Amendments Information Item

PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Request for Proposal (RFP) for Housing Study and Needs Assessment

Harbor Point Mixed-Use Waterfront Development Opportunity UTICA, NY Development Request for Proposals

CITY OF LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA

The SoNo Collection Norwalk, CT

City of Falls Church, Virginia. Request for Conceptual Proposals Pursuant to The Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act (PPEA)

City of Coquitlam. Request for Information and Qualifications RFIQ No Design Services for Maillardville Community Centre

Request for Qualifications/Proposals Alameda County Redevelopment Agency Economic Development Strategic Plan

CITY OF TRENTON DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

REQUEST for INTEREST. Building & Parking Redevelopment Project. Travis Park United Methodist Church. TABLE of CONTENTS

COMMUNITY MEETING NOTES UCSF Mission Bay Phase 2 Study. Meeting Date: June 17, 2010 Genentech Hall Mission Bay campus Subject: Community Meeting 1

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION TOWN OF MARKHAM MARKHAM LIVE MARKHAM INTERNATIONAL SPORTS TRAINING ACADEMY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL STRATEGIC PLANNING WESTFIELD WASHINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY 333 W. HOOVER ST WESTFIELD, IN 46074

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) for Feasibility Study Borough of Kennett Square New Municipal Office and Police Station Joint Facility

City of Saint Paul Request for Proposals for a Downtown Parking Management Strategy Event 91

RFP for Bicycle/Pedestrian Scoping Study Page 1

BRANDON UNIVERSITY DOWNTOWN PROJECT REQUEST FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST (REOI)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FIRE STATION FEASIBILITY STUDY. Borough of Phoenixville. July 15, 2016

City of Elmhurst. Request for Development Proposal. 138 and 142 N. Addison Avenue. City-Owned Properties. (Executive Summary)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET

Wilmington Downtown Incorporated. Facade Improvement Program POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Updated 8/30/17

Professional Planning Services to Complete Recreation Plan Update

Requests for Proposals CITY OF ANN ARBOR. Development of City-Owned Property RFP - No. 743

Request for Proposal Qualified Management Partner for Como Park Lakeside Pavilion Lexington Parkway North, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103

Comprehensive Plan Amendment

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS (RFQ/P) RFQ # ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Bond Measure G

Subdivision Presubmittal Conference Submittal Package Cover Page

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PLANNING SERVICES NORTHWEST AREA SHARED VISION BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL PARK

Call for Artists RFQ + RFP Meridian Split Corridor Phase 2 Public Art Project

Request for Proposals

Facilities Condition Assessment

DOWNTOWN WILMINGTON, NC MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY

PHILADELPHIA ENERGY AUTHORITY

Request for Proposals for Space Needs Analysis and Projected Building Program Aram Public Library City of Delavan, WI

07/01/2010 ACTUAL START

City of Oxnard, California Request for Developer Qualifications Multiple Mixed-Use Development Opportunity Sites

City of Waterloo, Wisconsin. Request for Proposals. Municipal Engineering Services

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Former Fire Station 47 Site - 24,400 square feet

The Village requests that responses be submitted by: 4:00 p.m. Pacific Time on Thursday, August 30, 2012.

York Mills Road Rezoning Application Refusal Report

Community Revitalization Fund Tax Credit Program (CRFP) Overview and Request for Proposals (RFP)

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: RFQ PROGRAM/PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO SUPPORT MUNICIPAL FACILITIES & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS

Financial Advisory Services. Page 1

Section F: Committee of Adjustment: Minor Variance and Consent Applications

GEORGETOWN DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DOWNTOWN RETAIL AND ENTERTAINMENT STRATEGY. For. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Riverside. Issued: August 13, 2010

THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY RIVERTOWN WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS. January 24, 2005

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Operation: Storefront

NOW THEREFORE, the parties enter into the following Agreement:

500 EL CAMINO REAL PROJECT. City Council Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Transcription:

Introduction and Summary The City of De Pere (City) is requesting redevelopment proposals for a development opportunity of a City owned parcel on the corner of Broadway and George Street in Downtown De Pere. The City will consider proposals from qualified developers interested in accomplishing the redevelopment for the area with a high quality project which may contain a mix of commercial and residential uses. The City is willing to utilizing various economic development tools at its disposal to stimulate and assist the redevelopment of the site. Proposals must be received in the office of the Planning Department at City Hall, 335 S. Broadway, De Pere, WI 54115 no later than 4:00p.m. on May 7 th, 2015. City of De Pere The City of De Pere is located in central Brown County on both the east and west sides of the Fox River. The City is adjacent to the Villages of Allouez and Ashwaubenon to the north, Town of Lawrence to the southwest, Town of Rockland to the south, and Town of Ledgeview to the south and east. De Pere is the second largest community in Brown County with a population of 24,180. It contains a thriving downtown on both sides of the Fox River, St. Norbert College on the west bank of the Fox River, growing residential neighborhoods, two large industrial/business parks, and many park and recreation sites. De Pere's historic downtown offers unique shopping, casual and fine dining and live entertainment including a comedy theatre and a variety of music. Our community boasts an exceptional quality of life and is known for its beautiful river views, water sports, parks, progressive attitude, and family friendliness. Downtown Vision In 2010, the City completed a Downtown Master Plan which helps define the long term vision for our downtown. The Plan outlines areas for redevelopment and it provides the framework for how the City and the private sector can work together to continue the growth and success of the downtown. The Master Plan and the City Comprehensive Plan are available online at www.de-pere.org. Page 1

The Site The site is located on the northeast corner of Broadway and George Streets. The site consists of 9,691 square feet (Parcel ED-844). Please note that a portion of George Street is being vacated which will make the site 11,400 square feet. Located in the heart of downtown De Pere, the site is regarded as the premier development site with scenic views of the Fox River. Part of the property directly across Broadway has been designated park property and further enhances the overall development potential for the site. Current Use The site is undeveloped and is currently used as green space for the public and parking for local businesses. Ownership The site is owned by the City of De Pere. The redevelopment of the site will be overseen by the City Redevelopment Authority and the City Common Council. Site Information Both electric and natural gas serviced by WPS are available to the site. Single and three phase power is available from the alley. The natural gas is also provided from the alley. Water service is available on Broadway, in the parking area. Sufficient water pressure can be provided for fire suppression systems. Sanitary sewer is located in the alley east of the site. The sewer is approximately 10 feet deep. If the post construction impervious surface is less than 20,000 square feet, no numeric storm water requirements apply to the site. If the impervious area is to be greater than 20,000 square feet after redevelopment, a 40% reduction in total suspended solids will be required. The City has completed a Phase I and Phase II Environmental Assessment of the property.* The City has completed a Geotechnical study of the site to determine the feasibility to support a new development.* The City is currently vacating a portion of George Street to increase the overall size of the lot. The site currently has an easement for the sidewalk and parking on the east side of the site. The City is willing to remove the easement for site development; however some type of sidewalk connection through the alley must be maintained. * Interested parties should contact the City Planning Director to obtain copies of these reports. Page 2

Zoning The site is currently zoned B-1 which is defined as the Central Business District. The B-1 zoning does not have any setbacks, and design standards for the building would need to match our existing zoning code. If necessary, the City would also be willing to rezone the property to a Planned Unit Development District (PDD). The PDD allows for some flexibility within the code to help promote the maximum benefit to the site. Development Objectives Recognizing that this is a premier site in the downtown, the Common Council and the Redevelopment Authority have defined several objectives for the site. While not seeking to be overly prescriptive on the design and the exact mix of uses, the vision calls for exceptional and iconic architecture, as well as a mix of uses that complement the balance of downtown activity and augment the vitality of the downtown. As a key site in the downtown, the project is expected to include a contribution package as part of a Development Agreement from the City. The City Council and Redevelopment Authority have endorsed the following objectives that the project should address: 1. Incorporation of ground-floor commercial use that contributes to an interactive and vibrant pedestrian experience. A square footage amount for commercial use on the ground floor has not been specified. 2. The development above the ground floor can be a mix of uses that may include residential or commercial uses. 3. The proposed development must exemplify exceptional architecture and sustainable design and construction. LEED certification is not required. The project should complement and be respectful of adjacent land uses. 4. Parking will be addressed through the site planning process. It is expected that parking for the 1 st floor will be offset by the Mission Square Parking lot to the south. Parking for additional floors is expected to be provided on-site. 5. Pedestrian access must be provided along the east side of the parcel. 6. The property will be offered to the selected developer in AS-IS condition. Site Visits Site visits can be conducted as needed. Since the site is currently used as public space there is no need to schedule a meeting with the City. Page 3

Submission Requirements Proposals should be mailed or emailed to: City of De Pere Planning Department Attn: Ken Pabich 335 S. Broadway St De Pere, WI 54115 The submission should include one digital copy of the proposal and it should be received not later than 4:00p.m. on May 1, 2015. Proposals should include all of the following: 1. Firm / Developer Qualifications a. Name, address and contact information for the firm or individual(s) responding to the proposal. b. Development Team: Provide qualifications of all team members anticipated to participate in the project. c. Experience: Provide a list of project(s) detailing relevant development projects related to urban infill. d. Financial Viability: Provide a statement that indicates the financial capability to accomplish the project. 2. Project Proposal a. Project proposal: Provide a detailed description of the proposed project. b. Concept site plan: Site plan should provide basic site information including totals for building coverage, parking, and summary of square footage of uses. c. Conceptual elevation renderings of the building. d. Project Rationale / Strategy: Provide information supporting the feasibility and marketability of the proposed project. e. Preliminary Financial Analysis: Provide estimated redevelopment costs and anticipated financing. f. Project Timeline: Provide estimate of the project timeline including acquisition, design development, permits, and construction. 3. City Participation a. Site Acquisition: The estimated value of the site is $90,000. The City is open to either selling the property at fair market value, or considering all or part of the market value as part of a City development incentive for the project. b. Development Assistance: Type and amount of economic development assistance being requested for the project. Selection Process Each of the following items will be taken into consideration in evaluation of the proposals: 1. Completeness of Proposal Proposal should address each item outlined in the submission requirements. 2. Project Feasibility The financial and technical feasibility of the anticipated project and its long-term viability. The proposal must demonstrate a thoughtful and realistic understanding of the potential market demand as well as a thorough understanding of the development review process. Page 4

3. Capability / Track Record of Developer Demonstrated ability to complete a development project in complex urban environments from concept to construction. 4. Design / Appropriateness of Proposed Use The extent to which the proposal achieves architectural excellence and responsiveness to the City s design and sustainability objectives. 5. Project Financing The City will consider participation requested from the City in terms of acquisition price and development assistance. The Redevelopment Authority will make a recommendation to the City Council based on the review criteria. The RDA and City Council reserve the right to reject all proposals. All applicants will be notified in writing of the City s decision. Once a final decision is made, the City expects to enter into negotiations with the selected developer to complete a development agreement. Time Line The following is the conceptual time line for the process: March 5 th May 7 th May 18 th June 2 nd Release of Submission deadline by 4:00p.m. Presentation of Proposals to RDA Recommendation to City Council Statement of Rights and Understanding The City reserves, and may, in its sole discretion, exercise the following rights and options with respect to this Request for Redevelopment Proposal: 1. To accept, reject, or negotiate modifications to any and all submissions; 2. Submission of proposal does not bind the City to any action or any party; 3. To issue clarifications and propose addenda; 4. To modify any timeline; 5. To negotiate with one or more respondents; 6. To select any submission as the basis for negotiations, and to negotiate with respondents for amendment or modifications to their submission; 7. To conduct investigation with respect to the qualifications of each respondent; and 8. To reject any or all proposals. Questions For questions please contact Ken Pabich at 920-339-4043 or by email at kpabich@mail.de-pere.org. Questions and their answers which have general applicability may be shared with all interested parties. Page 5