NC Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS)

Similar documents
Alliance Behavioral Healthcare Area Board Meeting Thursday, April 3, :00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES

Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2016 Executive Summary

Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2015

The North Carolina Behavioral Health Crisis Referral System

Cardinal Innovations Healthcare 2017 Needs and Gaps Analysis

Outcome and Process Evaluation Report: Crisis Residential Programs

ILLINOIS 1115 WAIVER BRIEF

National Patient Safety Foundation at the AMA

Critical Time Intervention (CTI) (State-Funded)

North Carolina. CAHPS 3.0 Adult Medicaid ECHO Report. December Research Park Drive Ann Arbor, MI 48108

MACOMB COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL EVALUATION, FISCAL YEAR 2009 ANNUAL PLAN, FISCAL

Nevada County Health and Human Services FY14 Rural Health Care Services Outreach Grant Project Evaluation Report June 30, 2015

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

SUBSTANCE ABUSE & HEALTH CARE SERVICES HEALTH SERVICES. Fiscal Year rd Quarter

Quarterly Report. Ken Jones, CEO. Renewing the Mind, Restoring the Spirit 1 S T A N D 2 N D Q U A R T E R : J U L Y - D E C E M B E R

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

ANNUAL COMMUNITY REPORT

CRISIS AND INPATIENT SERVICES

The Scope and Impact of the Metropolitan St. Louis Psychiatric Center (MPC) Emergency Department (ED)/Acute Care Closure

NC-TOPPS NORTH CAROLINA - TREATMENT OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM PERFORMANCE SYSTEM SFY IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES

Quality Management and Improvement 2016 Year-end Report

Understanding the Referral Criteria and Process to MH/SUD Care Coordination

TENNESSEE S CRISIS RESPITE SERVICES

Oklahoma Health Care Authority. ECHO Adult Behavioral Health Survey For SoonerCare Choice

Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT)

Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health Devereux Pennsylvania Children s Behavioral Health Center: Community Health Needs Assessment

Outcome and Process Evaluation Report County-wide Triage Teams

CCBHC CARE COORDINATION AGREEMENTS: OVERVIEW OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS AND CHECKLIST OF RECOMMENDED TERMS

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Fleet and Marine Corps Health Risk Assessment, 02 January December 31, 2015

Intensive In-Home Services (IIHS): Aligning Care Efficiencies with Effective Treatment. BHM Healthcare Solutions

CRISIS SERVICES. N. C. Department of Health and Human Services Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services

UnitedHealthcare Community Plan 2016 Long Term Care Member/Responsible Party Satisfaction Survey

See Protecting Access to Medicare Act (PAMA) 223(a)(2)(C), Pub. L. No (Apr. 1, 2014).

Provider Network Capacity, Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis

NCQA s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2011 Standards 11/21/11

FY 2016 PERFORMANCE PLAN

Inpatient Experience Survey 2012 Research conducted by Ipsos MORI on behalf of Great Ormond Street Hospital

Behavioral Pediatric Screening

NORTH CAROLINA COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY PROGRAMS

DHHS Should Integrate State Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities into the Community-Based System and Improve Performance Management

AOPMHC STRATEGIC PLANNING 2018

Part 2: PCMH 2014 Standards

Wake Forest Baptist Health Lexington Medical Center. CHNA Implementation Strategy

Checklist for Ocean County Community Health Improvement Plan Implementation of Strategies- Activities for Ocean County Health Centers: CHEMED & OHI

Joint Medicaid Oversight Committee Medicaid Behavioral Health Re-Design Panel Testimony

A Community Need Assessment of Broome County:

The CCBHC: An Innovative Model of Care for Behavioral Health

National Health Promotion in Hospitals Audit

Shifting Public Perceptions of Doctors and Health Care

Participant Satisfaction Survey Summary Report Fiscal Year 2012

California HIPAA Privacy Implementation Survey

Outpatient Experience Survey 2012

FY 2017 Quality Management Program Evaluation

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Survey of Registrants 2015 Summary of Findings

Department of Behavioral Health

Colorado Choice Health Plans

INTEGRATED CASE MANAGEMENT ANNEX A

Access to Psychiatric Inpatient Care: Prolonged Waiting Periods in Medical Emergency Departments. Data Report for

Integrated Offender Management Participant Exit Survey Report

Contra Costa County. Drug Medi-Cal Organized Delivery System (DMC-ODS) Program BENEFICIARY HANDBOOK

FY 2017 PERFORMANCE PLAN

FirstHealth Moore Regional Hospital. Implementation Plan

North Carolina s Transformation to Managed Care

Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT)

Executive Summary: Utilization Management for Adult Members

South Dakota Health Homes Care Coordination Innovation

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Specifics of the Program for Hospitals. August 11, 2010

Assessment, Treatment Plan and Discharge Plan Group Homes for Children

Central East LHIN Strategic Aims

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Provider Communications Plan

Care Management Policies

Diversion and Forensic Capacity: Presentation to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services

In the most recent County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, Red Lake County Ranked 14 th out of 87 Minnesota Counties in overall Health Outcome.

Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers

Alternative or in Lieu of Service Description Alliance Behavioral Healthcare

YOUTH EMPOWERMENT SERVICES PROGRAM EVALUATION

EVALUATION OF THE CARE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECT. Prepared By: Geneva Strech, M. Ed., MHR Betty Harris, M. A. John Vetter, M. A.

Fresno County, Department of Behavioral Health Full Service Partnership Program Outcomes Reporting Period Fiscal Year (FY)

Community Health Needs Assessment July 2015

COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT HINDS, RANKIN, MADISON COUNTIES STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

Residential Level Transitions: Levels III and IV

and Supports in Maryland: Volume 3

CODES: H0045-U4 = Individual Respite H0045-HQ-U4 = Group Respite T1005-TD-U4 = Nursing Respite-RN T1005-TE-U4 = Nursing Respite-LPN

EVALUATION OF THE CARE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECT. June 30, 2011 Prepared By: Geneva Strech, M. Ed., MHR Betty Harris, M. A. John Vetter, M. A.

Individual and Family Guide

Prepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID August 06, 2012

Clinical Utilization Management Guideline

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY REPORT NO "Mental Health Services for At-Risk Children in Contra Costa County

The Alliance Health Plan. NC Innovations Individual and Family Guide

2017 Community Mental Health, Substance Use and Developmental Disabilities Services Needs and Gaps Analysis

Medicaid Funded Services Plan

TEXAS HEALTHCARE TRANSFORMATION & QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Bluebonnet Trails Community Services

AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending WSR , filed 8/27/15, effective. WAC Inpatient psychiatric services. Purpose.

The Number of People With Chronic Conditions Is Rapidly Increasing

Ancora Psychiatric Hospital is dedicated to the care and support of each person s journey toward wellness and recovery within a culture of safety.

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

AOPMHC STRATEGIC PLANNING 2016

Transcription:

NC Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS) Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers Fiscal Year 2014

Background Information The Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS) conducted a survey from June 24 through July 12, 2013 to assess consumers perception of care of services received from mental health, substance abuse, or developmental disability service providers. The results of the survey are used by local and state agencies to assess and improve the quality of services provided to consumers, as well as to satisfy state and federal requirements to report consumer perception of care. Methodology DMH/DD/SAS allocated 1,450 surveys to Alliance Behavioral Healthcare LME/MCO with instructions to disseminate the survey materials to providers contracted with the MCO. Providers were to, in turn, distribute the survey materials to LME/MCO consumers, and return the completed surveys to the LME/MCO by July 12, 2013. To meet state and federal standards, Alliance Behavioral Healthcare was required to return at minimum of 400 completed surveys. Providers Providers eligible to participate were those that served at least 25 LME/MCO consumers and provided and billed for publically funded services within 60 days of the survey s administration. The 30 providers who received surveys were randomly selected from a list of eligible providers generated from claims data for the months of May and June of 2013. Consumers Eligible participants were any active LME/MCO consumer who received publically funded services, Medicaid or IPRS, for behavioral health issues during the past 12 months. The number of surveys providers received varied from 20-140 based proportionally on the unduplicated client count LME/MCO consumers served by the participating providers. Survey Instrument Three survey instruments were used in the FY2014 administration: 1. The 2013 North Carolina Consumer Perception of Care Survey (Adults, all ages) 2. The 2013 North Carolina Consumer Perception of Care Survey (12-17 years of age) 3. The 2013 North Carolina Consumer Perception of Care survey for Families (YSS, families of children 0-11 years of age) Surveys were distributed in both Spanish and English for each of the three instruments. NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 2

Each instrument included the following four sections: I. Background Information: consumer demographic information, primary reason for seeking services, length of time served by provider, help seeking practices (Adults and Adolescents), number of hospitalizations (Adults and Adolescents), height and weight (Adults only) II. Perception of Care: consumer perception of care, provider staff, and quality of life outcomes related to services received III. MCO/Network Provider: consumer perception of routine and emergent services provided by MCO staff IV. Comments: additional consumer feedback and request for follow-up from DMH/DD/SAS Consumers 18 years and older were asked to respond to an additional section that addressed consumer physical health: V. Physical Health: general perception of health, recent routine physical and/or dental examinations, medical conditions, tobacco use, physical activity Consumers used a five-item Likert-type scale to demonstrate their level of agreement with the surveys statements (e.g., Strongly Agree, Agree, I am Neutral, Disagree, Strongly Agree, N/A ). The survey instrument also included yes/no, multiple choice, and short answer questions to best capture the consumers background information, physical health, and perception of the MCO/network provider. Consumer Privacy Identifying consumer information (ex. name, social security number) was not included in any of the survey material. Providers were asked to offer consumers a sealable envelope and privacy while completing their surveys. Providers were also instructed to assure consumers that survey participation is voluntary and their responses will have no repercussion on the services they receive. NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 3

Findings Twenty- nine providers returned 563 completed consumer surveys during the designated collection period, with a 38.7% response rate. The following is a summary of the participants feedback. Child/Parent I. Background Information: Ninety-six parents responded on behalf of their children. The majority of children engaged in services had relatively new relationships with their providers, with over one-half of consumers receiving services with their current provider for 5 months or less. "How Long Has your Child Received Services Here, at This Provider Site, for His/Her Current Problem? 8% 16% Fewer than 5 Months 6-11 Months 56% 1-2 Years More than 2 Years 20% Figure 1. Parent Response to survey question, How long has your child been receiving services here, at this provider site, for his/her current problem? (N=95) Twenty one percent (21%) of parents reported seeking health services for their children through the emergency department (ED) for physical health care, with an average of 3 visits per consumer. Two consumers reported using ED services for mental health care for a total of 3 visits. NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 4

II. Perception of Care: Participants reported overwhelming satisfaction with the services their children receive from providers. Strongly Agree and Agree were the top-two responses for 100% of questions addressing consumer satisfaction with providers. "Overall, I am Satisfied with the Services my Child Received" 3% 2% 1% 40% 54% Strongly Agree Agree I am Neutral N/A Strongly Disagree Figure 2. Parent response to survey statement, Overall I am satisfied with the services my child received (N=95) Parents reported feeling involved in their children s treatment with 76% of parents responding that they helped select their children s services and treatment goals. Participants expressed high satisfaction with providers rapport with consumers and their families, especially in terms of feeling understood and respected by provider staff. III. MCO/Network Provider: When asked if they received a consumer handbook in the mail within 14 days of starting services with Alliance Behavioral Healthcare, 41% of consumers reported that they did not. For those individuals who contacted the LME/MCO for an emergency related to mental health, 43% responded that a network provider did not see them within 2 hours. Likewise, 41% reported not being seen by a network provider for urgent (but not emergent) services within 48 hours of contacting Alliance Behavioral Healthcare. However, 85% of consumers seeking routine appointments with providers were seen within 14 calendar days of communicating with Alliance Behavioral Healthcare staff. Parents noted that that cost/ availability of transportation, availability of telephone access, and cost of services were the most common barriers to treatment for their children. NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 5

Adolescent I. Background Information: Ninety-seven adolescents submitted Perception of Care Surveys. Adolescent participants tended to have more established relationships with their providers, with 50% reporting that they have received services from their current provider for over a year. More than half of adolescent participants (61%) reported voluntarily engaging in services. Those who felt forced into treatment reported that they were pressured by family to go to treatment (16%), their treatments were court ordered (16%), or an outside agent, such as their school or social worker, encouraged them to seek treatment. "Did You Voluntarily Come for Services?" 1% 5% Yes 13% 10% 48% No, I was Pressured by my family to come to services Other No, My Treatment was court ordered 23% No, I was Pressured by work/school to come for services No, I was pressured by my family Figure 3. Adolescent Response to question, Did you voluntarily come for service (N=95) Twenty percent (21%) of adolescents reported seeking ED services for physical health care, with an average of 2 visits per consumer within the last 12 months. Nineteen percent (19%) of adolescents also reported visiting the ED for mental health care, with an average of 3 visits within the past 12 months. Two (2) consumers disclosed seeking ED treatment for substance abuse in the past 12 months, averaging one visit per consumer. NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 6

II. Perception of Care: Adolescent consumers expressed high satisfaction with their service providers. Strongly Agree and Agree were the number one and two responses for 100% of all statements related to service providers. However, adolescents felt they were included less in choosing their services than either parent or adult survey participants. 30.00% 28.13% "I helped choose my services" 25.00% 20.00% 20.83% 20.83% 18.75% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 9.38% 2.08% Strongly Agree Agree I am Neutral Disagree N/A Strongly Disagree Total Figure 4. Adolescent response to question statement, I helped to choose my services (N=96) There was wider response variation with regard to questions addressing consumer quality of life. More so than children or adults, adolescents reported higher rates of dissatisfaction with their relationships with friends, family, and work/school life. "I Am Satisfied with My Life Right Now" 6% 15% 11% 35% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree I am Neutral Strongly Disagree 33% Figure 5. Adolescent Response to survey statement, I am satisfied with my family life right now (N=95) NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 7

45.00% 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 38.54% 22.92% "I do better in school and/or work" 17.71% 8.33% 7.29% 5.21% Agree Strongly Agree I am Neutral Disagree N/A Strongly Disagree Total Figure 6. Adolescent response to survey statement, I do better in school and/or work (N=96) III. MCO/Network Provider: When asked if they received a consumer handbook in the mail within 14 days of starting services with Alliance Behavioral Healthcare, 51% of adolescent participants said that had not. For those individuals who contacted Alliance Behavioral Healthcare for an emergency related to mental health or substance use, 52% responded that a network provider did not see them within 2 hours. Likewise, 66% reported not being seen by a network provider for urgent (but not emergent) services within 48 hours of contacting Alliance Behavioral Healthcare. Seventy-two percent (72%) of adolescent participants seeking routine appointments with Alliance Behavioral Healthcare providers noted that they were seen within 14 calendar days of speaking to LME/MCO staff. Adolescents reported that that cost/availability of transportation, availability of telephone access, and providers office hours were their most common barriers to treatment. NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 8

Adults I. Background Information: Three-hundred-seventy (370) adults submitted Consumer Perception of Care Surveys. Unlike child and adolescent consumers, adult participants generally maintained long-term relationships with their providers. More than half (69%) of participants reported being with their current provider for at least 6 months, and 49% stated they have received services from their provider for over a year. The majority of adult participants reported voluntary engagement in services. About one third (26%) felt pressured into help-seeking practices by friends and family or were court ordered to enter treatment. "Did You Voluntarily Come to Service?" 3% 2% 4% Yes 17% Other No, I was pressured by my family to come for services No, my treatment was court ordered 74% No, I was pressured by my family to come for services Figure 7. Adult response to survey question, Did you voluntarily come to service? (N=70) Adult consumers relied on ED services significantly more than children and adolescents. In the past 12 months, about a third (37%) of adult participants reported seeking ED services for physical health care, averaging 3 visits per person; 16% reported visiting the ED for mental health care, averaging 3 visits per person. Only 5% of adult participants reported visiting the ED for self-reported care related to substance use. However, these consumers averaged 3 visits each for the past 12 months. II. Perception of Care: Adult consumers reported high degrees of satisfaction with their current service providers. As was the case for parent/child survey participants, all survey statements addressing issues of perception of care received Strongly Agree and Agree as the most frequent responses. Nearly all adults 86% stated that given other choices, [they] would still get services from NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 9

[their provider] agency ; and 90% would recommend [their provider agency] to a friend or family member. Adult participants expressed feeling well supported by agency staff. They reported that they received services that were appropriate for their individual needs at times that were convenient for their schedule and were able to communicate with providers in a timely manner. Most notably, adult consumers felt that because of the services received with their current provider, they enjoyed a higher quality of life. Consumers reported improved relationships with family members, feeling more in control of their lives, and also reported a decrease in the severity of symptoms related to their illnesses. III. Physical Health: Overall, the majority of adult participants believed that they were in good health with only one third of participants reporting that their health was fair to poor. In the past 12 months, nearly three-fourths (71%) of adult consumers were able to visit a medical doctor for routine physical exam and slightly over half (51%) of consumers visited a dentist for routine care. "In General Would You Say Your Health is?" 5.93% 22.88% 11.02% 34.46% Good Very Good Fair Excellent Poor 25.71% Figure 8. Adult consumer response to survey question, In general would you say your health is? (N=354) Despite the generally positive self-assessment of consumer health, there were several negative health behaviors reported by consumers. Nearly half (48%) of the participants admitted to smoking every day and another 10% reported smoking at least some days throughout the week. Additionally, based on the consumers reported height and weight, more than two-thirds of participants have a Body Mass Index (BMI) Score that place them in an unhealthy weight range. NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 10

35.00% 32.60% Adult participants' BMI weight range 30.00% 27.90% 25.00% 20.00% 17.55% 15.00% 10.00% 10.03% 9.09% Total 5.00% 1.57% 1.25% 0.00% Normal Overweight Moderately Obese Very Severly Obese Severely Obsese Underweight Very Severly Underweight Figure 9. Distribution of adult participants BMI Range as calculated by self-report of height and weight (N=319) IV. MCO/Network Provider: When asked if they received a consumer handbook in the mail within 14 days of starting services with Alliance Behavioral Healthcare, 48% of adult participants said that had not. For those individuals who contacted Alliance Behavioral Healthcare for an emergency related to mental health or substance use, over half (52%) responded that a network provider did not see them within 2 hours. For adult participants in need of urgent (but not emergent) services, 45% reported not being seen by a network provider for within 48 hours of contacting Alliance Behavioral Healthcare. Seventy percent (70%) of adult consumers seeking routine appointments with LME/MCO providers noted that they were seen within 14 calendar days of speaking to Alliance Behavioral Healthcare staff. Cost/availability of transportation, cost of medication, and cost of services were adult respondents most frequently reported barriers to treatment. NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 11

Conclusions 1. Alliance Behavioral Healthcare had a successful return rate of this survey with 563 (of 1,450) surveys returned for a 38.7% return rate. 2. A high percentage of all respondents indicated satisfaction with services overall, and that they would continue with their current providers and refer to friends or family if asked. A high percentage also indicated feeling respected by and understood by their providers. 3. A moderate percentage of consumers are utilizing the ED for physical health care services. According to consumer self-report, 21% of children, 16% of adolescents, and 37% of adult participants have visited the ED at least once in the past 12-months primarily for physical health treatment. Adult consumers are also seeking ED treatment in large numbers for behavioral health problems. Sixteen percent (16%) of adult consumers reported receiving treatment for mental health symptoms within the past 12-months and 5% visited the ED for health problems around substance use. Both of these consumer groups visited the ED an average of 3 times in the past year. Recommendation: Alliance Behavioral Healthcare should develop strategies to engage consumers in continuous and integrated treatment to reduce health care emergencies. Alliance may consider a collaboration effort with hospital emergency department staff to improve discharge planning in order to direct consumers to more appropriate levels of care as well as to reduce inappropriate hospital admissions. Strategies: 1. Each county will have a local crisis collaborative with representation from local hospitals/eds, the MCO, Law Enforcement, EMS, Crisis Facilities, network providers, shelters and other key stakeholders that meets monthly to identify and address issues and barriers and develop collaborative plans and agreements. The groups will receive data reports regarding the use of the crisis system and identify trends and needs. 2. In collaboration with inpatient facilities in Cumberland County, develop a 24/7 crisis and assessment center that can receive consumers on IVC. Funding has been allocated for this project and implementation is underway. 3. Expand facility based crisis/non-hospital detoxification beds in Cumberland County from 8 to 16 beds. Ensure 24 hours access to this facility. Funding has been allocated and planning is underway. 4. Improve connections to outpatient and follow-up psychiatric services for consumers leaving the EDs and inpatient services. a. Develop an open access outpatient/psychiatric clinic in Cumberland County. Will improve post ED and inpatient connection to aftercare. Funding has been allocated and hiring and limited appointments have been offered and should be fully operational within 4 months. NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 12

b. Expand use of open access and walk-in clinics in the four Alliance communities with a goal of discharge follow-up available within 24 hours. (See Local Initiative on Open Access) c. Implement Wake Crisis Facility/ACTT pilot Alliance wide. Currently, the crisis facility in Wake County contacts ACTT providers directly when they have determined that a consumer has a history of accessing crisis and inpatient services. The ACT teams come to the assessment center before the consumer leaves to enhance engagement. d. Improve the rate in which EDs and crisis facilities contact Alliance Access and Information Center to determine if consumers presenting at these facilities are linked with providers or need a provider post discharge. i. Provide education and continued outreach to EDs and crisis facilities ii. Ensure accurate call coding in the Alliance MIS system to better track all calls from these facilities in order to report progress and ensure facilities are following established protocols. iii. Ensure each community has Alliance ED liaisons who are available to assist in the linkage of high utilizers to services and to assist EDs with system navigation iv. Ensure each local inpatient unit has an assigned Alliance liaison to assist with discharge planning and better community linkage 4. Communication with consumers new to services should be given more information with their welcome letter. Since nearly half of the respondents indicated not receiving a consumer handbook, a brochure or other document should accompany the letter. Recommendation: Alliance staff to send a one page brochure with the welcome letter that describes rights and responsibilities, in addition to the information about the Alliance Behavioral Healthcare website. Strategy: As of November 1, 2013, a one page brochure is now accompanying the welcome letter to consumers. 5. Access to care within timelines required by contract need to be improved, per selfreport of consumers. Almost half (43%) indicated they were not seen within 2 hours due to an emergent request, and 41% were not seen by provider for an urgent request within 48 hours. Recommendation: Alliance staff to review barriers to being seen for appointments. Some are due to lack of telephone access, costs and availability of transportation. In addition, review internal processes with providers to ensure that appointments are NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 13

being scheduled appropriately and that mobile crisis is seeing consumers within the 2 hour window of time. Strategy: Alliance staff has worked with providers in the network to improve timely access to treatment services. There are now several providers in the Alliance catchment area that offer walk-in and same day appointments meaning on the day a consumer contacts Alliance seeking services they can be seen. Additionally, several of these providers also offer same day access to a prescriber, so not only can they receive a comprehensive assessment, treatment can begin on the very same day. Results are already showing improvements as in early spring 2013, it took an average of 17 days in Wake County for a consumer to receive an outpatient assessment; whereas, since August 2013, the average time is now 4 days. Alliance will continue to support providers in the transition to an open access model of care and reduce administrative burdens where possible. Next Steps 1. Results of the Consumer Perception of Care Survey will be discussed with the Alliance Behavioral Healthcare Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Committee before end of December 2013 to develop an internal plan to address identified issues and recommendations. 2. Results will be shared with the Alliance Behavioral Healthcare Provider Advisory Committee and CFAC. 3. Strategies will be tracked and included in the Annual Gaps and Needs Assessment. NC DMH/DD/SAS FY14 Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers 14