July 8, The Honorable Charles T. Hagel Secretary of Defense. General Lloyd J. Austin III Commander, U.S. Central Command

Similar documents
SIGAR. $14.7 Million Warehouse Facility at Kandahar Airfield: Construction Delays Prevented the Facility from Being Used as Intended J U L Y

SIGAR NOVEMBER 2017 SIGAR SP

SIGAR. Department of State s Demining Activities in Afghanistan: Audit of Costs Incurred by the Mine Detection Dog Center M A R C H

June 6, Major General Jeffrey N. Colt Deputy Commander, United States Forces Afghanistan

SIGAR OCTOBER. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. SIGAR 14-6 Inspection Report. SIGAR 14-6-IP/Gardez Hospital

SIGAR. CONTRACTING WITH THE ENEMY: DOD Has Limited Assurance that Contractors with Links to Enemy Groups Are Identified and their Contracts Terminated

SIGAR APRIL Qala-I-Muslim Medical Clinic: Serving the Community Well, But Construction Quality Could Not Be Fully Assessed

Office of Inspector General Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation New Dawn Operation and Maintenance

SIGAR JANUARY. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. SIGAR Inspection Report. SIGAR IP/Camp Commando Phase IV

SIGAR JULY. Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction

SIGAR NOVEMBER 2017 SIGAR SP OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS

SIGAR. Afghan National Defense and Security Forces: DOD Cannot Fully Account for U.S.-funded Infrastructure Transferred to the Afghan Government

March 30, The Honorable Mark Green Administrator U.S. Agency for International Development

July 30, SIGAR Audit-09-3 Management Information Systems

November 25, The Honorable Ashton B. Carter Secretary of Defense. Dear Secretary Carter:

SIGAR. Department of Defense Reconstruction Projects: Summary of SIGAR Inspection Reports Issued from July 2009 through September 2015 MARCH

March 5, The Honorable P. Michael McKinley U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan. Dear Ambassador McKinley:

SUPPLEMENT TO SIGAR S APRIL 2018 QUARTERLY REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS

SIGAR JULY. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction

SIGAR APRIL 2017 SIGAR SP GOOD PERFORMERS INITIATIVE: STATUS OF SEVEN COMPLETED PROJECTS IN KHOST PROVINCE, AFGHANISTAN

4 Other Agency. Oversight

Improvised Explosive Devices: Unclear Whether Culvert Denial Systems to Protect Troops Are Functioning or Were Ever Installed

SIGAR O C T O B E R. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. SIGAR Inspection Report

SIGAR AFGHAN NATIONAL ARMY: CONTROLS OVER FUEL FOR VEHICLES, GENERATORS, AND POWER PLANTS NEED STRENGTHENING TO PREVENT FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE

OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS

SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION

June 30, The Honorable Gayle E. Smith Administrator U.S. Agency for International Development

SIGAR MARCH 2018 SIGAR SP OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS

SIGAR JANUARY. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction

SIGAR. Gardez Hospital: $14.6 Million and Over 5 Years to Complete, Yet Construction Deficiencies Still Need to be Addressed A U G U S T

SIGAR. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction QUARTERLY REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT OF STATE ASSISTANCE TO AFGHANISTAN: $4 BILLION OBLIGATED BETWEEN 2002 AND 2013

4 Other Agency. Oversight

sigar Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction SUPPLEMENT SUPPLEMENT TO SIGAR s JANUARY 2015 February 2015

4OTHER AGENCY OVERSIGHT

2SIGAR 2Oversight O 19

SIGAR. Management and Oversight of Fuel in Afghanistan: DOD Is Taking Steps to Improve Accountability, but Additional Actions Are Needed APRIL

Report Documentation Page

OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR AFGHANISTAN RECONSTRUCTION FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET REQUEST

Oral Statement. Hearing on the Federal Employees Compensation Act Program. April 13, 2011

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Afghan National Security University Has Experienced Cost Growth and Schedule Delays, and Contract Administration Needs Improvement

2SIGAR 2OVERSIGHT O 15

Report No. D September 22, Kuwait Contractors Working in Sensitive Positions Without Security Clearances or CACs

SCENARIO 19 Emergency Planning for a Propane Bulk Plant

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

SIGAR JANUARY 2013 SIGAR SP-13-2

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

University of Pittsburgh Procurement Fraud Brief

JOINT STRATEGIC OVERSIGHT PLAN FOR AFGHANISTAN RECONSTRUCTION FY13 JOINT STRATEGIC PLANNING SUBGROUP FOR OVERSIGHT OF AFGHANISTAN RECONSTRUCTION

August 8, Dear Mr. Ginman:

S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N

Be clearly linked to strategic and contingency planning.

SIGAR JULY. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. SIGAR Audit Report. SIGAR AR/Legacy and ASOM Programs

ANA Garrison at Farah Appeared Well Built Overall but Some Construction Issues Should Be Addressed

Army Regulation Audit. Audit Services in the. Department of the Army. Headquarters. Washington, DC 30 October 2015 UNCLASSIFIED

MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST-MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE ORDER COMMANDING GENERAL'S INSPECTION PROGRAM

Summary Report for Individual Task H-3511 Direct Lashing Containers on the Deck of a Landing Craft Status: Approved

Equinox Care. Equinox Care. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Inadequate

SIGAR. DOD Task Force for Business and Stability Operations: $675 Million in Spending Led to Mixed Results, Waste, and Unsustained Projects JANUARY

1'::\ SIGAR I OfficeoftheSpeclallnspectorGaneral

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

Air Force Officials Did Not Consistently Comply With Requirements for Assessing Contractor Performance

Virginia Department of Planning and Budget Project Request Justification

June 25, Honorable Kent Conrad Ranking Member Committee on the Budget United States Senate Washington, DC

Evaluation of Defense Contract Management Agency Contracting Officer Actions on Reported DoD Contractor Estimating System Deficiencies

Amendment Require DOD to obtain an audit with an unqualified opinion by FY 2018

OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR AFGHANISTAN RECONSTRUCTION

OFFICE OF THE STATE INSPECTOR GENERAL FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS St. Francis Barracks P.O. Box 1008 St. Augustine, Florida

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Committees

OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS

Department of Defense

USAG-RC SINGLE SOLDIER HOUSING

Ashley Court. Healthcare Homes (LSC) Limited. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Good

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Vending Facility Program for the Blind on DoD-Controlled Federal Property

SIGAR Testimony. Before the Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support U.S. Senate. Statement of John F. Sopko,

SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION LETTER FOR COMMANDING GENERAL, U.S. FORCES-IRAQ

Naval Audit Service. Audit Report

Report No. D September 25, Transition Planning for the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program IV Contract

Powering Our Communities. Grant Guidelines

LIMITED-SCOPE PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT

OTHER AGENCY OVERSIGHT

Conduct Field Maintenance on a Hydra-start System Status: Approved

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

The Civil Air Patrol and the United States Air Force have agreed upon a new STATEMENT OF WORK FOR CIVIL AIR PATROL. Part of the new Statement of

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Operation: Storefront

sigar Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction

SIGAR JANUARY 2017 SIGAR SP OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS INFORMATION ON USAID S STABILITY IN KEY AREAS PROGRAM NORTHERN REGION, AFGHANISTAN

Child Care Program (Licensed Daycare)

Shay Assad assumed his position as director of defense

DOD MANUAL , VOLUME 1 DOD MANAGEMENT OF ENERGY COMMODITIES: OVERVIEW

Management Instruction

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Army Needs to Improve Contract Oversight for the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program s Task Orders

LAKEWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDARD OPERATING GUIDELINES

Case 1:08-cv JR Document 9-6 Filed 08/11/2008 Page 1 of 76. James Madison Project v. CIA, Civil Action No (D.D.C.

We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards.

Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction

VA Office of Inspector General

GAO WARFIGHTER SUPPORT. DOD Needs to Improve Its Planning for Using Contractors to Support Future Military Operations

Transcription:

July 8, 2013 The Honorable Charles T. Hagel Secretary of Defense General Lloyd J. Austin III Commander, U.S. Central Command General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr. Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan, and Commander, International Security Assistance Force The Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) is charged with preventing and detecting waste, fraud, and abuse in programs and operations relating to the reconstruction of Afghanistan. On a recent trip to Afghanistan, I uncovered a potentially troubling example of waste that requires your immediate attention. I was told by senior U.S. military officials that the recently completed Regional Command- Southwest (RC-SW) Command and Control Facility, a 64,000 square feet building and related infrastructure with a contract award value of $34 million that was meant to serve as a command headquarters in Helmand to support the surge, will not be occupied. Based on documents provided to SIGAR, it appears that military commanders in Afghanistan determined as early as May 2010 that there was no need for the facility, yet the military still moved ahead with the construction project and continued to purchase equipment and make various improvements to the building in early 2013. Based on these preliminary findings, I am deeply troubled that the military may have spent taxpayer funds on a construction project that should have been stopped. In addition, I was told that U.S. military officials expect that the building will be either demolished or turned over to the Afghan government as our military presence in Afghanistan declines and Camp Leatherneck is reduced in size. Both alternatives for how to resolve this issue are troubling destroying a never-occupied and never-used building or turning over what may be a white elephant to the Afghan government that it may not have the capacity to sustain. Determining all of the facts on how we reached this $34 million dilemma and what can be done to prevent it from happening again is the reason for sending this management alert letter to you. I toured the facilty and, as the photographs show on the following page, in my opinion it appears to be an impressive and well-constructed building. In fact, it appears to be the best constructed building I have seen in my travels to Afghanistan. Unfortunately, it is unused, unoccupied, and presumably will never be used for its intended purpose. SIGAR SP-13-7 Management Alert: Command and Control Facility at Camp Leatherneck Page 1

Photos: RC-SW Command and Control Facility Note: Top left: exterior view; top right: tactical operations center; bottom left: cubicles; bottom right: unopened boxes and unused chairs. Source: SIGAR site visit, May 8, 2013. One senior U.S. military official told me that this facility was designed for a military division that was never deployed and, subsequently, a decision was made not to construct the facility, but inexplicably the building construction started and is now complete. Military officials explained this is an example of what is wrong with military construction in general once a project is started, it is very difficult to stop. In addition to my recent inspection of the facility, in May and June of 2013, SIGAR investigators and auditors visited the facility, conducted interviews, and reviewed documentation that indicated the following: In February 2010, the Department of the Army requested funding from Congress for the project. In May 2010, the I Marine Expeditionary Force (Forward) submitted a request to U.S. Forces Afghanistan (USFOR-A) to cancel the project. In February 2011, the Air Force s 772 nd Enterprise Sourcing Squadron issued a task order to AMEC Earth and Environment Inc. to construct the facility. 1 In November 2012, the U.S. government took ownership of the facility. 1 Air Force Materiel Command issued contract number FA8903-06-D-8507-025 to AMEC Earth and Environment Inc. on April 12, 2006, to build and update facilities and infrastructure at various locations in Afghanistan. On February 3, 2011, the 772nd Enterprise Sourcing Squadron issued Task Order 0025 under this contract to build a command and control facility (Project No. 76916). SIGAR SP-13-7 Management Alert: Command and Control Facility at Camp Leatherneck Page 2

The facility is now completed and usable, though it still needs additional communications equipment. It is estimated that such equipment may cost $2 million to obtain and $1 million to install. According to an official at Camp Leatherneck, the building can accommodate approximately 1,200 to 1,500 staff, and includes a war room, briefing theater, and offices for senior military officials, including a three star general. However, even under the best case scenario, only 450 people may be able to use the building today, which would result in excessive operation and maintenance costs because the cooling systems would be underutilized. The same official at Camp Leatherneck stated that the building s heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system are expensive to operate and maintain, and there is no one currently at Camp Leatherneck who can maintain the air conditioning system. According to a senior U.S. military official, as the footprint of Camp Leatherneck decreases, the building could be outside the security perimeter, thereby making it unsafe for the U.S. military to occupy it. This leaves the military with two primary options demolish the building or give it to the Afghan government. However, to make it usable for the Afghan government, the building would require a major overhaul of existing systems, including the expensive heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. A high-ranking, senior U.S. military official also advised me that the facility was built to U.S. construction standards rather than Afghan standards. For example, the power runs at U.S. 60 cycles versus Afghan 50 cycles and U.S. 120 volts versus Afghan 220 volts. Therefore, it would not be easy to transfer the building to the Afghan government. These were some of the reasons why the U.S. military officials we spoke with believe the building will probably be demolished. Although the building may be demolished, it appears that the military made modifications to the building as recently as early 2013. According to documentation provided to SIGAR, the military recently completed work on a water tank, the commander s conference room, and other parts of the building, and in response to an audit conducted by the Department of Defense Inspector General that found problems with emergency exits at the facility, USFOR-A agreed to make improvements to the facility. 2 I am deeply concerned that USFOR-A may be spending additional taxpayer dollars on a facility no one will ever use. Due to the regular rotation of military and civilian personnel, we were unable to locate officials at Camp Leatherneck who could provide more details about what happened. To better understand the circumstances regarding this situation, I am requesting information 2 DODIG Report No. 2013-052, Inadequate Contract Oversight of Military Construction Projects in Afghanistan Resulted in Increased Hazards to Life and Safety of Coalition Forces (March 8, 2013). SIGAR SP-13-7 Management Alert: Command and Control Facility at Camp Leatherneck Page 3

from your Command and the Department. Please answer the following questions by July 25, 2013: Why did the I Marine Expeditionary Force (Forward) submit a request to USFOR-A to cancel the project? Since the U.S. military knew the facility would not be used for its intended purpose before construction began, who made the decision to continue with the project and what was the justification for that decision? Is there a process for terminating approved projects after Congress provides funding for them? If so, why did the military fail to stop this project? Why is the U.S. military continuing to spend U.S. taxpayer dollars to improve and equip a facility that may never be used? Did the U.S. military consider alternative uses for the facility when it first determined that the facility would not be used for its originally intended purpose? Are the alternatives proposed in the recently completed commander s inquiry viable options? 3 Is it true that another command facility was built to replace this facility and, if so, why? Is there a coordination function among construction projects that identifies potentially unnecessary or duplicate projects? If so, please explain the process. How was the decision made to choose the facility s heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems? What are the current and estimated annual operation and maintenance costs? How are those estimates calculated? What steps are being taken to minimize operation and maintenance costs while the building remains unoccupied? What will be done with the building and its contents as the boundaries of Camp Leatherneck are reduced post-transition? Has consideration been given to turning this building over to the Afghan government? Does the Afghan government have the financial resources, technical capacity, and political will to sustain the facility? If the building is turned over to the Afghan government, who will be responsible for operation and maintenance costs? Are Afghan officials aware that the building was constructed to U.S. standards? Has a study been performed to determine the cost of retrofitting the building for use by the Afghan government? If so, please provide a copy of the study. 3 On May 20, 2013, the U.S. military completed an Army Regulation (AR) 15-6 Investigation into the headquarters building at Camp Leatherneck. Among other things, the investigations proposed turning the large briefing room into a movie theater and portions of the first floor into a gym. SIGAR SP-13-7 Management Alert: Command and Control Facility at Camp Leatherneck Page 4

Should you or your staff have any questions about this request, you may contact me directly or contact Monica Brym, Director of Special Projects, at 703-545-6003 or monica.j.brym. civ@mail.mil. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. I look forward to your response. John F. Sopko Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction SIGAR SP-13-7 Management Alert: Command and Control Facility at Camp Leatherneck Page 5